现行普适降水入渗产流模型的比较研究：SCS与LCM

doi:10.11821/dlxb201407005

地理学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (7): 926-932.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201407005

现行普适降水入渗产流模型的比较研究：SCS与LCM

李军(), 刘昌明(), 王中根, 梁康

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2014-04-20 修回日期:2014-05-26 出版日期:2014-07-20 发布日期:2014-07-20
作者简介:
作者简介：李军 (1968-), 男, 辽宁大连人, 博士生, 主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail: lijun.12b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划课题 (2013BAC10B02-02);国家自然科学基金项目 (41271048);国家自然科学基金重点项目 (41330529)

Two universal runoff yield models: SCS vs. LCM

Jun Li(), Changming LIU(), Zhonggen WANG, Kang LIANG

Key Laboratory of Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2014-04-20 Revised:2014-05-26 Published:2014-07-20 Online:2014-07-20
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Support Program, No.2013BAC10B02-02;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271048;The Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41330529

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

产流计算是水文模拟的关键环节之一。在一定的空间尺度上,产流是一个十分复杂的非线性过程。目前在不同水文模型中,产流计算并不唯一。本文通过对比同时期提出的LCM模型与SCS模型,基于理论及数值分析发现：(1) SCS模型在其比例相等假设下,是LCM模型的一种简单线性化表示。LCM模型更加反映流域宏观产流的非线性。(2) LCM模型参数与SCS模型参数存在严格的数学关系。LCM模型参数的确定可以利用SCS模型参数研究成果。(3) LCM模型参数很容易通过野外实验进行测定,而SCS模型参数很难实测,也可通过LCM模型参数为SCS模型参数确定提供依据。(4) SCS模型揭示了流域产流期内总降雨损失与总降雨量存在倒数线性关系,而LCM模型通过泰勒展开发现具有同样规律。

关键词: 降雨入渗, 产流计算, 非线性, SCS模型, LCM模型

Abstract:

Runoff calculation is one of the key components in the hydrological modeling. For a certain spatial scale, runoff is a very complex nonlinear process. Currently, the runoff yield model in different hydrological models is not unique. The Chinese LCM model and the American SCS model describe runoff at the macroscopic scale, taking into account the relationship between total actual retention and total rainfall and having a certain similarity. In this study, by comparing the two runoff yield models using theoretical analyses and numerical simulations, we found that: (1) the SCS model is a simple linear representation of the LCM model, and the LCM model reflects more significantly the nonlinearity of catchment runoff. (2) There are strict mathematical relationships between parameters (R, r) of LCM model and between parameters (S) of SCS model, respectively. Parameters (R, r) of LCM can be determined using the research results of SCS model parameters. (3) LCM model parameters (R, r) can be easily obtained by field experiments, while it is difficult to measure SCS parameters (S). Therefore, parameters (R, r) of LCM model can also provide the foundation for SCS model. (4) The SCS model has a linear relationship between the reciprocal of total actual retention and the reciprocal of total rainfall during runoff period. The one-order term of a Taylor series expansion of the LCM model describes the same relationship, which needs to be further studied.

Key words: rainfall infiltration, runoff calculation, nonlinearity, the SCS model, the LCM model

李军, 刘昌明, 王中根, 梁康. 现行普适降水入渗产流模型的比较研究：SCS与LCM[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(7): 926-932.

Jun Li, Changming LIU, Zhonggen WANG, Kang LIANG. Two universal runoff yield models: SCS vs. LCM[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(7): 926-932.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 18

[1]	Rui Xiaofang. Runoff Theory.Beijing: Hydraulic and Electric Power Press, 1995.
	[芮孝芳. 产汇流理论. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1995.]
[2]	SCS. Hydrology.National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4 Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service. USDA, Washington, DC, 1956.
[3]	Mishra S K, Singh V P.Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
[4]	Mishra S K, Singh V P.Long-term hydrological simulation based on the soil conservation service curve number . Hydrol.Processes, 2004, 18: 1291-1313.
[5]	Mishra S K.A modified SCS-CN method: characterization and testing. Water Resources Management, 2003, 17: 38-68.
[6]	Ponce V M.Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1996, 1(1): 11-19.
[7]	Patil J P, Sarangi A, Singh A K et al. Evaluation of modified CN methods for watershed runoff estimation using a GIS-based interface. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, 100(1): 137-146.
[8]	Liu Changming, Wang Guangte.The estimation of small-watershed peak flows in China. Water Resources Research, 1980, 16(5): 881-886.
[9]	The Study Group of Rainstorm Runoff in Small Watershed. Calculation of Rainstorm Runoff in Small Watershed. Beijing: Science Press, 1978.
	[小流域暴雨径流研究组. 小流域暴雨洪峰流量计算. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978.]
[10]	Liu Changming, Zhong Junxiang, 1978. Preliminary analysis of effects of forest on runoff in Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1978, 33(2): 112-126
	[刘昌明, 钟骏襄. 黄土高原森林对年径流影响的初步分析. 地理学报, 1978, 33(2): 112-126]
[11]	Wang Zhonggen, Zheng Hongxing, Liu Changming.Application study of the distributed hydrological model in the Yellow River typical watershed. Science in China Series E: Science and Technology, 2004, 34(Suppl.I): 49-59.
	[王中根, 郑红星, 刘昌明. 黄河典型流域分布式水文模型及应用研究. 中国科学E辑: 技术科学, 2004, 34(S1): 45-59.]
[12]	Liu Changming, Wang Zhonggen, Zheng Hongxing et al. Application study of HIMS system and custom model. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2008, 38(3): 350-360.
	[刘昌明, 王中根, 郑红星等. HIMS系统及其定制模型的开发与应用. 中国科学E辑: 技术科学, 2008, 38(3): 350-360.]
[13]	Wang Zhonggen, Zheng Hongxing, Liu Changming.Based distributed hydrological modeling system and its application modules. Progress in Geography, 2005, 24(6): 109-115.
	[王中根, 郑红星, 刘昌明. 基于模块的分布式水文模拟系统及其应用. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(6): 109-115.]
[14]	Liu Changming, Zheng Hongxing, Wang Zhonggen et al. The hydrological process of HIMS integrated simulation based on multi scale. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Natural Science, 2010, 46(3): 268-273.
	[刘昌明, 郑红星, 王中根等. 基于HIMS的水文过程多尺度综合模拟. 北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 46(3): 268-273.]
[15]	Liang Kang, Liu Changming, Wang Zhonggen et al. Runoff simulation in the Heiyukou sub-basin of the Weihe River Basin and its responses to climate change based on HIMS. Yellow River, 2012, (10): 13-14.
	[梁康, 刘昌明, 王中根, 刘晓伟. 基于HIMS的渭河中游黑峪口子流域径流模拟及其对气候变化的响应研究. 人民黄河, 2012, (10): 13-14.]
[16]	Liu Changming, Bai Peng, Gong Tongliang et al. Estimation of peak flow of an ungauged basin in Tibetan Plateau. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2013, 11(1): 1-6.
	[刘昌明, 白鹏, 巩同梁等. 西藏稀缺资料地区洪峰流量推求. 南水北调与水利科技, 2013, 11(1): 1-6.]
[17]	USDA S C S. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington, DC, 1985.
[18]	Patil J P, Sarangi A, Singh A K et al. Evaluation of modified CN methods for watershed runoff estimation using a GIS-based interface. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, 100(1): 137-146.

现行普适降水入渗产流模型的比较研究：SCS与LCM

Two universal runoff yield models: SCS vs. LCM

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 18

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 丁正山, 秦东丽. 长三角多维城市化对PM_2.5浓度的非线性影响及驱动机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1274-1293.
[2]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 林静, 郭华, 韩燕, 廖柳文. 2000—2014年全球粮食安全格局的时空演化及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 332-347.
[3]	程昌秀,史培军,宋长青,高剑波. 地理大数据为地理复杂性研究提供新机遇[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1397-1406.
[4]	张亦弛, 刘昌明, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 蔡明勇, 董国涛, 罗娅. 黄土高原典型流域LCM模型集总、半分布和分布式构建对比分析[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 90-99.
[5]	杨忠勇, 程和琴, 朱建荣, 李身铎. 洋山港海域潮动力特征及其对工程的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1282-1290.
[6]	张豪, 罗亦泳, 张立亭. 基于遗传支持向量机的城市扩张非线性组合模型[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(6): 656-664.
[7]	刘小平, 黎夏. 从高维特征空间中获取元胞自动机的非线性转换规则[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 663-672.
[8]	夏军,王纲胜,吕爱锋,谈戈. 分布式时变增益流域水循环模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 789-796.
[9]	金德生, 陈浩, 郭庆伍. 流域物质与水系及产沙间非线性关系实验研究[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(4): 439-448.
[10]	金德生, 陈浩, 郭庆伍. 河道纵剖面分形-非线性形态特征[J]. 地理学报, 1997, 52(2): 154-162.
[11]	杨家坦. 小流域汇流非线性模式的研究[J]. 地理学报, 1981, 36(4): 442-449.