中国环渤海地区城乡发展转型格局测度

doi:10.11821/dlxb201502006

地理学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (2): 248-256.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502006

中国环渤海地区城乡发展转型格局测度

刘彦随^1,²(), 杨忍^2,³()

1. 北京师范大学资源学院,北京 100875
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
3. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院城市与区域规划系,广州 510275

收稿日期:2014-05-21 修回日期:2014-12-20 出版日期:2015-02-20 发布日期:2015-02-20
作者简介:
作者简介：刘彦随(1965-), 男, 陕西绥德人, 研究员, 博士生导师、长江学者特聘教授, 主要从事土地利用和城乡发展研究, 发表论文300余篇, 出版著作12部。E-mail: liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目 (41130748)

The spatial pattern measure of urban-rural development transformation in the Bohai Rim region in China

Yansui LIU^1,²(), Ren YANG^2,³()

1. College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
3. Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2014-05-21 Revised:2014-12-20 Published:2015-02-20 Online:2015-02-20
Supported by:
Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41130748

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城乡发展转型是城乡要素转移、战略转变、机制转换的综合人文过程。利用网格和地统计分析方法,揭示了环渤海地区城乡发展转型的中心性、动态性与差异性;利用logistic回归模型,探测了城乡发展转型的空间敏感性。研究表明：① 城乡发展转型中心性呈现以中心城市为核心的空间分异格局。平原地区逐渐形成以省会城市为一级集聚中心、地级市为二级集聚中心、县级市及县城镇为三级集聚中心的空间格局,山区城乡发展转型的中心集聚性尚不明显。② 城乡发展转型空间拓展呈现“小聚集,大分散”的结构特征。以北京、天津、济南、沈阳、大连、石家庄、青岛为主要城市扩展核心,呈空间聚核模式持续向外蔓延拓展。沿海岸线的“C”型带和港口群区域的土地快速非农化,成为城乡快速转型的热点区。③ 受点—轴—面区位要素综合影响,城乡发展转型的空间敏感性具有明显的区域差异性,其最佳探测空间尺度为1200 m。④ 未来城乡发展转型的极强敏感区以北京—天津—滨海新区为轴带,以京津为核心区,以辽东、山东半岛为两翼的环渤海区域经济协同发展格局初步形成。合理有序的城乡空间开发应以城乡发展转型空间中心性、动态性和差异性为依据,科学实施城乡空间优化与差别化管控策略。

关键词: 城乡发展转型, 中心性, 动态性, 敏感性, 空间格局, 环渤海地区, 中国

Abstract:

Urban-rural development transformation (URDT) is a comprehensive human process of elements transfer, strategy change and mechanism transformation between urban and rural areas in the new period of China. Under the background of coordinated industrialization, urbanization, informatization and agricultural modernization, the investigation of dynamic disciplines and spatial-temporal structure of URDT is of great importance to promote new-type urbanization and coordinated urban-rural development in China. The paper investigates the centrality, dynamics and differences of URDT in the Bohai Rim region by using the gridding and geostatistics methods, and analyzes the spatial sensibility probability of URDT based on the Logistic regression model. The results show that: (1) The centrality of URDT presents spatial difference structure with the central cities at different levels as the nucleus. In the plain areas, super city is the first-class agglomeration center, prefecture cities are the second-class agglomeration center while counties and towns are the third-class agglomeration center. The central agglomeration is not obvious in the mountainous areas. (2) The spatial expansion of URDT presents the feature of "agglomeration at small areas while dispersion at large areas". With Beijing, Tianjin, Jinan, Shenyang, Dalian, Shijiazhuang and Qingdao as the nucleuses, the urban space expands outwards. Places form as 'C' belt along the coastal lines and the harbors have fast land use conversion. These cities have become hot spots in the region. (3) Influenced by the 'point-axis-area' location elements, the spatial sensibility of URDT is of obvious regional differences and central agglomeration. Its suitable probing scale is 1200 meters. (4) The most sensitive zone of URDT in the future is the belt of Beijing-Tianjin-Binhai region. The new coordinated economic structure in the Bohai Rim region develops with Beijing and Tianjin as the core, and Liaodong Peninsula and Shandong Peninsula as two wings. The Bohai Rim region is the third largest economic zone in China behind the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta. Based on the spatial centrality, dynamics and differences, urban-rural space optimization, different management and control measures should be taken to promote rational urban-rural development and layout in the Bohai Rim region in China.

Key words: urban-rural development transformation, centrality, dynamics, sensitivity, spatial structure, Bohai Rim region

刘彦随, 杨忍. 中国环渤海地区城乡发展转型格局测度[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 248-256.

Yansui LIU, Ren YANG. The spatial pattern measure of urban-rural development transformation in the Bohai Rim region in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 248-256.

图/表 5

参考文献 23

[1]	Bai X M, Shi P J, Liu Y S.Realizing China's urban dream. Nature, 2014, 509(7499): 158-160.
[2]	Liu Yansui.Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
	[刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[3]	Soini K, Vaarala H, Pouta E.Residents' sense of place and landscape perception at the rural-urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104: 124-134.
[4]	Walker AJ, Ryan R L.Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 86: 141-152.
[5]	Yang Z S, Cai J M, Sliuzas R.Agro-tourism enterprises as a form of multi-functional urban agriculture for peri-urban development in China. Habitat International, 2010, 34: 374-385.
[6]	Henderson J.V. Aspects of rural-urban transformation of countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 2005, (5): 23-42.
[7]	Gong J Z, Liu Y S, Xia B C et al. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting, based on a cellular automata model: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(24): 3612-3620.
[8]	Hu D, Huang S L.Relationships between rapid urban development and the appropriation of ecosystems in Jiangyin City, eastern China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 87: 180-191.
[9]	Anstey G.Unplanned rural living and its policy implication: Some findings from Bundaberg, Australia. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26: 401-413.
[10]	Liu Y S, Lu S S, Chen Y F.Spatio-temporal change of urban-rural equalized development patterns in China and its driving factors. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, 32: 320-330.
[11]	Jiang Ye, Wu Dianting, Yang Huan.Research on regional models of balancing urban and rural development. Urban Studies, 2011,18(2): 42-47, 93.
	[姜晔, 吴殿廷, 杨欢. 我国统筹城乡协调发展的区域模式研究. 城市发展研究, 2011, 18(2): 42-47, 93.]
[12]	Gong J Z, Liu Y S, Chen W L.Optimal land use allocation of urban fringe in Guangzhou. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(1): 179-191.
[13]	Liu Yansui, Yang Ren.The spatial characteristics and formation mechanism of the county urbanization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(8): 1011-1020.
	[刘彦随, 杨忍. 中国县域城镇化的空间特征与形成机理.地理学报, 2012, 67(8): 1011-1020.]
[14]	Hu Weiyan, Zhang Anlu, Qu Liping.Interrelationships among non-agricultural population, jobs and land. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(05): 104-110.
	[胡伟艳, 张安录, 渠丽萍. 人口、就业与土地非农化的相互关系研究. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2009, 19(05): 104-110.]
[15]	Dai Junliang, Gao Xiaolu, Du Shoushuai.Expansion of urban space and land use control in the process of urbanization. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(10): 1822-1832.
	[戴均良, 高晓路, 杜守帅. 城镇化进程中的空间扩张和土地利用控制. 地理研究, 2010, 29(10): 1822-1832.]
[16]	Long H L, Li Y R, Liu Y S et al. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by 'increasing vs. decreasing balance' land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 11-22.
[17]	Wang Lei, Duan Xuejun.The expansion of urbanization area in Yangtze River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(5): 702-709.
	[王磊, 段学军. 长江三角洲地区城市空间扩展研究. 地理科学, 2010, 30(5): 702-709.]
[18]	Liu Denge, Chen Shuang.Diffusion and aggregate process of urban pattern in Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou cities over the recent 30 years. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(1): 47-54.
	[刘登娥, 陈爽. 近30年来苏锡常城市增长形态过程与聚散规律. 地理科学, 2012, 32(1): 47-54.]
[19]	Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Zhai Rongxin.Geographical research and optimizing practice of rural hollowing in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1193-1202.
	[刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新. 中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1193-1202.]
[20]	Long Hualou, Li Yurui, Liu Yansui.Analysis of evolutive characteristics and their driving mechanism of hollowing villages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.
	[龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随. 空心化村庄演化阶段、类型及其动力机制研究. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.]
[21]	Hao Suqiu.The situation analysis and countermeasures for regional economic integration around Bohai Rim. Economic Forum, 2010, (9): 89-91.
	[郝素秋. 环渤海区域经济一体化现状分析与对策. 经济论坛, 2010, (9): 89-91.]
[22]	Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Li Y H.Process and cause of urban-rural development transformation in the Bohai Rim Region, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(6): 1147-1160.
[23]	Liu Y S, Li Y H, Chen C.Pollution: Build on success in China. Nature, 2015, 517(7533): 145-145.

中国环渤海地区城乡发展转型格局测度

The spatial pattern measure of urban-rural development transformation in the Bohai Rim region in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	林李月, 朱宇, 林坤, 柯文前. 两栖生计下中国流动人口城镇购房意愿的空间特征和影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1350-1365.
[2]	魏石梅, 潘竟虎. 中国地级及以上城市网络结构韧性测度[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[3]	杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[4]	殷江滨, 李尚谦, 姜磊, 程哲, 黄晓燕, 路改改. 中国连片特困地区非农就业增长的时空特征与驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[5]	胡畔, 陈波, 史培军. 中国暴雨洪涝灾情时空格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[6]	黄晓东, 马海涛, 苗长虹. 基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[7]	王录仓, 刘海洋, 刘清. 基于腾讯迁徙大数据的中国城市网络研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[8]	夏兴生, 潘耀忠, 朱秀芳, 张锦水. 中国综合农业分区下的Ångström-Prescott公式系数逐月校正与优选[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[9]	周扬, 李寻欢, 童春阳, 黄晗. 中国村域贫困地理格局及其分异机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 903-920.
[10]	王淑佳, 孙九霞. 中国传统村落可持续发展评价体系构建与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 921-938.
[11]	范泽孟. 中国生态过渡带分布的空间识别及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 626-644.
[12]	徐羽, 李秀彬, 辛良杰. 中国耕地规模化流转租金的分异特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 753-763.
[13]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[14]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[15]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.