ImPACTS Identity of Sustainability Assessment

Expand
  • 1. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. Chinese Center for Desert Research, College of Resources Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2004-08-30

  Revised date: 2004-12-11

  Online published: 2005-03-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40201019; Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40235053; The Assessment of Impact and Adaptation of Climate Change (AIACC) Project, No.AS25

Abstract

Based on formal ImPACT identity which describes environmental impacts (Im) as a function of population(P), affluence(A), intensity use(C) and efficiency(T), a new “ImPACTS” identity as a framework for sustainability science was produced, where S denote the level of social resources, m is assigned to management and I is changed from formal environmental impacts to the trade-off between environmental impacts and development. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of ImPACTS by performing an empirical analysis of our integrated impacts assessment on the Earth by using existing data of Ecological footprint and Human development index. In an attempt to analyse the relationship between ecological footprint and social development using existing data, developed countries showed a great advantage over developing countries in terms of energy resource use efficiency due to their social and technological development. Global warming shows that humanity has gone beyond the sustainable scale of the Earth. We thus suggest that every country should increase its global share of ecological footprints within the sustainable scale of the Earth, rather than simply decrease its ecological footprints. The reason why current analysis contradicts the conventional ecological footprint analysis is that ecological footprint's concept simply considers the land embodied in goods and attributes a high ecological footprint value to high-income countries, and effects of trade on social development and in turn on the environment have not been considered. The ecological footprint analysis ignores the effects of development mainly in the stock of social resources on environment. The critical point in sustainable development is to harmonize environment and development. Examples from water shortage in northern China and China's food security and world energy consumption show that managing and mobilizing social resources should be considered as an alternative to mitigating human impacts on the environment and adapting to these impacts.

Cite this article

XU Zhongmin, CHENG Guodong, QIU GuoYu . ImPACTS Identity of Sustainability Assessment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005 , 60(2) : 198 -208 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200502003

References


[1] Wackernagel M, Schulz N B, Deuming D et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2002, USA 99: 9266-9271.

[2] Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF). Living Planet Report 2002. http://www.wwf-uk.org/filelibrary/pdf/livingplanet2002.pdf (accessed 2004)

[3] Wilson E O. The Future of Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 2002

[4] Rees W E. Footprint: our impact on Earth is getting heavier. Nature, 2002, 420: 267-268.

[5] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints of Gansu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5): 607-616.
[徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 607-616.]

[6] Rees W E. A bolt on the land. Nature, 2003, 421: 898.

[7] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Reports 2001, 2002.

[8] Energy Information Adminstration. International Energy Outlook 2004. 2004-5-31

[9] Daly H E, Farley J. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington: Island Press, 2004.

[10] Costanza R, Jorgensen S E. Understanding and Solving Environmental Problems in the 21st Century: Toward a New, Integrated Hard Problem Science. Netherlands, Amsterdam: Elesiver, 2002.
[徐中民, 张志强 ,张齐兵 等译. 理解和解决21世纪的环境问题——面向一个新的、集成的硬问题科学. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2004]

[11] Todaro M P, Smith S C. Economic Development. 8th edn. New York: Addison Wesley, 2003.

[12] Goklany I M, Trewavas A. How technology can reduce our impact on the Earth. Nature, 2003, 423: 115

[13] Pan J Z, Zhang Z Z (eds.). Allocation of Water Resources in Northern China and South-to-North Water Transfer Project. Beijing: China Hydraulic and Hydropower Press, 2001.
[潘家铮, 张泽祯 主编. 中国北方地区水资源合理配置和南水北调问题. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2001].

[14] Chen Z K. Water resources in China and the water crisis in northern China. In: The Best Lectures Given at Peking University. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.
[陈志凯. 中国水资源与华北水危机. 北大最佳讲座. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2003.]

[15] Brown L R. Worsening water shortages threaten China's Food security. 2001. http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update1_printable.htm (accessed 2004)

[16] Hofwegen P V. Virtual water trade--conscious choice, 2004. http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/virtual_water/documents/virtual_water_final_synthesis.pdf (accessed 2004)

[17] Cheng Guodong. Virutal water: a strategic instrument to achieve water security. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Science, 2003, (4): 260-265.
[程国栋. 虚拟水-中国水资源安全战略的新思路. 中国科学院院刊, 2003, (4): 260-265]

[18] Xu Zhongmin, Long Aihua, Zhang Zhiqiang. Virtual water consumption calculation and analysis of Gansu province in 2000. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(6): 861-869.
[徐中民, 龙爱华, 张志强. 虚拟水的理论方法及在甘肃省的应用. 2003, 58(6): 861-869.]

[19] Xu Zhongmin, Long Aihua. The primary study on assessing social water scarcity in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6): 982-988.
[徐中民, 龙爱华. 中国社会化水资源稀缺评价. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 982-988.]

[20] Brown L R. Who Will Feed China: Wake up Call for a Small Planet. New York: W W Norton & Company, 1995.

[21] Jikun Huang, Carl Pray, Scott Rozelle. Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature, 2002, 418: 678-684.

[22] Brown L R. Wakeup call on the food front, 2003. http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update31.htm (accessed 2004)

[23] Brown L R. China's shrinking grain harvest: how its growing grain imports will affect world food prizes, 2004. http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update36.htm (accessed 2004)

[24] Campbell C J, Laherrere J H. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American, 1998, March: 78-83.

[25] Daily G C, Ehrlich P. Population, sustainability and Earth's carrying capacity. Bioscience, 1992, 42: 761-771.

[26] Waggoner P R, Ausubel J H. A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2002, USA 99: 7860-7865.

[27] Dietz T, Rosa E A. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1997, USA, 94: 175-179.

[28] York R, Rose E A, Dietz T. Bridging environmental science with environmental policy: plasticity of population, affluence, and technology. Social Science Quarterly, 2002, 83(1): 18-34.

[29] Budiansky S. How affluence could be good for the environment. Nature, 2002, 416: 581.

[30] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong. Theory, Method and Application of Ecological Economics. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Conservancy Press, 2003.
[徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 生态经济学理论方法与应用. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2003.]

[31] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Reports 2003, 2004.

[32] Heckman J J, Krueger A B. Inequality in America. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003.

Outlines

/