Received date: 2006-01-25
Revised date: 2006-04-27
Online published: 2006-08-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40371031; No.70503026
Along with the highly speedy urbanization and industrialization in the developed area in China, the sprawl of land use has led to the development disorder and difficulties in natural ecology and agricultural land protection, which will threaten the regional sustainability. However, the regionalization based on ecological-economic approach amphasizes that regions with low development cost, high carrying capacity of resources and environment as well as great development ability should undertake social and economic activities with great intensity; whereas those regions having high ecological values but are difficult to be developed should maintain fuctions of agriculture and ecology, so as to promote the harmonious interrelations among economy, population, resources and environment with spatial order. Referred to the existing regionalization, this paper discusses how to divide the assessed units, choose and manage the assessed elements etc. on the basis of traditional regionalization. The classification matrix has been applied for integrating the ecological significant value and economic significant value. As a case study, Suzhou city is divided into four types, i.e., preferential development area, feasible development area, moderate conservation area and prohibited exploiting area. Finally, this paper analyses the main function regionalization method and the policy guarantee of management at different areas.
CHEN Wen, SUN Wei, DUAN Xuejun, CHEN Jianglong . Regionalization of Regional Potential Development in Suzhou City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006 , 61(8) : 839 -846 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200608006
[1] Yokohari M, Takeuchib K, Watanabe T et al. Beyond greenbelts and zoning: a new planning concept for the environment of Asian mega-cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 47(3-4): 159-171.
[2] Bromley Daniel W. Handbook of Environmental Economics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1995.
[3] Bryant C R, Russwurm L H, McLellan A G. The City's Countryside: Land and its Management in the Rural-Urban Fringe. London and New York: Longman Group UK Limited, 1982.
[4] Brown L R. Who Will Feed China?: Wake-Up Call for a Small Planet. New York: W W Norton & Company, 1995.
[5] Chen Wen, Duan Xuejun, Chen Jianglong et al. Primary study on the methods of spatial development function zoning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(suppl.): 1-6.
[陈雯, 段学军, 陈江龙 等. 空间开发功能区划方法. 地理学报增刊, 2004, 59(增刊): 1-6.]
[6] Zhao Songqiao. A new scheme for comprehensive physical regionalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1983, 38(1): 1-10.
[赵松乔. 中国综合地理区划的一个新方案. 地理学报, 1983, 38(1): 1-10.]
[7] Ren Mei'e, Bao Haosheng. Nature Region Development and Renovation in China. Beijing: Science Press, 1992. 70-82.
[任美锷, 包浩生. 中国自然区域及开发整治. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992. 70-82.]
[8] Zhou Lisan. Theories and Practices of the Agricultural Regionalization. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1993. 244-284.
[周立三. 中国农业区划的理论与实践. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1993. 244-284.]
[9] Hu Xuwei. The organization and type of the economic regions in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1993, 38(3): 193-202.
[胡序威. 中国经济区类型与组织. 地理学报, 1993, 38(3): 193-202.]
[10] Bailey R G. Ecological regionalization in Canada and the United States. Geoforum, 1985, 6(3): 265-275.
[11] Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Chen Liding. Scheme of ecological regionalization in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(1): 1-6.
[傅伯杰, 刘国华, 陈利顶. 中国生态区划方案. 生态学报, 2001, 21(1): 1-6.]
[12] Cullingworth J B, Caves R W. Planning in the USA: Policies, Issues and Processes. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, 1997. 63-124.
[13] Leung Hok-Lin. Land Use Planning Made Plain. Beijing: Geologic Publishing House, 2003. 99-103.
[梁鹤年. 简明土地利用规划. 北京: 地质出版社, 2003. 99-103.]
[14] Institute of Linlcon Land Policy. The Management of Land Use Planning. Beijing: China Land Press, 2003. 89-95.
[林肯土地政策研究所. 土地市场监控与城市类型发展. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2003. 89-95.]
[15] McHarg I L. Natural factors in planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1997, 52(1): 13-17.
[16] Institut für Raumordnung und Entwicklungsplanung Universit?t Stuttgart, Chinese Academy of Sciences, South East Resources Environment Comprehensive Research Centre, Sustainable Development by Integrated Land Use Planning (SILUP), IREUS-SCHRIFTENREIHE BAND 22, 2001, 15-16.
[17] Huang Xingyuan, Ni Shaoxiang, Xu Shoucheng et al. Study on regional land use decision making supported by GIS. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1993, 48(2): 114-121.
[黄杏元, 倪绍祥, 徐寿成 等. 地理信息系统支持区域土地利用决策的研究. 地理学报, 1993, 48(2): 114-121.]
[18] Wang Guizhi. The research on the GIS-based land suitability evaluation model. China Land Science, 1996, 10(5): 40-44.
[王桂芝. 基于GIS的土地适宜性评价模型研究. 中国土地科学, 1996, 10(5): 40-44.]
[19] Constanza B, Hannon B, Farber S et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital: toward a dynamic, integrated approach. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260.
[20] Heal G M. Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 2000, 3: 24-30.
[21] Krenter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 333-346.
[22] Lofvenhaft K, Bjorn C, Ihse M. Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 58(2): 223-240.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |