Impact of Land Use Change on Soil Properties in a Typical Karst Agricultural Region: A Case Study of Xiaojiang Watershed, Yunnan

  • 1. College of Resources and Environment Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
    2. Institute of Geology Investigation in Yunnan Province, Kunming 650041, China;
    3. Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Karst Dynamics Laboratory, MLR, Guilin 541004, China

Received date: 2005-06-09

  Revised date: 2005-07-28

  Online published: 2005-09-25

Supported by

The Open Foundation of Physical Geography of Southwest China University, No.250-411109; Foundation of Science and Technology Committee of Chongqing, No.20027534; No.20048258); Project of Ministry of Land and Resources, No.200310400024


Karst has been regarded as a fragile environment by environmental scientists. Because of karst system with a low capacity, it is difficult to restore if once disturbed. Changes in environment are not unique throughout the karst region, but a karst region is more sensitive than other regions. In the present study we analyzed the land use changes from 1982 to 2003, and assessed the effects of land use changes on pH value, organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK) in soils of Xiaojing watershed, a typical karst agricultural region in Yunan province, Southwest China. The results indicate: (1) The total land converted covers an area of 610.12 km2, of which 134.29 km2 of forestland were converted into cultivated land, and 210 km2 of unused land were converted into cultivated land during the past 20 years in Xiaojiang watershed. (2) The rapid growth of population and the economic development were the main driving forces of cultivated land change, and the comparative economic benefits from the macro-policies such as eco-environmental protection were important driving forces of forestland change in Xiaojiang watershed during the past 20 years. (3) Because of land use change, the soil properties have been changed significantly. The pH value, OM, TN, TP, TK, AN, AP and AK in soils in 1982 were 6.3, 38.02 g/kg, 1.86 g/kg, 1.63 g/kg, 10.94 g/kg, 114.42 mg/kg, 11.65 mg/kg and 64.69 mg/kg, respectively; and those in 2003 were 6.73, 25.26 g/kg, 1.41g/kg, 0.99 g/kg, 12.6 g/kg, 113.43 mg/kg and 11.11 mg/kg, 151.59 mg/kg, respectively. Pared samples t-test of the tested indices of soil properties indicate that those indices have changed significantly during the past 20 years. (4) Because of the differences of land use change, the soil properties change differently. The contents of the soil OM, TN, TP in 2003 were significantly lower than those in 1982 after the forestland and unused land were converted into cultivated land, but the pH of soil increased significantly in 2003, especially the properties of the soils developed from the carbonate rock strata changed most significantly. The soil properties change was mainly attributed to deforestation, water and soil erosion, and the low land management level after the forestland and unused land were converted into the cultivated land. Because of lack of the vegetation cover and the land management, the contents of soil OM, TN, and TP for short-time reforested land also decreased, but the soil pH increased. Because of the use of more fertilizer and the improvement of land management, the soil properties improved significantly after the cultivated land was converted into orchard land. But due to unreasonable human activities to the fragile soils in the karst region, the land became rock desertified. The content of the soil OM, TN, TP, AN and AP decreased significantly, but the soil pH increased significantly after land converted became rock desertified. (5) Also, with the changes in land use and soil ameliorative measures, the modifications of properties of soils developed from the carbonate rock strata were more sensitive than those from the sandstone strata.

Cite this article

JIANG Yongjun, YUAN Daoxian, ZHANG Cheng, KUANG Mingsheng, WANG Jianli, XIE Shiyou, ZHANG Gui, HE Raosheng . Impact of Land Use Change on Soil Properties in a Typical Karst Agricultural Region: A Case Study of Xiaojiang Watershed, Yunnan[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005 , 60(5) : 751 -760 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200505006


[1] Turner B L II, Meyer W B. Land use and land cover in global environmental change: considerations for study. International Social Science, 1991, 130: 669-679.

[2] Dalal R C. Long-term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in Southern Queensland: II. total organic carbon and its rate of loss from the soil profile. Soil Res., 1986, 24: 281-292.

[3] Halvorson A D, Reule C A, Anderson R L. Evaluation of management practices for converting grassland back to cropland. Soil Water Conserv., 2000, 55: 57-62.

[4] Islam K R, Weil R R. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 2000, 79: 9-16.

[5] Mcalister J J, Smith B J, Sanchez B. Forest clearance: impact of landuse change on fertility status of soils from the Sao Francisco area of Niteroi, Brazil. Land Degradation & Development, 1998, 9: 425-440.

[6] Braimoh A K, Viek P L G. The impact of land-cover change on soil properties in northen Ghana. Land Degradation & Development, 2004, 15: 65-74.

[7] J C Voundi Nkana, J Tonye. Assessment of certain soil properties related to different land-use syetems in the Kaya watershed of the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Land Degradation & Development, 2003, 14: 57-67.

[8] Warkentin B P. The change concept of soil quality. Soil Water Conserv., 1995, 50: 226-228.

[9] Lal R, Mokma D, Lowery B. Relation between soil quality and erosion. In: Rattan Lal (ed.), Soil Quality and Soil Erosion. Washington D. C.: CRC Press, 1999. 237-258.

[10] Williams P W. Karst terrains: environmental changes and human impact. Catena, 1993, 25(suppl.): 268.

[11] Daoxian Yuan. Environmental change and human impact on karst in southern China. In: Karst Terrains: Environmental Changes and Human Impact. Catena, 1993, 25(suppl.): 99-107.

[12] Kong Xiangbin, Zhang Fengrong, Qi Wei et al. The influence of land use change on soil fertility in intensive agricultural region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(3): 332-342.
[孔祥斌, 张凤荣, 齐伟 等. 集约农业区土地利用变化对土壤养分的影响. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 332-342.]

[13] Chen Fu, Pu Lijie, Peng Buzhuo et al. The effect of land use changes on soil conditions in Korla city, Xinjiang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(8): 1290-1295.
[陈浮, 濮励杰, 彭补拙 等. 新疆库尔勒市土地利用变化对土壤性状的影响. 生态学报, 2001, 21(8): 1290-1295.]

[14] Guo Xudong, Fu Bojie, Chen Liding et al. Effects of land use on soil quality in a hilly area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(4): 447-455.
[郭旭东, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶 等. 低山丘陵区土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响. 地理学报, 2001, 56(4): 447-455.]

[15] Liu Shiliang, Fu Bojie, Chen Liding et al. Effects of land use change on soil properties in Wolong Nature Reserve. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(6): 682-688.
[刘世梁, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶 等. 卧龙自然保护区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 682-688.]

[16] Yuan Daoxian. Carbon circulation and global karst. Quaternary Sciences, 1993, (1): 1-6.
[袁道先. 碳循环与全球岩溶. 第四纪研究, 1993, (1): 1-6.]

[17] Cao Jianhua, Yuan Daoxian, Pan Genxing. Some soil features in karst ecosystem. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2003, 18(1): 37-44.
[曹建华, 袁道先, 潘根兴. 岩溶生态系统中的土壤. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(1): 37-44.]

[18] Zhao Qiguo. The Circulation of Materials and Control on Red Soil. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. 73-163.
[赵其国. 红壤物质循环及其调控. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. 73-163.]