Ecosystem Services and Environmental Health
WANG Shihao, HUANG Lin, XU Xinliang, LI Jiahui
The rapid urbanization of China's urban agglomerations in recent decades has resulted in over-occupied ecological space and increased ecological pressure, which has become an important factor restricting regional healthy development. This paper examines the structure and distribution characteristics of "production-living-ecological" spaces of five mega-urban agglomerations in China, namely, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), Chengdu-Chongqing (CY), and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (MYR), and analyzes the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of ecological space and the influencing factors of its changes in 1990-2020. Then it explores the comprehensive ecological carrying capacity of water resource supply, water quality regulation, air quality regulation, and leisure and recreation space. The results show that: (1) Urban agglomerations at different developmental stages present different area ratios of the "production-living-ecological" spaces, living space expansion patterns dominated by multi-center combination, and structure of ecological space including barrier type, compact, discrete, and full enveloping type. (2) In the study period, the area of living space in urban agglomerations increased significantly while the area of production space decreased. The ecological space of all the urban agglomerations except the GBA increased. In the last 10 years, the increase of ecological space accelerated significantly. The spatial structure of "production-living-ecological" spaces and its characteristics of spatial and temporal evolution indicate that the main functions of production and ecological space in mega-urban agglomerations have shifted from supply to regulation and culture, and reflect the transition from rapid urbanization to new sustainable urbanization in China. (3) The ecologically overloaded cities in the BTH, YRD, GBA, CY, and MYR account for 78.6%, 73.1%, 54.5%, 56.3%, and 25.8% of the respective urban agglomeration. Water supply and water quality regulation are the main factors that restrict the ecological carrying capacity of BTH and YRD, while leisure and recreation services restrict the ecological carrying status of the GBA and CY urban agglomerations. In the future, we need to pay attention to the conservation and rational layout of ecological space to reduce the ecological pressure in urban agglomerations.