Please wait a minute...
 
引用检索 快速检索 DOI 高级检索
地理学报  2014, Vol. 69 Issue (9): 1346-1357    DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201409008
  土地利用 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
土地利用集约化研究的回顾与未来工作重点
朱会义1, 孙明慧1,2
1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京100049
Main progress in the research on land use intensification
ZHU Huiyi1, SUN Minghui1,2
1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
全文: PDF(551 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 土地利用集约化是粮食安全、经济发展与生态保护等多重压力作用下人类土地利用的必然选择.积极推进土地利用集约化进程,使其向可持续集约化方向发展,对于中国这样人多地少的国家而言,具有尤为重要的意义.土地利用集约化研究兴起于20 世纪60 年代,但源流更远的农业生产潜力研究、农业生产要素配置研究等与土地集约利用有关的研究成果,同样加深了人们对土地利用集约化规律的认识.由于这些工作分散于多个学科领域,相关成果并未得到很好梳理.为了弥补这一不足,本文重点围绕基本特征与测度指标、极值问题与潜力研究、驱动因素与限制因素、环境影响与可持续集约化等4 个方面,简要回顾了至今为止土地利用集约化方面的主要研究成果,并概要介绍了监测和制图、路径选择、政策选择、城镇用地"集约化"等有待进一步探讨的主要问题.
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙明慧
朱会义
关键词 研究回顾土地利用集约化工作重点    
Abstract:Land use intensification is an unimpeachable choice of human beings under the multiple pressures of food security, economic development, and ecological conservation. It is particularly important for the countries with less land resource per capita like China to foster a sustainable intensification in their use of land. The scienti fi c understanding of land- use change, however, is still insuf fi cient to characterise the conditions under which such a sustainable intensi fi cation can and will occur. The existing large knowledge gaps should be filled in the future. In this paper, we briefly review main progress in the research on land use intensification. The content is arranged in two sections. The first section focuses on four subtopics: (1) basic characters and their measuring indicators, (2) extremum and potential for input and output, (3) driving factors and limiting factors, (4) ecological effects and sustainable intensification. The second section is on current hotspots: monitoring and mapping land use intensity, land sharing & land sparing, policy premise and choice, and urban land "intensification" in China.
Key wordsland use change    agricultural intensification    land use intensification    main progress
收稿日期: 2014-04-22      出版日期: 2014-11-19
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41171087)
作者简介: 朱会义(1966-), 男, 博士, 副研究员, 中国地理学会会员(S110008010M), 主要从事土地利用变化研究.E-mail: zhuhy@igsnrr.ac.cn
引用本文:   
朱会义, 孙明慧. 土地利用集约化研究的回顾与未来工作重点[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(9): 1346-1357.
ZHU Huiyi, SUN Minghui. Main progress in the research on land use intensification. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(9): 1346-1357.
链接本文:  
http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/10.11821/dlxb201409008      或      http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2014/V69/I9/1346
[1] Trewavas A. Malthus foiled again and again. Nature, 2002, 418(8): 668-670.
[2] Godfray H C J, Beddington J R, Crute I R et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 2010, 327: 812-818.
[3] Haberl H, Beringer T, Bhattacharya S C et al. The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050: Considering sustainability constraints. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010, 2: 394-403.
[4] Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J et al. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 20260-20264.
[5] Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 3465-3472.
[6] Smith P. Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Security, 2013, 2: 18-23.
[7] Tilmana D, Balzerb C, Hillc J, and Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108, No.50.
[8] Erb KH, Haberl H, Rudbeck M. Conceptual framework for analyzing and measuring land-use intensity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 464-470.
[9] Shriar A. Agricultural intensity and its measurement in frontier regions. Agroforestry Systems, 2000, 49: 301-318.
[10] Boserup E. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure. Earthscan, 1965.
[11] Turner B L, Hanham R Q, Portararo A V. Population pressure and agricultural intensity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1977, 67: 384-396.
[12] Dayal E. A measure of cropping intensity. Professional Geographer, 1978, 30: 289-296.
[13] Ruthenberg H. Farming Systems in the Tropics. Clarendon Press, 1980.
[14] Pryor F L. The invention of the plow. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2009, 27: 727.
[15] Siebert S, Portmann F T, Doll P. Global patterns of cropland use intensity. Remote Sensing, 2010, 2: 1625-1643.
[16] Powers RF. On the sustainable productivity of planted forests. New Forests, 1999, 17: 263-306.
[17] Giller K, Beare M, Lavelle P et al. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agro-ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology, 1997, 6: 3-16.
[18]Noble I R, Dirzo R. Forests as human-dominated ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277: 522-525.
[19] Turner B L, Doolittle W. The concept and measure of agricultural intensity. Professional Geographer, 1978, 30: 297-301.
[20] Burney J A, Davis S J, Lobell D B. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensi fi cation. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 12052-12057.
[21] Smith P, Gregory P J, van Vuuren D et al. Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society BBiological Sciences, 2010, 365: 2941-2957.
[22] Dietrich J P, Schmitz C, Muller C et al. Measuring agricultural land-use intensity: A global analysis using a modelassisted approach. Ecological Modelling, 2012, 232: 109-118.
[23] MacLeod CJ, Moller H. Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 115: 201-218.
[24]. Herzog F, Steiner B, Bailey D et al. Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scale. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24: 165-181.
[25] Hendrickx F, Maelfait J P, Van Wingerden W et al. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 44: 340-351.
[26] Le Fe'on V, Schermann-Legionnet A, Delettre Y et al. Intensification of agriculture, landscape composition and wild bee communities: A large scale study in four European countries. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2010, 137: 143-150.
[27] Brook fi eld H C. Intensi fi cation and disintensi fi cation in Pacific agriculture: A theoretical approach. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 1972, 13: 30-48.
[28] Brookfield H C, Hart D. Melanesia: A Geographical Interpretation of an Island World. London: Methuen; 1971.
[29] Brown P, Podolefsky A. Population density, agricultural intensity, land tenure, and group size in the New Guinea highlands. Ethnology, 1976, 15: 211-238.
[30] Stone G D, Netting R M C, Stone M P. Seasonally, labor scheduling, and agricultural intensification in the Nigerian Savanna. American Anthropologist, 1990, 92: 7-23.
[31] Temme A, Verburg P. Mapping and modelling of changes in agricultural intensity in Europe. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2010, 140: 46-56.
[32] Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A et al. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Science, 2009, 276: 903-909.
[33] Duncker P H, Barreiro S, Hengeveld G et al. Classi fi cation of forest management approaches: A new conceptual framework and its applicability to European forestry. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17: 51-62.
[34] FAO. Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Rainfed Agriculture. Soils Bulletin 52. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1983.
[35] FAO. Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Irrigated Agriculture. Soils Bulletin 55. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1985.
[36] FAO. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. A FAO perspective//Bruinsma J. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2003.
[37] Naughton-treves L, Treves A, Chapman C et al. Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: Linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 35: 596-606.
[38] Fischer G, Shah M, Tubiello F N et al., 2005. Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: An integrated assessment, 1990-2080. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003,360 (1463): 2067-2083.
[39] Liu Xunhao. A study on the potential of multi-cropping index of China arable land. Crop Magazine, 1997, 3: 1-2. [刘 巽浩. 论中国耕地种植指数(复种) 的潜力. 作物杂志, 1997, (3): 1-2.]
[40] Shi Juntong, Liu Mengjun, Li Jun. Multi-cropping and sustainable development in grain production of China. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1998, 16( 1): 51-57. [史俊通, 刘孟君, 李军. 论复种与我国粮食生产的可持 续发展. 干旱地区农业研究, 1998, 16( 1): 51-57.]
[41] Fan Jinlong, Wu Bingfang. A study on cropping index potential based on GIS. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 8(6): 637-644. [范锦龙, 吴炳方. 基于GIS的复种指数潜力研究. 遥感学报, 2004, 8(6): 637-644.]
[42] Odum E P. Fundamentals of Ecology. People's Education Press, 1981. [Odum E P. 生态学基础. 北京: 人民教育出版 社, 1981.]
[43] Bouman B, Vankeulen H, Vanlaar H H et al. The 'school of de wit' crop growth simulation models: A pedigree and historical overview. Agricultural Systems, 1996, 52(2/3): 171-198.
[44] de Wit C T. Photosynthesis in leaf canopies. Wageningen, 1965.
[45] Howell T, Cuenca R, Solomon K. Crop yield response: Management of farm irrigation systems. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1990: 93-122.
[46] Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009, 34: 179.
[47] Licker R, Johnston M, Foley J A et al. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the 'yield gap' of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19: 769-782.
[48] Neumann K, Verburg P H, Stehfest E et al. The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis. Agricultural Systems, 2010, 103: 316-326.
[49] Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wangerb T C et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 2012, 151: 53-59.
[50] Ye Jianping. An Introduction to Land Science. Renmin University Press of China, 2005: 69-71. [叶剑平. 土地科学导 论. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005: 69-71.]
[51] Hall R E, Jones J C. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1999, 83-116.
[52] Allen B J. Boserup and Brookfield and the association between population density and agricultural intensity in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2001, 42: 236-254.
[53] Hunt RC. Labor productivity and agricultural development: Boserup revisited. Human Ecology, 2000, 28: 251-277.
[54] Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F, Erb K H et al. Globalization of land use: Distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2013, 5: 438-444.
[55] Johnston K J. The intensi fi cation of pre-industrial cereal agriculture in the tropics: Boserup, cultivation lengthening, and the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2003, 22 126-161.
[56] Stone G D. Theory of the square chicken: Advances in agricultural intensification theory. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2001, 42(2/3): 163-180.
[57] Shriar AJ. Determinants of agricultural intensity index "scores" in a frontier region: An analysis of data from northern Guatemala. Agriculture and Human Values, 2005, 22: 395-410.
[58] Keys E, McConnell W J. Global change and the intensi fi cation of agriculture in the tropics. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15: 320-337.
[59] Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G et al. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 1997, 277: 504-509.
[60] Tilman D. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 2001, 292: 281-284.
[61] Dubreuil A, Gaillard G, Muller-Wenk R. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12: 5-15.
[62] Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P et al. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe: A review. Journal of Environment Management, 2009, 91: 22-46.
[63] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570.
[64] Cordell D, Drangert J O, White S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19: 292-305.
[65] Scott D, Cooper P, Lake S et al. The effects of land use changes on streams and rivers in Mediterranean climates. Hydrobiologia, 2013, 719: 383-425.
[66] Sauer T, Havlík P, Schneider U A et al. Agriculture and resource availability in a changing world: The role of irrigation. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46: 1-12.
[67] Moller H, MacLeod C J, Haggerty J. Intensification of New Zealand agriculture: Implications for biodiversity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 51(3): 253-263.
[68] Hatfield J L, Cruse R M, Tomer M D. Convergence of agricultural intensification and climate change in the Midwestern United States: Implications for soil and water conservation. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2013, 64: 423-435.
[69] Lovett G M, Burns D A, Driscoll C T et al. Who needs environmental monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2007, 5: 253-260.
[70] Turner B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 20666-20671.
[72] Hannah L, Lohse D, Hutchinson C et al. A preliminary inventory of human disturbance of world ecosystems. Ambio, 1994, 23(4/5): 246-250.
[71]T scharntke T, Klein A M, Kruess A et al. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensi fi cation and biodiversityecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 857-874.
[72] Krausmann F, Haberl H, Erb K H et al. Resource fl ows and land use in Austria 1950-2000: Using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21: 215-230.
[73] Doréa T, Makowski D, Malézieuxc E et al. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensi fi cation in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy, 2011, 34: 197-210.
[74] Foley J A, Ramankutty N, Brauman K A et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 2011, 478: 337-342.
[75] Erb K H. How a socio-ecological metabolism approach can help to advance our understanding of changes in land-use intensity. Ecological Economics, 2012, 76: 8-14.
[76] Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts S G. Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2013, 28(4): 230-238.
[77] Verburg P H, Mertz O, Erb K H et al. Land system change and food security: Towards multi-scale land system solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 494-502.
[78] Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P et al. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 484-493.
[79] Erb K H, Gaube V, Krausmann F et al. A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use dataset for the year 2000 consistent with national census data. Journal of Land Use Science, 2007, 2: 191-224.
[80] Zaks D P M, Kucharik C J. Data and monitoring needs for a more ecological agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 2011, 6: 014017.
[81] Rudel T K, Schneider L, Uriarte M et al. Agricultural intensi fi cation and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106: 20675-20680.
[82] Grau R, Kuemmerle T, Macchi L. Beyond 'land sparing versus land sharing': Environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 477-483.
[83] Mandemaker M, Bakker M, Stoorvogel J. The role of governance in agricultural expansion and intensi fi cation: A global study of arable agriculture. Ecology and Society, 2011, 16: 8.
[84] Heaton E A, Schulte L A, Berti M. Managing a second-generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref, 2013, 7: 702-714.
[85] Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 39-53.
[86] Kumar P, Brondizio E, Gatzweiler F et al. The economics of ecosystem services: From local analysis to national policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 78-86.
[87] Seppelt R, Lautenbach S, Volk M. Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: A plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 458-463.
[88] Garnett T, Appleby M C, Balmford A et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science, 2013, 341: 33-34.
[89] Albajes R, Cantero-Martíez C, Capell T et al. Building bridges: An integrated strategy for sustainable food production throughout the value chain. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 32: 743-770.
[90] Tittonella P, Gillerb K E. When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensi fi cation in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research, 2013, 143: 76-90.
[91] Messerli P, Heinimann A, Giger M. From 'land grabbing' to sustainable investments in land: Potential contributions by land change science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 528-534.
[92] Caraveli H. A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in mediterranean agriculture: Dilemmas for LFAs policy. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000, 16: 231-242.
[1] 谢花林,刘桂英. 1998-2012年中国耕地复种指数时空差异及动因[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 604-614.
[2] 杨俊,解鹏,席建超,葛全胜,李雪铭,马占东. 基于元胞自动机模型的土地利用变化模拟——以大连经济技术开发区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3): 461-475.
[3] 何凡能,李美娇,肖冉. 中美过去300年土地利用变化比较[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 297-307.
[4] 席建超, 王新歌, 孔钦钦, 张楠. 旅游地乡村聚落演变与土地利用模式——野三坡旅游区三个旅游村落案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 531-540.
[5] 宋小青, 吴志峰, 欧阳竹. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 435-447.
[6] 赵国松, 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 欧阳志云. 1990-2010年中国土地利用变化对生物多样性保护重点区域的扰动[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1640-1650.
[7] 王渊刚, 罗格平, 赵树斌, 韩其飞, 李超凡, 范彬彬, 陈耀亮. 新疆耕地变化对区域碳平衡的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 110-120.
[8] 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 徐新良, 秦元伟, 宁佳, 周万村, 张树文, 李仁东, 颜长珍, 吴世新, 史学正, 江南, 于东升, 潘贤章, 迟文峰. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.
[9] 吴琳娜, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 罗娅, 周旭, 赵海根. 1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 54-63.
[10] 罗娅, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 宋文龙, 董国涛, 赵海根, 娄和震. 黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 42-53.
[11] 杨胜天, 周旭, 刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 罗娅, 吴琳娜, 赵海根. 黄河中游多沙粗沙区(渭河段)土地利用对植被盖度的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 31-41.
[12] 朱会义. 土地利用变化的内在动力——新疆地区农业生产要素产出效率的变动趋势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1029-1037.
[13] 龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.
[14] 杨依天, 郑度, 张雪芹, 刘羽. 1980-2010 年和田绿洲土地利用变化空间耦合及其环境效应[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 813-824.
[15] 周彬学, 戴特奇, 梁进社, 张华. 基于Lowry模型的北京市城市空间结构模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(4): 491-505.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2013 《地理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发