Incentives of Environmental Design and Management in Residential Areas of Beijing

  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2006-10-09

  Revised date: 2006-12-08

  Online published: 2007-02-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40671063; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of CAS; The project sponsored by SRF for ROCS, SEM


To increase the quality of life in urban areas, new management systems facilitating the long-run improvement of residential environments are expected. This necessitates a good understanding of the benefits of environmental design and management, as well as the social effects of relevant policies. This paper addressed this issue by studying the incentives of environmental design and management with data of Beijing. Through detailed survey of neighborhoods, the critical factors of environmental design and management were explored, and then the economic effects of these factors on housing prices were investigated. In this way, the incentives of improving the design and management of residential environments were clarified. The results suggested that, planning and design, incompatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, and the property management of neighborhoods, are three critical factors influencing the quality of residential environments, and the environmental design and management of neighborhoods have significant economic values. These results implied that the introduction of environmental design and management system would effectively bring benefits to the neighborhoods. Based on analysis results, the appropriate range of property management fee is also proposed.

Cite this article

GAO Xiaolu . Incentives of Environmental Design and Management in Residential Areas of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007 , 62(2) : 147 -156 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200702004


[1] Adams L W, Leedy D L (eds). Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment. Columbia MD: National Institute for Urban Wildlife, 1987.

[2] de Haas W, Kranendonk R, Pleijte M. Valuable man-made landscapes (VMLs) in the Netherlands: a policy evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, 46: 133-141.

[3] Jim C Y. Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 2004, 21 (4): 311-320.

[4] Department of the Environment. Guidance on the Protection of Strategic Views for London. Department of the Environment Consultation Letter, UK, 1990.

[5] Murtagh W J. Keeping Time: The History and Theory of Preservation in America. Revised edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1997.

[6] Lichfield N. Economics in Urban Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

[7] Carter R W, Bramley R. Defining heritage values and significance for improved resource management: an application to Australian tourism. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2002, 8(3): 175-199.

[8] Coeterier J F. Lay people's evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 59(2): 111-123.

[9] !pekoglu B. An architectural evaluation method for conservation of traditional dwellings. Building Environment, 2006, 41(3): 386-394.

[10] Gómez-Sal A, Belmontes J A, Nicolau J M. Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 168(3): 319-341.

[11] Prato T. Multiple attribute evaluation of landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 60(4): 325-337.

[12] Groat L. Public opinion of contextual fit. Journal of American Institute of Architects, 1984, 73: 72-75.

[13] Willis K G, Garrod G D. Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 1993, 37(1): 1-22.

[14] Tyrvainen L, Vaananen H. The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 43: 105-118.

[15] McLeod P B. The demand for local amenity: a hedonic price analysis. Environment and Planning A, 1984, 16: 389-400.

[16] Tyrvainen L. The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 37: 211-222.

[17] Tyrvainen L, Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environment and Economic Management, 2000, 39: 205-223.

[18] Geoghegan J, Wainger L A, Bockstael N E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 1997, 23: 251-264.

[19] Chen Fu, Chen Haiyan, Zhu Zhenhua et al. Analysis on evaluation of urban residential quality and satisfaction. Human Geography, 2000, 15(4): 20-23.
[ 陈浮, 陈海燕, 朱振华等. 城市人居环境与满意度评价研究. 人文地理, 2000, 15 (4): 20-23.]

[20] Gu Chuanhui, Chen Guizhu. Study on index system of eco-city assessment. Environmental Protection, 2001, (11): 24-25.
[顾传辉, 陈桂珠. 生态城市评价指标体系研究. 环境保护, 2001, (11): 24-25.]

[21] Hua Hong. The quality evaluation of environment for the urban old residential area. Environmental Protection, 1999, (6): 26-28.
[华虹. 城市旧居住区的环境质量评价. 环境保护, 1999, (6): 26-28.]

[22] Li Bin. Evaluation of the development of human settlements in Lanzhou city. Ecological Economy, 2005, (5): 34-37.
[李斌. 兰州城市人居环境建设质量评价研究. 生态经济, 2005, (5): 34-37.]

[23] Li Wangming, Ye Xinyue. The assessment of urban human settlements. Economic Geography, 1999, 19(2): 38-43.
[李 王鸣, 叶信岳. 城市人居环境评价. 经济地理, 1999, 19(2): 38-43.]

[24] Li Xueming, Li Jianhong. Analysis of urban space in Dalian. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(8): 809-817.
[李雪铭, 李建宏. 大连城市空间意象分析. 地理学报, 2006, 61(8): 809-817.]

[25] Li Zhibin. Renovation of urban landscape. Economic Geography, 2001, 21(suppl.): 106-108.
[李植斌. 城市景观特色的 整治与创新. 经济地理, 2001, 21(增刊): 106-108.]

[26] Ning Yuemin, Zha Zhiqiang. A study on urban human settlements assessment and optimization measures. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(6): 15-20.
[宁越敏, 查志强. 大都市人居环境评价和优化研究. 城市规划, 1999, 23(6): 15-20]

[27] Wang Maojun, Zhang Xuexia, Zhang Wenzhong. An evaluation of spatial structure of urban residential environment in Dalian: Based on area source model. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(6): 753-762.
[王茂军, 张学霞, 张文忠. 基于面 源模型的城市居住环境评价空间分异研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 753-762]

[28] Wu Qiong, Wang Rusong, Li Hongqing et al. The indices and the evaluation method of eco-city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.
[吴琼, 王如松, 李宏卿等. 生态城市指标体系与评价方法. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2090-2095.]

[29] Wu Zhiqiang, Wei Fang et al. Evaluation System of Sustainable Human Settlements in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
[吴志强, 蔚芳等. 可持续发展中国人居环境评价体系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.]

[30] Xie Rangzhi. Comprehensive evaluation of the environmental quality and the sustainability of urban residential areas in China. City, 1997, (3): 38-40.
[谢让志. 中国城市住区环境质量综合评估及其可持续发展研究. 城市, 1997, (3): 38-40].

[31] Zhang Wenzhong, Liu Wang, Meng Bin. A study on location advantage value of residential environment (LAVRE) in the urban and suburban Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.
[张文忠, 刘旺, 孟斌. 北京城市内部 居住环境的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.]

[32] Wu Shuoxian, Li Jinpeng, Huo Yun et al. Evaluation of factores affecting the living and environmental quality of resident areas. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1995, 15(3): 354-362.
[吴硕贤, 李劲鹏, 霍云等. 居住区生活环境质量 影响因素的多元统计分析与评价. 环境科学学报, 1995, 15(3): 354-362.]