俄罗斯油气资源空间分布格局及可达性评估

doi:10.11821/dlxb202009014

Abstract

Abstract:

Russia is rich in oil, gas resources, and areas with unproven reserves, and also has a huge potential for application of oil and gas resources. As climate change intensifies, it would be possible for navigation in Arctic, and Russia hopes to vigorously develop its energy trade through the Arctic Sea Route. In this study, the Russian transportation network was regarded as the focus of connecting resources and ports, and spatial statistical method was used to describe the spatial distribution characteristics of Russian oil and gas resources. By means of grid cost distance, weighted average travel time and potential location advantage, the accessibility of oil and gas resources in each port was quantified, and the conclusions were drawn as follows. (1) The oil and gas resources were concentrated in the Western Siberian Plain. The accessibility of ports in the whole region of Russia was characterized by "high in the west and low in the middle". (2) The resource accessibility of the northeast port of Russia was generally poor, and the resource accessibility of the northwest port was better than that of the northeast one. Taking oil and gas resources, geographical location and project cooperation into account, we focused on the construction of three ports: Sabetta, Murmansk and Vladivostok. (3) The density of the nearby traffic network affected the resource accessibility of the port. With the climate warming, the melting of frozen soil, and the gradual implementation of the "Polar Silk Road" between China and Russia, it would be possible for further improvement in the resource accessibility of ports in the Far East region of Russia in the future.

Key words: Polar Silk Road, oil and gas resources, ports, accessibility, potential location advantage

HUANG Jixia, ZHANG Tianyuan, WANG Li, YANG Linsheng, GE Quansheng. Spatial distribution patterns and the accessibility evaluation of oil and gas resources in Russia[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(9): 2009-2024.

Figures/Tables 13

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

Tab. 8

Tab. 9

References 46

[1]	Li Jie. Analysis of the international cooperation for the development of oil and gasresource in the Arctic. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2014,17(2):88-107.
	[ 李洁. 北极地区油气资源开发国际合作机制研究. 武大国际法评论, 2014,17(2):88-107.]
[2]	Gautier D L, Bird K J, Charpentier R R, et al. Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Arctic. Science, 2009,324(5931):1175-1179. doi: 10.1126/science.1169467 pmid: 19478178
[3]	Wang Shuling, Jiang Chongxin, Jin Xi. The strategic significance of the Arctic and the development of oil and gas resource, China Mining Magazine, 2018,27(1):20-26, 39.
	[ 王淑玲, 姜重昕, 金玺. 北极的战略意义及油气资源开发. 中国矿业, 2018,27(1):20-26, 39.]
[4]	Zhu Jing. Research on port cooperative competitiveness of ports along the Northeast Passage of the Arctic[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2017.
	[ 朱静. 北极东北航线港口合作竞争力研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2017.]
[5]	Liu Feng. The oil and gas resources exploration in the eastern area in Russian Federation and the Sino-Russia energy cooperation[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.
	[ 刘锋. 俄罗斯东部地区油气资源开发与中俄能源合作[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013.]
[6]	Morris J M, Dumble P L, Wigan M R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 1979,13(2):91-109.
[7]	Li Pinghua, Lu Yuqi. Review and prospection of accessibility research. Progress in Geography, 2005,24(3):69-78.
	[ 李平华, 陆玉麒. 可达性研究的回顾与展望. 地理科学进展, 2005,24(3):69-78.]
[8]	Hansen W G. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959,25(2):73-76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
[9]	Chen Gang, Huang Xiang, Liu Dajun, et al. Spatial analysis of transport accessibility and its correlation with the tourism economic linkage of Hubei province. Tourism Forum, 2012,5(6):62-66.
	[ 陈刚, 黄翔, 刘大均, 等. 湖北省旅游交通可达性及旅游经济联系空间分析. 旅游论坛, 2012,5(6):62-66.]
[10]	Larsen K, Gilliland J. Mapping the evolution of "food deserts" in a Canadian city: Supermarket accessibility in London, Ontario, 1961-2005. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2008,7(1):1-16. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-1
[11]	Weiss D J, Nelson A, Gibson H S, et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature, 2018,553(7688):333-336. doi: 10.1038/nature25181 pmid: 29320477
[12]	Luo Pengfei, Xu Yilun, Zhang Nannan. Study on the impacts of regional accessibility of high speed rail: A case study of Nanjing to Shanghai region. Economic Geography, 2004,24(3):407-411.
	[ 罗鹏飞, 徐逸伦, 张楠楠. 高速铁路对区域可达性的影响研究: 以沪宁地区为例. 经济地理, 2004,24(3):407-411.]
[13]	Liu Chuanming, Zeng Juxin. The calculating method about the comprehensive transport accessibility and its correlation with economic development at county level: The statistical analysis of 79 counties in Hubei province. Geographical Research, 2011,30(12):2209-2221.
	[ 刘传明, 曾菊新. 县域综合交通可达性测度及其与经济发展水平的关系: 对湖北省79个县域的定量分析. 地理研究, 2011,30(12):2209-2221.]
[14]	Song Bingliang. Land access to ports and the construction of international shipping center. Economic Geography, 2001,21(4):447-450, 477.
	[ 宋炳良. 港口内陆空间通达性与国际航运中心建设. 经济地理, 2001,21(4):447-450, 477.]
[15]	Li Zhenfu, Zeng Qian, Liu Chao. Definition of the Arctic Route ports of China. Areal Research and Development, 2016,35(6):7-11, 53.
	[ 李振福, 曾茜, 刘超. 中国北极航线港口界定. 地域研究与开发, 2016,35(6):7-11, 53.]
[16]	Li Zhenfu, Ding Chaojun, Zeng Qian. Hierarchy of Chinese ports for Arctic Route. Navigation of China, 2016,39(3):128-134.
	[ 李振福, 丁超君, 曾茜. 中国北极航线港口层次划分. 中国航海, 2016,39(3):128-134.]
[17]	Li Zhenfu, Li Yi. The impact of the Arctic Route on the global shipping network. World Regional Studies, 2014,23(1):1-9.
	[ 李振福, 李漪. 北极航线的世界航运网络格局影响分析. 世界地理研究, 2014,23(1):1-9.]
[18]	Li Zhenfu, Jiang Shufei, Xu Mengqiao, et al. On the shipping network evolution under the Arctic Route. Complex System and Complexity Science, 2015,12(4):55-60.
	[ 李振福, 姜书飞, 徐梦俏, 等. 面向北极航线通航的海运网络演化研究. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015,12(4):55-60.]
[19]	Franc P, Horst M V D. Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010,18(4):557-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004
[20]	Ferrari C, Parola F, Gattorna E. Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case. Transport Policy, 2011,18(2):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.11.002
[21]	Stephen J. Ramos. Planning for competitive port expansion on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard: The case of the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014,36:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.007
[22]	Priemus H, Visser J. Infrastructure policy in the Randstad Holland: Struggle between accessibility and sustainability. Political Geography, 1995,14(4):363-377. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(95)95719-E
[23]	Baird A J. Optimising the container transhipment hub location in northern Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 2006,14(3):195-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.004
[24]	Stephenson S R, Smith L C, Agnew J A. Divergent long-term trajectories of human access to the Arctic. Nature Climate Change, 2011,1(3):156-160.
[25]	Zhu Mingya, Ping Ying, He Shufeng. The potential impact of Arctic oil and gas exploitation on the world energy pattern and China. Ocean Development and Management, 2015,32(4):1-7.
	[ 朱明亚, 平瑛, 贺书锋. 北极油气资源开发对世界能源格局和中国的潜在影响. 海洋开发与管理, 2015,32(4):1-7.]
[26]	Wang Chunjuan. The study on China strategy of exploitation and utilization of Arctic oil and gas resources[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2018.
	[ 王春娟. 中国开发利用北极油气资源战略研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2018.]
[27]	Tuzova Y, Qayum F. Global oil glut and sanctions: The impact on Putin's Russia. Energy Policy, 2016,90:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.008
[28]	Vatansever A. Is Russia building too many pipelines? Explaining Russia's oil and gas export strategy. Energy Policy, 2017,108:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.038
[29]	Richter P M, Holz F. All quiet on the eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe. Energy Policy, 2015,80:177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.024
[30]	Xu Shubao, Wang Suhua. Petroleum geological characteristics and resource potential of oil-bearing basins in eastern Siberia. Oil Forum, 2007,26(2):33-38.
	[ 徐树宝, 王素花. 东西伯利亚含油气盆地石油地质特征和资源潜力. 石油科技论坛, 2007,26(2):33-38.]
[31]	Li Xuejie, Yao Yongjian, Yang Chupeng, et al. Sedimentary basins in Eastern Arctic Shelf and their petroleum potential. Geological South China Sea, 2013,26(1):1-13.
	[ 李学杰, 姚永坚, 杨楚鹏, 等. 东北极陆架区沉积盆地分布与油气资源潜力. 南海地质研究, 2013,26(1):1-13.]
[32]	Zhou Yongheng, Liu Jinlong, Chai Lu, et al. Supporting design and optimization of large section roadway with straight wall and semicircle arch. China Mining Magazine, 2017,26(11):118-125.
	[ 周永恒, 刘金龙, 柴璐, 等. 俄罗斯远东地区矿产资源开发现状与潜力. 中国矿业, 2017,26(11):118-125.]
[33]	Hao Q, Zuo Y, Li L, et al. The distribution of petroleum resources and characteristics of main petroliferous basins along the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. Acta Geologica Sinica: English Edition, 2017,91(4):1457-1486. doi: 10.1111/acgs.2017.91.issue-4
[34]	Zou C, Zhai G, Zhang G, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(1):14-28. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(15)60002-7
[35]	Jiang Haibing, Xu Jiangang, Qi Yi. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(10):1287-1298. doi: 10.11821/xb201010013
	[ 蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响. 地理学报, 2010,65(10):1287-1298.]
[36]	Song Zhengna, Chen Wen. Measuring spatial accessibility to health care facilities based on potential model. Progress in Geography, 2009,28(6):848-854. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.06.003
	[ 宋正娜, 陈雯. 基于潜能模型的医疗设施空间可达性评价方法. 地理科学进展, 2009,28(6):848-854.]
[37]	Tao Haiyan, Chen Xiaoxiang, Li Xia. Research on spatial accessibility to health service: A case study in the Haizhu District of Guangzhou. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2007,30(1):1-5.
	[ 陶海燕, 陈晓翔, 黎夏. 公共医疗卫生服务的空间可达性研究: 以广州市海珠区为例. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2007,30(1):1-5.]
[38]	Pan Jinghu, Li Junfeng. Spatial distribution characteristics and accessibility of A-grade tourist attractions in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014,29(1):55-66. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.01.006
	[ 潘竟虎, 李俊峰. 中国A级旅游景点空间分布特征与可达性. 自然资源学报, 2014,29(1):55-66.]
[39]	Lawrence D M, Slater A G. A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005,32(24):L24401. Doi: 10.1029/2005GL025080. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025080
[40]	Batir J, Hornbach M J, Blackwell D D, et al. Ten years of measurements and modeling of soil temperature changes and their effects on permafrost in Northwestern Alaska. Global and Planetary Change, 2017(148):55-71.
[41]	Wang Zhimin, Chen Yuanhang. Opportunities and challenges for China and Russia to build "Silk Road on Ice". Northeast Asia Forum, 2018,27(2):17-33, 127.
	[ 王志民, 陈远航. 中俄打造“冰上丝绸之路”的机遇与挑战. 东北亚论坛, 2018,27(2):17-33, 127.]
[42]	Zhang Ziyue. The research on the meteorological risk of railway system over the Sichuan-Tibet region[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019.
	[ 张子曰. 川藏铁路沿线气象风险特征分析[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.]
[43]	Fang Jianhong. Adaptive countermeasure research on expressway construction in permafrost region of eastern part of Qinghai-Tibet[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017.
	[ 房建宏. 青藏高原东部多年冻土区高速公路建设适应性对策研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017.]
[44]	Wang Shuangjie, Wang Zuo, Yuan Kun, et al. Qinghai-Tibet highway engineering geology in permafrost regions: Review and prospect. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015,28(12):1-8, 32.
	[ 汪双杰, 王佐, 袁堃, 等. 青藏公路多年冻土地区公路工程地质研究回顾与展望. 中国公路学报, 2015,28(12):1-8, 32.]
[45]	Wang Zhiming, Zheng Shengzhang. Characteristics analysis and governance measures of permafrost along a highway in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2019,37(3):24-28.
	[ 王智明, 郑胜章. 青藏高原某公路沿线多年冻土特征分析及治理措施. 勘察科学技术, 2019,37(3):24-28.]
[46]	Wu Hao. Analysis and preventive measures of highway traffic accidents at high altitude and high altitude: A case study of Qinghai-Tibet Highway [D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017.
	[ 吴昊. 高寒高海拔地区公路交通事故分析与预防对策研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.]

港口中文名称	港口英文名称	纬度	经度
阿纳德尔	ANADYR	64°44′20″N	171°31′12″E
阿尔汉格尔斯克	ARKHANGELSK	64°32′00″N	40°31′00″E
迪克森	DIKSON	73°30′27″N	80°23′47″E
哈坦加	KHATANGA	71°58′57″N	102°28′17″E
霍尔姆斯克	KHOLMSK	47°03′02″N	142°02′38″E
马加丹	MAGADAN	59°32′21″N	150°46′26″E
摩尔曼斯克	MURMANSK	68°58′21″N	33°02′46″E
尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)	NIKOLAEVSK ON AMUR	53°07′56″N	140°42′56″E
堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKIY	53°00′28″N	158°38′59″E
佩韦克	PEVEK	69°42′06″N	170°16′59″E
普罗维杰尼亚	PROVIDENIJA	64°24′12″N	173°13′02″W
萨别塔	SABETTA	71°15′00″N	72°06′10″E
圣彼得堡	ST. PETERSBURG	59°55′38″N	30°13′48″E
季克西	TIKSI	71°38′35″N	128°52′35″E
瓦尼诺	VANINO	49°05′06″N	140°16′18″E
符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)	VLADIVOSTOK	43°05′40″N	131°53′25″E

运输方式	铁路	一级公路	二级公路	陆地	河流	湖泊	输油管道	输气管道
速度(km/h)	100	120	80	20	-	-	-	-
时间成本(min)	6	5	7.5	30	300	600	3.7	2.47

资源种类	资源规模
资源种类	大型	特大型	巨型
石油	64	5	-
天然气	60	10	1

资源种类	NNI	分布类型	z得分	p值
石油	0.43	聚集	-8.98	0.00
天然气	0.60	聚集—随机	-6.42	0.00

时间(h)	阿纳德尔	阿尔汉格尔斯克	迪克森	哈坦加	霍尔姆斯克	马加丹	摩尔曼斯克	尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)
0~28	4645	59867	3436	5755	15460	10288	51500	13560
28~45	4978	27404	15675	6567	29718	22276	28822	27711
45~58	2439	19493	52412	7301	45135	30987	20450	41235
58~70	3419	14985	28068	17391	36385	30783	15461	40273
70~85	7492	15581	21221	42675	17366	51199	16875	19377
85~105	19480	14962	21121	53645	14220	16149	16744	15094
> 105	125099	15261	25620	34218	9269	5871	17700	10302
时间(h)	堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	佩韦克	普罗维杰尼亚	萨别塔	圣彼得堡	季克西	瓦尼诺	符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)
0~28	1928	3770	1454	2198	63227	4323	21668	21348
28~45	639	5404	2516	50202	26871	6997	36166	36449
45~58	344	4011	2523	27857	19600	8917	51210	49528
58~70	902	3237	2525	19545	14280	15777	23785	24776
70~85	3086	6957	3026	18937	15395	33815	15087	15233
85~105	7579	18265	6139	21297	13834	62455	12197	12510
> 105	153073	125907	149368	27516	14346	35269	7439	7709

Spatial distribution patterns and the accessibility evaluation of oil and gas resources in Russia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 46

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

港口	0~28	28~45	45~58	58~70	70~85	85~105	> 105	到所有油田总时间(h)
阿纳德尔	0	0	0	0	0	0	69	8755.64
阿尔汉格尔斯克	66	0	3	0	0	0	0	1363.62
迪克森	1	30	31	5	2	0	0	3341.22
哈坦加	0	0	0	1	50	18	0	5592.39
霍尔姆斯克	0	35	28	5	1	0	0	3250.98
马加丹	0	0	0	52	16	1	0	4547.45
摩尔曼斯克	63	3	1	2	0	0	0	1588.87
尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)	0	30	33	5	1	0	0	3374.88
堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	0	0	0	0	0	0	69	10990.72
佩韦克	0	0	0	0	0	0	69	8802.06
普罗维杰尼亚	0	0	0	0	0	0	69	10939.48
萨别塔	0	61	6	0	2	0	0	2716.00
圣彼得堡	66	0	3	0	0	0	0	1302.04
季克西	0	0	0	0	0	62	7	6763.85
瓦尼诺	0	47	21	1	0	0	0	2901.39
符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)	0	50	18	1	0	0	0	2835.73

港口	0~28	28~45	45~58	58~70	70~85	85~105	> 105	到所有气田总时间(h)
阿纳德尔	0	0	0	0	0	3	68	9710.88
阿尔汉格尔斯克	43	18	2	4	3	1	0	2137.29
迪克森	4	28	19	10	2	8	0	3703.39
哈坦加	0	0	7	28	27	9	0	5024.80
霍尔姆斯克	0	4	20	28	13	6	0	4498.87
马加丹	0	3	5	14	31	15	3	5380.72
摩尔曼斯克	30	25	8	1	6	1	0	2570.07
尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)	0	4	14	33	13	7	0	4659.74
堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	0	0	0	0	0	0	71	12010.74
佩韦克	0	0	0	0	0	3	68	9758.65
普罗维杰尼亚	0	0	0	0	0	0	71	11958.02
萨别塔	12	43	4	4	1	6	1	2911.39
圣彼得堡	50	13	0	5	2	1	0	1906.53
季克西	0	0	3	1	6	38	23	7111.96
瓦尼诺	0	6	35	14	13	3	0	4191.74
符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)	0	4	35	16	12	4	0	4245.49

港口	油田加权平均旅行时间(h)	气田加权平均旅行时间(h)	加权平均旅行时间(h)
圣彼得堡	17.91	20.83	19.37
阿尔汉格尔斯克	18.65	24.01	21.33
摩尔曼斯克	21.92	30.17	26.05
萨别塔	38.04	35.26	36.65
迪克森	47.08	46.60	46.84
符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)	39.78	59.09	49.44
瓦尼诺	40.73	58.48	49.61
霍尔姆斯克	45.79	62.85	54.32
尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)	47.59	65.11	56.35
马加丹	64.58	76.39	70.49
哈坦加	80.04	68.88	74.46
季克西	96.86	102.12	99.49
阿纳德尔	125.57	137.37	131.47
佩韦克	126.25	138.05	132.15
普罗维杰尼亚	157.22	169.02	163.12
堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	157.96	169.77	163.87

港口	石油区位优势潜力	天然气区位优势潜力	综合资源区位优势潜力
圣彼得堡	7899	16811	12355
阿尔汉格尔斯克	7241	13864	10553
摩尔曼斯克	6037	10381	8209
萨别塔	3348	12387	7867
迪克森	2701	6525	4613
符拉迪沃斯托克(海参崴)	3186	4943	4064
瓦尼诺	3109	5013	4061
霍尔姆斯克	2757	4635	3696
尼古拉耶夫斯克(庙街)	2651	4459	3555
马加丹	1943	3782	2863
哈坦加	1565	4153	2859
季克西	1291	2795	2043
阿纳德尔	995	2053	1524
佩韦克	990	2043	1516
普罗维杰尼亚	794	1663	1229
堪察加彼得罗巴浦洛夫斯克	791	1656	1223

[1]	TAO Zhuolin, DAI Teqi, SONG Changqing. Improving spatial equity-oriented location-allocation models of urban medical facilities [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(2): 474-489.
[2]	ZHAI Shiyan, HE Xinxin, KONG Yunfeng, LUO Jingjing, SONG Genxin. Measuring the spatial accessibility of public services by optimal supply-demand allocation [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 1028-1038.
[3]	LIU Haolong, ZHOU Yu, LIU Jun, DAI Junhu, GE Quansheng, QI Xiaobo. Characteristics and scenario simulation of the ice-sports season in Beijing Beihai Park under climate change [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(1): 35-50.
[4]	ZHANG Tianyuan, HUANG Jixia, WANG Li. Maritime accessibility and navigation cost evolution estimation of Sino-Russian oil and gas resources from 2030 to 2070 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1122-1135.
[5]	HUANG Jixia, ZHANG Tianyuan, CAO Yunfeng, GE Quansheng, YANG Linsheng. The evolution of navigation performance of Northeast Passage under the scenario of Arctic sea ice melting [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1051-1064.
[6]	FENG Jian, ZHONG Yichun. The spatial structure of urban residents' quality of life in Changzhou based on residential environment [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1237-1255.
[7]	LI Luqi, WU Qiyan, LIU Kewen, LIANG Shuangbo, QIAN Chaofeng. Spatial evolution of Eurasian land and sea transport accessibility from the historical perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 804-819.
[8]	YANG Qingshan, LIU Jian, ZHANG Yu, YANG Weixu. Multi-scale factors influencing the evolution of Manzhouli port-city relationship [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2146-2163.
[9]	GAO Xingchuan,CAO Xiaoshu,LI Tao,LV Minjuan. Evolution of accessibility spatial pattern of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in 1976-2016 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(6): 1190-1204.
[10]	DAI Changlei,ZHANG Xiaohong,YU Miao,A. N. NIKOLAEV,N. R. MAXIMOV. Feasibility study on land-river combined transport between Dalian and Tiksi [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(6): 1224-1235.
[11]	YIN Jie,XU Shiyuan,JING Yameng,YIN Zhan'e,LIAO Banggu. Evaluating the impact of fluvial flooding on emergency responses accessibility for a mega-city's public services: A case study of emergency medical service [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(9): 1737-1747.
[12]	NIU Fangqu,WANG Fang. Modelling urban spatial impacts of land-use/transport policies [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(2): 380-392.
[13]	Dongqi SUN, Dadao LU, Zhenbo WANG, Jianbin XU, Xiaoyan SHEN, Xixi WANG, Zedong WANG, Zhongchao SUN, Fenghua SUN. Predictive analysis of passenger and goods flow of Bohai Strait Cross-sea Channel [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1486-1507.
[14]	Yu CHEN, Fengjun JIN, Yuqi LU, Zhuo CHEN, Yu YANG. Development history and accessibility evolution of land transportation network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2252-2264.
[15]	Ren YANG. An analysis of rural settlement patterns and their effect mechanisms based on road traffic accessibility of Guangdong [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(10): 1859-1871.