Models for Landscape Connectivity and Their Applications

  • State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2001-06-04

  Revised date: 2001-09-26

  Online published: 2002-01-25

Supported by

Knowledge Innovation Project, CAS, No. kzcx2-308-02; Director Fund for Knowledge Innovation Project of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Recearch, CAS, No. SJ10G-D00-02


The models for landscape connectivity are distinguished into model for line connectivity, one for vertex connectivity, another for network connectivity and still another for patch connectivity. Because the models for line connectivity, for vertex connectivity, and for network connectivity have been long studied and have become ripened, the model for patch connectivity is paid special attention in this paper. The patch connectivity is defined as the average movement efficiency (minimizing movement distance) of animal migrants or plant propagules in patches of a region under consideration. According to this definition, a model for landscape connectivity is mathematically deduced, which applies to GIS data. The application of model for patch connectivity in the new-born wetland of the Yellow River Delta shows that patch connectivity has a negative interrelation with human impact intensity and landscape diversity.

Cite this article

YUE Tian-xiang, YE Qin-hua . Models for Landscape Connectivity and Their Applications[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002 , 57(1) : 67 -75 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200201008


[1] Menger K. Zur allgemeinen Kurventheorie. Fund. Math., 1927, 10: 96-115.

[2] Taaffe E L, Jr Gauthier H L. Geograpy of Transportation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1973.

[3] Lowe J C, Moryadas S. The Geography of Movement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1975.

[4] Haggett P, Chorley R J. Network Analysis in Geography. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969.

[5] Haber W.über Landschaftspflege.Landschaft Stadt, 1984, 16: 193-199.

[6] Merriam G. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: J. Brandt and P. Agger eds. Methodologies in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning, Proceedings of the First International Seminar of the International Association of Landscape Ecology. Denmark: Roskilde, 1984. 5-15.

[7] Risser P G, Karr J R, Forman R T T. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication Number 2, 1984.

[8] Haber W. Using landscape ecology in planning and management. In: I. S. Zonneveld and R. T. T. Forman eds. Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990. 217-231.

[9] Haber W. über den Umweltzustand der Bundersrepublik Deutchland am Ende der 1980er Jahre. Korrespondenz Abwasser, 1988, 35: 1084-1089.

[10] Haber W. Zur Umsetzung ?kologischer Forschungsergebnisse in politisches Handeln. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für ?kologie, 1987, 15: 61-69.

[11] Haber W. über die menschenliche Nutzung von ?kosystemen: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Agrarokosystemen. Verh. Gesellsch. für ?kologie, 1986, 14: 13-24.

[12] Haber W, Burkhardt I. Landschafts?kologie in der Landespflege in Weihenstephan. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde, 1988, 62: 155-173.

[13] Haber W, Burkhardt I. Protecting the environment by means of landscape ecology. Universitas, 1986, 28: 233-238.

[14] Merriam G. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: Proceedings of the First International Seminar of the International Association of Landscape Ecology. Denmark: Roskilde, 1984, 5-15.

[15] Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.

[16] Schreiber K F. Connectivity in landscape ecology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of the International Association for Landscape Ecology. Münster: Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten, 29, 1987, 11-15.

[17] Janssens P, Gulinck H. Connectivity, proximity and contiguity in the landscape interpretation of remote sensing data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of the International Association for Landscape Ecology. M口ster: Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten, 29, 1987, 43-47.

[18] Taylor P D, Fahrig L, Henein K et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 1993, 68:571-573.

[19] Forman R T T. Land Mosaics: the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge in Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[20] With K A, Gardner R H, Turner M G. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos, 1997, 78: 151-169.

[21] Ravenstein E G. The Laws of Migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1885, XLVIII (Part II): 167-227.

[22] Young E C. The Movement of Farm Population. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, No.426, 1924.

[23] Stewart J Q. An inverse distance variation for certain social influence. Science, 1941, 93: 89-90.

[24] Ullman E L. The role of transportation and the bases for interaction. In: William L. Thomas, Jr. ed. Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956. 862-880.

[25] Isard W, Bramhall D F, Carrothers G A P et al. Methods of Regional Analysis: an Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge: The M. I. T. Press, 1960.

[26] Dodd S C. The interactant hypothesis: a gravity model fitting physical masses and human groups. American Sociological Review, 1950, 15: 245-256.

[27] Ikle F C. Sociological relationship of traffic to population and distance. Traffic Quarterly, 1954, 8: 123-136.

[28] Carroll J D and Bevis H W. Predicting local travell in urban regions. Papers and Proceedings of the the Regional Science Association, 1957, 3: 183-197.

[29] Zhang W H, Jin F J, Rong C H et al. Spatial Transportation. Beijing: China Railway Press, 1992
[张文尝, 金风君,荣朝和等. 空间运输联系. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1992.]

[30] Garrison W. Connectivity of the interstate highway system. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1960, 6: 121-137.

[31] Chen S P. Urbanization and Geographical Information System for Cities. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. 147-147.
[陈述彭. 城市化与城市地理信息系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. 147-148.]

[32] Whitney H. Congruent graphs and the connectivity of graphs. Amer. J. Math., 1932, 54: 150-168.

[33] Chartrand G. A graph-theoretic approach to a communication problem. J. SIAM Appl. Math., 1966, 14: 778-781.

[34] Harary F. Graph Theory. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969.

[35] Shimbel A. Structural properties of communication networks. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1953, 15: 501-507.

[36] Shimbel A, Katz W. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 1953, 18: 39-43.

[37] Niu W Y. Theoretical Geography. Beijing: Commercial Publishing House, 1992.
[牛文元. 理论地理学. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1992.]

[38] Yue T X, Haber W, Grossmann W D et al. Towards the satisfying model for biological diversity. EKOLOGIA, 1998, 17 (Supplement 1): 129-141.

[39] Yue T X, Haber W, Grossmann W D et al. Discussion on Models for Species Diversity and Suggestion on a Comprehensive Model. ECOMOD, 1998, September: 1-15.

[40] Yue T X, Liu J Y, J?rgensen S E et al. Studies on relationship between diversity and stability. Ecological Modelling: An International Journal on Ecological Modelling and Systems Ecology, 2001.

[41] Yue T X, Haber W, Cheng T, et al. Models for DLU Strategy and their applications. EKOLOGIA, 1998, 17(Supplement 1): 118-128.

[42] Gao Z Q, Liu J Y, Zhuang D F. The relation between ecological environmental background and the used degree of land resources in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(Supplement): 36-43.
[高志强, 刘纪远, 庄大方. 中国土地资源生态环境背景与利用程度的关系. 地理学报, 1988, 53(增刊): 36-43.]

[43] Chen S P. An Applied Study of Satellite Materials on General Investigation of Land. Beijing: Science Press, 1989.
[陈述彭. 国土普查资料应用研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989.]

[44] Zhao Y M. Forestry Development and Natural Conservation of Yellow River Delta. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1997.
[赵延茂. 黄河三角洲林业发展与自然保护. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1997.]

[45] Tian J Y, Jia W Z, Dou H Y et al. Study on Biodiversity in the Yellow River Delta. Qingdao: Qingdao Press, 1999.
[田家怡, 贾文泽, 窦洪云等. 黄河三角洲生物多样性研究. 青岛: 青岛出版社, 1999.]

[46] Ye Q H. A Study on Complex Model for Land Use and Land Cover Change of Yellow River Delta.Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research of Chinese Academy of Sciences: Doctoral Thesis, 2001.
[叶庆华. 黄河三角洲土地利用/土地覆被变化的时空复合模式研究. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所博士论文, 2001.]

[47] Tischendorf L, Fahrig L. How should we measure landscape connectivity?. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15: 633-641.

[48] Malanson G P, Cramer B E. Landscape heterogeneity, connectivity, and critical landscapes for conservation. Diversity and Distribution, 1999, 5: 27-39.

[49] Ruckelshaus M, Hartway C, Kareiva P M. Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models. Conservation Biology, 1997, 11: 1298-1306.

[50] Roberts S A, Hall G B, Calamai P H. Analysing forest fragmentation using spatial autocorrelation, graphs and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000, 14(2): 185-204.

[51] Gustafson E G, Gardner R H. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology, 1996, 77: 94-107.