Assessment and Empirical Study on the Relationship between Infrastructure Construction and Urban-Rural Development
Received date: 2002-09-12
Revised date: 2003-03-09
Online published: 2003-07-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.70173022; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of CAS, No.CX10G-B00-01-03
Urban-rural development has always been illustrated as the interdependent and interaction relationship, represented by the free flow of population, commodities, capital and information between urban and rural areas, which, in some sense, guarantees the effective and efficient uses of resources in urban and rural areas. It is self-evident that the construction of regional infrastructure is a precondition for regional urbanization.The improvement of public infrastructure shortens the "spatial distance" between urban and rural areas, widens the built-up areas, pushes outside the urban fringe and forms, in some time, a new form of spatial complexity in which urban and rural areas are intensely mixed or "interlocked". The joint development of urban and rural areas depends on the increase of capital investment for infrastructures mainly cover transportation, telecommunication, education, medical facilities and welfare. We can safely come to a conclusion that regional infrastructure is indispensable to the development of urban and rural areas and lays the foundation for the relationship generation between regional infrastructure and urban-rural development. On the other hand, the strong interaction between urban and rural areas will promote the construction and improvement of regional infrastructure. Many scholars have paid much attention to the relationship between regional infrastructure and urban-rural development now. It has important implications for the construction of infrastructure and improvement of social and economic benefits to find out and assess the relationship between regional infrastructure and urban-rural development.
Key words： China; infrastructure; urban-rural development; associative degree; model
ZHAN Jinyan, LU Qi . Assessment and Empirical Study on the Relationship between Infrastructure Construction and Urban-Rural Development[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003 , 58(4) : 611 -619 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200304017
[1] Jin Fengjun. Infrastructure and the living environment of human being. Progress in Geography, 2001, 20(3): 276-285.
[金凤君. 基础设施与人类生存环境之关系研究. 地理科学进展, 2001, 20(3): 276-285.]
[2] Deng Shulian. Research on the relationship between infrastructure and economic development. Acta Shandong Finance Academy, 2001, (4): 33-38.
[邓淑莲. 基础设施与经济发展关系探析. 山东财政学院学报, 2001, (4): 33-38.]
[3] Lewis Munford. Urban Development History. Beijing: Science Press, 1989. 383-386.
[刘易斯·芒福德. 倪文彦, 宋峻岭 译. 城市发展史. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1989. 383-386.]
[4] Yang Rongnan, Zhang Xuelian. An approach to some problems of urban-rural integration. Tropical Geography, 1998, 18(1): 12-17.
[杨荣南, 张雪莲. 城乡一体化若干问题初探. 热带地理, 1998, 18(1): 12-17.]
[5] Lu Dadao. Analysis of geo-factors behind regional development and regional policy in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2000, 20(6): 487-493.
[陆大道. 论中国区域发展与区域政策的地学基础. 地理科学, 2000, 20(6): 487-493.]
[6] George C S Lin. Transportation and metropolitan development in China's Pearl River Delta: the experience of Panyu. Inhabitat Intl., 1999, 23(2): 249-270.
[7] Zeng Juxin. Network Model of Modern Urban-rural Development. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
[曾菊新. 现代城乡网络化发展模式. 城市发展与规划丛书. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.]
[8] Albert Hirshmann. Economic Strategy. Beijing: Economical Scientific Press, 1991.
[艾伯特·赫希曼. 经济发展战略. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 1991.]
[9] W W Rostel. Economic Development Stage. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1962. 73-74.
[罗斯托. 经济成长阶段. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1962. 73-74.]
[10] Li Boxi. Comparative analysis on the relationship of infrastructure and economic development. Mana. Research, 1995, (2): 106-111.
[李伯溪. 中国基础设施水平与经济增长的区域比较分析. 管理世界, 1995, (2): 106-111.]
[11] Mao Hanying, Yu Danlin. Regional carrying capacity in Bohai Rim. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(3): 364-371.
[毛汉英, 余丹林. 环渤海地区区域承载力研究. 地理学报, 2001, 56(3): 364-371.]
[12] Liao Zhijie, Liu Yue. Comprehensive indexes and spatial distribution characteristics of the regional sustainable development of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(2): 139-150.
[廖志杰, 刘岳. 中国区域可持续发展水平及其空间分布特征. 地理学报, 2000, 55(2): 139-150.]
[13] Shen Jinshan, Song Jianmin, Guan Ke. Quantitative evaluation method and its application for infrastructure and social economy coordinated development. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2000, 13(5): 10-12.
[申金山, 宋建民, 关柯. 城市基础设施与社会经济协调发展的定量评价方法与应用. 城市环境与城市生态, 2000, 13(5): 10-12.]
[14] Li Chunlin, Liu Jinghui, Liu Weidong. A study of the gray relating degree and adjustment among agro-economic components in the Hetao oasis area. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 1995, 9(4): 216-222.
[李春林, 刘景辉, 刘卫东. 河套绿洲农业经济构成因素间的灰色关联度及其调控. 干旱区资源与环境, 1995, 9(4): 216-222.]
[15] Lu Feng. Research on the identification coefficient of relational grade for grey system. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 1997, (6): 4-52.
[吕锋. 灰色系统关联度之分辨系数的研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 1997, (6): 4-52.]
[16] Guo Tengyun, Lu Dadao, Gan Guohui. Effects of China's opening-up policy on the nation's regional economic development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(5): 581-589.
[郭腾云, 陆大道, 甘国辉. 中国开放政策对区域发展的作用. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 581-589.]
[17] Liu Yansui, Chen Baiming. The study framework of land use/cover change based on sustainable development in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(3): 324-341.
[刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324-341.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |