Validation of the Feasibility of MOD16 Algorithm for Estimating Crop Field Vapor Flux in North China Plain

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan

Received date: 2003-09-17

  Revised date: 2003-12-25

  Online published: 2004-01-25

Supported by

The Asia-Pacific Environmental Innovation Strategy (ASEIS), NIES, Japan


The MODIS product of the land surface vapor flux (MOD16) is not yet released by NASA because some parameters in the algorithm are very unstable in the time and space scales, which are difficult to be or cannot be derived from the remote sensing data. In this study, we validated the original algorithm of MOD16 with the ground measured data from April to May in 2002 (Yucheng Ecological Experimental Station in Shandong, CAS). The result showed that the estimated vapor flux was about 20% more than the observed values. We revised the original model by adjusting the crop physiological temperature parameters and coefficients for calculating the aerodynamic resistance, and the fractional vegetation cover according to the characteristics of winter wheat in Yucheng Station. The slope of the regression line plotted with the result simulated by the revised algorithm and the field measured data was 0.9706, and the correlation coefficient (R2

Cite this article

SUN Zhigang, WANG Qinxue, OUYANG Zhu, WATANABE Masataka . Validation of the Feasibility of MOD16 Algorithm for Estimating Crop Field Vapor Flux in North China Plain[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004 , 59(1) : 49 -55 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200401006


[1] Churkina G, Running S W, Schloss A L. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): the importance of water availability. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5(Suppl. 1): 46-55.

[2] Schmugge T J, Becker F. Remote sensing observations for the monitoring of land-surface fluxes and water budgets. In: Schmugge T J, Andre J C (eds.), Land Surface Evaporation-Measurement and Parameterization. New York: Spreinger-Verlag, 1992. 337-347.

[3] Kenlo Nishida, Ramakrishna R Nemani, Steven W Running et al. Remote sensing of land surface evaporation (I): theoretical basis for an operational algorithm.

[4] Shuttleworth W J, Gurney R J, Hsu A Y et al. FIFE: the variation in energy partition at surface flux sites. IAHS Publication, 1989, 186: 67-74.

[5] Kondo J. Meteorology of Water Environment. Tokyo: Asakura-shoten, 1994. 350.

[6] Kondo J. Atmospheric Science near the Ground Surface. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 2000. 324.

[7] Jarvis P G. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 1976, 273: 593-610.

[8] Kosugi Y. Leaf-scale analysis of the CO2 and H2O exchange processes between trees and atmosphere. Ph. D. Dissertation to Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 1996.

[9] Sugita M, Brutsaert W. Daily evaporation over a region from lower boundary-layer profiles measured with radiosondes. Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(5): 747-752.

[10] Crago R D. Comparison of the evaporative fraction and the Priestley-Taylor α for parameterizing daytime evaporation. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(5): 1403-1409.

[11] Kell Wilson, Allen Goldstein, Eva Falge et al. Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 223-243.

[12] Peter van der Keur, Kirsten Schelde et al. Modification of DAISY SVAT model for potential use of remotely sensed data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001, 106: 215-231.

[13] Richard G Allen, Lui S Pereira, Dirk Raes et al. Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.

[14] Department of Agrometeorology, Beijing Agricultural University. Agrometeorology. Beijing: Science Press, 1984. 53.

[15] Liu Changming, Wang Huixiao et al. The Interface Processes of Water Movement in the Soil-Crop-Atmosphere System and Water-saving Regulation. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. 65.