中国与美国大都市区城市内部土地覆盖结构时空差异

doi:10.11821/dlxb201407001

地理学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (7): 883-895.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201407001

• 土地利用与土地覆盖 • 下一篇

中国与美国大都市区城市内部土地覆盖结构时空差异

匡文慧¹, 迟文峰^1,2, 史文娇¹

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京100049

收稿日期:2013-12-27 修回日期:2014-03-06 出版日期:2014-07-20 发布日期:2014-09-12
作者简介:匡文慧（1978-），男，副研究员，主要从事土地利用/覆盖变化，城市生态环境研究。E-mail：kuangwh1978@sina.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划（2013AA122802）；国家自然科学基金项目（41371408）；国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2010CB95090400，2014CB954302）；国家科技支撑计划项目（2012BAJ15B02）资助

Spatio-temporal characteristics of intra-urban land cover in the cities of China and USA from 1978 to 2010

KUANG Wenhui¹, CHI Wenfeng^1,2, SHI Wenjiao¹

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2013-12-27 Revised:2014-03-06 Online:2014-07-20 Published:2014-09-12
Supported by:
National High-Tech R&D Program of China, No.2013AA122802; National Natural Science Foundation ofChina, No.41371408; National Basic Research Program of China, No.2010CB95090400, No.2014CB954302;National Key Technology R&D Program, No.2012BAJ15B02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市内部土地覆盖结构对城市生态服务功能和人居环境质量产生重要影响。中国与美国不同发展阶段城市不透水地表和绿地时空分布格局存在显著差异。本文基于Landsat TM/MSS影像获取1978、1990、2000、2010 年城市内部土地覆盖和不透水地表分类信息，监测并比较中国和美国六个特大城市扩展时空动态、土地覆盖结构差异及城市不同功能区特征。研究表明，在过去30 多年以来，中国城市以相对紧凑形态发展，美国城市较为离散；美国三大城市植被所占的比例是中国的2.21 倍；中国城市内部结构土地利用功能类型更加复杂，不透水地表密度更高，而美国城市CBD和居住区功能相对独立，特别居住区以镶嵌式低不透水地表和高绿地比例结构为主。

关键词: 不透水地表, 中国, 遥感, 城市结构, 绿地, 美国

Abstract: Urban land cover has major impacts on urban ecosystem service and inhabitant living environment. Chinese cities' spatio-temporal distribution of impervious surface area and green land shows more remarkable differences than that of USA. This study focused on monitoring and comparing the spatio-temporal dynamics, land cover patterns and characteristics of urban functional regions in six cities located in China and USA, based on Landsat TM/MSS images obtained in 1978, 1990, 2000 and 2010. The study indicated that the three major cities in China were developing with compact forms, but the three major cities of USA have presented dispersed forms during the past 30 years. The proportion of vegetation land of the three cities in the USA was as much as 2.21 times of that in the three China's cites. Land use types of Chinese cities are more complicated with a higher density of impervious surface area. In contrast, the CBD and living areas of American cities were covered by low impervious surface area and high rate of green land, which were relatively independent. This study can make contribution to urban planning and administration for both China and USA.

Key words: China, remote sensing, green land, impervious surface, urban structure, USA

匡文慧, 迟文峰, 史文娇. 中国与美国大都市区城市内部土地覆盖结构时空差异[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(7): 883-895.

KUANG Wenhui, CHI Wenfeng, SHI Wenjiao. Spatio-temporal characteristics of intra-urban land cover in the cities of China and USA from 1978 to 2010[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(7): 883-895.

参考文献

[1] McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B. The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 2007, 19(1): 17-37.
[2] Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Golubiewski N B et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 2008, 319(5864): 756-760.
[3] Alberti M. Maintaining ecological integrity and sustaining ecosystem function in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010, 2(3): 178-184.
[4] Grimmond C, Blackett M, Best M et al. The international urban energy balance models comparison project: First results from phase 1. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2010, 49(6): 1268-1292.
[5] Seto K C, Guneralp B, Hutyra L R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. PNAS, 2012, 109(40): 16083-16088.
[6] Van De Voorde T, Jacquet W, Canters F. Mapping form and function in urban areas: An approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 102(3): 143-155.
[7] Oke T R. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1982, 108 (455): 1-24.
[8] Goldbach A, Kuttler W. Quantification of turbulent heat fluxes for adaptation strategies within urban planning. International Journal of Climatology, 2012, 33(1): 143-159.
[9] Laaidi K, Zeghnoun A, Dousset B et al. The impact of heat islands on mortality in Paris during the August 2003 Heat Wave. Environment Health Perspectives, 2012, 120(2): 254-259.
[10] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2003.
[11] Kuang Wenhui. Simulating dynamic urban expansion at regional scale in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Metropolitan Area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(1): 317-330. [匡文慧. 区域尺度城市增长时空动态模型及其在京津唐都市圈应用. 地理学报, 2011, 21(1): 317-330.]
[12] Arnold C L, Gibbons C J. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(2): 243-258.
[13] Lu D, Moran E, Hetrick S. Detection of impervious surface change with multitemporal Landsat images in an urbanrural frontier. ISPRS Journal of Photogramm Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(3): 298-306.
[14] Wolf K M. Public response to the urban forest in inner-city business districts. Journal of Arboriculture, 2003, 29(3): 117-126.
[15] Nowak D J, Dwyer J F. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems//Kuser J. Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2007: 25-46.
[16] Byomkesh T, Nakagoshi N, Dewan A M. Urbanization and green space dynamics in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2012, 8(1): 45-58.
[17] Zhang Renhua. Quantity Infrared Remote Sensing Model and the Ground Experiment Base. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. [张仁华. 定量热红外遥感模型及地面实验基础. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.]
[18] Yuan F, Bauer M E. Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 106(3): 375-386.
[19] Tong X, Lin C, Lu W et al. Environmental impacts of surface mining on mined lands, affected streams and agricultural lands in the Dabaoshan Mine region, southern china. Journal of Land Degradation & Development, 2005, 16(5): 463-474.
[20] Ashie Y, Ca VT, Asaeda T. Development of a numerical model for the evaluation of the urban thermal environment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 81: 181-196.
[21] Nowak D J, Greenfield E J. Tree and impervious cover in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 107 (1): 21-30.
[22] Kuang W H, Liu J Y, Zhang Z X et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of impervious surface areas across China during the early 21st century. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58: 1-11.
[23] Yue Wenze, Xu Jianhua, Xu Lihua. An analysis on eco-environment effect of urban land use based on remote sensing images. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 1450-1460. [岳文泽, 徐建华, 徐丽华. 基于遥感影像的城市土地利用生态环境效应研究. 生态学报, 2006, 26(5): 1450-1460.]
[24] Ying Tianyu, Li Mingze, Fan Wenyi et al. Analysis of urban forests and heat island effect based on GIS. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(8): 63-67. [应天玉, 李明泽, 范文义等. 基于GIS技术的城市森林与热岛效应的分析. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(8): 63-67.]
[25] Kuang W H. Evaluating impervious surface growth and its impacts on water environment in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Metropolitan Area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(3): 535-547.
[26] Kuang W H. Spatio-temporal patterns of intra-urban land use change in Beijing, China between 1984 and 2008. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 210-220.
[27] Sexton J O, Song X-P, Huang C et al. Urban growth of the Washington, D.C.-Baltimore, MD metropolitan region from 1984 to 2010 by annual, Landsat-based estimates of impervious cover. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 129: 42-53.
[28] Wang Xiuxin, Zhu Qijiang, Chen Shenghai et al. Analysis of water, heat and CO2 fluxes on urban green space. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(8): 3232-3239. [王修信, 朱启疆, 陈声海等. 城市公园绿地水、热与CO2通量观测与分析. 生态学报, 2007, 27(8): 3232-3239.]
[29] Potchter O, Cohen P, Bitan et al. Climatic behavior of various urban parks during hot and humid summer in the Mediterranean city of Tel Aviv, Israel. International Journal of Climatology, 2006, 26(12): 1695-1711.
[30] Kuang Wenhui, Zhang Shuwen, Liu Jiyuan et al. Methodology for classifying and detecting intra-urban land use change: A case study of Changchun city during the last 100 years. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010, 14(2): 345-355. [匡文慧, 张树文, 刘纪远等. 城市用地空间信息分类与数字重建: 以长春百年城市内部用地变化为例. 遥感学报, 2010, 14(2): 345-355.]

中国与美国大都市区城市内部土地覆盖结构时空差异

Spatio-temporal characteristics of intra-urban land cover in the cities of China and USA from 1978 to 2010

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	朱艳硕, 王铮, 程文露. 中国装备制造业的空间枢纽—网络结构[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1525-1533.
[2]	陈小强, 袁丽华, 沈石, 梁晓瑶, 王元慧, 王翔宇, 叶思菁, 程昌秀, 宋长青. 中国及其周边国家间地缘关系解析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1534-1547.
[3]	高超,汪丽,陈财,罗纲,孙艳伟. 海平面上升风险中国大陆沿海地区人口与经济暴露度[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1590-1604.
[4]	郑景云,刘洋,吴茂炜,张学珍,郝志新. 中国中世纪气候异常期温度的多尺度变化特征及区域差异[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1281-1291.
[5]	隆院男,闫世雄,蒋昌波,吴长山,李志威,唐蓉. 基于多源遥感影像的洞庭湖地形提取方法[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1467-1481.
[6]	周沂,贺灿飞. 中国城市出口产品演化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1097-1111.
[7]	王少剑,黄永源. 中国城市碳排放强度的空间溢出效应及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1131-1148.
[8]	宋雪茜,邓伟,周鹏,张少尧,万将军,刘颖. 两层级公共医疗资源空间均衡性及其影响机制——以分级诊疗改革为背景[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1178-1189.
[9]	杨宇,李小云,董雯,洪辉,何则,金凤君,刘毅. 中国人地关系综合评价的理论模型与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1063-1078.
[10]	马丹阳, 尹云鹤, 吴绍洪, 郑度. 中国干湿格局对未来高排放情景下气候变化响应的敏感性[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 857-874.
[11]	程维明,周成虎,李炳元,申元村. 中国地貌区划理论与分区体系研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 839-856.
[12]	刘俊,黄莉,孙晓倩,李宁馨,张恒锦. 气候变化对中国观鸟旅游的影响——基于鸟类物候变化的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 912-922.
[13]	杨帆,何凡能,李美娇,李士成. 全球历史森林数据中国区域的可靠性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 923-934.
[14]	赵鹏军,吕迪. 中国小城镇镇区土地利用结构特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1011-1024.
[15]	方创琳, 王振波, 刘海猛. 美丽中国建设的理论基础与评估方案探索[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 619-632.