区域耕地利用功能转型的理论解释与实证

doi:10.11821/dlxb201905012

Abstract

Abstract:

Changes of cultivated land use structures including type structure, input structure, and plantation structure, could succinctly reveal change of cultivated land use function morphology. Cultivated land use function transition (CLUFT) in the process of socio-economic development, however, is currently an issue to be resolved. Based on the underlying relationship between induced production substitution and cultivated land use structure change, this paper established a comprehensive explanation framework of the CLUFT. Then, the regional CLUFT was studied with Guangdong province as a typical case area. Results show that cultivated land use functional morphology in Guangdong overall entered the interim stage of the transition from socio-economic morphology to ecological and economic morphology. Cultivated land use function in the Pearl River Delta has accomplished the transition from socio-economic morphology to ecological-economic morphology. The rest of districts of Guangdong, however, accomplished the transition from socio-ecological morphology to socio-economic morphology. Both socio-economic and institutional forces drove the CLUFT in Guangdong. Mechanism of the CLUFT behaves as cascading effects of interactions among urbanization, socio-economic development, induced production substitution, changes of cultivated land use structures, and transformation of cultivated land use function morphologies. The positive analysis above justified the comprehensive explanation framework presented in this paper. That is, changes of cultivated land use structures could effectively denote cultivated land use function transition. With socio-economic development from its primary stage to an advanced one, changes of cultivated land use structures will drive transition of cultivated land use function morphology from socio-ecological morphology to socio-economic morphology, and to ecological and economic morphology under the direct force of induced production substitution. This paper presented new knowledges on morphology and transition explanations in land use transition research. Furthermore, new knowledges on the underlying mechanism of cultivated land use transition has been developed based on rethinking of the induced production substitution in agriculture. This study is of significance to bridge the knowledge gap of cultivated land use transition among scholars, the public, and policy makers and to deepen further research on land use transition. Finally, suggestions on transformation from dryland to paddy filed in southern China and control of socio-ecological effects of cultivated land use function transition were discussed.

Key words: land use transition, cultivated land, function, structure, pattern, Guangdong

SONG Xiaoqing,LI Xinyi. Theoretical explanation and case study of regional cultivated land use function transition[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 992-1010.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 2

Fig. 5

Tab. 3

Fig. 6

Tab. 4

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References 34

[1]	Li H, Wu Y Z, Huang X J , et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and classification of marginalization of cultivated land in the process of urbanization. Habitat International, 2017,61:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.01.001
[2]	Liu Chengwu, Li Xiubin . Diagnosis on the marginalisation of arable land use in China. Geographical Research, 2006,25(5):145-154.
	[ 刘成武, 李秀彬 . 对中国农地边际化现象的诊断: 以三大粮食作物生产的平均状况为例. 地理研究, 2006,25(5):145-154.]
[3]	Li Xiubin, Zhao Yuluan . Forest transition, agricultural land marginalization and ecological restoration. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011,21(10):91-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.10.014
	[ 李秀彬, 赵宇鸾 . 森林转型、农地边际化与生态恢复. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011,21(10):91-95.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.10.014
[4]	Zhang Q, Song C H, Chen X D . Effects of China's payment for ecosystem services programs on cropland abandonment: A case study in Tiantangzhai Township, Anhui, China. Land Use Policy, 2018,73:239-248. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.001
[5]	Zhang Y, Li X B, Song W , et al. Land abandonment under rural restructuring in China explained from a cost-benefit perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016,47(47):524-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.019
[6]	Zhao Yuluan, Li Xiubin, Xin Liangjie , et al. Driving forces of "poplar expansion and cropland shrinkage" in the North China Plain: A case study of Wen'an County, Hebei Province. Geographical Research, 2012,31(2):323-333.
	[ 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬, 辛良杰 , 等. 华北平原“杨上粮下”现象的驱动机制: 以河北省文安县为例. 地理研究, 2012,31(2):323-333.]
[7]	Song Xiaoqing, Ouyang Zhu . Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land Protection. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(7):859-868. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.004
	[ 宋小青, 欧阳竹 . 耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(7):859-868.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.004
[8]	Song Xiaoqing, Ouyang Zhu . Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012,27(4):540-551. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.002
	[ 宋小青, 欧阳竹 . 中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(4):540-551.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.002
[9]	Song Xiaoqing, Wu Zhifeng, Ouyang Zhu . Changes of cultivated land function in China since 1949. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(4):435-447.
	[ 宋小青, 吴志峰, 欧阳竹 . 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化. 地理学报, 2014,69(4):435-447.]
[10]	Long Hualou . Land use transition and land management. Geographical Research, 2015,34(9):1607-1618.
	[ 龙花楼 . 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理. 地理研究, 2015,34(9):1607-1618.]
[11]	Long H L, Qu Y . Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy, 2018,74:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.021
[12]	Song Xiaoqing . Discussion on land use transition research framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(3):471-487.
	[ 宋小青 . 论土地利用转型的研究框架. 地理学报, 2017,72(3):471-487.]
[13]	Yang Xue, Tan Minghong . Changes and relationships of arable land functions in Beijing in recent years. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014,29(5):733-743.
	[ 杨雪, 谈明洪 . 近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性. 自然资源学报, 2014,29(5):733-743.]
[14]	Yang Xue, Tan Minghong . Spatial differences and evolution of arable land functions in Beijing. Geographical Research, 2014,33(6):1106-1118.
	[ 杨雪, 谈明洪 . 北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变. 地理研究, 2014,33(6):1106-1118.]
[15]	Zhang Yingnan, Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan , et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of farmland functions evolution in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(3):518-534.
	[ 张英男, 龙花楼, 戈大专 , 等. 黄淮海平原耕地功能演变的时空特征及其驱动机制. 地理学报, 2018,73(3):518-534.]
[16]	Cai Yinying. Relationship between Agricultural Land Ecology and Value. Beijing: Science China Press, 2010.
	[ 蔡银莺 . 农地生态与农地价值关系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.]
[17]	Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Leiming , et al. Improvement of the Evaluation Method for Ecosystem Service Value Based on Per Unit Area, 2015(8):1243-1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
	[ 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明 , 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[18]	Lu X, Shi Y Y, Chen C L , et al. Monitoring cropland transition and its impact on ecosystem services value in developed regions of China: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Land Use Policy, 2017,69:25-40. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.035
[19]	Song B J, Robinson G M, Zhou Z X . Agricultural transformation and ecosystem services: A case study from Shaanxi Province, China. Habitat International, 2017,69:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.008
[20]	Demestihas C, Plénet D, Génard M , et al. Analyzing ecosystem services in apple orchards using the STICS model. European Journal of Agronomy, 2018,94:108-119. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.009
[21]	Stephen A, Karp, Daniel S , et al. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015,30(9):531-539.
[22]	Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P , et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005,309(22):570-574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
[23]	Department of Price of National Development and Reform Commission. Data Compilation of the National Agricultural Costs and Returns(2016) . Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2016.
	[ 国家发展和改革委员会价格司. 全国农产品成本收益资料汇编(2016). 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2016.]
[24]	Grainger A . National land use morphology: Patterns and possibilities. Geography, 1995,80(3):235-245.
[25]	Hayami Y, Ruttan V W. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1985.
[26]	Yamada S, Ruttan V W. International comparisons of productivity in agriculture//Yamada S, Ruttan V W. New Developments in Productivity Measurement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980: 507-594.
[27]	Song X Q, Wu Z F . Modelling and mapping trends in grain production growth in China. Outlook on Agriculture, 2013,42(4):255-263. doi: 10.5367/oa.2013.0142
[28]	National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook(1996) . Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1996.
	[ 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴1996). 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1996.]
[29]	National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. China statistical bulletins on national economic and social development. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018.
	[ 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.]
[30]	Editorial board of Guangdong Rural Statistical Yearbook. Guangdong Rural Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1993- 2016.
	[ 广东农村统计年鉴编辑委员会. 广东农村统计年鉴(1993-2016). 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1993- 2016.]
[31]	Bi Yuyun, Zheng Zhenyuan . The actual changes of cultivated area since the founding of new China. Resources Science, 2000,22(2):8-12.
	[ 毕于运, 郑振源 . 建国以来中国实有耕地面积增减变化分析. 资源科学, 2000,22(2):8-12.]
[32]	Feng Zhiming, Liu Baoqin, Yang Yanzhao . A study of the changing trend of Chinese cultivated land amount and data reconstructing: 1949-2003. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005,20(1):35-43. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2005.01.006
	[ 封志明, 刘宝勤, 杨艳昭 . 中国耕地资源数量变化的趋势分析: 1949-2003. 自然资源学报, 2005,20(1):35-43.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2005.01.006
[33]	Wang Yong, Wang Bin, Ma Cang , et al. Study on the multiple cropping index based on revised cultivated land area in China. China Land science, 2008,22(12):46-52.
	[ 汪涌, 王滨, 马仓 , 等. 基于耕地面积订正的中国复种指数研究. 中国土地科学, 2008,22(12):46-52.]
[34]	Bureau of Statistics of Guangdong Province. Guangdong Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1993- 2016.
	[ 广东省统计局. 广东统计年鉴(1993-2016). 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1993- 2016.]

	广东			中国
	粮食作物	经济作物	园艺作物	粮食作物	经济作物	园艺作物
每亩主产品产量(kg/亩)	404.59	2765.48	2351.54	434.28	2707.49	2764.87
每亩净利润(元/亩)	-2.21	80.44	3298.30	91.58	107.26	1659.37
每亩现金收益(元/亩)	674.72	982.26	6061.60	672.30	1014.23	2906.62
每50 kg主产品净利润(元/亩)	-0.26	29.80	65.31	10.30	10.57	32.59
每50 kg主产品现金收益(元/亩)	82.74	160.15	127.74	76.45	109.57	57.16
每亩用工数量(日/亩)	6.86	10.26	45.58	5.90	11.50	21.00
每亩化肥折纯量(kg/亩)	24.64	45.36	55.04	22.34	40.85	42.61
每亩净利润平均用工数量(元/亩·日)	-0.32	7.84	72.36	15.52	9.33	79.03
每亩现金收益平均用工数量(元/亩·日)	98.35	95.78	132.98	113.95	88.23	138.42

经济社会发展阶段	经济社会背景	人均GDP(元/人)	人口城镇化水平(%)	城乡收入差距
初级阶段	市场经济体制初建	≤ 5000	≤ 35	扩大
中高级阶段	市场经济体制逐步完善	5000~60000	35~70	扩大
高级阶段	市场经济体制日益成熟	> 60000	> 70	缩小至平衡

经济社会转型阶段	年份	经济社会背景	人均GDP(元/人)	人口城镇化(%)	城乡收入比
初级转型为中高级	1992	社会主义市场经济体制建立,合理引导农村劳动力转移,农村土地流转迅速发展,惠农政策全面实施	3699	35^*	2.66
初级转型为中高级	2008	社会主义市场经济体制建立,合理引导农村劳动力转移,农村土地流转迅速发展,惠农政策全面实施	37638	63.40	3.08
中高级向高级过渡阶段	2010	社会主义市场经济体制逐步完善,农村劳动力自由转移,农村土地普遍流转,大力支持多功能农业发展	44758	66.20	3.03
中高级向高级过渡阶段	2015	社会主义市场经济体制逐步完善,农村劳动力自由转移,农村土地普遍流转,大力支持多功能农业发展	67503	68.71	2.60

区域经济社会转型阶段		年份	人均GDP(元/人)	人口城镇化(%)	城乡收入比
珠江三角洲	中高级转型为高级	1992	7567.11	53.25	1.84^*
	中高级转型为高级	2008	62643.83	80.05	2.58^*
	高级	2010	68633.00	82.72	2.42^*
	高级	2015	107011.00	84.59	2.33
东翼	初级转型为中高级	1992	1794.50	31.15	1.73^*
	初级转型为中高级	2008	15396.36	56.58	2.57^*
	中高级	2010	19371.00	57.70	2.33^*
	中高级	2015	31426.00	59.93	1.88
西翼	初级转型为中高级	1992	2053.00	26.20	3.24^*
	初级转型为中高级	2008	17972.52	37.67	2.32^*
	中高级	2010	23239.00	39.25	2.22^*
	中高级	2015	38461.00	42.01	1.76
山区	初级转型为中高级	1992	1682.25	28.96	3.70^*
	初级转型为中高级	2008	15539.43	43.16	2.66^*
	中高级	2010	20370.00	44.29	2.47^*
	中高级	2015	29583.00	47.17	1.89

Theoretical explanation and case study of regional cultivated land use function transition

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 34

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHU Xiaohua, ZHANG Yan, ZHU Yuanyuan. Regional regulation and interregional coordination of cultivated land protection in China from the perspective of "Greater Food" approach [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(9): 2147-2162.
[2]	LIU Jing, JIN Xiaobin, XU Weiyi, WANG Shilei, ZHOU Yinkang. Characteristic evolution and trend prediction of cultivated land landscape fragmentation in China from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(9): 2163-2185.
[3]	YANG Yu, XIA Siyou, JIN Zhijun. Energy transition reshapes geopolitics: Logic and research frontiers [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(9): 2299-2315.
[4]	ZHENG Yuhan, LONG Hualou. Measurement and spatio-temporal pattern of urban-rural integrated development in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1869-1887.
[5]	LI Yuan, LIU Chengliang, MAO Weisheng, XIE Yongshun. Spatial characteristics and location selection of global data center expansion [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1936-1954.
[6]	YANG Huiyu, ZENG Da, LI Miaomiao, WU Yuwei, FAN Xuening, TONG De. Urban niche in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the perspective of multiple space of flows [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1983-2000.
[7]	DUAN Dezhong, JIN Hong. Spatiotemporal process and driving factors of green technology diffusion in Chinese cities [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 2001-2018.
[8]	KE Wenqian, XIAO Baoyu, LIN Liyue, ZHU Yu, WANG Yan. Interprovincial urban and rural floating population evolution of China and its relationship with regional economic development [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 2041-2057.
[9]	WANG Junsong, LIU Zhiqing. Spatial and temporal evolutionary patterns and influencing factors of patent agency service networks in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 2058-2073.
[10]	XU Shan, YUAN Xinmiao, DENG Yu. Evolution of urban functional space in Beijing: Modes and aggregation laws [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 2092-2102.
[11]	LI Jiaming, SUN Dongqi, JIANG Yanpeng. The influence of the industrial structure of central cities on surrounding cities and regional urban systems [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1955-1968.
[12]	XIA Jun, CHEN Jin, SHE Dunxian, LUO Wenguang. Opportunities and challenges of national water network construction under changing environment [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(7): 1608-1617.
[13]	ZHANG Baifa, MIAO Changhong, RAN Zhao, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Hang. Economic differences among counties in the Yellow River Basin from the core-periphery perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(6): 1355-1375.
[14]	WANG Qiang, CUI Can, LAO Xin. Talent migration and its influencing factors using spatial econometric interaction model: A case study of China's "double first-class" university graduates [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(6): 1392-1407.
[15]	YANG Xingzhu, YU Haiyan, YIN Chengqiang, JI Shuyuan, ZHU Yue. The conflict and coordination mechanism of stakeholder's cognition on multifunctional spaces in rural tourism destinations: A case study of Shancha Village in Huangshan Scenic Area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(6): 1530-1552.