Landscape Functions Network Construction and Application in Watershed Scale: A Case Study on Taiwan Wuxi Watershed
Received date: 2005-04-25
Revised date: 2005-08-30
Online published: 2005-11-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40471002
On maintaining ecological balance and promoting economical development, it is necessary to strengthen the spatial relation among the landscape patterns whose functions are similar. The growing awareness of the adverse effects of habitat fragmentation on natural systems has resulted in a rapidly increasing number of actions to reduce current fragmentation of natural systems as well as a growing demand for tools to predict and evaluate the effect of changes in the landscape on connectivity in the natural world. For promoting and positioning functions of each landscape unit in the whole Taiwan island, systematically studying characteristics of landscape patterns in the research areas, and identifying energy routes of landscape function flows, this study chooses the basic regionalism units as the research areas such as Wuxi watershed to analyze connectivity traits among network nodes with single function as well as spatial interactions of different functional networks based on landscape function network establishment. Then from the aspect of consolidating network configuration to strengthen landscape functions, this study puts forward some strategies to optimize landscape patterns. Through linkage analysis of network nodes, it is found that urban function network structure is better than ecological function network in Wuxi watershed, and most urban function sub-nodes are located around the urban function centers, which can allow landscape functions export and transmit. The connectivity of ecological function nodes is similar, but the first and second level nodes such as Hongxiang and Gaomei wetlands are isolated and less connected, so this study proposes to consolidate function transmitting routes and highlight significance of main transferring nodes like Erzhaishan and Beikengzi aiming at optimizing ecological landscape in Wuxi watershed.
CHANG Hsiaofei, WANG Yanglin, LI Guicai, WU Jiansheng, LI Zhengguo . Landscape Functions Network Construction and Application in Watershed Scale: A Case Study on Taiwan Wuxi Watershed[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005 , 60(6) : 974 -980 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200506010
[1] Naveh Z. What is holistic landscape ecology? a conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 50: 7-26.
[2] Chen Bo, Bao Zhiyi. Application of landscape ecology principle of holism to landscape planning and design. Planners, 2003, 3(19): 60-63.
[陈波, 包志毅. 整体论的景观生态学原则在景观规划设计中的应用. 规划师, 2003, 3(19): 60-63.]
[3] Wang Yangli, Zhao Yibin, Han Dang. The spatial structure of landscape eco-systems: concept, indices and case studies. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1999, 14(3): 235-241.
[王仰麟, 赵一斌, 韩荡. 景观生态系统的空间结构: 概念、指标与案例. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(3): 235-241.]
[4] Wu J, David J L. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecological Modelling, 2002, 153: 7-26.
[5] Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.]
[6] Xiao Duning, Bu Rencang, Li Xiuzhen. Spatial ecology and landscape heterogeneity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997, 17(5): 453-461.
[肖笃宁, 布仁仓, 李秀珍. 生态空间理论与景观异质性. 生态学报, 1997, 17(5): 453-461.]
[7] Qi Y, Wu J. Effect of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11: 39-48.
[8] Antrop M. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 77: 17-28.
[9] Fu Bojie, Chen Liding, Ma Keming et al. The Principle and Application of Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. 52-56.
[傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明 等. 景观生态学原理及应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. 52-56.]
[10] ESRI. Arc/Info User's Guide. 2002.
[11] Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape Ecology. New York: Willey, 1986. 64-72.
[12] Collinge S K. Spatial arrangement of habitat patches and corridors: clues from ecological field experiments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42: 157-168.
[13] Cook E A. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 58: 269-280.
[14] Chen Cunyou, Liu Houliang, Zhan Shuifang. Power in the world city network. Foreign Urban Planning, 2003, 18(2): 47-49.
[陈存友, 刘厚良, 詹水芳. 世界城市网络作用力. 国外城市规划, 2003, 18(2): 47-49.]
[15] Miller W, Collins M G, Steiner F R et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42: 91-105.
[16] Taylor P J, Walker D R F, Catalano G et al. Diversity and power in the world city network. Cities, 2002, 19 (4): 231-241.
[17] Tjallingii S P. Ecological Conditions: Strategies and Structures in Environmental Planning, IBN Scientific Contributions 2. Wageningen, 1996.
[18] Zong Yueguang. Corridor effects and urban landscape structure. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 1996, 9(3): 21-25.
[宗跃光. 廊道效应与城市景观结构. 城市环境与城市生态, 1996, 9(3): 21-25.]
[19] Schrijnen P J. Infrastructure networks and red-green patterns in city regions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 48: 191-204.
[20] Zhu Yingming, Yu Nianwen. Urban flows in the Hu-Ning-Hang urban compact district. Urban Planning Forum, 2002, 137: 31-44.
[朱英明, 于念文. 沪宁杭城市密集区城市流研究. 城市规划汇刊, 2002, 137: 31-33.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |