基于EEA方法的中国水泥制造业能耗的空间差异

doi:10.11821/dlxb201510003

Abstract

Abstract:

Factory data from 23 Chinese provinces, combined with Chinese cement manufacturing industry data and socioeconomic data from 2012, was used to analyze the spatial distribution of exergy use for China's cement manufacturing industry using the Extended Exergy Accounting method. This method allows for the inclusion of energy and raw material supply and other external factors (capital, labor and environment) in a comprehensive resource cost assessment. We quantitatively calculated the extended exergy consumption and its intensity at the provincial level and evaluated the agglomeration level of exergy use at the regional level. Based on this analysis, a distribution in size and efficiency of exergy use at the provincial level was determined, and regional characteristics were revealed. The results are as follows. (1) The gross distribution of exergy use in China's cement manufacturing industry is focused on the eastern region, which centers on Anhui and Shandong, and on the western region with Sichuan as a core. For exergy use, energy costs related to coal and electricity are highest for the center of the eastern region, whereas the costs of capital, labor and external environmental factors highlight the invisible social cost in the central and western regions to various degrees. (2) The efficiency distribution of exergy use in China's cement manufacturing industry reveals an incremental character from west to east, especially for the energy, labor and capital efficiencies. An evaluation of the environmental efficiency indicates that Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Shanxi have much higher environmental costs. (3) By building up the Euclidean distance model using the gross and efficiency results of exergy use, the 23 provinces could be classified into eight groups. (4) High industry concentration is the main driving factor of exergy efficiency improvement for cement manufacturing industry.

Key words: cement manufacturing industry, spatial difference, exergy use, extended exergy accounting method, China

Fengnan CHEN, Lei SHEN, Litao LIU, Tianming GAO. Distribution of exergy use of cement manufacturing industry in China based on the extended exergy accounting method[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(10): 1566-1580.

Figures/Tables 16

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 1

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Fig. 3

Tab. 7

Fig. 4

Tab. 8

Tab. 9

Tab. 1

Fig. 5

Tab. 11

References 33

[1]	Daly H E, Farley J.Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2010: 106-125.
[2]	Costanza R, Cumberland J H, Daly H, et al.An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Florida, USA: Taylor & Francis, Chemical Rubber Company Press, 2002: 183-193. doi: 10.2307/176531
[3]	Valero A, Lozano M A, Munoz M.A general theory of exergy saving: I. On the exergetic cost. Computer-aided Engineering and Energy Systems, 1986, 3: 1-8.
[4]	Szargut J, Morris D R, Steward F R.Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes. New York, NY, USA: Hemisphere Press, 1987: 66-108.
[5]	Sciubba E.Extended exergy accounting applied to energy recovery from waste: The concept of total recycling. Energy, 2003, 28: 1315-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00111-7
[6]	Sogut M Z, Oktay Z, Hepbasli A.Energetic and exergetic assessment of a trass mill processin a cement plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(9): 2316-2323. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.05.013
[7]	IEA-ETSAP..
[8]	National Bureau of Statistics.
	[国家统计局.]
[9]	Jebaraj S, Iniyan S.A review of energy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2006, 10(4): 281-311. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.004
[10]	Scheuer A, Ellerbrock H G.Possible ways of saving energy in cement production. Zement-Kalk-Gips, 1992, 45(5): 222-230.
[11]	Saxena J P, Saxena A, Pahuja A, et al.Energy efficiency through technological improvements. World Cement, 1995, 26(6): 62-67.
[12]	Phylipsen G J M, Blok K, Worrell E. International comparisons of energy efficiency: Methodologies for the manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 1997, 25(7-9): 715-725. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00063-3
[13]	Worrell E, Martin N, Price L.Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry. Energy, 2000, 25(12): 1189-1214. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00042-6
[14]	Worrell E, Laitner J A, Ruth M, et al.Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures. Energy, 2003, 28(11): 1081-1098. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00091-4
[15]	Zeng Xuemin.Energy consumption status and energy saving potential of cement industry. Chinese Cement, 2006, 20(3): 16-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8321.2006.03.006
	[曾学敏. 水泥工业能源消耗现状与节能潜力. 中国水泥, 2006, 20(3): 16-21.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8321.2006.03.006
[16]	Qi Baoping.The impact analysis research on energy saving factors in China [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2010: 58-72.
	[齐宝平. 中国节能因素影响分析研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010: 58-72.]
[17]	Hasanbeigi A, Menke C, Therdyothin A.The use of conservation supply conversion energy policy and economic analysis: The case study of Thai cement industry. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 392-405.
[18]	Sogut M Z.A research on exergy consumption and potential of total CO2 emission in the Turkish cement sector. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 56: 37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.004
[19]	Rocco M V, Colombo E, Sciubba E.Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the extended exergy accounting method. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 1405-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.080
[20]	Zhu Mingshan.Exergy Analysis on Energy System .Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988: 56-89.
	[朱明善. 能源系统的㶲分析. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1988: 56-89.]
[21]	Sciubba E.A revised calculation of the econometric factors α and β for the extended exergy accounting method. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 1060-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.003
[22]	Shen L, Gao T, Zhao J, et al.Factory-level measurements on CO2 emission factors of cement industry in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 2014, 34: 337-349.
[23]	National Bureau of Statistics. Economic Statistical Yearbook of the People's Republic of China .Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2013: 3-398.
	[国家统计局. 中华人民共和国经济统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2013: 3-398.]
[24]	The People's Bank of China. The annual statistics of 2012. .
	[中国人民银行网站. 2012年度统计数据. .]
[25]	CDC.
	[中国气象科学数据共享服务网.]
[26]	Hu Bin.A comparative study on China's inter-provincial Human development Index [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2009: 10-21.
	[胡斌. 我国省际间人类发展指数比较研究. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009: 10-21.]
[27]	China Cement Association. China Cement Almanac.Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2006-2011: 390-600.
	[中国水泥协会. 中国水泥年鉴. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2006-2011: 390-600.]
[28]	ASKCI.
	[中商情报网.]
[29]	Lv Weiguo, Chen Wen.Manufacturing industry enterprises location choice and the urban spatial restructing in Nanjing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(2): 142-152.
	[吕卫国, 陈雯. 制造业企业区位选择与南京城市空间重构. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 142-152.]
[30]	IEA.
[31]	Liu Jiyuan, Deng Xiangzheng, Liu Weidong, et al.The concept framework of green development in western China. Population, Resource and Environment of China, 2013, 23(10): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.10.001
	[刘纪远, 邓祥征, 刘卫东, 等. 中国西部绿色发展概念框架. 中国人口资源与环境, 2013, 23(10): 1-7.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.10.001
[32]	Rokaya M, Atlam E, Fuketa M, et al.Ranking of field association terms using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 2008, 44(2): 738-755. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.001
[33]	Mei Changlin, Fan Jincheng.Method of Data Analysis .Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006: 55-156.
	[梅长林, 范金城. 数据分析方法. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 55-156.]

	扩展?	能源?耗	劳动力?耗	资金?耗	环境成本?耗
安徽	485.937	443.641	22.363	2.221	17.712
山东	418.394	360.372	39.139	4.624	14.259
四川	403.122	328.768	52.613	8.921	12.820
河南	338.594	300.191	25.007	1.980	11.416
广西	298.105	255.748	25.554	6.342	10.462
广东	295.514	264.361	19.731	0.566	10.857
湖南	291.936	237.273	38.695	8.170	7.798
河北	291.914	238.490	36.873	6.866	9.686
云南	290.653	261.074	20.333	1.838	7.408
湖北	279.172	244.959	22.515	3.054	8.644
江苏	262.285	226.601	25.161	2.313	8.210
浙江	254.440	236.305	8.794	0.194	9.147
福建	229.120	214.621	7.529	0.286	6.684
江西	227.888	193.742	22.709	4.482	6.956
陕西	211.176	188.898	14.276	1.165	6.837
新疆	207.209	191.190	9.618	0.541	5.860
贵州	188.316	162.811	17.833	1.335	6.337
内蒙古	175.765	153.476	13.487	2.260	6.542
辽宁	171.575	151.771	12.875	0.880	6.049
重庆	170.913	149.190	14.665	1.510	5.547
山西	154.046	137.738	10.657	0.391	5.260
西藏	21.865	19.796	1.478	0.099	0.491
北京	18.369	16.754	0.654	0.001	0.960

	安徽	山东	四川	河南	广西	广东	湖南	河北	云南	湖北
扩展?值	486	418	403	339	298	296	292	292	291	279
占全国比重	8.5%	7.4%	7.1%	6.0%	5.2%	5.2%	5.1%	5.1%	5.1%	4.9%

	安徽	山东	四川	河南	广东	云南	广西	湖北	河北	湖南
能源?耗	444	360	329	300	264	261	256	245	238	237
占扩展?的比重(%)	91.3	86.1	81.6	88.7	89.5	89.8	85.8	87.7	81.7	81.3
	四川	山东	湖南	河北	广西	江苏	河南	江西	湖北	安徽
劳动力外部性?耗	52.6	39.1	38.7	36.9	25.6	25.2	25.0	22.7	22.5	22.4
占扩展?的比重(%)	13.1	9.4	13.3	12.6	8.6	9.6	7.4	10.0	8.1	4.6
	四川	湖南	河北	广西	山东	江西	湖北	江苏	内蒙古	安徽
资金外部性?耗	8.9	8.2	6.9	6.3	4.6	4.5	3.1	2.3	2.3	2.2
占扩展?的比重(%)	2.2	2.8	2.4	2.1	1.1	2.0	1.1	0.9	1.3	0.5
	安徽	山东	四川	河南	广东	广西	河北	浙江	湖北	江苏
环境成本?耗	17.7	14.3	12.8	11.4	10.9	10.5	9.7	9.1	8.6	8.2
占扩展?的比重(%)	3.6	3.4	3.2	3.4	3.7	3.5	3.3	3.6	3.1	3.1

		东部地带	中部地带	西部地带
扩展?耗基尼系数	G	0.225	0.191	0.243
能源?耗基尼系数	G1	0.218	0.199	0.234
劳动力?耗基尼系数	G2	0.389	0.174	0.353
资金?耗基尼系数	G3	0.613	0.388	0.513
环境?耗基尼系数	G4	0.238	0.221	0.241
基尼系数均值	G0	0.337	0.234	0.317

	扩展?强度	能源?耗强度	劳动力?耗强度	资金?耗强度	环境成本?耗强度
西藏	10339.752	9361.690	698.847	46.843	232.372
新疆	6256.840	5773.150	290.411	16.323	176.956
湖南	5496.197	4467.078	728.507	153.807	146.805
云南	5447.390	4893.027	381.086	34.443	138.834
四川	5215.048	4253.154	680.638	115.410	165.845
陕西	5160.090	4615.729	348.837	28.463	167.061
山西	5150.822	4605.546	356.344	13.063	175.870
江苏	5102.379	4408.192	489.477	45.004	159.705
湖北	5031.084	4414.514	405.759	55.041	155.770
内蒙古	5022.853	4385.894	385.427	64.591	186.941
福建	4922.684	4611.174	161.752	6.144	143.613
河北	4908.618	4010.269	620.022	115.448	162.880
山东	4803.530	4137.393	449.347	53.089	163.701
江西	4801.097	4081.713	478.424	94.417	146.543
重庆	4795.631	4186.113	411.496	42.372	155.651
河南	4721.650	4186.137	348.714	27.607	159.191
辽宁	4648.038	4111.535	348.789	23.832	163.882
浙江	4487.138	4167.314	155.084	3.427	161.313
贵州	4483.586	3876.349	424.588	31.782	150.867
广西	4389.202	3765.548	376.248	93.373	154.033
安徽	4371.883	3991.352	201.196	19.980	159.355
广东	4301.659	3848.172	287.214	8.237	158.036
北京	2842.496	2592.588	101.171	0.113	148.625

Distribution of exergy use of cement manufacturing industry in China based on the extended exergy accounting method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

	西藏	新疆	湖南	云南	四川	陕西	山西	江苏	湖北	内蒙古
扩展?强度	10340	6257	5496	5447	5215	5160	5151	5102	5031	5023
与均值的比	2.04	1.23	1.08	1.07	1.03	1.02	1.02	1.01	0.99	0.99

	西藏	新疆	云南	陕西	福建	山西	湖南	湖北	江苏	内蒙古
能源?耗强度	9362	5773	4893	4616	4611	4606	4467	4415	4408	4386
与全国均值的比	2.10	1.29	1.10	1.03	1.03	1.03	1.00	0.99	0.99	0.98
	湖南	西藏	四川	河北	江苏	江西	山东	贵州	重庆	湖北
劳动力?耗强度	729	699	681	620	489	478	449	425	411	406
与全国均值的比	1.84	1.76	1.71	1.56	1.23	1.21	1.13	1.07	1.04	1.02
	湖南	河北	四川	江西	广西	内蒙古	湖北	山东	西藏	江苏
资金?耗强度	154	115	115	94	93	65	55	53	47	45
与全国均值的比	3.24	2.43	2.43	1.99	1.97	1.36	1.16	1.12	0.99	0.95
	西藏	内蒙古	新疆	山西	陕西	四川	辽宁	山东	河北	浙江
环境?耗强度	232	187	177	176	167	166	164	164	163	161
与全国均值的比	1.43	1.15	1.09	1.08	1.03	1.02	1.01	1.01	1.00	0.99

		东部地带	中部地带	西部地带
扩展?耗强度基尼系数	g	0.067	0.040	0.133
能源?耗强度基尼系数	g1	0.065	0.029	0.147
劳动力?耗强度基尼系数	g2	0.297	0.203	0.153
资金?耗强度基尼系数	g3	0.586	0.437	0.314
环境?耗强度基尼系数	g4	0.023	0.033	0.078
基尼系数均值	g0	0.208	0.149	0.165

	重庆	浙江	云南	新疆	西藏	四川	陕西	山西
重庆	0.000	0.214	0.143	0.158	0.623	0.604	0.048	0.091
浙江	0.214	0.000	0.203	0.160	0.754	0.720	0.136	0.178
云南	0.143	0.203	0.000	0.203	0.720	0.533	0.123	0.227
新疆	0.158	0.160	0.203	0.000	0.539	0.693	0.072	0.073
西藏	0.623	0.754	0.720	0.539	0.000	0.969	0.613	0.557
四川	0.604	0.720	0.533	0.693	0.969	0.000	0.611	0.703
陕西	0.048	0.136	0.123	0.072	0.613	0.611	0.000	0.054
山西	0.091	0.178	0.227	0.073	0.557	0.703	0.054	0.000

类别	地区	能耗主要特点
第一类	四川、湖南、河北	能耗总量高、能耗强度高
第二类	山东、安徽	能耗总量高、能耗强度低
第三类	江西、广西	略高于平均水平、劳动力和资金成本较高
第四类	河南、湖北、江苏、云南、贵州、重庆、陕西、辽宁	能耗程度中等
第五类	广东、浙江、福建	略低于平均水平、外部性成本较低
第六类	内蒙古、山西、新疆	能耗总量低、能耗强度高
第七类	西藏	能耗总量很低、能效水平落后
第八类	北京	能耗总量很低、能效水平先进

解释变量	水泥制造业能耗的空间差异
	EEA消耗总量			EEA消耗强度
	相关系数		N值	相关系数	N值
规模
规模以上企业单位数	0.779^**	0.000		-0.293	0.175
规模以上企业资产总额	0.821^**	0.000		-0.282	0.193
收益
主营业务收入	0.797^**	0.000		-0.273	0.207
利润总额	0.780^**	0.000		-0.258	0.235
投资
固定资产投资	0.504^*	0.014		-0.057	0.795
投资累计新增生产线设计生产能力	0.973^**	0.000		-0.323	0.133
技术
水泥生产技术专利数	0.354	0.097		-0.312	0.147
行业集中度
N20	0.149	0.497		-0.383	0.071
N100	0.228	0.295		-0.439*	0.036

[1]	SUN Pingjun, WANG Kewen. Identification and stage division of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1366-1379.
[2]	WEI Shimei, PAN Jinghu. Network structure resilience of cities at the prefecture level and above in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[3]	YANG Ren, PAN Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[4]	YIN Jiangbin, LI Shangqian, JIANG Lei, CHENG Zhe, HUANG Xiaoyan, LU Gaigai. The spatio-temporal variations and driving factors of non-farm employment growth in contiguous destitute areas of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[5]	HU Pan, CHEN Bo, SHI Peijun. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of rainstorm-induced flood disasters in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[6]	LIU Zhenhai, WANG Shaoqiang, CHEN Bin. Spatial and temporal variations of frozen ground and its vegetation response in the eastern segment of China-Mongolia-Russia economic corridor from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1231-1244.
[7]	MA Zuopeng, LI Chenggu, ZHANG Pingyu. Characteristics, mechanism and response of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 767-780.
[8]	HUANG Xiaodong, MA Haitao, MIAO Changhong. Connectivity characteristics for city networks in China based on innovative enterprises [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[9]	WANG Lucang, LIU Haiyang, LIU Qing. China's city network based on Tencent's migration big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[10]	XIA Xingsheng, PAN Yaozhong, ZHU Xiufang, ZHANG Jinshui. Monthly calibration and optimization of Ångström-Prescott equation coefficients for agricultural comprehensive area in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[11]	FAN Zemeng. Spatial identification and scenario simulation of ecotone distribution in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 626-644.
[12]	XU Yu, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie. Differentiation of scale-farmland transfer rent and its influencing factors in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 753-763.
[13]	LI Gang, XUE Shuyan, MA Xueyao, ZHOU Junjun, XU Tingting, WANG Jiaobei. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution and formation mechanism of missing person incidents in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[14]	GU Hengyu, SHEN Tiyan. Spatial evolution characteristics and driving forces of Chinese highly educated talents [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[15]	ZHU Shengjun, JIN Wenwan. Local export variety, regional institutions and firm related diversification [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.