A Quantitative Comparison and Analytical Study on the Assessment Indicator s of Greenhouse Gases Emissions

  • 1. Lanzhou Branch Library of National Science Library, Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. MOE Key Laboratory of Western Environmental Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2007-12-20

  Revised date: 2008-03-06

  Online published: 2008-07-25

Supported by

the Key Project for Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS, No. KZCX2-YW-501; National S&T Pillar Program,No.007BAC03A11-05


Currently the main assessment indicators for GHG emissions include national indicator, per capita indicator, per GDP indicator, and international trade indicator. Based on the GHG emission data from World Resource Institute (WRI), US Energy Information Administration (EIA), and Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), the results of each indictor are calculated for the world and especially for the eight main industrialized countries of US, UK, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Russia (G8 Nations), and the five major developing countries of China, Brazil, India, South Africa and Mexico, and their merits and demerits are analyzed. It points out that all these indicators have some limitations. The indicator of Industrialized Accumulative Emission per Capita (IAEC) is identified to evaluate the industrialized historical accumulative emission per capita of every country. IAEC indicator is an equitable indicator for GHG emission assessment, which reflects the economic achievement of GHG emission enjoyed by the current generations in every country and their commitments. The analysis of IAEC indicates that the historical accumulative emissions per capita in industrialized countries such as UK and USA were typically higher than those in the world average level and the developing countries. Emission indicator per capita per unit GDP, consumptive emission indicator and survival emission indicator are also put forward and discussed in the paper.

Cite this article

ZHANG Zhiqiang, QU Jiansheng, ZENG Jingjing . A Quantitative Comparison and Analytical Study on the Assessment Indicator s of Greenhouse Gases Emissions[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008 , 63(7) : 693 -702 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200807003


[1] IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Secretariat, 2007.

[2] Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. http://cdiac.ornl. gov/

[3] World Resource Institute. CO2 emissions series data. http://www.wri.org

[4] US Energy Information Administration. International Energy Annual 2004. 2006.

[5] UNFCCC. Kyoto Protocol. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php

[6] US Census Bureau. IDB-Rank Countries by Population. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbrank.html

[7] United Nations Population Fund. State of World Population 2007. UNFPA, 2007.

[8] US Government. Clear Skies & Global Climate Change Initiatives. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/ 2002/02/ 20020214-5.html

[9] World Bank. DDP data. http://ddp-ext.worldbank.orgAhmad Nadim. A Framework For Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods. OECD, Paris. 2003.

[10] Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research. Who owns China's carbon emissions? Tyndall Briefing Note No.23, October 2007.

[11] Ren Guoyu, Xu Ying. The status and history of CO2 emission from world countries. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2002, 30(3): 129-134.
[任国玉, 徐影. 世界各国CO2 排放历史和现状. 气象科技, 2002, 30(3): 129-134.]

[12] Wang Weizhong, Chen Bin, Lu Chuanyi et al. The Koyto Protocol and allocation of carbon emission permits. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2002, 17(6): 81-85.
[王伟中, 陈滨, 鲁传一等. 《京都议定 书》和碳排放权分配问题. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002, 17(6): 81-85.]

[13] Zhu Xingshan. The fairness and efficiency problem of action to address climate change. Environmental and Sustainable Development, 1998, (3): 6-11.
[朱兴珊. 应付气候变化行动中的公平和效率问题. 环境科学动态, 1998, (3): 6-11.]

[14] Ruddiman W, Thomson J. The case for human causes of increased atmospheric CH4 over the last 5000 years. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2001, 20: 1769-1777.

[15] W Ruddiman. The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Climate Change, 2003, 61: 261-293.