Spatial-temporal Changes of Urban Spatial Morphology in China

Expand
  • 1. School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. School of Resources and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2004-11-15

  Revised date: 2005-02-21

  Online published: 2005-05-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.90202002

Abstract

Fractal dimensions, compact ratios, shape indices and types of urban land expansion of 31 Chinese cities in 1990 and 2000 were computed by using dynamic land-use data from the National Resources and Environmental Database established by the IGSNRR, CAS. The results show, during the period from 1990 to 2000, that the type of urban land expansion belongs mostly to the 'extension' types and the cities with the 'filling' land expansion are almost located in the flat regions. Generally, fractal dimensions of 31 Chinese cities were inclined to reduce and fractal dimensions of the southern cities are more than those of the northern cities, compact ratios of most of the cities increased, urban shape indices of most of the cities decreased, during the period from 1990 to 2000. In all the 31 cities, the changes in the planar configurations of Guangzhou, Nanchang, Jinan, Chengdu, Beijing and Shanghai are the greatest, while the changes of Lanzhou, Taiyuan and Tangshan's configurations are the least. Such a simple rule is revealed that the fractal dimensions would reduce, compact ratio would increase and shape index would decrease if the type of urban land expansion belongs to the 'filling' type and vice versa.

Cite this article

WANG Xinsheng, LIU Jiyuan, ZHUANG Dafang, WANG Liming . Spatial-temporal Changes of Urban Spatial Morphology in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005 , 60(3) : 392 -400 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200503005

References


[1] Yan Xiaopei, Lin Zhangping. The change of spatial disparities of urban development in China, 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(3): 445-453.
[闫小培, 林彰平. 20世纪90年代中国城市发展空间变异变动分析. 地理学报, 2004, 59(3): 445-453.]

[2] Xu Jianhua, Yue Wenze, Tan Wenqi. Statistical study on spatial scaling effects of urban landscape pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6): 1058-1067.
[徐建华, 岳文泽, 谈文琦. 城市景观格局尺度效益的空间统计规律. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 1058-1067.]

[3] Zheng Xin, Lin Lin. A review of studies on the urban morphology since 1990s. City Planning Review, 2002, 26(7): 59-64.
[郑莘, 林琳. 1990年以来国内城市形态研究述评. 城市规划, 2002, 26(7): 59-64.]

[4] Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Zhuang Dafang et al. Spatial pattern analysis of Chinese modern land use change. Science in China (Series D), 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040.
[刘纪远, 刘明亮, 庄大方 等. 中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析. 中国科学(D辑), 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040.]

[5] Benguigui L, Czamanski D. Simulation analysis of the fractality of cities. Geographical Analysis, 2004, 36(1): 69-84.

[6] Keersmaeeker M L D, Frankhauser P, Thomas I. Using fractal dimensions for characterizing intra-urban diversity: the example of Brussels. Geographical Analysis, 2003, 35(4): 310-328.

[7] Shen G. Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2002, 16(5): 419-437.

[8] Chen Yanguang, Liu Jisheng. An index of equilibrium of urban land-use structure and information dimension of urban form. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(2): 146-152.
[陈彦光, 刘继生. 城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述: 从信息墒到分维. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 146-152.]

[9] Gert D R. Environmental conflicts in compact cities: complexity, decisionmaking, and policy approaches. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2000, 27(2): 151-162.

[10] Leorey O M, Nariida C S. A framework for linking urban form and air quality. Environmental Modelling & Software, 1999, 14: 541-548.

[11] Liu Jiyuan, Wang Xinsheng, Zhuang Dafang et al. Application of convex hull in identifying the types of urban land expansion. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(6): 885-892.
[刘纪远, 王新生, 庄大方 等. 凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别. 地理学报, 2003, 58(6): 885-892.]

[12] Roberto C, Maria C G, Paolo R. Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological Economics, 40(3): 199-216.

[13] Stephan P, Friedrich D. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 52(1): 1-20.

[14] Boyce R R, Clark W A V. The concept of shape in geography. The Geographical Review, 1964, 54: 561-572.

[15] Lo C P. Changes of the shapes of Chinese cities, 1934-1974. Professional Geographer, 1980, 32(2): 173-183.

[16] Medda F, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. Recognition and classification of urban shapes. Geographical Analysis, 1998, 30(3): 304-314.

[17] Wentz E A. A shape definition for geographic applications based on edge, elongation, and perforation. Geographical Analysis, 2000, 32(1): 95-112.

[18] Whitford V, Ennos A R, Handley J F. "City form and natural process": indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 57(2): 91-103.

[19] Griffith D A, O'neill M P, O'neill W A et al. Shape indices: useful measures or red herrings? Professional Geographer, 1986, 38(3): 263-270.

[20] Liu Shenghe, Wu Chuanjun, Shen Hongquan. A GIS based model of urban land use growth in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(4): 407-416.
[刘盛和, 吴传钧, 沈洪泉. 基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式. 地理学报, 2000, 55(4): 407-416.]

[21] Longley P A, Batty M. On the fractal measurement of geographical boundaries. Geographical Analysis, 1989, 21(1): 47-67.

[22] Longley P A, Batty M. Fractal measurement and line generalization. Computers & Geosciences, 1989, 15(2): 167-183.

Outlines

/