南京城市内部景点间游客流动特征分析

doi:10.11821/dlxb201412011

Abstract

Abstract:

Taking Nanjing as a case study, this paper calculates a matrix to describe the flows between scenic spots using data mining of tourism strategies and then systematically analyzes the structures, mechanisms and patterns of the flows. This study has drawn the following conclusions: (1) All the scenic spots form a hierarchy of several levels and the central ones are positioned as a core node on the flow network. Based on the quantity of inflows and outflows, Sun Yat-sen's Mausoleum is classified as a diffusion-type spot, Confucius Temple as a clustering-type one and Xinjiekou as a balance-type one. (2) The tourist flows have demonstrated a clear effect of distance decay. The scenic spots in inner city play a dominant role in influencing the overall flow. (3) The pattern of the flows is determined by the interactions between the intensities of inflows, outflows and the origin-destination distance. These flows follow the Wilson model represented as a power function. Compared with the inter-city and intra-city daily flows, the tourist flows between the inner city scenic spots are less sensitive to distance. (4) The primary scenic spots in Nanjing, encompassing the three systems (Sun Yat-sen's Mausoleum system, Confucius Temple system and central business district system), can be abstracted into three models: diffusion from a single center, clustering to a single center and balancing between multiple centers. The flow pattern is characterized by the primary flows between core nodes, secondary flows between the core and minor nodes and between the minor nodes, and the tertiary flows between the minor and normal moves and between the normal nodes.

Key words: scenic spot, flow network, tourism strategy, inner city, Nanjing

Cheng JIN, Jing XU, Zhenfang HUANG, Fangdong CAO. Analyzing the characteristics of tourist flows between the scenic spots in inner city based on tourism strategies: A case study in Nanjing[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(12): 1858-1870.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Evaluation indexes

指标	具体指标	计算公式	结果含义
网络中景点评价相关指标	流入度	$C ini = ∑ j = 1 n l ji$ (1)	结果数值越大,景点的流入度、流出度和中心度越强,在网络中的地位越高。
	流出度	$C outi = ∑ j = 1 n l ij$ (2)
	中心度	$C i = C outi + C ini$ (3)
	扩散指数	$S i = (C outi - C ini) / C i × 100 %$ (4)	评价景点扩散集聚的强弱,结果数值越大,扩散功能越强。
整体网络评价相关指标	网络密度	$D = E / n (n - 1)$ (5)	数值介于0~1之间,结果数值越大,网络密度越高。
	中心势	$C D = 2 ∑ i = 1 n max (C i) - C i / (n 2 - 3 n + 2)$ (6)	数值介于0~1之间,结果数值越大,中心势越强,分布越不均衡。
	平均流量	$l ? = ∑ i = 1 n ∑ j = 1 n l ij / E$ (7)	结果数值越大,该网络平均流动强度越大。
	流量占比	$r = ∑ i = 1 n ∑ j = 1 n l ij / ∑ i = 1 m ∑ j = 1 m l ij × 100 % n ? m$ (8)	度量各子网络的重要性,结果数值越大,子网络越重要。
景点作用加权平均距离	流出加权平均距离	$D outi = ∑ j = 1 n l ij d ij / ∑ j = 1 n l ij$ (9)	加权平均距离反映了该景点流出和流入的平均作用距离,结果数值越大,作用距离越远。
景点作用加权平均距离	流入加权平均距离	$D ini = ∑ j = 1 n l ji d ij / ∑ j = 1 n l ji$ (10)	加权平均距离反映了该景点流出和流入的平均作用距离,结果数值越大,作用距离越远。

Tab. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 4

Tab. 5

Fig. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

The comparison of regression analysis

类型	回归方程	R²
幂函数	$T ij = 7.12 × 10 - 4 × C outi C inj / d ij 0.635$	0.652
指数函数	$T ij = 7.09 × 10 - 4 × C outi C inj / e - 0.143 d ij$	0.378

Tab. 7

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References 21

[1]	Bao Jigang, Chu Yifang. Tourism Geography.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1999.
	[保继刚, 楚义芳. 旅游地理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.]
[2]	Bowden J.A cross-national analysis of international tourist flows in China. Tourism Geographies, 2003, 5(3): 257-279.
[3]	Ma Yaofeng, Li Tianshun, Liu Xinping.Research on Chinese Inbound Tourism. Beijing: Science Press, 1999.
	[马耀峰, 李天顺, 刘新平. 中国入境旅游研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.]
[4]	Jansen V K, Spee R.A regional analysis of tourist flows within Europe. Tourism Management, 1995, 16(1): 73-80.
[5]	Richards G.Tourism attraction systems: Exploring cultural behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 28(4): 1048-1064.
[6]	Liu Fajian, Zhang Jie, Zhang Jinhe et al. Analysis of basic method of collecting the spatial data of tourist flows: A study review and comparison both at home and abroad. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(6): 101-109.
	[刘法建, 张捷, 章锦河等. 旅游流空间数据获取的基本方法分析. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(6): 101-109.]
[7]	Li Zhenting, Ma Yaofeng, Li Chuangxin et al. Analysis on the change of the inbound tourism flow to China in the latest 20 years. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 40(1): 94-99.
	[李振亭, 马耀峰, 李创新等. 近20年来中国入境旅游流流量与流质的变化分析. 陕西师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 40(1): 94-99.]
[8]	Liu Fajian, Zhang Jie, Chen Dongdong.The characteristics and dynamical factors of Chinese inbound tourist flow network. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(8): 1013-1024.
	[刘法建, 张捷, 陈冬冬. 中国入境旅游流网络结构特征及动因研究. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 1013-1024.]
[9]	Bian Xianhong, Sha Run, Du Changhai.Analysis on regional floating share of inbound tour flow in the Yangtze River delta. Human Geography, 2007, 22(2): 32-38.
	[卞显红, 沙润, 杜长海. 长江三角洲城市入境旅游流区域内流动份额分析. 人文地理, 2007, 22(2): 32-38.]
[10]	Yang Guoliang, Zhang Jie, Ai Nanshan et al. Zipf Structure and difference degree of tourist flow size system: A case study of Sichuan province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(12): 1281-1289.
	[杨国良, 张捷, 艾南山等. 旅游流齐夫结构及空间差异化特征: 以四川省为例. 地理学报, 2006, 61(12): 1281-1289.]
[11]	Chen Hao, Lu Lin, Zheng Shanting.The spatial network structure of the tourism destinations in urban agglomerations based on tourist flow: A case study of the Pearl River delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(2): 257-266.
	[陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 257-266.]
[12]	Yang Xingzhu, Gu Chaolin, Wang Qun.Urban tourism flow network structure construction in Nanjing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 609-620.
	[杨兴柱, 顾朝林. 南京市旅游流网络结构构建. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 609-620.]
[13]	Niu Yafei, Xie Libo, Liu Chunfeng.The variation tendency and proposed counter measures for adjusting and controlling vistor flow in Beijing. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(2): 283-292.
	[牛亚菲, 谢丽波, 刘春凤. 北京市旅游客流时空分布特征与调控对策. 地理研究, 2005, 24(2): 283-292.]
[14]	Xu Honggang, Xue Dan.Spatatial relationshaips among Tourism destination based on bionics theory: a case study of Xidi and Hongcun villages in Anhui province. Scientia Geograhpica Sinica, 2011, 31(12): 1518-1524.
	[徐红罡, 薛丹. 旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究: 以安徽省古村落西递、宏村为例. 地理科学, 2011, 31(12): 1518-1524.]
[15]	Smith S. Recreation Geography. London: Longman, 1983.
[16]	O'Kelly M E, Song W, Shen G Q. New estimates of gravitational attraction by linear programming. Geographical Analysis, 1995, 27(4): 271-285.
[17]	Lew A, Mckercher B.Modeling tourist movements: A local destination analysis. Annals of tourism research, 2006, 33(2): 403-423.
[18]	Zhang youyin, Ma Yaofeng, Gu Jing. The dynamic mechanism of inbound diffusing tourists flow of Beijing. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(1): 122-127.
	[张佑印, 马耀峰, 顾静. 北京入境旅游流扩散动力机制分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(1): 122-127.]
[19]	Kang C, Ma X, Tong D, Liu Y.Intra-urban human mobility patterns: An urban morphology perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2012, 391(4): 1702-1717.
[20]	Liu Y, Kang C, Gao S et al. Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2012, (4): 463-483.
[21]	Xiao Y, Wang F, Liu Y et al. Reconstructing gravitational attractions of major cities in China from air passenger flow data 2001-2008: A particle swarm optimization approach. The Professional Geographer, 2013, 65(2): 265-282.

中心度	层级	目录
>900	市级中心景点	夫子庙、中山陵、玄武湖、总统府
600~900	市级副中心景点	明孝陵、雨花台、鼓楼
300~600	区域级中心景点	中华门、南京大学、鸡鸣寺、湖南路
100~300	区域级副中心景点	大屠杀纪念馆、新街口、瞻园、台城、灵谷寺、长江大桥、莫愁湖、紫金山天文台
<100	一般性景点	朝天宫、梅园新村、美龄宫、阅江楼、南京博物院、1912、白鹭洲、九华山、明故宫、中山植物园、情侣园、石头城、清凉山、梅花山、燕子矶、海底世界、先锋书店、南京师范大学、东南大学、甘熙故居、云锦博物馆、奥体中心、半山园、静海寺、渡江胜利纪念碑、古林公园

类型	扩散型	平衡型	集聚型
S_i	>20%	[-20%, 20%]	<-20%
景点	中山陵	玄武湖、鸡鸣寺、总统府、南京大学、莫愁湖、雨花台、中华门、大屠杀纪念馆、鼓楼、长江大桥、明孝陵、灵谷寺、瞻园、紫金山天文台、湖南路	新街口、夫子庙

流量阀值	节点数	路径数	网络密度	中心势	平均流量	流量占比
l_ij ≥ 1	45	590	0.298	0.365	8.81	100%
l_ij ≥ 5	30	194	0.223	0.462	23.24	86.80%
l_ij ≥ 10	26	115	0.177	0.459	34.64	76.69%
l_ij ≥ 20	18	62	0.203	0.368	52.48	62.64%
l_ij ≥ 50	8	18	0.321	0.429	99.94	34.63%
l_ij ≥ 100	6	7	0.233	0.400	148.57	20.02%

距离 (km)	节点数	路径数	网络密度	中心势	平均流量	流量占比
全部距离	30	194	0.223	0.462	23.24	100%
(0, 3]	29	87	0.107	0.173	27.18	52.45%
(3, 6]	23	46	0.100	0.324	22.41	22.87%
(6, 9]	17	36	0.132	0.169	18.94	15.12%
>9	14	25	0.137	0.468	17.24	9.56%

景点类型	夫子庙		中山陵		总统府		玄武湖
景点类型	流出	流入	流出	流入	流出	流入	流出	流入
连接节点	16	22	16	14	18	15	16	13
流量占比 (%)	11.29	23.86	17.65	7.96	11.60	9.67	12.42	8.87
平均流量	31.81	43.59	49.75	25.64	29.06	29.07	35	30.77
加权距离（km）	3.75	4.58	5.95	6.80	3.58	3.94	3.57	4.82

Analyzing the characteristics of tourist flows between the scenic spots in inner city based on tourism strategies: A case study in Nanjing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 21

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SONG Weixuan, SUN Jie, CHEN Yanru, YIN Shanggang, CHEN Peiyang. Commercial gentrification in the inner city of Nanjing, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 426-442.
[2]	SONG Weixuan,MA Yuzhu,LI Xiaoli,CHEN Yanru. Housing price growth in different residences in urban Nanjing: Spatiotemporal pattern and social spatial effect [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1880-1895.
[3]	Weixuan SONG, Ning MAO, Peiyang CHEN, Yaqi YUAN, Yi WANG. Coupling mechanism and spatial-temporal pattern of residential differentiation from the perspective of housing prices:A case study of Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 589-602.
[4]	Weixuan SONG, Chunhui LIU, Yi WANG, Yaqi YUAN. Rent gap and gentrification in the inner city of Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2115-2130.
[5]	Chen ZHANG, Zhenfang HUANG, Jie ZHANG, Junlian GE. Urban tourism destination personality and its cultural landscape representation via machine learning: A case study of Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(10): 1886-1903.
[6]	Weifeng QIAO, Yansui LIU, Yahua WANG, Bin FANG, Youchen ZHAO. The relationship of evolution between urban land use types and intensity in Nanjing since the early 21st century [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1800-1810.
[7]	LI Zhi, ZHOU Shenglu, WU Shaohua, DAI Wanying, CHEN Long, LU Ligang. The impact of metro lines on public transit accessibility and land value capture in Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(2): 255-267.
[8]	ZHAO Rongqin, HUANG Xianjin, PENG Buzhuo. Research on Carbon Cycle and Carbon Balance of Nanjing Urban System [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(6): 758-770.
[9]	SONG Weixuan, XU Di, WANG Liye, ZHU Xigang. Urban Socio-spatial Structure of Nanjing during the Modern Era: Analysis Based on the Data of Urban Population Investigation in 1936 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(6): 771-784.
[10]	LIU Fajian, ZHANG Jie, CHEN Dongdong. The Characteristics and Dynamical Factors of Chinese Inbound Tourist Flow Network [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(8): 1013-1024.
[11]	SONG Wei-xuan, WU Qi-yan, ZHU Xi-gang. Residential Differentiation of Nanjing in the New Period [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(6): 685-694.
[12]	YAO Yifeng. Essential Geography Landscapes and Ecological Culture in Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6): 677-686.
[13]	ZHU Wei, WANG De, Harry TIMMERMANS. Applying Multi-Agent Systems in the Simulation of Consumer Behavior in Shopping Streets: The Shanghai East Nanjing Road Case [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 445-455.
[14]	CAO Guangjie,WANG Jian,ZHANG Xueqin,QU Guixian,BAI Shibiao,GONG Xiaohui. Characteristics and Runoff Volume of the Yangtze River's Paleovalley at Nanjing Reach in the Last Glacial Maximum [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(3): 331-338.
[15]	LU Weiguo, CHEN Wen. Manufacturing Industry Enterprises Location Choice and the Urban Spatial Restructuring in Nanjing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(2): 142-152.