Please wait a minute...
 
引用检索 快速检索 DOI 高级检索
地理学报  2014, Vol. 69 Issue (4): 531-540    DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201404009
  旅游地理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
旅游地乡村聚落演变与土地利用模式——野三坡旅游区三个旅游村落案例研究
席建超1, 王新歌1,2, 孔钦钦1,2, 张楠1,2
1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
Spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism:A comparative study of three villages in Yesanpo tourism area, China
XI Jianchao1, WANG Xinge1,2, KONG Qinqin1,2, ZHANG Nan1,2
1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
全文: PDF(4940 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 旅游村落在旅游地系统演化中扮演着重要的角色,并逐步成为中国新型城镇化过程中重要的乡村发展类型。研究采取参与式农村评估(PRA)、GIS 空间分析和Google earth 高清遥感影像相结合的方法,以野三坡旅游区3 个旅游乡村聚落为例,从土地利用和空间形态变迁两个维度,分析了旅游业诱导下旅游地乡村聚落的空间演变规律。研究发现,因区位条件的差异,乡村聚落土地利用模式演变呈现出“核心—边缘”的差异,距离核心景区越近的村落,土地集约利用程度越高,旅游功能愈加完善,村落风貌格局变化愈大。其中,苟各庄村用地容积率由0.17 提高到0.44,但村落原真性破坏最严重,原真性指数为仅为0.048,是3 个村子最低的,其旅游功能也最完善;刘家河村落土地扩张规模最大,建设用地由173564 m2扩展到341128 m2,增幅达到96.54%,村落的原真性相对保持稳定,为0.566,旅游功能相对完整;上庄村是原真性保持最好的村落,原真性指数则高达0.942,但是其建设用地规模和用地强度则最低,但其旅游功能也最单一。显然,在具体空间形态上,3 个村落也表现为“现代城镇”—“半城镇化”—“传统村落”的过渡特征,并对应形成“就地重建型”、“飞地开发型”、“原地利用型”3 种空间重构模式。乡村聚落作为乡村旅游发展的最基本空间单元,这3 个乡村聚落发展模式隐含着旅游地传统乡村聚落“旅游化”空间演变的阶段形态,这种空间模式在国内旅游地乡村聚落演变中具有一定的代表性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孔钦钦
张楠
王新歌
席建超
关键词 空间演变乡村聚落土地利用野三坡旅游区    
Abstract:As the main reception base and important tourism attraction, tourism village is the core element of the tourism destination system, and has also become one of the most important forms of rural urbanization in China. Integrating the method of PRA (participatory rural assessment), GIS technology and HD remote sensing images, this study aims to analyze the spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism through a comparative study of three tourism villages in Yesanpo tourism destination. The results suggest that there exists a "core-periphery" pattern of the spatial evolution of rural settlements. The closer to the core scenic spot, the higher degree of land-use intensity the village shows, as well as the more mature tourism function and greater change in landscape pattern. In the research, Gougezhuang shows an increase of the floor area ratio from 0.17 to 0.44, with the most mature tourism function and destroyed landscape authenticity as well and it has the lowest authenticity index of 0.448. Liujiahe has gone through a largest increase of 96.54% in construction land area, with moderately mature tourism function and relatively stable authenticity of 0.566. Shangzhuang, in contrast, has the lowest construction land scale and intensity, with the poorest tourism function and most well-preserved landscape authenticity of 0.942. Overall, in term of the spatial morphology, the three villages are characterized by "modern town", "semi-urbanization" and "traditional village", respectively, in corresponding to three land development types: "intensive reconstruction type", "enclave extension type" and "in situ using type". Tourism village is the basic spatial unit of rural tourism. The spatial evolution patterns of these three villages present the spatial characteristics of the touristization of traditional villages in different stages, and also has great representative value for the management of rural settlements in tourism destinations of China.
Key wordsrural settlements    spatial evaluation    land use    Yesanpo tourism area
收稿日期: 2013-03-13      出版日期: 2014-06-14
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(40971299)
作者简介: 席建超(1972-),男,河南确山人,副研究员,博士后,研究兴趣主要集中在旅游地用地格局演变及其环境效应,区域旅游发展规划等。E-mail:xijc@igsnrr.ac.cn
引用本文:   
席建超, 王新歌, 孔钦钦, 张楠. 旅游地乡村聚落演变与土地利用模式——野三坡旅游区三个旅游村落案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 531-540.
XI Jianchao, WANG Xinge, KONG Qinqin, ZHANG Nan. Spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism:A comparative study of three villages in Yesanpo tourism area, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(4): 531-540.
链接本文:  
http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/10.11821/dlxb201404009      或      http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2014/V69/I4/531
[1] Long Hualou, Li Yurui, Liu Yansui et al. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by 'increasing vs. decreasing balance' land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 11-22.
[2] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570. [刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[3] Long Hualou. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 193-200.[龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 193-200.]
[4] Mitchell C. Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 2004, 20(1): 15-34.
[5] Dahms F. Settlement evolution in the arena society in the urban field. Journal of Rural Studies, 1998, 14(4): 299-320.
[6] Long Hualou, Li Tingting. Analysis of the coupling of farmland and rural housing land transition in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(2): 201-210. [龙花楼, 李婷婷. 中国耕地和农村宅基地利用转型耦合分析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(2): 201-210.]
[7] Long Hualou, Zou Jian, Liu Yansui. Differentiation of rural development driven by industrialization and urbanization in eastern coastal China. Habitat International, 2009, 33(4): 454-462.
[8] National Tourism Administration Planning and Finance. About the "National Rural Tourism Development Program (2009-2015)", URL: http://www.china.com.cn/travel/txt/2009~07/02/content_18055536.htm. [国家旅游局规划财务司. 《全国乡村旅游发展纲要(2009-2015)》. http://www.china.com.cn/travel/txt/2009~07/02/content_18055536.htm.]
[9] Xue Li. Study on the inner decaying village and the countermeasures with Jiangsu province as the case. City Planning Review, 2001, 25(6): 8-13. [薛力. 城市化背景下的“空心村”现象及其对策探讨: 以江苏省为例. 城市规划, 2001, 25 (6): 8-13.]
[10] Cheng Liansheng, Feng Wenyong, Jiang Lihong. The analysis of rural settlement hollowizing system of the southeast of Taiyuan Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(4): 437-446. [程连生, 冯文勇, 蒋立宏. 太原盆地东南部农村聚 落空心化机理分析. 地理学报, 2001, 56(4): 437-446.]
[11] Wang Chengxin, Yao Shimou, Chen Caihong. Empirical study on "village-hollowing" in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(3): 257-262. [王成新, 姚士谋, 陈彩虹. 中国农村聚落空心化问题实证研究. 地理科学, 2005, 25(3): 257-262.]
[12] Zhong Zaiming. The causes and treatment of idle homestead in rural area. Agricultural Economy, 2008, (6): 57-58. [钟 在明. 农村宅基地闲置原因与治理探析. 农业经济, 2008, (6): 57-58.]
[13] Young B. "Touristization" of traditional Maltese fishing-farming village: A general model. Tourism Management, 1983, 4(1): 35-41.
[14] Xi Jianchao, Zhao Meifeng, Ge Quansheng. The micro-scale analysis of rural settlement land use pattern: A case study of Gouge Village of Yesanpo Scenic Area in Hebei Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1707-1717. [席建 超, 赵美风, 葛全胜. 旅游地村落用地格局演变的微尺度分析: 河北野三坡旅游区苟各庄村的案例实证. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1707-1717.]
[15] Isla F I. From touristic villages to coastal cities: The costs of the big step in Buenos Aires. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2012, 2(5): 1-7.
[16] Agarwal S. Restructuring sea-side tourism: The resort lifecycle. Annals of Tourism Research, 2001, 29(1): 25-55.
[17] Butler R W. Concept of a tourism area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 1980, 24(1): 5-12.
[18] Papatheodorou A. Exploring the evolution of tourism resorts. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004, 31(1): 219-237.
[19] Butler R, Clark G, Bowler I R. Tourism in rural areas: Canada and the United Kingdom. Economy and Society, 1992, 2: 166-183.
[20] Zurick D N. Adventure travel and sustainable tourism in the peripheral economy of Nepal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1992, 82(4): 604-628.
[21] Leiper N. Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research, 1990, 17(3): 367-384.
[22] Pearce D. Tourism in Paris: Studies at the microscale. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26(1): 77-97.
[23] Faché W, Ashworth G J. Transformations in the concept of holiday villages in Northern Europe. Tourism and Spatial Transformations, CAB International, 1995: 109-128.
[24] Liu Shenghe, Wu Chuanjun, Shen Hongquan. A GIS based model of urban land use growth in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 55(4): 407-416. [刘盛和, 吴传钧, 沈洪泉. 基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式. 地理学 报, 2002, 55(4): 407-416.]
[25] Zou Deci. Floor area ratio. Urban Planning, 1994, (1): 19-23. [邹德慈. 容积率研究. 城市规划, 1994, (1): 19-23.]
[26] Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin, He Shujin et al. Spatio-temporal change of land use in Bohai Rim. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(3): 253-260. [朱会义, 李秀彬, 何书金等. 环渤海地区土地利用的时空变化分析. 地理学报, 2001, 56(3): 253-260.]
[27] Stovel H. Authenticity in conservation decision-making: The world heritage perspective. Journal of Research in Architecture and Planning, Conservation and Cultural Heritage, 2004, 3: 1-8.
[28] UNESCO WH Centre. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2005.
[29] Wang Yuncai, Mille P, Katen B. The traditionality evaluation of culture landscape space and its holistic conservation pattern: A case study of Qiandeng-Zhangpu region in Jiangsu province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 525-534. [王云才, Mille P, Katen B. 文化景观空间传统性评价及其整体保护格局: 以江苏昆山千灯—张浦片区为例. 地 理学报, 2011, 66(4): 525-534.]
[30] Nepal S K. Tourism, rural settlements Nepal's Annapurna region. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007, 34(4): 855-875.
[31] Bernard L. What is rural tourism? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1994, 2(1/2): 7-21.
[32] Long Hualou, Liu Yansui, Zou Jian. Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 426-434. [龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性 评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.]
[1] 谢花林,刘桂英. 1998-2012年中国耕地复种指数时空差异及动因[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 604-614.
[2] 杨俊,解鹏,席建超,葛全胜,李雪铭,马占东. 基于元胞自动机模型的土地利用变化模拟——以大连经济技术开发区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3): 461-475.
[3] 何凡能,李美娇,肖冉. 中美过去300年土地利用变化比较[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 297-307.
[4] 朱会义, 孙明慧. 土地利用集约化研究的回顾与未来工作重点[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(9): 1346-1357.
[5] 宋小青, 吴志峰, 欧阳竹. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 435-447.
[6] 赵国松, 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 欧阳志云. 1990-2010年中国土地利用变化对生物多样性保护重点区域的扰动[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1640-1650.
[7] 唐承丽, 贺艳华, 周国华, 曾山山, 肖路遥. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472.
[8] 王渊刚, 罗格平, 赵树斌, 韩其飞, 李超凡, 范彬彬, 陈耀亮. 新疆耕地变化对区域碳平衡的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 110-120.
[9] 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 徐新良, 秦元伟, 宁佳, 周万村, 张树文, 李仁东, 颜长珍, 吴世新, 史学正, 江南, 于东升, 潘贤章, 迟文峰. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.
[10] 吴琳娜, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 罗娅, 周旭, 赵海根. 1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 54-63.
[11] 罗娅, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 宋文龙, 董国涛, 赵海根, 娄和震. 黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 42-53.
[12] 杨胜天, 周旭, 刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 罗娅, 吴琳娜, 赵海根. 黄河中游多沙粗沙区(渭河段)土地利用对植被盖度的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 31-41.
[13] 朱会义. 土地利用变化的内在动力——新疆地区农业生产要素产出效率的变动趋势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1029-1037.
[14] 龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.
[15] 杨依天, 郑度, 张雪芹, 刘羽. 1980-2010 年和田绿洲土地利用变化空间耦合及其环境效应[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 813-824.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2013 《地理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发