三峡水库运行下洞庭湖盆冲淤过程响应与水沙调控阈值

doi:10.11821/dlxb201403012

地理学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (3): 409-421.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201403012

三峡水库运行下洞庭湖盆冲淤过程响应与水沙调控阈值

周永强^1,2,3, 李景保¹, 张运林², 章新平¹, 黎昔春⁴

1. 湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院, 长沙410081;
2. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所湖泊与环境国家重点实验室, 南京210008;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京100049;
4. 湖南省水利水电勘测设计研究总院, 长沙410007

收稿日期:2013-09-09 修回日期:2013-12-04 出版日期:2014-03-20 发布日期:2014-06-10
通讯作者: 李景保（1951- ），男，湖南桂阳人，教授，主要从事水文水资源及自然灾害等方面的教学与研究。E-mail：lijingbao1951@126.com E-mail:lijingbao1951@126.com
作者简介:周永强（1988- ），男，湖南江永人，硕士生，主要从事湖泊生态系统动力学方向的研究。E-mail：yohnchou917251@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41071067）；湖南省重点学科（地理学）建设项目

Silting/scouring process responses of Dongting Lake basin to the operations of TGR and thresholds of water-sediment regulation

ZHOU Yongqiang^1,2,3, LI Jingbao¹, ZHANG Yunlin², ZHANG Xinping¹, LI Xichun⁴

1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Hunan Hydro & Power Design Institute, Changsha 410007, China

Received:2013-09-09 Revised:2013-12-04 Online:2014-03-20 Published:2014-06-10
Supported by:
National NaturalScience Foundation of China,No.41071067;Construction Program of the Key Discipline (Geography) inHunan Province

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以1951-2011 年洞庭湖区及荆江段干流主要控制站实测径流输沙量资料为依据，分析三峡水库不同蓄水阶段及不同调度方式下洞庭湖盆冲/淤响应，并提出上游来水来沙调控阈值。结果表明：① 荆南三（四）口流量与枝城站流量、荆南三（四）口输沙率存在极显著正相关（p < 0.0001），决定系数r2分别为0.859 及0.895。② 与三峡水库蓄水运用前（1999-2002）相比，一、二期蓄水阶段及全面试验性蓄水阶段（2008.10-2011.12）洞庭湖盆年均冲淤量由+4796.4×10⁴ t 依次递减为+684.1×10⁴ t、+449.8×10⁴ t 及-559.6×10⁴ t，湖盆冲淤率由+70.25%分别降至+31.13%、+23.56%及-42.64%。③ 预泄调度及蓄水调度期，湖盆泥沙均由以淤积为主转变为以冲刷为主，防洪补偿调度期湖盆泥沙表现为淤积，而在补水调度运用期则表现为冲刷。④ 洞庭湖盆处于冲/淤临界平衡状态时的荆南三口平均流量、输沙率及含沙量分别为970.81 m³/s、466.82 kg/s 及0.481 kg/m³。并认为，为增强湖泊调蓄功能，必须进一步优化三峡水库调度方式，合理调控下泄水沙量。

关键词: 荆南三口, 径流, 洞庭湖盆, 三峡水库, 输沙量

Abstract: Based on measured runoff and sediment discharge rate of major control stations in the Dongting Lake basin and the Jingjiang River section, Yangtze River, from 1951 to 2011, this paper analyzes silting/scouring process responses of the Dongting Lake basin to different impoundment phases and different dispatching modes of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR). Results are shown as follows: (1) Significant correlations were found between flow rate of the Zhicheng Station and flow rate of the Three (Four) Outlets of the Southern Jingjiang Rivers (r²=0.859, p<0.0001), flow rate and sediment deliver rate of the Three (Four) Outlets (r²=0.895, p<0.0001), indicating that flow rate and sediment deliver rate of the Three (Four) Outlets were strongly influenced by upstream Yangtze River flow rate. (2) Compared with period before operation of the TGR (1999-2002), sediment silting/scouring amount of the Dongting Lake basin during the TGR impoundment phases I, II and the TGR in comprehensive operation phase (2008.10-2011.12) dropped from +4796.4×10⁴ t to +684.1×10⁴ t, +449.8×10⁴ t, -559.6×10⁴ t, and sediment silting/scouring rate dropped from +70.25% to + 31.13%, +23.56%, -42.64% successively. The results present notably positive effects due to operation of the TGR. (3) During pre-discharge dispatch and water-storage dispatch period, the lake basin changed from silting to scouring mode. For flood-storage dispatch and water-supplement dispatch period, the Dongting Lake basin was mainly controlled by silting and scouring processes, respectively. (4) The calculated optimum thresholds of annual mean flow rate, sediment transport rate and sediment concentration of the Three Outlets were 970.81 m³/s, 466.82 kg/s and 0.481 kg/m³, respectively, while the Dongting Lake basin were under the state of neither silting nor scouring. The thresholds could provide practical references for operation regulation of the TGR.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, The three outlets of southern Jingjiang river, sediment discharge, Dongting Lake basin, runoff

周永强, 李景保, 张运林, 章新平, 黎昔春. 三峡水库运行下洞庭湖盆冲淤过程响应与水沙调控阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(3): 409-421.

ZHOU Yongqiang, LI Jingbao, ZHANG Yunlin, ZHANG Xinping, LI Xichun. Silting/scouring process responses of Dongting Lake basin to the operations of TGR and thresholds of water-sediment regulation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(3): 409-421.

参考文献

[1] Sharaf S H El Din. Effect of the Aswan High Dam on the Nile flood and on the estuarine and coastal circulation pattern along the Mediterranean Egyptian coast. Limnology and Oceanography, 1977, 22(2): 194-207.
[2] Keown M P, Dardeau Jr E A, Causey E M. Historic trends in the sediment flow regime of the Mississippi River. Water Resources Research, 1986, 22(11): 1555-1564.
[3] Walling D E. Human impact on land-ocean sediment transfer by the world's rivers. Geomorphology, 2006, 79(3/4): 192-216.
[4] Li Jingbao, Wang Kelin, Qin Jianxin et al. The evolution of annual runoff and sediment in the Dongting Lake and their driving forces. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(3): 503-510. [李景保, 王克林, 秦建新等. 洞庭湖年径流泥沙的演变特征及其动因. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 503-510.]
[5] Han Qiwei. Changes of flood situation along the middle Yangtze River. Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, (5): 1-12.[韩其为. 江湖流量分配变化导致长江中游新的洪水形势. 泥沙研究, 1999, (5): 1-12.]
[6] Xu Gui, Huang Yunxian, Li Xichun et al. Analysis on causes of water level rising at Chenglingji hydrological station of Changjiang River. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 35(8): 33-37. [徐贵, 黄云仙, 黎昔春等. 城陵矶水位抬高原因分析. 水利学报, 2004, 35(8): 33-37.]
[7] Fu Renshou, Qi Meilan, Fang Hongwei et al. Sediment transport characteristics of Yangtze River in river section from Yichang to Hankou. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(1): 35-41. [府仁寿, 齐梅兰, 方红卫等. 长江宜昌至汉口河段输沙特性分析. 水利学报, 2005, 36(1): 35-41.]
[8] He Yong, Li Yitian, Wu Daoxi et al. Flow and sediment process versus river health. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(11): 1354-1359. [何用, 李义天, 吴道喜等. 水沙过程与河流健康. 水利学报, 2006, 37(11): 1354-1359.]
[9] Zhang Zhen, Yang Shilun, Li Peng. Quantifying the influence of water impoundment Phase I and II of the Three Gorges Reservoir on downstream suspended sediment flux. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(5): 623-631. [张珍, 杨世伦, 李鹏. 三峡水库一、二期蓄水对下游悬沙通量影响的计算. 地理学报, 2010, 65(5): 623-631.]
[10] Lu Jinyou, Huang Yue, Gong Ping. Scouring and silting variation in middle and lower channel of the Yangtze River after TGP. Yangtze River, 2006, 37(9): 55-57. [卢金友, 黄悦, 宫平. 三峡工程运用后长江中下游冲淤变化. 人民长江, 2006, 37(9): 55-57.]
[11] Lu Jinyou, Luo Hengkai. Preliminary analysis on variation of the relation between Yangtze River and Dongting Lake. Yangtze River, 1999, 30(4): 24-26. [卢金友, 罗恒凯. 长江与洞庭湖关系变化初步分析. 人民长江, 1999, 30(4): 24-26.]
[12] Li Yitian, Guo Xiaohu, Tang Jinwu et al. Changes on runoff division from Jingjiang reach of the Yangtze River to Dongting Lake after the operation of TGR. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2009, 17(1): 21-31. [李义天, 郭小虎, 唐金武等. 三峡建库后荆江三口分流的变化. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2009, 17(1): 21-31.]
[13] Zhong Zhiyu, Hu Weizhong. On relation of river and lake. Yangtze River, 2008, 39(1): 20-23. [仲志余, 胡维忠. 试论江湖关系. 人民长江, 2008, 39(1): 20-23.]
[14] Wang Huiling, Liang Xing. Analysis on flood storage function of the Dongting Lake. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2003, 19(3): 63-66. [王慧玲, 梁杏. 洞庭湖调蓄作用分析. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(3): 63-66.]
[15] Dai Shibao, Yang Shilun, Zhao Huayun et al. Response of middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River to the initial operation stage of the Three Gorges Project. Journal of Sediment Research, 2005, (5): 35-39. [戴仕宝, 杨世伦, 赵华云. 三峡水库蓄水运用初期长江中下游河道冲淤响应. 泥沙研究, 2005, (5): 35-39.]
[16] Li Jingbao, Chang Jiang, Lv Dianqing et al. The hydrological effect between Jingjiang River and Dongting Lake during the initial period of Three Gorges Project operation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(11): 1342-1352. [李景保, 常疆, 吕殿青等. 三峡水库调度运行初期荆江与洞庭湖区的水文效应. 地理学报, 2009, 64(11): 1342-1352.]
[17] Duan Wenzhong, Zheng Yahui, Liu Jianjun. Causes of water level rising in Chenglingji-Luoshan reach of Changjiang River. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001, (2): 29-34. [段文忠, 郑亚慧, 刘建军. 长江城陵矶—螺山河段水位抬高及原因分析. 水利学报, 2001, (2): 29-34.]
[18] Li Jingbao, Zhang Zhaoqing, Ou Chaomin et al. Responses of water regimes in Dongting Lake area under different dispatching modes during the running period of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(9): 1251-1260. [李景保, 张照庆, 欧朝敏等. 三峡水库不同调度方式运行期洞庭湖区的水情响应. 地理学报, 2011, 66 (9): 1251-1260.]
[19] Chen Jin. Approach on drought defying operation of Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2010, 27(5): 19-23. [陈进. 三峡水库抗旱调度问题的探讨. 长江科学院院报, 2010, 27(5): 19-23.]
[20] Hu Chunhong, Zhang Zhihao. Evolution and control of estuary sandbar in Yellow River responding to variation of flow sediment condition. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(5): 511-517. [胡春宏, 张治昊. 水沙过程变异条件下黄河口拦门沙的演变响应与调控. 水利学报, 2006, 37(5): 511-517.]

三峡水库运行下洞庭湖盆冲淤过程响应与水沙调控阈值

Silting/scouring process responses of Dongting Lake basin to the operations of TGR and thresholds of water-sediment regulation

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李朝君,王世杰,白晓永,谭秋,李汇文,李琴,邓元红,杨钰杰,田诗琪,胡泽银. 全球主要河流流域碳酸盐岩风化碳汇评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1319-1332.
[2]	严鑫,孙昭华,谢翠松,夏军强. 基于经验模型的长江口南支上段压咸临界流量[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 935-947.
[3]	曹晓娟, 谢林妤, 张风宝, 杨明义, 李占斌. 沙层特性对沙盖黄土坡面产流产沙变化贡献的定量分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 962-974.
[4]	代稳, 吕殿青, 李景保, 王金凤, 赵增友. 水系连通变异下荆南三口河系水文干旱识别与特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 557-571.
[5]	朱玲玲,许全喜,鄢丽丽. 三峡水库不同类型支流河口泥沙淤积成因及趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 131-145.
[6]	薛兴华,常胜,宋鄂平. 三峡水库蓄水后荆江洲滩变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1714-1727.
[7]	潘威, 郑景云, 满志敏. 1766-2000年黄河上中游汛期径流量波动特征及其与PDO关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2053-2063.
[8]	包为民, 沈丹丹, 倪鹏, 周俊伟, 孙逸群. 滑动平均差检测法的提出及验证[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2075-2085.
[9]	杨志远, 高超, 臧淑英, 杨秀春. SWIM模型在东北黑土区流域的适用性评价——以乌裕尔河中上游流域为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 457-470.
[10]	杨云平, 张明进, 李义天, 张为, 由星莹, 朱玲玲, 王冬. 长江三峡水坝下游河道悬沙恢复和床沙补给机制[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1241-1254.
[11]	马延东, 赵景波, 罗小庆, 邵天杰, 岳大鹏, 周旗. 巴丹吉林沙漠沙山区径流与地下水补给条件[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 433-448.
[12]	刘剑宇, 张强, 陈喜, 顾西辉. 气候变化和人类活动对中国地表水文过程影响定量研究[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(11): 1875-1885.
[13]	刘晓燕, 党素珍, 刘昌明. 天桥泉域与黄河河段的补径排关系变化及其对河川径流的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 66-74.
[14]	张健, 满志敏, 宋进喜, 李同昇. 1765-2010年黄河中游5-10月面降雨序列重建与特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1101-1113.
[15]	王彦君, 吴保生, 王永强, 钟德钰. 黄河内蒙古河段非汛期和汛期冲淤量计算方法[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1137-1148.