The Research Trends of Ecosystem Services and the Paradigm in Geography

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University;Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. The Key Laboratory for Environmental and Urban Sciences, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2011-04-15

  Revised date: 2011-09-20

  Online published: 2011-12-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41130534;No.40971052

Abstract

As studies on ecosystem services are becoming a hot spot among scientists, a research paradigm needs to be built in related discipline fields such as geography. This paper reviewed the progress, problems and trends of studies on ecosystem services at home and abroad. Furthermore, aiming at the topics and problems in current ecosystem service studies, we proposed a geographical paradigm and priority themes in this field. It is suggested that spatial heterogeneity and regional difference should be taken as entry points to study ecosystem services from geographical perspectives. Researches should be focused on the theme of ecosystem structure and function-ecosystem services-human well-being, and take the coupling connections between "ecosystem services offered by natural system and then internalized consumption of socioeconomic system" as the core research theme for comprehensive analysis of the response of socioeconomic system to the internalization of natural capital. We can promote integrated research on geographical sciences by constructing the geographical study paradigm of ecosystem service, which can not only expand the study capacity for ecosystem services, but also raise the level of comprehensive studies on social-ecological system. In addition, we should offer an important practical field for the study of human-land relationship, which is the core issue of geography.

Cite this article

LI Shuangcheng, LIU Jinlong, ZHANG Caiyu, ZHAO Zhiqiang . The Research Trends of Ecosystem Services and the Paradigm in Geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011 , 66(12) : 1618 -1630 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201112004

References

[1] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997.

[2] Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China.Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 4(6): 571-576. [傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞等. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全. 地球科学进展, 2009, 4(6): 571-576.]

[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington,DC: Island Press, 2003.

[4] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277(5325):494-499.

[5] Li Wenhua et al. Theories, Methods and Applications of Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Beijing: China RenminUniversity Press, 2008. [李文华等. 生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2008.]

[6] Li Wenhua, Zhang Biao, Xie Gaodi. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal ofNatural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 1-10. [李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望. 自然资源学报,2009, 24(1): 1-10.]

[7] Sutherland W J, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth P R et al. The identification of 100 ecological questions of highpolicy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 43: 617-627.

[8] Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP). Man's Impact on the Global Environment. Cambridge,Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1970.

[9] Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: RandomHouse, 1981.

[10] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997,387: 253-260.

[11] Wallace K J. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139:235-246.

[12] Fisher B, Turner R K. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141: 1167-1169.

[13] Costanza R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141:350-352.

[14] Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. EcologicalEconomics, 2009, 68: 643-653.

[15] Heal G, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R et al. Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. StanfordEnvironmental Law Journal, 2001, 20: 333-364.

[16] Pereira H M, Reyers B, Watanabe M et al. Condition and trends of ecosystem services and biodiversity//Capistrano D,Samper C, Lee M J et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Multiscale Assessments. Vol.4. Findings of theSub-global Assessments Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press,2005: 171-203.

[17] Farber S C, Costanza R, Wilson M A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. EcologicalEconomics, 2002, 41: 375-392.

[18] van Jaarsveld, A S, Biggs R, Scholes R J et al. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiplescales: The Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005, 360(1454): 425-441.

[19] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. EcologyLetters, 2009, 12(12): 1394-1404.

[20] de Bello F, Lavorel S, Diaz S et al. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services viafunctional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19(10): 2873-2893.

[21] Raudsepp-Hearnea C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverselandscapes. PNAS, 2010, 107(11): 5242-5247.

[22] RodrÍguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology andSociety, 2006, 11(1): 28.

[23] Swallow B M, Sang J K., Nyabenge M et al. Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the LakeVictoria basin of East Africa. Environmental Science & Policy 2009, 12: 504-519.

[24] Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrne K. Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services.Ecological Applications, 2007, 17(5): 1267-1278.

[25] Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystemfunctioning and services. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9: 1146-1156.

[26] Hector A, Bagchi R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature, 2007, 448: 88-191.

[27] Worm B, Barbier E B, Beaumont N et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 2006, 314(787): 787-790.

[28] DÍaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessment.PNAS, 2007, 104(52): 20684-20689.

[29] Mertz O, Ravnborg H M, Lövei G L et al. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. BiodiversityConservation, 2007, 16(10): 2729-2737.

[30] Anderson, Barbara J et al. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. Journal ofApplied Ecology, 2009, 46(4): 888-896.

[31] Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters, 2005, 8:468-479.

[32] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary forDecision-makers. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.

[33] Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Zurlini G. Multi-scale vulnerability of natural capital in a panarchy of social-ecologicallandscapes. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3): 359-367.

[34] Gabriel D, Sait S M, Hodgson J A et al. Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at differentspatial scales. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13(7): 858-869.

[35] Cowling R M, Egoh B, Knight A T. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(28): 9483-9488.

[36] Haines-Young R. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26: S178-S186.

[37] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.

[38] Bohensky E, Reyers B, van Jaarsveld A S. Future ecosystem services in a southern African river basin: Reflections ona scenario planning experience. Conservation Biology, 2006, 20 (4): 1051-1061.

[39] Viglizzo F, Frank F C. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystemservice provision. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57: 140-151.

[40] Flynn D F B, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T et al. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification acrossmultiple taxa. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 22-33.

[41] Turner II B L, Matson P A, McCarthy J J et al. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerabilityanalysis: Three case studies. PNAS, 2003, 100(14): 8080-8085.

[42] Priess J A, Mimler M, Klein A et al. Linking deforestation scenarios to pollination services and economic returns incoffee agroforestry systems. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17(2): 407-417.

[43] O'Farrell P J, Donaldson J S, Hoffman M T. The influence of ecosystem goods and services on livestock managementpractices on the Bokkeveld plateau, South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 2007, 122: 312-324.

[44] Yadav V, Malanson G. Spatially explicit historical land use land cover and soil organic carbon transformations inSouthern Illinois. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2008, 123: 280-292.

[45] Beier C M, Patterson T M, Chapin Ⅲ F S. Ecosystem services and emergent vulnerability in managed ecosystems: Ageospatial decision-support tool. Ecosystems, 2008, 11(6): 923-938.

[46] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodityproduction, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 4-11.

[47] Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. PNAS,2008, 105(28): 9495-9500.

[48] Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa.Biological Conservation, 2009, 142(3): 553-562.

[49] Burkhard B, Kroll F. Maps of ecosystem services, supply and demand//Cutler J Cleveland. Encyclopedia of Earth.Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, 2010.

[50] Tallis H, Polasky S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resourcemanagement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009, 1162(1): 265-283.

[51] Carpenter S R Mooney H A, Agard J et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the MillenniumEcosystem Assessment. PNAS, 2009, 106(5): 1305-1312.

[52] Bryan B A, Grandgirard A, Ward J R. Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing naturalcapital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems, 2010, 13(4): 539-555.

[53] Chapin Ⅲ F S, Carpenter S R, Kofinas G P et al. Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidlychanging planet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2009, 25: 241-249.

[54] Mäler K G, Aniyar S, Jansson Å. Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements forsustainable development. PNAS, 2008, 105(28): 9501-9506.

[55] Comim F, Kumar P, Sirven N. Poverty and environment links: An illustration from Africa. Journal of InternationalDevelopment, 2009, 21(3): 447-469.

[56] Tschakert P. Environmental services and poverty reduction: Options for smallholders in the Sahel. Agricultural Systems, 2007, 94(1): 75-86.

[57] Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miaohong. A primary study on chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and theirecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607-613. [欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607- 613.]

[58] Chen Zhongxin, Zhang Xinshi. The value of the eco-system benefits of China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(1):17-22. [陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 17-22.]

[59] Jiang Yanling, Zhou Guangsheng. Estimation of ecosystem services of major forest in China. Acta PhytoecologicaSinica, 1999, 23(5): 426-432. [蒋延玲, 周广胜. 中国主要森林生态系统公益的评估. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(5):426-432.]

[60] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal ofNatural Resources, 2004, 19(4): 480-491. [赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.]

[61] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of NaturalResources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. [谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003,18(2): 189-196.]

[62] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Jia Liangqing et al. Ecosystem services and their valuation of China Grassland. ActaEcologica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 1101-1110. [赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价. 生态学报, 2004, 24(6): 1101-1110.]

[63] Sun Xinzhang, Zhou Hailin, Xie Gaodi. Ecological services and their values of Chinese agroecosystem. ChinaPopulation, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(4): 55-60. [孙新章, 周海林, 谢高地. 中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(4): 55-60.]

[64] Ouyang Zhiyun, Zhao Tongqian, Wang Xiaoke et al. Ecosystem services analysis and valuation of China terrestrialsurface water system. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(10): 2092-2099. [欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 王效科等. 水生态服务功能分析及其间接价值评价. 生态学报, 2004, 24(10): 2092-2099.]

[65] Wang Qixiang, Tang Xuexi. Production and realization of marine ecosystem service. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5): 2400-2406. [王其翔,唐学玺. 海洋生态系统服务的产生与实现. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5): 2400-2406.]

[66] Min Qingwen, Liu Shoudong, Yang Xia. Evaluation of the ecosystem services of the Inner Mongolia steppe. ActaAgrestia Sinica, 2004, 12(3): 165-175. [闵庆文, 刘寿东, 杨霞. 内蒙古典型草原生态系统服务功能价值评估研究. 草地学报, 2004, 12(3): 165-175.]

[67] Zhang Mingyang, Wang Kelin, Chen Hongsong et al. Quantified evaluation and analysis of ecosystem services in karstareas based on remote sensing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 5891-5901. [张明阳, 王克林, 陈洪松等. 喀斯特生态系统服务功能遥感定量评估与分析. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 5891-5901.]

[68] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, Wang Jian et al. Value of the ecosystem services in the Heihe River Basin. Journal ofGlaciology and Geocryology, 2001, 23(4): 360-366. [张志强, 徐中民, 王建等. 黑河流域生态系统服务的价值. 冰川冻土, 2001, 23(4): 360-366.]

[69] Chen Guojie, He Jinfeng, Tu Jianjun. A study on the regional disparity of ecological service functions at the upperYangtze River Basin. Journal of Mountain Science, 2005, 23(4): 406-412. [陈国阶, 何锦峰, 涂建军. 长江上游生态服务功能区域差异研究. 山地学报, 2005, 23(4): 406-412.]

[70] Wang Chunlian, Zhang Yili, Wang Zhaofeng et al. Changes of wetland ecosystem service value in the Lhasa RiverBasin of Tibetan Plateau. Resources Science, 2010, 32(10): 2038-2044. [王春连, 张镱锂, 王兆锋等. 拉萨河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值变化. 资源科学, 2010, 32(10): 2038-2044.]

[71] Yang Zhaohui, Wang Hao, Chu Junying et al. Ecosystem service valuation and spatial characteristics of Haihe Basin.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(9): 1121-1127. [杨朝晖, 王浩, 褚俊英等. 海河流域生态系统价值评估与空间特征. 水利学报, 2010, 41(9): 1121-1127.]

[72] Zhao Jingzhu, Xiao Han, Wu Gang. Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystemsservices. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 11(2): 290-292. [赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚. 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(2): 290-292.]

[73] Shi Peijun, Pan Yaozhong, Chen Yunhao et al. Technical system of ecological capital integrated measurement usingmulti-scale remotely sensed data. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2002, 17(2): 169-173. [史培军, 潘耀忠, 陈云浩等. 多尺度生态资产遥感综合测量的技术体系. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 169-173.]

[74] Li Jing, Chen Yunhao, Pan Yaozhong et al. Studies on technology system of ecological property measurement basedon remote sensing technology in western China: The ecological property assessment model based on RS. RemoteSensing Information, 2003, (3): 8-11. [李京, 陈云浩, 潘耀忠等. 生态资产定量遥感测量技术体系研究: 生态资产定量遥感评估模型. 遥感信息, 2003, (3): 8-11.]

[75] Pan Yaozhong, Shi Peijun, Zhu Wenquan et al. Quantitative remote sensing on ecological assessment of Chineseterrestrial ecosystem. Science in China: Series D, 2004, 34(4): 375-384. [潘耀忠, 史培军, 朱文泉等.中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感定量测量. 中国科学: D辑, 2004, 34(4): 375-384.]

[76] Wang Ailing, Zhu Wenquan, Li Jing et al. Measurement of ecosystem service value based on remote sensing: A casestudy in Inner Mongolia, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(3): 325-330. [王爱玲, 朱文泉, 李京等. 内蒙古生态系统服务价值遥感测量. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3): 325-330.]

[77] Jiang Lipeng, Qin Zhihao, Xie Wen et al. Estimation of grassland ecosystem service value of China using remotesensing data. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(2): 161-170. [姜立鹏, 覃志豪, 谢雯等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能价值遥感估算研究. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(2): 161-170.]

[78] Jiang Yonghua, Jiang Hong. Remote sensing estimation of forest ecosystem service: A case study of Yuhang District inHangzhou. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2009, 34(6): 155-158. [姜永华, 江洪. 森林生态系统服务价值的遥感估算: 以杭州市余杭区为例. 测绘科学, 2009, 34(6): 155-158.]

[79] Feng Xiaoming, Fu Bojie, Yang Xiaojun et al. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: An opportunity for spatiallyexplicit assessment. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(6): 522-535.

[80] Wan Li, Chen Youqi, Tan Jing et al. Variation of ecosystem services value in the suburbs of Beijing based on the landuse change. Areal Research and Development, 2009, 28(4): 94-99. [万利, 陈佑启, 谭靖等. 土地利用变化对区域生态系统服务价值的影响: 以北京市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2009, 28(4): 94-99.]

[81] Ye Changsheng, Dong Yuxiang. Effects of land use change on ecosystem service value of the Pearl River Delta.Tropical Geography, 2010, 30(6): 603-608. [叶长盛, 董玉祥. 珠江三角洲土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响.热带地理, 2010, 30(6): 603-608.]

[82] Jiang Jing, Tian Guangjin. Responses of ecosystem service value to land use change in Beijing from 1988 to 2005.Resources Science, 2010, 32(7): 1407-1416. [蒋晶, 田光进. 1988 年至2005 年北京生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应. 资源科学, 2010, 32(7): 1407-1416.]

[83] Wang Jiali, Huang Xianjin, Lu Rucheng et al. Assessment on the vulnerability of ecosystem services to land usechange: A case study of carbon stock of Taihu Lake District in Jiangsu Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(4): 556-563. [王佳丽, 黄贤金, 陆汝成等. 区域生态系统服务对土地利用变化的脆弱性评估: 以江苏省环太湖地区碳储量为例. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(4): 556-563.]

[84] Li Wenhua, Li Shidong, Li Fen et al. Discussions on several issues of forest eco-compensation mechanism. ChinaPopulation, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(2): 13-18. [李文华, 李世东, 李芬等. 森林生态补偿机制若干重点问题研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(2): 13-18.]

[85] Fan Xiaoshan, Gao Jixi, Yu Yong. NSE classifying system of ecosystem service & its application model based onecosystem compensation. Ecological Economy, 2007, (4): 35-38. [范小杉, 高吉喜, 于勇. 基于生态补偿实施的NSE生态服务功能分类体系及应用模型. 生态经济, 2007, (4): 35-38.]

[86] Xu Zhongmin, Zhong Fanglei, Zhao Xueyan et al. Summary of progress of the study on ecological compensation.Research of Financial & Accounting, 2008, (23): 67-72. [徐中民, 钟方雷, 赵雪雁等. 生态补偿研究进展综述. 财会研究, 2008, (23): 67-72.]

[87] Li Xiaoguang, Miao Hong, Zheng Hua et al. Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and theirapplication. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440. [李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华等. 生态补偿标准确定的主要方法及其应用. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440.]

[88] Liu Guihuan, Wen Yihui, Zhang Huiyuan. A study on ecological compensation for the Guanting Reservoir based onecosystem services. Resources Science, 2010, 32(5): 856-863. [刘桂环, 文一惠, 张惠远. 基于生态系统服务的官厅水库流域生态补偿机制研究. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5): 856-863.]

[89] Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Rusong. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. World Sci-tech R&D, 2000, (5):45-50. [欧阳志云, 王如松. 生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展. 世界科技研究与发展, 2000, (5): 45-50.]

[90] Zong Yaoguang, Zhou Shangyi, Wen liang et al. Assessment with eco-economic valuation of sustainable developmentof a regional ecosystem: A case study of Lingwu City, Ningxia Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(10):1573-1580. [宗跃光, 周尚意, 温良等. 区域生态系统可持续发展的生态价值评价: 以宁夏灵武市为例. 生态学报,2002, 22(10): 1573-1580.]

[91] Shi Peijun, Zhang Shuying, Pan Yaozhong et al. Ecological capital and regional sustainable development. Journal ofBeijing Normal University: Social Sciences, 2005, (2): 131-137. [史培军, 张淑英, 潘耀忠等. 生态资产与区域可持续发展. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2005, (2): 131-137.]

[92] Wu Jianzhai, Li Bo, Zhang Xinshi. Ecosystem service value and its application in evaluation of eco-economicharmonious development. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(11): 2554-2558. [吴建寨, 李波, 张新时. 生态系统服务价值变化在生态经济协调发展评价中的应用. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(11): 2554-2558.]

[93] Chen Liang, Wang Rusong, Li Aixian et al. The assessment of regional natural capital and sustainable degree: A casestudy for Beijing. Urban Studies, 2009, 16(2): 51-55. [陈亮, 王如松, 李爱仙等. 区域自然资本与自然资本持续度评价: 以北京市为案例. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16(2): 51-55.]

[94] Su Fei, Zhang Pingyu. Assessment of coordinative development between economy and environment based onecosystem service values change: A case of Daqing City. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(3): 471-477. [苏飞, 张平宇.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展评价: 以大庆市为例. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(3): 471-477.]

[95] Yu Kongjian, Wang Sisi, Li Dihua et al. Ecological baseline for Beijing's urban sprawl: Basic ecosystem services andtheir security patterns. City Planning Review, 2010, 34(2): 19-24. [俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华等. 北京城市扩张的生态底线: 基本生态系统服务及其安全格局. 城市规划, 2010, 34(2): 19-24.]

[96] Zhong Xianghao, Liu Shuzhen, Wang Xiaodan et al. Research of ecological security on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal ofMountain Science, 2010, 28(1): 1-10. [钟祥浩, 刘淑珍, 王小丹等. 西藏高原生态安全研究. 山地学报, 2010, 28(1):1-10.]

[97] Zheng Wei, Shi Honghua. Formation of marine ecosystem services and their contribution to human welfare. EcologicalEconomy, 2009, (8): 178-180. [郑伟, 石洪华. 海洋生态系统服务的形成及其对人类福利的贡献. 生态经济, 2009,(8): 178-180.]

[98] Yang Li, Zhen Lin, Li Fen et al. Impacts of ecosystem services change on human well-being in the Loess Plateau.Resources Science, 2010, 32(5): 849-855. [杨莉, 甄霖, 李芬等. 黄土高原生态系统服务变化对人类福祉的影响初探. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5): 849-855.]

[99] Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 325: 419-422.

[100] Zurlini, Jones K B, Li L et al. Potentials of ecosystem service accounting at multiple scales//Cutler J Cleveland.Encyclopedia of Earth. Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and theEnvironment, 2010.

[101] Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F Vet al. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches,shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.

[102] Zhang Yongmin, Zhao Shidong. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Follow-up: A global strategy for turningknowledge into action. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(3): 522-528. [张永民, 赵士洞. 千年生态系统评估项目的后续计划: 将知识转化为行动的全球战略. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 522-528.]

[103] Sneddon C S. "Sustainability" in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: A review. Progress in HumanGeography, 2000, 24(4): 521-549.

[104] Huang Bingwei. Land system science and integrated research of geography: The Academic Thought Symposium ofAcademician of CAS Huang Bingwei. Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 1-16. [黄秉维. 陆地系统科学与地理学综合研究: 黄秉维院士学术思想研讨会文集. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 1-16.]

[105] Yang Qinye, Zheng Du, Wu Shaohong et al. Review and prospects: Integrated physical geography in China since the1950s. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(6): 899-910. [杨勤业, 郑度, 吴绍洪等. 20 世纪50 年代以来中国综合自然地理研究进展. 地理研究, 2005, 24(6): 899-910.]

[106] Song Changqing, Leng Shuying. Some important scientific problems of integrative study of Chinese geography in 5to 10 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 546-552. [宋长青, 冷疏影. 21 世纪中国地理学综合研究的主要领域. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4): 546-552.]

[107] Lu Dadao, Liu Weidong. The significance, progress and future tasks of an integrated study of geo-dynamics behindregional development. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2003, 18(1): 12-21. [陆大道, 刘卫东. 区域发展地学基础综合研究的意义、进展与任务. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(1): 12-21.]

[108] Wang Xiuhong, Shen Yuancun. Energy analysis and integrated study of geography//Committee of PhysicalGeography of The Geographical Society of China. Physical Geography and Ecology Construction. Beijing: ChinaMeteorological Press, 2006. [王秀红, 申元村. 能值分析和地理学的综合研究//中国地理学会自然地理学专业委员会. 自然地理学与生态建设. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006.]

[109] Zhang Wei, Zhang Hongye, Zhang Yifeng. Evaluation of ecosystem services value and integrated study in geography.Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(3): 465-470. [张伟, 张宏业, 张义丰. 生态系统服务功能价值核算与地理学综合研究. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(3): 465-470.]

[110] Kathy G, James H, Kathryn W et al. Communication tools//Brown K, Hall W, Snook M H et al. Sustainable LandDevelopment and Restoration: Decision Consequence Analysis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010: 305-310.

[111] Lu Dadao. Development of geographical sciences and research on global change in China. Acta Geographica Sinica,2011, 66(2): 147-156. [陆大道. 中国地理学的发展与全球变化研究. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 147-156.]
Outlines

/