黄土高原典型流域LCM模型集总、半分布和分布式构建对比分析

doi:10.11821/dlxb201401009

Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (1): 90-99.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401009

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of LCM hydrological models with lumped, semi-distributed and distributed building structures in typical watershed of Yellow River Basin

ZHANG Yichi¹, LIU Changming^2,3, YANG Shengtian¹, LIU Xiaoyan⁴, CAI Mingyong¹, DONG Guotao⁵, LUO Ya^1,6

1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Laboratory for Remote Sensing of Environment and Digital Cities, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Institute of Water Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Land Water Cycle and Surface Process, CAS, at IGSNRR, Beijing 100101, China;
4. Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
5. Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
6. School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China

Received:2013-10-12 Revised:2013-11-08 Online:2014-01-20 Published:2014-01-20
Contact: 刘昌明（1934-），男，院士，中国地理学会名誉理事长（S110001654H），主要研究方向：水文水资源学。E-mail：liucm@igsnrr.ac.cn E-mail:liucm@igsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Key Technologies R&D Program, No.2012BAB02B00; Public Welfare Fund of the Ministry of Water Resources of China, No.201101037; The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Abstract

Abstract: The distribution of rainstorm center is critical factor influencing the simulation accuracy of rainstorm runoff process. There are significant differences among the varying discretization responding to rainfall heterogeneities, thus it is important to improve simulation efficiency and accuracy by selecting appropriate discretization methods for reducing the influence of rainfall heterogeneity. For this, the LCM model which deduced from the unsaturated infiltration theory in Loess Plateau by Liu Changming was modeled in three ways: lumped, semi-distributed and distributed. The simulation results indicate that: the NSE with distributed method arrives at 0.81 and correlation coefficient attains 0.82 which shows the best fitness to gauge data. Comparatively, NSE of semi-distributed method arrives at 0.78, while the fitness to main peak of outlet stream-flow reaches 76.1% and 65.8%. Generally, distributed method shows the highest simulation accuracy, lumped method owns the highest calculation efficiency, and semi-distributed method indicates high simulation accuracy, and high calculation efficiency at the same time. So, spatial discretization of modeling is helpful to reduce the influence of rainfall heterogeneity and to improve simulation accuracy of LCM model, but it will consume more time. Thus, it is appropriate to select suitable spatial discretization methods according to the application requirements.

Key words: rainfall heterogeneity, distributed modeling, Yellow River, LCM model, storm runoff

ZHANG Yichi, LIU Changming, YANG Shengtian, LIU Xiaoyan, CAI Mingyong, DONG Guotao, LUO Ya. Comparison of LCM hydrological models with lumped, semi-distributed and distributed building structures in typical watershed of Yellow River Basin[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 90-99.

References

[1] Beven K J. Rainfall-runoff Modelling: The Primer. Chichester: Wiley, 2001.
[2] Chiew F H S. Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 1993, 147(1): 1-36.
[3] Beven K J, Kirkby M J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1979, 24(1): 43-69.
[4] Abbott M B, Bathurst J C, Cunge J A et al. An introduction to the European Hydrological System: Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 1. Journal of Hydrology, 1986, 87(1): 45-59.
[5] Bronstert A, Plate E J. Modelling of runoff generation and soil moisture dynamics for hillslopes and micro-catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 1997, 198(1-4): 177-195.
[6] Zhao Renjun. Hydrological Simulation of River Basin-Xin'anjiang Model and North Shaanxi Model. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 1984. [赵人俊. 流域水文模拟: 新安江模型与陕北模型. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1984.]
[7] Liu C M, Wang Z G, Zheng H X et al. Development of hydro-informatic modelling system and its application. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2008, 51(4): 456-466.
[8] Liu Changming, Wang Zhonggen, Yang Shengtian et al. Research progress of water cycle integrated simulation system (HIMS). Water Resources Development Research, 2010, 8(3): 5-15. [刘昌明, 王中根, 杨胜天等. 水循环多元综合模拟系统(HIMS) 的研究进展. 水利发展研究, 2010, 8(3): 5-15.]
[9] Borah D K, Xia R J, Bera M et al. DWSM: A dynamic watershed simulation model. Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, 2002: 113-166.
[10] Bicknell B R, Imhoff J C, Kittle Jr J L et al. Hydrologic simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): User's Manual for Release 10. Rep. No. EPA/600/R-93/174. US EPA Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Ga, 1993.
[11] Young R A. AGNPS, Agricultural non-point-source pollution model. Conservation Research Report, 1987.
[12] Beasley D B, Huggins L F, Monke E J. ANSWERS. Transactions of the ASAE, 1980, 23(4): 938-944.
[13] Refshaard J C, Storm B, Singh V P. MIKE SHE. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, 1995: 809-846.
[14] Liu C M, Yang S T, Wen Z Q et al. Development of eco-hydrological assessment tool and its application. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(7): 1947-1957.
[15] Liu Changming, Hong Baoxin, Zeng Mingxuan. A primary study on the forecasting of relationship on heavy rainfall-runoff in the Loess Plateau. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1965, 2(2): 158-161. [刘昌明, 洪宝鑫, 曾明煊. 黄土高原暴雨径流预报关系初步实验研究. 科学通报, 1965, 2(2): 158-161.]
[16] Jiao Enze. Analysis on variation trend of runoff and sediment of Gushanchuan Watershed. Yellow River, 1992, (6): 5. [焦恩泽. 孤山川流域水沙变化趋势的分析. 人民黄河, 1992, (6): 5.]
[17] Wang Guoqing, Chen Jiangnan, Li Haobing et al. Review on benefit assessment of water and soil conservation measures in Gushanchuan river basin. Northwest Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2003, 14(3): 13-16. [王国庆, 陈江南, 李皓冰等. 黄土高原孤山川流域水沙变化研究综述. 西北水资源与水工程, 2003, 14(3): 13-16.]
[18] Li Chunjuan. Analysis on variation characteristics and trends of precipitation in Gushanchuan watershed. Ground Water, 2012, (4): 136-138. [李春娟. 孤山川流域降水变化特征及趋势分析. 地下水, 2012, (4): 136-138.]
[19] Liu Zhuoying, Ni Guangheng, Lei Zhidong et al. The study of micro scale distributed hydrological model in Loess Plateau. Yellow River, 2005, 27(10): 19-21. [刘卓颖, 倪广恒, 雷志栋等. 黄土高原地区小尺度分布式水文模型研究. 人民黄河, 2005, 27(10): 19-21.]
[20] Liu Changming, Zheng Hongxing, Wang Zhonggen et al. Distributed Simulation of Watershed Hydrological Cycling.Zhengzhou: Yellow River Conservancy Press, 2006: 57-58. [刘昌明, 郑红星, 王中根等. 流域水循环分布式模拟. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2006: 57-58.]
[21] Holland J H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. University of Michigan Press, 1975.
[22] Wang Zhonggen, Xia Jun, Liu Changming et al. Comments on sensitivity analysis, calibration of distributed hydrological model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(4): 649-655. [王中根, 夏军, 刘昌明等. 分布式水文模型的参数率定及敏感性分析探讨. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 649-655.]
[23] Azuah R T. DAVE: A comprehensive software suite for the reduction, visualization, and analysis of low energy neutron spectroscopic data. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2009, 114(6): 341-358.
[24] Nash J E. River flow forecasting through conceptual models (Part I). Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282-290.
[25] Lee Rodgers J. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 1988, 42(1): 59-66.
[26] Small Watershed Rainstorm Runoff Study Group. The Calculation of Flood-peak Discharge during Rainstorm in Small Watersheds. Beijing: Science Press, 1978: 104-121. [小流域暴雨径流研究组. 小流域暴雨洪峰流量计算. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978: 104-121.]

Comparison of LCM hydrological models with lumped, semi-distributed and distributed building structures in typical watershed of Yellow River Basin

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	GAO Haidong, WU Zhao. Vegetation restoration and its effect on runoff and sediment processes in the Toudaoguai-Tongguan section of the Yellow River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1206-1217.
[2]	HUANG Chunchang. Palaeoflood deposits in the Zoige Basin and the enlightening on the formation of the Yellow River drainage systemon the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 612-625.
[3]	GUO Fuyou, TONG Lianjun, QIU Fangdao, LI Yiming. Spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics and influencing factors of green development in the eco-economic corridorof the Yellow River Basin [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 726-739.
[4]	CHENG Yifei, XIA Junqiang, ZHOU Meirong, WANG Yingzhen. Response of sediment delivery ratio to the incoming flow-sediment regime and channel geometry in the braided reach of the Lower Yellow River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 127-138.
[5]	WANG Yanjun, WU Baosheng, ZHONG Deyu. Simulation of the main-channel cross-section geometry of the Lower Yellow River in response to water and sediment changes [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1494-1511.
[6]	ZHANG Junhua, LI Guodong, WANG Yansong, ZHU Lianqi, ZHAO Wenliang, DING Yapeng. Spatial characteristics and variation mechanism of different soil organic carbon components in the alluvial/sedimentary zone of the Yellow River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(3): 558-570.
[7]	LU Dadao, SUN Dongqi. Development and management tasks of the Yellow River Basin: A preliminary understanding and suggestion [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2431-2436.
[8]	WANG Yanjun, WU Baosheng, SHEN Guanqing. Adjustment in the main-channel geometry of the lower Yellow River before and after the operation of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir from 1986 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(11): 2411-2427.
[9]	HE Lei,YE Siyuan,YUAN Hongming,XUE Chunting. Rethinking the spatio-temporal distribution of Lijin superlobe in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(1): 146-161.
[10]	GAO Chao,WANG Suiji. Evolution characteristics of the gravel-bedded anastomosing river at the Qihama reach in the First Great Bend of the Yellow River since 1990 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(7): 1352-1364.
[11]	SUN Qian,YU Kunxia,LI Zhanbin,LI Peng,ZHANG Xiaoming,GONG Junfu. The trends of streamflow and sediment and their driving factors in the middle reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 945-956.
[12]	PAN Wei, ZHENG Jingyun, MAN Zhimin. Reconstruction of runoffs over Upper-Middle Reaches of Yellow River and its relationship between PDO since AD 1766 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(11): 2053-2063.
[13]	BAO Weimin, SHEN Dandan, NI Peng, ZHOU Junwei, SUN Yiqun. Proposition and certification of moving mean difference method for detecting abrupt change points [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(11): 2075-2085.
[14]	YE Hong,ZHANG Tingbin,YI Guihua,LI Jingji,BIE Xiaojuan,LIU Dong,LUO Linling. Spatio-temporal characteristics of evapotranspiration and its relationship with climate factors in the source region of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2014 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(11): 2117-2134.
[15]	Shuai MA, Yu SHENG, Wei CAO, Jichun WU, Xiaoying HU, Shengting WANG. Numerical simulation of spatial distribution and change of permafrost in the source area of the Yellow River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(9): 1621-1633.