Channel Pattern Discrimination Based on the Relationship Between Channel Slope and Width
Received date: 2003-05-07
Revised date: 2003-11-09
Online published: 2004-05-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.49970014; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of CAS, No.CXIOG-A00-05-01
The classic channel slope-discharge relationship proposed by Leopold and Wolman (1957) for channel pattern discrimination has been tested by a large database including 4 types of rivers: gravel-bed meandering, gravel-bed braided, sand-bed meandering and sand-bed braided rivers. The result shows that the Leopold-Wolman relationship cannot discriminate channel patterns well when both gravel- and sand-bed rivers are considered. It is indicated that the Leopold-Wolman relationship reflects the difference between gravel- and sand-bed rivers more than the difference between meandering and braided channel patterns. The channel width-bankfull discharge relationship for discrimination channel patterns of sand-bed rivers in China is also tested in this stud. The result shows that the channel width-discharge relationship discriminates channel patterns better than the slope-discharge relationship. To improve the Leopold-Wolman relationship, a diagram based on the channel slope-bankfull width relationship is proposed. This diagram shows that the slope-width plane is divided by two straight-lines into 4 areas, with each type of river located in each area. Hence, the two straight lines can be regarded as the thresholds between the 4 types of rivers: gravel-bed meandering, gravel-bed braided, sand-bed meandering and the sand-bed braided patternes.
XU Jiongxin . Channel Pattern Discrimination Based on the Relationship Between Channel Slope and Width[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004 , 59(3) : 462 -467 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200403017
[1] Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1957, 282B: 39-85.
[2] Schumm S A, Khan H R, Winkley B R et al. Variability of river patterns. Nature, 1972, 237: 75-76.
[3] Schumm S A. Evolution and response of the fluvial system: sedimentologic implications. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 1981, No.31: 9-29.
[4] Brice J C. Planform properties of meandering rivers, in river meandering. Proceedings of Conference Rivers' 83, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1984, 1-15.
[5] Qian Ning. On the classification and causes of formation of different channel patterns. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1985, 40(1): 1-10.
[钱宁. 关于河型分类及成因问题的讨论. 地理学报, 1985, 40(1): 1-10.]
[6] Shen Yuchang, Gong Guoyuan. A General Introduction to Fluvial Geomorphology. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.
[7] Henderson F M. Stability of alluvial channels. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1963, (128): 657-686.
[8] Ferguson R I. The threshold between meandering and braiding. In: K V H Smith (ed.), Channels and Channel Control Structures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984. 6.15-6.29.
[9] Parker G. On the cause and characteristic scales of meandering and braiding in rivers. J. Fluid Mech., 1976, 76: 457-480.
[10] Xu Jiongxin. The comparison of and geomorphological implication to water currents and energy comsumption of sandy and gravel channel beds. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1999, 42(1): 74-78.
[许炯心. 沙质河床与砾石河床水流及能耗特征的比较及其地貌学意义. 科学通报, 1999, 42(1): 74-78.]
[11] Carson M A. The meandering-braided river threshold: a reappraisal. Journal of Hydrology, 1984, 73: 315-334.
[12] van der Berg J H. Prediction of alluvial channel pattern of perennial rivers. Geomorphology, 1995, 12: 259-279.
[13] Church M. Ferguson R I, R Kellerhals. On the relation of river channel gradient and pattern to discharge and grain size. Research Report. The University of British Columbia, 1982.
[14] Chitale S V. Theories and relations of river channel patterns. Journal of Hydrology, 1973, 19: 285-308.
[15] Yalin M S. River Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992. pp220.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |