Quantitative Evaluation of the Uncer tainties in the Coordinated Development of Urban Human Settlement Environment and Economy: Taking Changsha City as an Example

  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Changsha 410082, China;
    2. The Department of Architecture of Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China

Received date: 2006-09-12

  Revised date: 2007-01-10

  Online published: 2007-04-25

Supported by

National Outstanding Youth Foundation of China, No.50425927; No.50225926


The human settlement environment problem has become a new focus on urban studies at home and abroad. Sustainable development of urban human settlement is the ultimate target of modern city construction and development. The coordinated development of human settlement and economy is of vital significance to urban sustainable development and urban ecosystem health. It is necessary to review its development and evaluate its coordinating degree. Urban human settlements and economic systems exist in urban ecosystems, which are a structural complexity. Therefore the research is being challenged by some uncertain factors between human settlements and economic systems. More and more attentions have been paid to the researches and the applications of the research result to the human settlement, eco-city and urban sustainable development. However most of the researches were focused on its determinate objective aspects and qualitative analyses while less concern on the quantitative evaluation of coordinated development of urban human settlement environment and economy, especially little on its uncertain aspect. At present, the urgent task is to study the coordinated development of urban settlement and economy in terms of the effect of uncertainty. This paper analyzed the uncertain characteristics, which would be confronted at different stages, such as confirming the index categories, their bound values, and their construction rate, etc. According to the actual urban conditions, many construction principles based on uncertainties were put forward and an indicating system for human settlement and economic evaluation was established. Moreover, the application of fuzzy mathematics presented a new method and a calculation model for the comprehensive assessment of the coordinated development of urban human settlement and economy. The application of the method and model in Changsha city of Hunan Province showed that the assessment results could reflect not only the overall coordinating degree of the city, but also the model of interactive mechanism between urban economic systems and human settlement.

Cite this article

XIONG Ying, ZENG Guangming, DONG Lisan, JIAO Sheng, CHEN Guiqiu . Quantitative Evaluation of the Uncer tainties in the Coordinated Development of Urban Human Settlement Environment and Economy: Taking Changsha City as an Example[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007 , 62(4) : 397 -406 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200704006


[1] Liu Qinpu, Lin Zhenshan, Feng Nianhua. Evaluation on the spatial differences of urban settlement environment of Jiangsu Province. Areal Research and Development, 2005, 24(5): 30-33.
[刘钦普, 林振山, 冯年华. 江苏城市人居环境 空间差异定量评价研究. 地域研究与开发, 2005, 24(5): 30-33.]

[2] Zheng Jia, Chen Zhongxiang, Wang Yao. Evaluation of urban human settlements development on Northwest China. Journal of Ningxia University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 26(2): 171-175.
[郑佳, 陈忠祥, 王尧. 中国西北地区城 市可持续人居环境综合评价. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(2): 171-175.]

[3] Wu Liangyong. Introduction to Sciences of Human Settlements. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2001.
[吴 良镛. 人居环境科学导论. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.]

[4] Wang Rusong. A transition of urban human settlement planning towards eco-integrity, naturalizing, low cost and humanity orientation. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2001,14(3): 1-5.
[王如松. 系统化、自然化、经济化、 人性化: 城市人居环境规划方法的生态转型. 城市环境与城市生态, 2001, 14(3): 1-5.]

[5] Ning Yuemin, Zha Zhiqiang. A study of evaluation and optimization for human settlement in the metropolitan areas: Take Shanghai for example. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(6): 15-20.
[宁越敏, 查志强. 大都市人居环境评价和优化 研究. 城市规划, 1999, 23(6): 15-20.]

[6] Li Xueming, Li Wanna. Quantitative analysis about coordinating development of environment of urban human settlements and economy in Dalian since the 1990's. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(3): 383-386.
[ 李雪铭, 李婉娜. 1990 年代以来大连城市人居环境与经济协调发展定量分析. 经济地理, 2005, 25(3): 383-386.]

[7] Zhu Xijin. Discussion on the composition of residential park. Urban Planning Forum, 1997, (2): 1-4.
[朱锡金. 居住园构 成说. 城市规划汇刊, 1997, (2): 1-4.]

[8] Guo Xiurui, Yang Jurong, Mao Xianqiang. Primary studies on urban ecosystem health assessment. China Environmental Science, 2002, 22(6): 525-529.
[郭秀锐, 杨居荣, 毛显强. 城市生态系统健康评价初探. 中国环境科学, 2002, 22(6): 525-529.]

[9] Hu Tinglan, Yang Zhifeng, He Mengchang et al. An urban ecosystem health assessment method and its application. Acta Scientiae Circumatantiae, 2005, 25(2): 269-274.
[胡廷兰, 杨志峰, 何孟常等. 一种城市生态系统健康评价方法及其应 用. 环境科学学报, 2005, 25(2): 269-274.]

[10] Li Huasheng, Xu Ruixiang, Peng Buzhuo. Early warning of the quality of human settlements in scale of Nanjing city. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(5): 658-661.
[李华生, 徐瑞祥, 彭补拙. 南京城市人居环境质量预警研究. 经济地理, 2005, 25(5): 658-661.]

[11] Zhang Wenzhong, Liu Wang, Meng Bin. On location advantage value of residential environment in the urban and suburban areas of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.
[张文忠, 刘旺, 孟斌. 北京市区居住环境 的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.]

[12] Wang Weiwu. A quantitative assessment on the quality of life in Hangzhou based on landsat/TM and socioeconomic data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 151-157.
[王伟武. 杭州城市生活质量的定量评价. 地理学报, 2005, 60 (1): 151-157.]

[13] Jia Liangqing, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zhao Tongqian et a1. Ecological security assessment of all urban ecosystem. Ecology and Environment, 2004, 13(4): 592-596.
[贾良清, 欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 等.城市生态安全评价研究价. 生态环境, 2004, 13(4): 592-596.]

[14] Zhang Guixiang, Yang Zhifeng. Evaluationon the ecological sustainable development level of Guangzhou City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(10): 2101-2114.
[张贵祥, 杨志峰. 广州市生态可持续发展水平对比评价. 生态学报, 2003, 23(10): 2101-2114.]

[15] Malkina Irina Q. Integrated assessment models and response function models: Pros and cons for sustainable development indices design. Ecological Indicators, 2002, (2): 93-108.

[16] Krajnc D, Glavic P. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2005, 43(2): 189-508.

[17] Liu Ping, Wang Rusong, Tang Hongshou. Approach of the method of ecological design on the environment of urban human settlement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(6): 998-1002.
[刘平, 王如松, 唐鸿寿. 城市人居环境的生态设计 方法探讨. 生态学报, 2001, 21(6): 998-1002.]

[18] Zhao Wei, Yang Zhifeng, Niu Junfeng. Construction and analysis of urban eco-economic system model. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2005, 25(10): 1425-1430.
[赵伟, 杨志峰, 牛军峰. 城市生态经济系统模型构建与分析. 环境科学学 报, 2005, 25(10): 1425-1430.]

[19] Xu Xueqiang, Zhang Junjun. Comprehensive evaluation of Guangzhou urban sustainable development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.
[许学强, 张俊军. 广州城市可持续发展的综合评价. 地理学报, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.]

[20] Wu Qiong, Wang Rusong, Li Hongqing et al. The indices and the evaluation method of eco-city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.
[吴琼, 王如松, 李宏卿等. 生态城市指标体系与评价方法. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.]

[21] Groenevel D J, Enrighn J, Lamout B B et al. A spatial model of coexistence among three banksia species along a topographic gradient in fire prone shrab lands. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90(5): 762-774.

[22] Salyer Kevind. Overlapping generation and represent at ivesagent model soft the equity premia: Implication from a growing economy. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1988, 21(3): 565-578.

[23] Dominique Guyonnet, Bern Ardcome, Pierre Perrochet et al. Comparing two methods for addressing gun certainty in risk assessments. Journal of Environmenal Engineering, 1999, 125(7): 660-666.

[24] Singer Hermann. Continuous panel models with time dependent parameters. Journal of Mathematics Sociology, 1998, 23(2): 77-98.

[25] Zou Rui, Guo Huaicheng. An inexact environmental planning method for economic development zone and its application. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2001, 21(1): 101-106.
[邹锐, 郭怀成. 经济开发区不确定性环境规划方法 与应用研究. 环境科学学报, 2001, 21(1): 101-106.]

[26] Chen Bing, Guo Huaicheng. An optimization approach and its application for environmental planning of tourism city: I. Inexact multi-objective programming mode. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2001, 21(2): 238-242.
[陈冰, 郭怀成. 旅游 城市环境规划优化方法与应用研究: I. 不确定性多目标规划模型. 环境科学学报, 2001, 21(2): 238-242.]

[27] Zeng Guangming, Jiao Sheng, Huang Guohe et al. Analysis of the uncertainties in urban ecological planning. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2006, 33(1): 102-105.
[曾光明, 焦胜, 黄国和等. 城市生态规划中的不确定性 分析. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 33(1): 102-105.]

[28] Deng Julong. Grey System (Society and Economy). Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 1985. 300-327.
[邓聚龙. 灰色系统(社会·经济). 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1985. 300-327.]

[29] Ma Shijun, Wang Rusong. Soical-economial-natural ecology system. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1984, 4(1): 1-9.
[马世骏, 王如松. 社会- 经济- 自然复合生态系统. 生态学报, 1984, 4(1): 1-9.]

[30] Yang Jiansen. Study on the frame theory of eco-city. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2001, 14(5): 59-61.
[杨 建森. 生态城市的构架理论研究. 城市环境与城市生态, 2001, 14(5): 59-61.]

[31] Dangiel Goodman. Extrapolation in risk assessment: Improving the quantification of uncertainty, and improving in formation to reduce the uncertainty. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002, 8(1): 177-192.

[32] Wayne G Landis. Uncertainty in the extrapolation from in dividual effects to impacts upon landscapes. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002, 8(1): 193-204.

[33] Fang Chuanglin, Mao Hanying. A system of indicators for regional development planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(5): 411-419.
[方创琳, 毛汉英. 区域发展规划指标体系建立方法探讨. 地理学报, 1999, 54(5): 411-419.]

[34] Jiao Sheng, Zeng Guangming, He Li. Study on the uncertainty of the index system of eco-city planning. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2004, 31(1): 75-90.
[焦胜, 曾光明, 何理. 生态城市指标体系的不确定性研究. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(1): 75-90.]

[35] Wang Jihua, Liu Yong, Guo Huaicheng. Strategic environmental assessment on regional development plans based on an inexact multiobjective method. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2004, 24(5): 922-929.
[王吉华, 刘永, 郭怀成等. 基于 不确定性多目标的规划环境影响评价研究. 环境科学学报, 2004, 24(5): 922-929.]

[36] Xiao Jianfei. General great breakthrough: Change of urban planning in social transformation period. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(1): 60.
[肖健飞. 常规大突破: 社会转型期城市规划的变革. 城市规划, 1999, 23(1): 60.]

[37] Song Yongchang, Qi Renhai, You Wenhui et al. A study on indices system and assessment criterion of eco-city. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 1999, 12(5): 16-19.
[宋永昌, 戚仁海, 由文辉等. 生态城市的指标体系与评价方 法. 城市环境与城市生态, 1999, 12(5): 16-19.]

[38] Lu Yonglong, Wang Rusong. A simulation method of urban ecosystems: Sensitivity model and its improvement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996, 16(3): 308-313.
[吕永龙, 王如松. 城市生态系统的模拟方法: 灵敏度模型及其改进. 生态学 报, 1996, 16(3): 308-313.]

[39] Hu Dan, Wang Rusong. Analysis on ecological cybernetics in urban-rural transition region: A case of Tianjin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996, 16(1): 50-57.
[胡聃, 王如松. 城乡交错带的生态控制论分析: 天津实例研究. 生态学报, 1996, 16(1): 50-57.]

[40] Li Yu, Ai Hua, Feng Feng et al. Advance in research of small town environment in 1990's. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(1): 90-101.
[李宇, 艾华, 冯枫等. 20 世纪90 年代以来小城镇环境研究进展.地理科学进展, 2006, 25(1): 90-101.]

[41] Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua. Characteristics and influencing factors of urban land expansion in Changsha. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(11): 1171-1180.
[周国华, 贺艳华. 长沙城市土地扩张特征及影响因素. 地理学报, 2006, 61(11): 1171-1180.]