中国能源消费碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量

doi:10.11821/dlxb201310011

地理学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (10): 1418-1431.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201310011

中国能源消费碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量

程叶青¹, 王哲野^1,2, 张守志³, 叶信岳⁴, 姜会明⁵

1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 长春 130102;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 延边大学地理系, 延吉 133002;
4. Department of Geography, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242;
5. 吉林农业大学管理学院, 长春 130018

收稿日期:2013-01-18 修回日期:2013-06-05 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-20
作者简介:程叶青(1976-), 男, 湖南武冈人, 博士, 副研究员, 中国地理学会会员(S110006162M), 从事经济地理与乡村发展研究。E-mail: yqcheng@neigae.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZD-EW-06, KSZD-EW-Z-021);国家自然科学基金项目(41201159);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(13JJD790008)

Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emission intensity and its driving factors from energy consumption in China

CHENG Yeqing¹, WANG Zheye^1,2, ZHANG Shouzhi³, YE Xinyue⁴, JIANG Huiming⁵

1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Department of geography, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, Jilin, China;
4. Department of Geography, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 44242, USA;
5. College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China

Received:2013-01-18 Revised:2013-06-05 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-20
Contact: 姜会明(1963-), 男, 吉林公主岭人, 博士, 教授, 主要从事区域经济与农村发展研究。E-mail: Jhm573@163.com
Supported by:
Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZZD-EW-06-03; No.KSZD-EW-Z-021-03; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41071108; Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education, No. 13JJD790008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碳排放所引起的全球气候变化对人类经济社会发展带来了严峻的挑战。中国政府承诺到2020 年GDP碳排放强度较2005 年降低40%~45%,这一目标的实现有赖于全国层面社会经济和产业结构的实质性转型,更有赖于省区层面节能减排的具体行动。基于联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC) 提供的方法,本文估算了全国30 个省区1997-2010 年碳排放强度,采用空间自相关分析方法和空间面板计量模型,探讨了中国省级尺度碳排放强度的时空格局特征及其主要影响因素,旨在为政府制定差异化节能减排的政策和发展低碳经济提供科学依据。研究结果表明:① 1997-2010 年,中国能能源消费CO₂排放总量从4.16 Gt 增加到11.29Gt,年均增长率为7.15%,而同期GDP年均增长率达11.72%,碳排放强度总体上呈逐年下降的态势;② 1997-2010 年,碳排放强度的Moran's I 指数呈波动型增长,说明中国能源消费碳排放强度在省区尺度上具有明显的空间集聚特征,且集聚程度有不断增强的态势,同时,碳排放强度高值集聚区和低值集聚区表现出一定程度的路径依赖或空间锁定;③ 空间面板计量模型分析结果表明,能源强度、能源结构、产业结构和城市化率对中国能源消费碳排放强度时空格局演变具有重要影响;④ 提高能源利用效率,优化能源结构和产业结构,走低碳城市化道路,以及实行节能减排省区联动策略是推动中国实现节能减排目标的重要途径。

关键词: 中国, 碳排放强度, 空间自相关, 空间面板计量模型

Abstract: The economic and social development has been facing with serious challenge brought by global climate change due to carbon emissions. As a responsible developing country, China pledged to reduce its carbon emission intensity by 40%-45% below 2005 levels by 2020. The realization of this target depends on not only the substantive transition of society, economy and industrial structure in national scale, but also the specific action and share of energy saving and emissions reduction in provincial scale. Based on the method provided by the IPCC, this paper examines the spatio-temporal dynamic patterns and domain factors of China's carbon emission intensity from energy consumption in 1997-2010 using spatial autocorrelation analysis and spatial panel econometric model. The aim is to provide scientific basis for making different policies on energy conservation and carbon emission reduction in China. The results are shown as follows. Firstly, China's carbon emissions increased from 4.16 Gt to 11.29 Gt in 1997-2010, with an annual rate of 7.15%, which was much slower than that of annual growth rate of GDP (11.72%); therefore, China's carbon emission intensity tended to decline. Secondly, the changing curve of Moran's I indicated that China's carbon emission intensity from energy consumption has a continued strengthening tendency of spatial agglomeration at provincial scale. The provinces with higher and lower values appeared to be path-dependent or space-locked to some extent. Third, according to the analysis of spatial panel econometric model, it can be found that energy intensity, energy structure, industrial structure and urbanization rate were the domain factors that have impact on the spatio-temporal patterns of China's carbon emission intensity from energy consumption. Therefore, in order to realize the targets of energy conservation and emission reduction, we should improve the utilizing efficiency of energy, and optimize energy and industrial structure, and choose the low-carbon urbanization way and implement regional cooperation strategy of energy conservation and emissions reduction.

Key words: spatial autocorrelation, spatial panel econometric model, carbon emission intensity, China

程叶青, 王哲野, 张守志, 叶信岳, 姜会明. 中国能源消费碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(10): 1418-1431.

CHENG Yeqing, WANG Zheye, ZHANG Shouzhi, YE Xinyue, JIANG Huiming. Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emission intensity and its driving factors from energy consumption in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(10): 1418-1431.

参考文献

[1] Liu Yanhua, Ge Quansheng, He Fanneng et al. Countermeasures against international pressure of reducing co2 emissions and analysis on China's potential of CO₂ emission reduction. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(7): 675-682. [刘燕华, 葛全胜, 何凡能等. 应对国际CO₂减排压力的途径及我国减排潜力分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(7): 675-682.]
[2] Greening L A, Davis W B, Schipper L. Decomposition of aggregate carbon emission intensity for the manufacturing sector: Comparison of declining trends from 100 ECD countries for the period 1971-1991. Energy Economics, 1998, 20 (1): 43-65.
[3] Greening L A, Ting M, Krackler T J. Effects of changes in residential end-use and behavior on aggregate carbon emission intensity: Comparison of 100 ECD countries for the period 1970 through 1993. Energy Economics, 2001, 23 (2): 153-178.
[4] Greening L A, Ting M, Davis W B. Decomposition of aggregate carbon emission intensity for freight: Trends from 100 ECD countries for the period 1971-1993. Energy Economics, 1999, 21(4): 331-361.
[5] Greening L A. Effects of human behavior on aggregate carbon emission intensity of personal transportation: comparison of 100 ECD counties for the period 1970-1993. Energy Economics, 2004, 26(1): 1-30.
[6] Schipper L, Murtishaw S, Khrushch M et al. Carbon emissions from manufacturing energy use in 13 IEA countries: Long-term trends through 1995. Energy Policy, 2001, 29(9): 667-688.
[7] Obas J E, Anthony J I. Decomposition analysis of CO₂ emission intensity between oil-producing and non-oil-producing sub-Saharan African countries. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 3599-3611.
[8] Bhattacharyya S C, Matsumura W. Changes in the GHG emission intensity in EU-15: Lessons from a decomposition analysis. Energy, 2010, 35(8): 3315-3322.
[9] Simone G, Petra K, Julia K et al. Long-term changes in co2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia: Identifying the drivers of environmental pressures. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2): 535-543.
[10] Nag B, Parikh J. Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commercial energy use in India. Energy Economics, 2000, 22(4): 441-461.
[11] Ang B W, Liu N. A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(15): 2398-2404.
[12] Davis W B, Stanstad A H, Koomey J G. Contribution of weather and fuel mix to recent declines in US energy and carbon emission intensity. Energy Economics, 2003, 25(5): 375-396.
[13] David A T, Dean N, Sujit D. Reducing GHG emissions in the United States' transportation sector. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 15(2): 117-136.
[14] Simone P S, Sergio P, Márcio T A et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(11): 2552-2561.
[15] Stern D I, Jotzo F. How ambitious are China and India's emissions intensity targets? Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6776 -6783.
[16] Yue Chao, Hu Xueyang, He Canfei et al. Provincial carbon emissions and carbon intensity in China from 1995 to 2007: Carbon emissions and social development (Ⅲ). Acta scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2010, 46 (4): 510-516. [岳超, 胡雪洋, 贺灿飞等. 1995-2007 年我国省区碳排放及碳强度的分析: 碳排放与社会发展(Ⅲ). 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 46(4): 510-516.]
[17] Tan Dan, Huang Xianjin. Correlation analysis and comparison of the economic development and carbon emissions in the eastern, central and western part of China. China Population Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(3): 54-57. [谭丹, 黄贤金. 我国东、中、西部地区经济发展与碳排放的关联分析及比较. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(3): 54-57.]
[18] Sather C, Qu J S, Wang Q et al. Carbon inequality at the sub-national scale: A case study of provincial-level inequality in co2 emissions in China 1997-2007. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(9): 5420-5428.
[19] Yang Qian, Liu Huajun. Regional difference and convergence of carbon intensity distribution in China: Based on an empirical study of provincial data 1995-2009. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2012, (2): 87-98. [杨骞, 刘华军.中国碳强度分布的地区差异与收敛性: 基于1995-2009 年省际数据的实证研究. 当代财经, 2012, (2): 87-98.]
[20] Zhao Yuntai, Huang Xianjin, Zhong Taiyang et al. Spatial pattern evolution of carbon emission intensity from energy consumption in China. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(11): 3145-3152. [赵雲泰, 黄贤金, 钟太洋等. 1997-2007 中国能源消费碳排放强度空间演变特征. 环境科学, 2011, 32(11): 3145-3152.]
[21] Wei Weixian, Yang Fang. Impact of technology advance on carbon dioxide emission in China. Statistical Research, 2010, 27(7): 36-44. [魏巍贤, 杨芳. 技术进步对中国二氧化碳排放的影响. 统计研究, 2010, 27(7): 36-44.]
[22] Li Liping, Ren Yong, Tian Chunxiu. Analysis of carbon emissions under the responsibility of the international trade perspective. Environmental Protection, 2008, (3): 62-64. [李丽平, 任勇, 田春秀. 国际贸易视角下的中国碳排放责任分析. 环境保护, 2008, (3): 62-64.]
[23] Yao Yi, Ni Qin. The impact of foreign direct investment on carbon intensity: Empirical study based on Chinese provincial dynamic panel data model. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(9): 1433-1437. [姚奕, 倪勤. 中国地区碳强度与 FDI的空间计量分析: 基于空间面板模型的实证. 经济地理, 2011, 31(9): 1433-1437.]
[24] Du Limin. Impact factors of China's CO₂ emissions: Provincial panel data analysis. South China Journal of Economics, 2010, (11): 20-33. [杜立民. 我国二氧化碳排放的影响因素:基于省际面板数据的研究. 南方经济, 2010, (11): 20-33.]
[25] Yang Qian, Liu Huajun. Regional difference decomposition and influence factors of China's CO₂ emission. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2012, (5): 36-49. [杨骞, 刘华军. 中国二氧化碳排放的区域差异分解及影响因素: 基于1995-2009 年省际面板数据的研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, (5): 36-49.]
[26] Anselin L. Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Papers in Regional Science, 2010, 89(1): 3-25.
[27] Zheng Changde, Liu Shuai. Empirical analysis of carbon emission and economic growth in China based on the spatial econometric analysis. China Population Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(5): 80-86. [郑长德, 刘帅. 基于空间计量经济学的碳排放与经济增长分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(5): 80-86.]
[28] Xu Haiping. Spatial and econometric analysis of spatial dependence, carbon emissions and per capita income. China Population Resources and Environment. 2012, 22(9): 149-157. [徐海平. 空间依赖、碳排放与人均收入的空间计量研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(9): 149-157.]
[29] Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 1970, 46(2): 234-240.
[30] Cliff A D, Ord J K. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion, 1981.
[31] Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1988.
[32] IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories//Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K et al. Japan: IGES, 2006.
[33] Rey S J. Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 2001, 33(3): 195-214.
[34] Ji Minhe, Wu Zhanyun, Jiang Lei. Issues in spatial panel data model specification. Statistics & Information Forum, 2011, 26(6): 3-8. [季民河, 武占云, 姜磊. 空间面板数据模型设定问题分析. 统计与信息论坛, 2011, 26(6): 3-8.]
[35] Elhorst J P. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 2003, 26 (3): 244-268.
[36] Lesage J, Pace R K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. New York, CRC Press, 2009.
[37] Hong Guozhi, Hu Huaying, Li Xun. Analysis of regional growth convergence with spatial econometrics in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(12): 1548-1558. [洪国志,胡华颖, 李郇. 中国区域经济发展收敛的空间计量分析. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12): 1548-1558.]
[38] Elhorst J P. Matlab. URL: http://www.regroningen.nl/elhorst/doc/Matlab-paper.pdf, 2010.
[39] He Jiang, Zhang Xinzhi. Chinese regional economic growth and convergence: Spatial panel data analysis. South China Journal of Economics, 2006, (6): 44-52. [何江, 张馨之. 中国区域经济增长及其收敛性: 空间面板数据分析. 南方经济, 2006, (6): 44-52.]
[40] Wang Junsong, He Canfei. Technological development, structural change and Chinese energy consumption efficiency. China Population Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(2): 157-161. [王俊松, 贺灿飞. 技术进步、结构变动与中国能源利用效率. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009,19(2): 157-161.]
[41] Burridge P. Testing for a common factor in a spatial autoregression model. Environment and Planning A, 1981, 13(7): 795-800.

中国能源消费碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量

Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emission intensity and its driving factors from energy consumption in China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	葛全胜, 方创琳, 江东. 美丽中国建设的地理学使命与人地系统耦合路径[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1109-1119.
[15]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.