黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征

doi:10.11821/dlxb201401004

地理学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (1): 42-53.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401004

黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征

罗娅^1,2, 杨胜天¹, 刘晓燕³, 刘昌明^4,5, 宋文龙^1,6, 董国涛⁷, 赵海根¹, 娄和震¹

1. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院, 北京100875;
2. 贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 贵阳550001;
3. 黄河水利委员会, 郑州450003;
4. 北京师范大学水科学研究院, 北京100875;
5. 中国科学院陆地水循环与地表过程重点实验室, 北京100101;
6. 中国水利水电科学研究院, 北京100044;
7. 黄河水利科学研究院, 郑州450003

收稿日期:2013-09-25 修回日期:2013-10-30 出版日期:2014-01-20 发布日期:2014-01-20
作者简介:罗娅（1979-），女，副教授。主要研究方向：土地利用与水土流失治理。E-mail：luoya2002@163.com
基金资助:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题(2012BAB02B00)；水利部公益项目(201101037)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项

Land use change in the reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River during 1998-2010

LUO Ya^1,2, YANG Shengtian¹, LIU Xiaoyan³, LIU Changming^4,5, SONG Wenlong^1,6, DONG Guotao⁷, ZHAO Haigen¹, LOU Hezhen¹

1. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;
3. Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
4. College of Water Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
5. Key Laboratory of Land Water Cycle and Surface Process, CAS, at IGSNRR, Beijing 100101, China;
6. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100044, China;
7. Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou 450003, China

Received:2013-09-25 Revised:2013-10-30 Published:2014-01-20 Online:2014-01-20
Supported by:
National Key Technologies R&D Program, No.2012BAB02B00; Public Welfare Fund of the Ministry of Water Resources of China, No.201101037; The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用土地利用变化重要性指数（C_i）、土地利用变化面积比重（D）和林草植被变化指数（I）等3 个指标，基于干湿条件、地貌类型与坡度坡向，由宏观到微观，分析黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010 年土地利用变化的主要类型、变化的剧烈程度以及林草植被变化程度，以期为评价退耕还林（还草）政策在黄河河口镇—潼关区间的实施效果提供参考。结果表明：① 1998-2010 年，土地利用变化面积占总面积的19.19%，高覆盖度草地、有林地、其它林地面积明显增加，低覆盖度草地、农用地面积明显减少，土地利用变化十分显著；② 空间上，土地利用变化主要发生在35°~38°N的区域，包括黄河以西的泾河支流马莲河流域、北洛河流域、延河流域、清涧河流域、无定河上中游区，以及黄河以东的沿黄区域；③ 土地利用变化过程中，低覆盖度草地转化为中覆盖度草地、中覆盖度草地转化为高覆盖度草地、农用地转化为其它林地、灌木林地转化为有林地是土地变化的主要类型；④ 土地利用变化呈现明显的干湿、地貌和坡度差异，但无明显的坡向差异。

关键词: 土地利用变化, 地貌, 坡向, 黄河河口镇—潼关区间, 坡度, 干湿

Abstract: In order to evaluate the effect of Grain for Green Policy in the reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River, based on dryness/wetness, geomorphic type, slope gradient and aspect, from macroscopic to microcosmic, three indicators, including (a) a land use change significance index, (b) a land use change proportion (c) a vegetation change index, are used to characterize the primary transformation types, the intensity of land use changes, and the degree of vegetation restoration in the period 1998-2010. The results show that: (1) The area of land use change accounted for 19.19% of the study area. High coverage grassland, forest, and other woodland increased significantly, while low coverage grassland, farmland decreased markedly. (2) Spatially, land use change was found primarily west of the Yellow River, between 35 and 38 degrees north latitude, including Malian River basin, Beiluo River basin, Yanhe River basin. (3) The transformation types, including low coverage grassland to moderate coverage grassland, moderate coverage grassland to high coverage grassland, farmland to other woodland, shrub to forest were the primary types resulting from land use change. (4) The effect of dryness/wetness, geomorphic type and slope gradient on land use change was significant, but that of aspect on land use change was not so clear.

Key words: slope gradient, aspect, dryness/wetness, the reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River, geomorphic type, land use change

罗娅, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 宋文龙, 董国涛, 赵海根, 娄和震. 黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 42-53.

LUO Ya, YANG Shengtian, LIU Xiaoyan, LIU Changming, SONG Wenlong, DONG Guotao, ZHAO Haigen, LOU Hezhen. Land use change in the reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River during 1998-2010[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 42-53.

参考文献

[1] Li Xiubin. A review of the international researches on land use/land cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51 (6): 553-557. [李秀彬. 全球环境变化研究的核心领域: 土地利用/覆被变化的国际研究动向. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 553-557.]
[2] GLP (Global Land Project). Global Land Project: Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No.53/IHDP Report No.19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm, 2005: 64.
[3] Cai Yunlong. A study on land use/cover change: The need for a new integrated approach. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(6): 645-652. [蔡运龙. 土地利用/土地覆被变化研究: 寻求新的综合途径. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6): 645-652.]
[4] Pei Xinfu, Gan Zhimao, Liu Xiao. A study on the problem of returning farmland to forests in Yellow River Basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2003, 17(3): 98-102. [裴新富, 甘枝茂, 刘啸. 黄河流域退耕还林有关技术问题研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2003, 17(3): 98-102.]
[5] Li Lijuan. Advances in hydrological response to land use/land cover change. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(2): 211-224. [李丽娟. 土地利用/覆被变化的水文效应研究进展. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(2): 211-224.]
[6] Du Fulin. Impacts of replacing agriculture with forestation policy on agricultural production in Zhuozi County. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2008, 22(4): 86-90. [杜富林. 黄河上中游地区实施退耕还林还草政策对农业生产的影响: 以内蒙乌兰察布市卓资县为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(4): 86-90.]
[7] Li Gun, Liang Wei, Yang Qinke. Analysis of land use pattern change in coarse sandy region of middle reaches of Yellow River. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(3): 52-58. [李滚, 梁伟, 杨勤科. 黄河中游多沙粗沙区土地利用格局变化分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(3): 52-58.]
[8] Zhang Xiaoping, Zhang Lu, Wang Yong et al. Tempo-spatially responses of the annual streamflow to LUCC in the middle reaches of Yellow River, China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(1): 19-26. [张晓萍, 张橹, 王勇等. 黄河中游地区年径流对土地利用变化时空响应分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(1): 19-26.]
[9] Thomas R Loveland, William Acevedo. Land cover change in the eastern United States. http://landcovertrends.usgs.gov/ east/regionalSummary.html.2006.
[10] Yang Shengtian, Zhu Qijiang. Affect of man-computer interactive interpretation method in soil erosion survey of large scale by remote sensing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(3): 88-91. [杨胜天, 朱启疆. 人机交互式解译在大尺度土壤侵蚀遥感调查中的作用. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(3): 88-91.]
[11] Hu Ningke, Li Xin. A review of research methods of historical land use change. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27 (7): 758-768. [胡宁科, 李新. 历史时期土地利用变化研究方法综述.地球科学进展, 2012, 27(7): 758-768.]
[12] Yang Jianping, Ding Yongjian, Chen Rensheng. The interdecadal fluctuation of dry and wet climate boundaries in china in recent 50 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(6): 655-661. [杨建平, 丁永建, 陈仁生等. 近50 年来中国干湿气候界线的10 年际波动. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6): 655-661.]
[13] Mao Fei, Sun Han, Yang Honglong. Research progress in dry/wet climate zoning. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(1): 17-26. [毛飞, 孙涵, 杨红龙. 干湿气候区划研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(1): 17-26.]
[14] Yang Qinke. Type division on land resource in Loess Plateau and Qinba mountainous area. Journal of Northwest Agricultural University, 1995(Suppl.): 19-22. [杨勤科. 黄土高原和秦巴山地的土地资源类型区划分. 西北农学院学报, 1995(增刊): 19-22.]
[15] Brown Iain, Poggio Laura, Gimona Alessandro et al. Climate change, drought risk and land capability for agriculture: implications for land use in Scotland. Regional Environmental Change, 2011, 11(3): 503-518.
[16] Brierley G, Stankoviansky M. Geomorphic responses to land use change. Catena, 2003, 51(4): 173-179.
[17] Quan Bin, Römkens M J M, Li Rui et al. Effect of land use and land cover change on soil erosion and the spatio-temporal variation in Liupan Mountain Region, southern Ningxia, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(4): 564-572.
[18] Lo Papa Giuseppe, Palermo Vanessa, Dazzi Carmelo. Is land-use change a cause of loss of pedodiversity? The case of the Mazzarrone study area, Sicily. Geomorphology, 2011, 135(3/4): SI: 332-342.
[19] Guo Biyun, Wang Guangqian, Fu Xudong et al.. Spatial structure and fractal model of land use in Qingjian river basin of middle Yellow River. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(14):223-228. [郭碧云, 王光谦, 傅旭东等. 黄河中游清涧河流域土地利用空间结构和分形模型. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(14): 223-228.]

黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998-2010年土地利用变化特征

Land use change in the reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River during 1998-2010

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张永强, 孔冬冬, 张选泽, 田静, 李聪聪. 2003—2017年植被变化对全球陆面蒸散发的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 584-594.
[2]	熊礼阳, 汤国安, 杨昕, 李发源. 面向地貌学本源的数字地形分析研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 595-611.
[3]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[4]	董治宝, 吕萍. 70年来中国风沙地貌学的发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 509-528.
[5]	孙毅中, 杨静, 宋书颖, 朱杰, 戴俊杰. 多层次矢量元胞自动机建模及土地利用变化模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2164-2179.
[6]	徐勇, 赵燊, 樊杰. 中国城市规划建设用地标准及气候和地形地貌修订[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 194-208.
[7]	华凯,程和琴,郑树伟. 长江口横沙通道近岸冲刷地貌形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1363-1373.
[8]	程维明,周成虎,李炳元,申元村. 中国地貌区划理论与分区体系研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 839-856.
[9]	马丹阳, 尹云鹤, 吴绍洪, 郑度. 中国干湿格局对未来高排放情景下气候变化响应的敏感性[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 857-874.
[10]	程维明,高晓雨,马廷,徐新良,陈印军,周成虎. 基于地貌分区的1990-2015年中国耕地时空特征变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1613-1629.
[11]	薛兴华,常胜,宋鄂平. 三峡水库蓄水后荆江洲滩变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1714-1727.
[12]	刘纪远,宁佳,匡文慧,徐新良,张树文,颜长珍,李仁东,吴世新,胡云锋,杜国明,迟文峰,潘涛,宁静. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
[13]	李玉辉,丁智强,吴晓月. 基于Strahler面积—高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 973-985.
[14]	刘博一, 王随继. 黄河玛曲砾质网状河段河间湿地形态特征及发育程度[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1195-1206.
[15]	程维明, 周成虎, 申元村, 刘樯漪. 中国近40年来地貌学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 755-775.