Assessing Non-market Value of Cultivated Land in Ecologically Fragile Areas of Three Gorges Reservoir

  • School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received date: 2010-07-19

  Revised date: 2010-12-20

  Online published: 2011-04-20

Supported by

National Social Science Foundation of China, No.07XJY014


Economic compensation is an effective way to break the external benefits spillover of cultivated land protection which is mainly composed of non-market value of cultivated land, so it is of great reference value for reasonably fixing the economic compensation criterion in cultivated land protection. In this paper, the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is used to evaluate the non-market value of cultivated land in ecologically fragile areas of the Three Gorges Reservoir according to 712 valid questionnaires. Several conclusions can be drawn as follows. (1) The cognition of different residents about the significance of protection cultivated land and the non-market value of cultivated land is in varying degrees, which is decided by how the economic, cultural, social, governmental, psychological and other factors act on the residents dwelling in ecologically fragile poverty-stricken areas. (2) The farmers’willingness rate to pay for the non-market value of cultivated land reaches 76.77% , while that of urban residents accounted for only 64.87%. Such a phenomenon results from the cognition that respondents would rather combine their own interests with cultivated land value, than pay great attention to the protection of cultivated land. (3) Through Probit Regression and Logit Regression analysis, it is also shown that economic and social characteristic of respondents plays an important role in their decision of whether to pay for the cultivated land protection, and income level is the dominant factor in farmers' decision, but that of urban residents is rooted in their awareness of the importance of cultivated land protection and their donor history. (4) Willingness to pay (WTP) of farmers and urban residents are 157.92 yuan/(household·a) and 206.28 yuan/ household·a) respectively. Respondents' WTP for the non-market value of per hectare cultivated land reaches 607.65 yuan/(hm2·a) and the overall non-market value of cultivated land reaches up to 104.26×108 yuan in ecological fragility of the Three Gorges Reservoir area.

Cite this article

LI Guangdong, QIU Daochi, WANG Ping . Assessing Non-market Value of Cultivated Land in Ecologically Fragile Areas of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011 , 66(4) : 562 -575 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201104012


[1] Pearce DW, Moran D. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. Cambridge: Earth Scan Publications, 1994.

[2] Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1987, (387):253-260.

[3] Yu Fengqing, Cai Yunlong. A new insight of cultivated land resource value. China Land Science, 2003, 17(3): 3-9. [俞奉庆,蔡运龙. 耕地资源价值探讨. 中国土地科学, 2003, 17(3): 3-9.]

[4] Li Jinggang, Ou Minghao, Zhang Xiaojun et al. Reconstruction of cultivated land resources value system and its evaluation:A case study of Qingdao. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880. [李景刚, 欧名豪, 张效军等. 耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价: 以青岛市为例. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880.]

[5] Cai Yinying, Zhang Anlu. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan. Acta EcologicaSinica, 2007, 27(2): 763-773. [蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地非市场价值评估. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 763-773.]

[6] Wang Ruixue, Yan Tingwu. Application and modification of CVM in China: An empirical research coming from Wuhan.Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(6): 879-887. [王瑞雪, 颜廷武. 条件价值评估法本土化改进及其验证: 来自武汉的实证研究. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(6): 879-887.]

[7] Wang Ruixue. Study on non-market valuation theories, methods of farmland and application [D]. Wuhan: HuazhongAgricultural University, 2005. [王瑞雪. 耕地非市场价值评估理论方法与实践[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2005.]

[8] Desvousges W H, Johnson F R, Dunford R W et al. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests ofvalidity and reliability//Hausman J A. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1993.

[9] Loomis J B, Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions, Comparing Benefits and Costs. 2nd ed. State College,Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing, Inc., 1997.

[10] Hanemann W M, Kanninen B. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. Department of Agricultural andResource Economics, University of California at Berkeley.Working Paper, No.798, 1996: 3-15.

[11] Carson R T. Contingent valuation: A user's guide. Environmental Scientific & Technology, 2000, 34(8): 1413-1418.

[12] Yu Yan, Lu Xinhai. Amelioration of the CVM in farmland non-use value assessment. China Land Science, 2010, 24(1):15-21. [喻燕, 卢新海. 意愿评估法在农地非使用价值评估中的改进. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(1): 15-21.]

[13] Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24:89-124.

[14] Gürlük S. The estimation of ecosystem services' value in the region of Misi Rural Development Project: Results from acontingent valuation survey. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006, 9: 209-218.

[15] Amirnejad H, Khalilian S, Assareh M H et al. Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingentvaluation method. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58: 665-675.

[16] álvarez Díaz M, González Gómez M, Saavedra G á et al. On dichotomous choice contingent valuation data analysis:Semiparametric methods and Genetic Programming. Journal of Forest Economics, 2010, 16: 145-156.

[17] López-Mosquera N, Sánchez. Emotional and satisfaction bene fi ts to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetaryvaluation of environmental goods: An application to per urban green spaces. Land Use Policy, 2010, 28: 151-166.

[18] Borghi J, Jan S. Measuring the benefits of health promotion programmes: Application of the contingent valuation method.Health Policy, 2008, 87: 235-248.

[19] Yoo S H, Kwak S Y. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study. Energy Policy, 2009,37: 5408-5416.

[20] Damigos D, Kaliampakos D. Assessing the benefits of reclaiming urban quarries: A CVM analysis. Landscape and UrbanPlanning, 2003, 64: 249-258.

[21] Zhao Jun, Yang Kai. Valuation of natural resources and environment: contingent valuation method and its applicationprinciples in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(5): 834-843. [赵军, 杨凯. 自然资源与环境价值评估:条件估值法及应用原则探讨. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(5): 834-843.]

[22] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner'secosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(1): 107-116. [徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋等. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 107-116.]

[23] Yang Kai, Zhao Jun. Study on the ecosystem services value of urban river using contingent valuation method and biasanalysis of the results. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(6): 1391-1396. [杨凯, 赵军. 城市河流生态系统服务的CVM估值及其偏差分析. 生态学报, 2005, 25(6): 1391-1396.]

[24] Ge Yanxiang, Liang Lijuan, Wang Beibei et al. The residents' willingness of ecological compensation and level in YellowRiver Basin: A case of Shandong Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2009, (10): 77-85. [葛颜祥, 梁丽娟, 王蓓蓓等. 黄河流域居民生态补偿意愿及支付水平分析: 以山东省为例. 中国农村经济, 2009, (10): 77-85.]

[25] Liang Shuang, Jiang Nan, Gu Shuzhong. An analysis on farmers' households' willingness to payment for environmentalprotection in water resource area of city and the causal factors: With Miyun County, the water resource area of BeijingMunicipality as an example. Chinese Rural Economy, 2005, (2): 55-60. [梁爽, 姜楠, 谷树忠. 城市水源地农户环境保护支付意愿及其影响因素分析:以首都水源地密云为例. 中国农村经济, 2005, (2): 55-60.]

[26] Liang Yong, Cheng Shengkui, Min Qingwen et al. Study on residents' willingness to pay for improving urban waterenvironment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(5): 613-617, 623. [梁勇, 成升魁, 闵庆文等. 居民对改善城市水环境支付意愿的研究. 水利学报, 2005, 36(5): 613-617, 623.]

[27] Cai Chunguang, Chen Gong, Qiao Xiaochun et al. Comparison of single bound and double bound dichotomous contingentvaluation technique: A case of estimate health economic loss by air pollution of Beijing. China Environmental Science,2007, 27(1): 39-43. [蔡春光, 陈功, 乔晓春等. 单边界、双边界二分式条件价值评估方法的比较:以北京市空气污染对健康危害问卷调查为例. 中国环境科学, 2007, 27(1): 39-43.]

[28] Li Ying, Bai Mo, Yang Kaizhong et al. Study on residents' willingness to pay for improving air quality in Beijing. UrbanEnvironment & Urban Ecology, 2001, 14(5): 6-8. [李莹, 白墨, 杨开忠等. 居民为改善北京市大气环境质量的支付意愿研究.城市环境与城市生态, 2001, 14(5): 6-8.]

[29] Zhang Mingjun, Fan Jianfeng, Hu Chenxia et al. Assessment of total economic value of improving atmospheric quality ofLanzhou. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2004, 18(3): 28-32. [张明军, 范建峰, 虎陈霞等. 兰州市改善大气环境质量的总经济价值. 干旱区资源与环境, 2004, 18(3): 28-32.]

[30] Gao Yunfeng, Jiang Wentao. An evaluation of forest resource in the mountainous areas of Beijing Municipality. ChineseRural Economy, 2005, (7): 19-29, 50. [高云峰, 江文涛. 北京市山区森林资源价值评价. 中国农村经济, 2005, (7):19-29, 50.]

[31] Xue Dayuan, Bao Haosheng, Li Wenhua. A valuation study on the indirect values of forest ecosystem in ChangbaishanMountain Biosphere Reserve of China. China Environmental Science, 1999, 19(3): 247-252. [薛达元, 包浩生, 李文华. 长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估. 中国环境科学, 1999, 19(3): 247-252.]

[32] Liu Yaping, Pan Xiaofang, Zhong Qiuping et al. Analyzing about the assessment of the recreational value of the naturalspaces in ecotourism districts: Applying contingent valuation method and travel cost method to analyze the recreationalvalue of Wulingyuan Scenic Resort. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(11): 3765-3774. [刘亚萍, 潘晓芳, 钟秋平等. 生态旅游区自然环境的游憩价值: 运用条件价值评价法和旅行费用法对武陵源风景区进行实证分析. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3765-3774.]

[33] Xu Lizhong, Wu Chunshan, Wang Feifeng et al. Testing reliability of the contingent valuation method: A case study on thetourism attraction non-use value. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(10): 4301-4309. [许丽忠, 吴春山, 王菲凤等. 条件价值法评估旅游资源非使用价值的可靠性检验. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 4301-4309.]

[34] Dorfman J H, Barnett B J, Bergstrom J C et al. Searching for farmland preservation markets: Evidence from thesoutheastern U.S. Land Use Policy, 2008, 26: 121-129.

[35] Cho S H, Newman D H, Bowker J M. Measuring rural homeowners' willingness to pay for land conservation easements.Forest Policy and Economics, 2005, 7: 757-770.

[36] Banzhaf H S. Economics at the fringe: Non-market valuation studies and their role in land use plans in the United States.Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91: 592-602.

[37] Chang K, Ying Y. External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan's rice fields. The Social Science Journal, 2005,42: 285-293.

[38] Wang Pai, Ling Xuebing, Zhang Anlu. Assessment on the existence value of recreational farmland by CVM: A case studyof Heping Village inWuhan city. China Land Science, 2009, 23(6): 66-71. [王湃, 凌雪冰, 张安录. CVM评估休闲农地的存在价值: 以武汉市和平农庄为例. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(6): 66-71.]

[39] Niu Haipeng, Zhang Anlu. Externality and its calculation of cultivated land protection: A case study of Jiaozuo city. ResourcesScience, 2009, 31(8): 1400-1408. [牛海鹏, 张安录. 耕地保护的外部性及其测算: 以河南省焦作市为例. 资源科学, 2009, 31(8): 1400-1408.]

[40] Wang Shuman, Tan Rong, Wu Limei. Assessing the amenity value of agricultural land: A case study in Jiangsu Province.Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2005, 14(6): 720-724. [王舒曼, 谭荣, 吴丽梅. 农地资源舒适性价值评估:以江苏省为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 720-724.]

[41] Hanemann W M. Some issues in continuous-and discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Northeast. J. Agr. Econ.,1985: 5-13.

[42] Carson R T. Three essays on contingent valuation [D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1985.

[43] Hanemann W M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingentvaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73(4): 1255-1263.

[44] Hoehn J P, Randall A. A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management, 1987, 14(3): 1226-1247.

[45] Liu Zhiguo, Li Guoping. Estimating of environmental loss caused by developing non-renewable energy resources in northShanxi Province. Statistical Research, 2006, (3): 61-66. [刘治国, 李国平. 陕北地区非再生能源资源开发的环境破坏损失价值评估. 统计研究, 2006, (3): 61-66.]

[46] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register,1993, 58(10): 4601-4614.

[47] Zhang Yin, Cai Yunlong. Using contingent valuation method to value environmental resources: A review. ActaScientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2005, 41(2): 317-328. [张茵, 蔡运龙. 条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 41(2): 317-328.]

[48] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong. The updated development and application of contingent valuationmethod (CVM) .Advance in Earth Sciences, 2003, 18(3): 454-463. [张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463.]

[49] Gao Wei, Min Jie, Zhang Anlu. The application of CVM for assessment of cultivated land of non-market value in JianghanPlain. Resources Science, 2007, 29(2): 124-130. [高魏, 闵捷, 张安录. 江汉平原耕地非市场价值评估. 资源科学, 2007,29(2): 124-130.]

[50] Cai Yunlong, Huo Yaqin. Reevaluating cultivated land in China: Method and case studies. Acta Geographica Sinica,2006, 61(10): 1084-1092. [蔡运龙, 霍雅勤. 中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.]

[51] Cao Zhihong, Hao Jinmin, Liang Liutao. The value accounting of cultivated land resources in Huang-Huai-Hai Region.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 23(9): 5-10. [曹志宏, 郝晋珉, 梁流涛. 黄淮海地区耕地资源价值核算. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009, 23(9): 5-10.]

[52] Whittington D. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. World Development, 1998, 26(1):21-30.