Dynamic Mechanism and Models of Regional Rural Development in China
Received date: 2007-04-15
Revised date: 2007-10-15
Online published: 2008-02-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40635029; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS
The agriculture, rural and farmer development are the principal and radical problems in the recent economic and social process in China. Nowadays, aiming at building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and modernizing the country, the project of new socialist countryside construction was advanced at the Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee of the Party, which means advanced production, improved livelihood, a civilized social atmosphere, clean and tidy villages and efficient management. Though many researches have been conducted on the new socialist countryside construction and given some suggestions, there have been relatively few studies on the research of rural development theory. It is an original approach to the analysis of the elements and configuration of the whole rural development system to provide theoretical basis for choosing rural development models based on the view of system theory. The results are as the follows: (1) The regional system is a urban-rural integration, so it is very necessary to study rural development problem in the general framework of the whole regional system. (2) Regional rural development system is a complicated synthesis, including regional rural development core system and regional rural development exterior system. The former is composed of rural natural system, rural economic system, rural social system and rural ecological system, and the latter consists of regional development policies, international trade circumstance, etc. The essence of rural development is the process of mutual coupling and coordination of the two sub-systems. (3) The regional rural comprehensive ability lies on two aspects including the rural development inner ability and the exterior drive of urbanization and industrialization. The interaction mechanism obeys parallelogram principle in physics. The evolvement characteristics of rural development system are different in the different combinations of the inner and exterior driving forces. (4) According to the difference of rural development driving forces, rural development models are classified into two types, namely the dominant type of rural self-development and the dominant type of the exterior drive of industrialization and urbanization, and six sub-types at the second level, which are industry driving, villages and towns construction driving, labor force transfer driving, characteristic industry driving, eco-tourism development and specialized market organization driving. In conclusion, it is a scientific approach to the exploration of regional rural sustainable development models, based on the analysis of elements, construction, and function of regional rural development system and characteristics.
ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui . Dynamic Mechanism and Models of Regional Rural Development in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008 , 63(2) : 115 -122 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200802001
[1] Wu Chuanjun. Problems of the Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Rural Economy in China: Case Studies of Agricultural Areas of Different Types. Beijing: China Environment Science Press, 2001. 3.
[吴传钧. 中国农业与农村经 济可持续发展问题: 不同类型地区实证研究. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2001. 3.]
[2] Taele B M, Gopinathana K K, Mokhuts'oane L. The potential of renewable energy technologies for rural development in Lesotho. Renewable Energy, 2006, (2): 1-14.
[3] Raja R. Energy planning and optimization model for rural development: A case of sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Energy Research, 1997, 21(6): 527-548.
[4] Crecente R, A'lvarez C, Fra U. Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia. Land Use Policy, 2002, 19: 135-147.
[5] Miranda D, Crecente R, Flor Alvarez M. Land consolidation in inland rural Galicia, N.W. Spain, since 1950: An example of the formulation and use of questions, criteria and indicators for evaluation of rural development policies. Land Use Policy, 2006, 23: 511-520.
[6] Jacobs H. Practicing land consolidation in a changing world of land use planning. Kart Og Plan, 2000, 60(3): 175-182.
[7] Mukherjee A N, Kuroda Y. Convergence in rural development: Evidence from India. Journal of Asian Economics, 2002, 13(3): 385-398.
[8] Lan Haitao, Huang Hanquan. International experience and revelation of new countryside construction. China Economic & Trade Herald, 2006, (7): 18-20.
[ 蓝海涛, 黄汉权. 新农村建设的国际经验与启示. 中国经贸导刊, 2006, (7): 18-20.]
[9] Deng Jingzhong. Study of China agricultural zoning staus. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1963, 29(4): 265-270.
[邓静中. 全 国农业现状区划的初步探讨. 地理学报, 1963, 29(4): 265-270.]
[10] She Zhixiang. New features in the development of agricultural regions and new problems concerning the distribution for agricultural production in Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1979, 34(2): 104-117.
[佘之祥. 江苏省农业 区域发展的新特点与农业生产布局的新问题. 地理学报, 1979, 34(2): 104-117.]
[11] Liu Yansui, Wang Dawei, Peng Liuying. Recent progress in agricultural geography and its trends in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(suppl.): 175-182.
[刘彦随, 王大伟, 彭留英. 中国农业地理学研究的进展与趋向. 地理 学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 175-182.]
[12] Cai Yunlong, Barry Smit. Sustainable agriculture and the Chinese perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1995, 50(2): 97-106.
[蔡运龙, Barry Smit. 持续农业及其中国态势. 地理学报, 1995, 50(2): 97-106.]
[13] Liu Yansui, Wu Chuanjun, Lu Qi. Orientation and tactics for 21st century sustainable agriculture and rural development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(4): 385-389.
[刘彦随, 吴传钧, 鲁奇. 21 世纪中国农业与农村可持续 发展方向和策略. 地理科学, 2002, 22(4): 385-389.]
[14] Chen Xiwen. New countryside construction reconsideration. China Reform, 2006, (2): 14-17.
[陈锡文. 重提“新农村 建设”. 中国改革, 2006, (2): 14-17.]
[15] Zhu Zijuan. Connotation of socialist new countryside construction analysis. Exoterica Observation, 2006, (1): 11-12.
[朱 子娟. 建设社会主义新农村内涵解读. 理论观察, 2006, (1): 11-12.]
[16] Ye Yiguang, Pang Ying, Zhang Quanjing. Contributions of technological innovation to land productivity in the coastal regions of eastern China: A case of Yantai city, Shandong Province. Resources Sciences, 2005, 27(3): 61-65.
[叶依广, 庞英, 张全景. 中国东部沿海区域土地生产力的技术进步效应实证研究. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 61-65.]
[17] Zeng Zungu, Xiong Ning, Fan Wenguo. An approach to the areal models of agricultural integration: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 115-124.
[曾尊固, 熊宁, 范文国. 农业产业化地域模式初步研 究: 以江苏省为例. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 115-124.]
[18] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
[ 刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[19] Long Hualou. Rural housing land transition in China: Theory and verification. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
[龙花楼. 中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1093-1100.]
[20] Zhang Xiaolin. Study of Rural Spatial System and Revolution: A Case Study of South Jiangsu Region. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press, 1999. 11.
[张小林. 乡村空间系统及其演变研究: 以苏南为例. 南京: 南京师范大 学出版社, 1999. 11.]
[21] Mao Hanying, Yu Danlin. Regional carrying capacity in Bohai Rim. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(3): 363-371.
[毛汉英, 余丹林. 环渤海地区区域承载力研究. 地理学报, 2001, 56(3): 363-371.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |