Relocation Mechanisms of the Ceramics Industry Impacted by the Environmental Regulations in Foshan City

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
    2. School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Received date: 2011-06-27

  Revised date: 2012-02-08

  Online published: 2012-04-20

Supported by

National Natural ScienceFoundation of China, No.40901066; No.41130747; MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanitiesand Social Sciences, No,10YJC790271; Project of Young Innovation Excellent Talents in Guangdong Province;The Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities

Abstract

Recent studies show that environmental regulations play a crucial role in the decision making of firm location. The methods in these empirical studies, however, are mainly quantitative models based on statistical data, and the way the environmental regulations work in the location decision are debatable. In this article, we analyze the relocation decision of the ceramic industry in Foshan City against the context of intensive environmental regulations through semi-structured interviews. The 'push-pull' model in the firm migration research is used to explore the way the environmental regulation works on to push firms from the old location and pulling them to the new sites. The conclusion is that the influences of the environmental regulation on the firm location decision cannot be ignored, and the effects of the environmental regulations depend on the social and economic conditions of the old and new sites. It is an interconnected process when the firms relocate from the old location to the new one that is heavily shaped by environmental regulations. The change of environmental regulation in the old place will not only affect the behaviors of the firms when relocated, but also the arrangement of environmental regulation in the new place. Besides the cost of pollution abatement, a possible interpretation of the effects of the environmental regulation upon the location decision is the behavior of the local governments and the firms. If the environmental regulation is lax, the pollution abatement cost is important for the firm to choose a new place, otherwise the sunk cost will be considered for risk prevention. It is confirmed that environmental regulation has become an important policy for local governments in China to promote the development of local industries under recent economic decentralization. Nevertheless, in this case study, the 'Pollution Havens' hypothesis is not yet confirmed

Cite this article

SHEN Jing, WEI Cheng . Relocation Mechanisms of the Ceramics Industry Impacted by the Environmental Regulations in Foshan City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012 , 67(4) : 467 -478 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201204004

References

[1] David C K. Wang Daoyong trans. When Corporations Rule the World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers,2001. [戴维·C·科顿. 王道勇译. 当公司统治世界. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2006.]
[2] Walter I, Ugelow J L. Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 1979, 8(2/3): 102-109.
[3] Liu Li. The Bi-transfer strategy on the regional industrial structure system: The evidence of Guangdong. Reform, 2009,(8): 62-67. [刘力. 区域产业结构协同的“双转移”战略: 广东省证据. 改革, 2009, (8): 62-67.]
[4] Birdsall N, Wheeler D. Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journalof Environment and Development, 1992, 2(1): 137-149.
[5] Copeland B R, Taylor M S. North-South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109:755-787.
[6] Copeland B R, Taylor M S. Trade, growth and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 2: 7-71.
[7] List J A, Milliment D L. Fredriksson P et al. Effect of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births:evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2003, 85: 944-952.
[8] Greenstone M. The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 CleanAir Act amendments and Census of Manufactures. Journal of Political Economy, 2002, 110(6): 1175-1219.
[9] Eskeland G S, Harrison A E. Moving to greener pastures? Multinational and the Pollution Haven hypothesis. Journal ofDevelopment Economics, 2003, 70: 1-23.
[10] Rowland C K, Feiock R. Environmental regulation and economic development: The movement of chemical productionamong states//Dubnick M J, Gitelson A R. Public Policy and Economic Institutions. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991. [11] Grether J M, Melo J D. Globalization and dirty industries: Do Pollution Havens matter? NBER Working Paper SeriesNo.9776, June, 2003.
[12] Regibeau P M, Gallegos A. Managed trade, liberalization and local pollution. Advances in Economic Analysis andPolicy, 2004, 4(2): 1331.
[13] Wu X. Pollution havens and the regulation of multinational with asymmetric information. Contributions to EconomicAnalysis and Policy, 2004, 3(2): 1-25.
[14] Jaff A B, Peterson S R, Portney P R. Environmental regulation and competitiveness of US manufacturing: What doesthe evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 1995, 33: 132-163.
[15] Dean J M. International Trade and Environment. UK: Ashgate Publisher, 2001.
[16] Xing Y Q, Kolstad C D. Do Lax Environmental Regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental and ResourceEconomics, 2002, 21: 1-22.
[17] Wagner U J, Timmins C D. Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the Pollution Haven hypothesis.Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 43: 231-256.
[18] Cole M A, Elliott R J R. FDI and the capital intensity of 'Dirty' sectors: A missing piece of the Pollution Havenpuzzle. Review of Development Economics, 2005, 9(4): 530-548.
[19] Keller W, Levinson A. Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to U.S. states. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 2002, 84: 691-703.
[20] Smarzynska B K, Wei S J. Pollution Havens and foreign direct investment: Dirty secret or popular myth//Fullerton D.The Economics of Pollution Havens. Elgar Publishers, 2006.
[21] Brunnermeier S, Lenvinson A. Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry location. TheJournal of Environment Development, 2004, 13(1): 6-41.
[22] Levinson A. Environmental regulations and manufacturers' location choices: Evidence from the census ofmanufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 1996, 62: 5-29.
[23] Ederington J, Levinson A, Minier J. Footloose and pollution-free. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 87:92-99.
[24] Jeppesen T, Folmer H. The confusing relationship between environmental policy and location behavior of firms: Amethodological review of selected case studies. The Annals of Regional Science, 2001, 35: 523-546.
[25] Quiroga M, Sterner T, Persson M. Have countries with Lax Environmental Regulations a comparative advantage inpolluting industries//RFF DP 07-08, Discussion Papers, Resources for the Future, 2007.
[26] Brander J, Spencer B. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics,1985, 18: 83-100.
[27] Greaker M. Strategic environmental policy when the governments are threatened by relocation. Resource and EnergyEconomics, 2003, 25: 141-154.
[28] Ma Li, Liu Weidong, Liu Yi. The mechanism analysis of FDI impact on regional resource and environment. ChinaSoft Science, 2003, (10): 129-132. [马丽, 刘卫东, 刘毅. 外商投资对地区资源环境影响的机制分析. 中国软科学,2003, (10): 129-132.]
[29] Janeba E. Tax competition in imperfectly competitive markets. Journal of International Economics, 1998, 44: 135-153.
[30] Markusen J R, Morey E R, Olewiler N. Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations areendogenous. Journal of Public Economics, 1995, 56: 55-77.
[31] Hoel M. Environmental policy with endogenous plant locations. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1997, 99:241-259.
[32] Tole L, Koop G. Do environmental regulations affect the location decisions of multinational gold mining firms?Journal of Economic Geography, 2010, 11: 151-177.
[33] Dean J M, Lovely M E, Wang H. Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating theevidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 2009, 90(1): 1-13.
[34] Dam L, Scholtens B. Environmental regulation and MNEs location: Do CSR matter? Ecological Economics, 2008, 67:55-65.
[35] He Jie. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrialemission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60: 228-245.
[36] Liu Jianmin, Chen Guo. An empirical analysis on impact of environmental regulations upon distribution of FDI. ChinaSoft Science, 2008, (1): 102-107, 124. [刘建民, 陈果. 环境管制对FDI 区位分布影响的实证分析. 中国软科学, 2008,(1): 102-107, 124.]
[37] Xia Youfu. The current situation, consequence and measurement of pollution intensive industries invested byforeigners. Management World, 1999, (3): 109-123. [夏友富. 外商投资中国污染密集产业现状、后果及其对策研究.管理世界, 1999, (3): 109-123.]
[38] Geng Qiang, Sun Chenghao, Fu Tan. The empirical analysis of FDI's choice of district under different environmentsupervision. South China Journal of Economy, 2010, (6): 39-50. [耿强, 孙成浩, 傅坦. 环境管制程度对FDI 区位选择影响的实证分析. 南方经济, 2010, (6): 39-50.]
[39] Chen Gang. FDI competition, environmental regulation and Pollution Heaven: Considering for Chinesedecentralization. World Economy Study, 2009, (6): 3-7, 43. [陈刚. FDI 竞争、环境规制与污染避难所: 对中国式分权的反思. 世界经济研究, 2009, (6): 3-7, 43.]
[40] Xiao Hong. The cross-border relocation of pollution intensive firms under environmental regulation and thegovernance [D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2008. [肖宏. 环境规则约束下的污染密集型企业越界迁移和治理[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2008.]
[41] Li Songzhi. Study on space-time succession mechanism of ceramic industry transfer based on the cluster theory.Human Geography, 2009, 24(1): 58-62. [李松志. 基于集群理论的佛山禅城陶瓷产业转移时空演替机理研究. 人文地理, 2009, 24(1): 58-62.]
[44] Porter M E, Linder C V D. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal ofEconomic Perspective, 1995, 9(4): 97-118.
Outlines

/