Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 78 ›› Issue (4): 792-810.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202304002
Previous Articles Next Articles
SONG Weixuan1(), CAO Hui1(
), TU Tangqi2, SONG Zhengna3, CHEN Peiyang4, LIU Chunhui5
Received:
2022-05-25
Revised:
2023-02-26
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-04-13
Contact:
CAO Hui
E-mail:wxsong@niglas.ac.cn;hcao@niglas.ac.cn
Supported by:
SONG Weixuan, CAO Hui, TU Tangqi, SONG Zhengna, CHEN Peiyang, LIU Chunhui. Jiaoyufication as an education-driven gentrification in urban China:A case study of Nanjing[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(4): 792-810.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Identification factors and description of Jiaoyufication in Nanjing school districts
特征类型 | 识别因子 | 变量描述 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|
学校属性 | 教学质量 | 学校教育质量 | 根据南京外国语学校初中部录取人数①(① 南京外国语学校是江苏省综合排名第一的中学,其初中部虽属公办性质但不设学区,而是采用面向南京市的自主招生方式择优录取,一直是南京小升初最热门甚至是首选学校。由于公办小学不存在类似于中考、高考成绩、升学率等官方排名,毕业生中考取南外初中的人数成为多年来南京坊间约定俗成的小学排名标准。) |
社区属性 | 住宅价格 | 单位面积房价(元/m2) | 以居住小区为单元计算住宅挂牌均价 |
居民属性②(②“个推”掌握着包括百度地图、滴滴出行、去哪儿网、京东、今日头条、中国银联、快手、新浪微博、知乎、趣头条等11万个APP的推送服务数据积累,覆盖移动终端10.5亿(覆盖率大于95%),能够在一定时段内有效采集多个APP调用的LBS数据,从而保证数据采集频率和精度,进而通过长期学习手机用户工作地(白天10:00—17:00出现最久的位置)、线下行为与场景偏好、线上APP使用类型和习惯等数据进行模型训练,获取用户年龄段、性别、消费水平等群体社会特征。) | 年龄结构 | 30~50岁群体占比(%) | 手机用户注册APP时提供给的身份信息 |
家庭结构 | 小学生家长占比(%) | 根据手机APP类型及活跃情况 | |
职业类型 | 白领职业群体占比(%) | 根据手机定位结合线上线下行为特征 | |
消费层次 | 高消费群体占比(%) | 根据消费习惯,相当于月收入2万元以上 |
Tab. 3
Comparison of social attribute among different Jiaoyufied school districts (%)
社会属性 | 高度绅士化 | 较高绅士化 | 中度绅士化 | 低度绅士化 | 全部学区 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄结构(岁) | 18~29 | 23.75 | 27.94 | 33.20 | 37.05 | 36.45 |
30~39 | 24.33 | 22.56 | 21.25 | 22.70 | 23.11 | |
40~49 | 22.75 | 21.20 | 19.11 | 17.64 | 18.73 | |
50~59 | 14.33 | 14.79 | 14.09 | 13.39 | 13.97 | |
≥ 60 | 12.74 | 10.50 | 9.54 | 8.21 | 7.75 | |
同住人口数(人) | 1~2 | 14.05 | 19.79 | 19.73 | 22.88 | 19.11 |
3 | 38.15 | 43.11 | 43.95 | 37.15 | 40.59 | |
4 | 27.71 | 17.67 | 21.23 | 20.18 | 21.70 | |
5 | 14.86 | 14.13 | 10.76 | 13.63 | 13.35 | |
≥ 6 | 5.22 | 5.30 | 4.33 | 6.16 | 5.25 | |
家长属性 | 学龄前家长 | 6.01 | 4.70 | 4.10 | 4.43 | 4.45 |
小学生家长 | 15.04 | 11.72 | 9.71 | 9.88 | 10.12 | |
中学生家长 | 12.06 | 10.46 | 7.87 | 6.97 | 7.50 | |
教育程度 | 高中及以下 | 9.24 | 9.89 | 10.91 | 22.60 | 13.16 |
专科 | 13.65 | 10.95 | 20.18 | 24.19 | 17.24 | |
本科 | 47.79 | 47.00 | 44.84 | 38.95 | 44.65 | |
硕士 | 18.88 | 20.49 | 18.24 | 9.14 | 16.69 | |
博士及以上 | 10.44 | 11.66 | 5.83 | 5.13 | 8.27 | |
职业结构 | 政府企事业管理者 | 25.70 | 32.51 | 26.61 | 16.50 | 25.33 |
专业技术人员 | 24.90 | 28.62 | 25.41 | 24.08 | 25.75 | |
办事人员 | 8.03 | 5.65 | 5.98 | 8.50 | 7.04 | |
私营企业主 | 2.01 | 2.12 | 5.08 | 3.68 | 3.22 | |
个体工商户 | 2.41 | 1.41 | 2.24 | 2.94 | 2.25 | |
商业服务业人员 | 5.22 | 6.36 | 9.87 | 9.38 | 7.71 | |
产业工人 | 1.61 | 2.12 | 1.35 | 6.37 | 2.86 | |
农业劳动者 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.25 | |
学生 | 15.66 | 9.54 | 9.12 | 11.93 | 11.56 | |
自由职业者 | 9.24 | 5.65 | 7.32 | 8.22 | 7.61 | |
离退休及无业 | 5.22 | 5.65 | 7.03 | 7.75 | 6.41 | |
消费能力 | 高消费 | 35.64 | 35.25 | 33.48 | 28.18 | 29.84 |
中消费 | 50.60 | 50.42 | 51.78 | 54.54 | 53.63 | |
低消费 | 12.18 | 13.48 | 14.17 | 17.23 | 16.28 | |
家庭年收入(万元) | < 20 | 33.73 | 36.40 | 42.45 | 59.70 | 43.07 |
20~40 | 36.14 | 37.81 | 34.23 | 28.19 | 34.09 | |
40~60 | 14.86 | 14.13 | 13.00 | 7.26 | 12.31 | |
60~100 | 9.24 | 8.48 | 7.62 | 2.83 | 7.04 | |
≥ 100 | 6.02 | 3.18 | 2.69 | 2.02 | 3.48 | |
住宅面积(m2) | < 50 | 6.83 | 11.31 | 9.27 | 11.37 | 9.69 |
50~59 | 10.84 | 7.07 | 5.98 | 5.70 | 7.40 | |
60~69 | 14.86 | 9.89 | 7.92 | 9.60 | 10.57 | |
70~79 | 9.64 | 10.60 | 8.22 | 7.29 | 8.94 | |
80~99 | 19.68 | 16.96 | 20.78 | 26.45 | 20.97 | |
100~119 | 19.28 | 15.90 | 17.94 | 18.48 | 17.90 | |
≥ 120 | 18.88 | 28.27 | 29.90 | 21.11 | 24.54 | |
社会属性 | 高度绅士化 | 较高绅士化 | 中度绅士化 | 低度绅士化 | 全部学区 | |
住房性质 | 购买商品房 | 65.06 | 73.14 | 63.68 | 52.58 | 63.62 |
租住 | 13.25 | 11.66 | 17.19 | 19.83 | 15.48 | |
公房 | 5.62 | 2.47 | 2.99 | 2.51 | 3.40 | |
原有私房 | 2.41 | 3.53 | 2.69 | 3.68 | 3.08 | |
拆迁安置房 | 3.21 | 0.35 | 2.24 | 7.01 | 3.20 | |
自购保障性住房 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 2.54 | 3.12 | 1.68 | |
自购小产权房 | 2.01 | 1.41 | 3.44 | 3.01 | 2.47 | |
房改房 | 3.61 | 4.59 | 4.33 | 2.41 | 3.74 | |
自建房 | 4.42 | 0.71 | 0.15 | 4.85 | 2.53 | |
房屋年代 | 1980年以前 | 7.23 | 4.95 | 4.63 | 2.90 | 4.93 |
1980—1989年 | 15.66 | 9.54 | 6.88 | 5.95 | 9.51 | |
1990—1999年 | 20.48 | 21.20 | 18.54 | 12.11 | 18.08 | |
2000—2009年 | 36.55 | 39.58 | 44.54 | 37.00 | 39.42 | |
2010年以后 | 20.08 | 24.73 | 25.41 | 42.03 | 28.06 |
Tab. 4
Information of highly Jiaoyufied school districts in the main city of Nanjing in 2020
排序 | 小学名称 | 行政区属 | 学区面积(m2) | 学区房价(元/m2) | 房价排名 | 名校分校 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 力学小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.84 | 87666 | 1 | 本部 |
2 | 拉萨路小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.70 | 74713 | 4 | 本部 |
3 | 芳草园小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.25 | 71958 | 5 | 本部 |
4 | 银城小学 | 鼓楼区 | 1.12 | 64450 | 7 | 拉小分校 |
5 | 琅琊路小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.50 | 83654 | 2 | 本部 |
6 | 金陵汇文小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.52 | 70112 | 6 | 拉小分校 |
7 | 北京东路小学 | 玄武区 | 0.69 | 63869 | 8 | 本部 |
8 | 凤凰花园城小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.39 | 50673 | 19 | 力小分校 |
9 | 南师附属小学 | 玄武区 | 0.53 | 56626 | 11 | 本部 |
10 | 汉江路小学 | 鼓楼区 | 0.56 | 50673 | 20 | 琅小分校 |
[1] |
Aalbers M B. Introduction to the forum: From third to fifth-wave gentrification. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2019, 110(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12332.
doi: 10.1111/tesg.12332 |
[2] |
Smith N. New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 2002, 34(3): 427-450.
doi: 10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3 |
[3] | Clark E. The order and simplicity of gentrification: A political challenge//Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge, 2005: 256-264. |
[4] |
Davidson M. Critical commentary. Gentrification in crisis: Towards consensus or disagreement? Urban Studies, 2011, 48(10): 1987-1996.
doi: 10.1177/0042098011411953 |
[5] | Hwang J. While some things change, some things stay the same: Reflections on the study of gentrification. City & Community, 2016, 15(3): 226-230. |
[6] | Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge, 2005. |
[7] | Merrifield A. The New Urban Question. London: Pluto Press, 2014. |
[8] | Lees L, Shin H B, López M E. Planetary Gentrification, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. |
[9] | Ley D, Teo S Y. Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs ontology. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2014, 38(4): 286-303. |
[10] | Chen Peiyang. A review on gentrification studies in western countries. City Planning Review, 2021, 45(1): 94-104. |
[陈培阳. 西方绅士化研究进展. 城市规划, 2021, 45(1): 94-104.] | |
[11] | He Shenjing, Qian Junxi, Deng Shangkun. Various forms of gentrification in transitional period in China: A case study of six communities in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2011, 26(1): 44-49. |
[何深静, 钱俊希, 邓尚昆. 转型期大城市多类绅士化现象探讨: 基于广州市六个社区的案例分析. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 44-49.] | |
[12] | Huang Xing, Liu Yuting. A review of empirical research on gentrification in contemporary China: Characteristics, topics, and prospects. Human Geography, 2021, 36(3): 5-14, 36. |
[黄幸, 刘玉亭. 中国绅士化研究的本土实践: 特征、议题与展望. 人文地理, 2021, 36(3): 5-14, 36.] | |
[13] | Song Weixuan, Zhu Xigang, Wu Qiyan. Process, characteristics and comments of gentrification in China: A case study of Nanjing. City Planning Review, 2010, 34(4): 14-20. |
[宋伟轩, 朱喜钢, 吴启焰. 中国中产阶层化过程、特征与评价: 以南京为例. 城市规划, 2010, 34(4): 14-20.] | |
[14] | Chen Peiyang. Jiaoyufication and its socio-spatial consequences in urban China. Urban Development Studies, 2015, 22(8): 55-60. |
[陈培阳. 中国城市学区绅士化及其社会空间效应. 城市发展研究, 2015, 22(8): 55-60.] | |
[15] |
Wu Q Y, Zhang X L, Waley P. Jiaoyufication: When gentrification goes to school in the Chinese inner city. Urban Studies, 2016, 53(16): 3510-3526.
doi: 10.1177/0042098015613234 |
[16] |
Butler T, Robson G. Plotting the middle classes: Gentrification and circuits of education in London. Housing Studies, 2003, 18(1): 5-28.
doi: 10.1080/0267303032000076812 |
[17] |
Hankins K B. The final frontier: Charter schools as new community institutions of gentrification. Urban Geography, 2007, 28(2): 113-128.
doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.113 |
[18] |
Pearman F A. Gentrification and academic achievement: A review of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 2019, 89(1): 125-165.
doi: 10.3102/0034654318805924 |
[19] |
Wilson D, Bridge G. School choice and the city: Geographies of allocation and segregation. Urban Studies, 2019, 56(15): 3198-3215.
doi: 10.1177/0042098019843481 |
[20] |
Hu shuju, Li Chenggu, Zhang Jing, et al. Jiaoyufication community: Its formation mechanisms and socio-spatial consequences. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(5): 1175-1188.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020170968 |
[胡述聚, 李诚固, 张婧, 等. 教育绅士化社区: 形成机制及其社会空间效应研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1175-1188.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020170968 |
|
[21] |
Boterman W R. School choice and school segregation in the context of gentrifying Amsterdam. Housing Studies, 2022, 37(5): 720-741.
doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1829563 |
[22] |
Green T L, Germain E, Castro A J, et al. Gentrifying neighborhoods, gentrifying schools? An emerging typology of school changes in a gentrifying urban school district. Urban Education, 2022, 57(1): 3-31.
doi: 10.1177/0042085920974090 |
[23] |
Taylor C. Towards a geography of education. Oxford Review of Education, 2009, 35(5): 651-669.
doi: 10.1080/03054980903216358 |
[24] |
Butler T, Hamnett C. The geography of education: Introduction. Urban Studies, 2007, 44(7): 1161-1174.
doi: 10.1080/00420980701329174 |
[25] |
Pearman F A, Swain W A. School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 2017, 90(3): 213-235.
doi: 10.1177/0038040717710494 |
[26] |
Reback R. House prices and the provision of local public services: Capitalization under school choice programs. Journal of Urban Economics, 2005, 57(2): 275-301.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2004.10.005 |
[27] |
Makris M V, Brown E. School development in urban gentrifying spaces: Developers supporting schools or schools supporting developers? Journal of Urban Affairs, 2020, 42(4): 571-594.
doi: 10.1080/07352166.2017.1360735 |
[28] |
Posey-Maddox L, Kimelberg S M, Cucchiara M. Middle-class parents and urban public schools: Current research and future directions. Sociology Compass, 2014, 8(4): 446-456.
doi: 10.1111/soc4.v8.4 |
[29] |
Liu Hongyan, Chen Wen. A review of research on the distribution of basic education resources in China. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(5): 557-568.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.05.004 |
[刘宏燕, 陈雯. 中国基础教育资源布局研究述评. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(5): 557-568.]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.05.004 |
|
[30] |
Dai Teqi, Liao Cong, Hu Ke, et al. Secondary school allocation optimization towards equal access: A case study on Shijingshan District, Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1476-1485.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708011 |
[戴特奇, 廖聪, 胡科, 等. 公平导向的学校分配空间优化: 以北京石景山区为例. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1476-1485.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708011 |
|
[31] |
Yuan Zhenjie, Guo Junwanguo, Yang Yunying, et al. Analysis of the spatial structure, mechanism and social-political effects of the high-quality basic educational resources in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 318-331.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002008 |
[袁振杰, 郭隽万果, 杨韵莹, 等. 中国优质基础教育资源空间格局形成机制及综合效应. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 318-331.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002008 |
|
[32] |
Song Zhengna, Hua Fuli, Liu Shaoli. Research progress and review of capitalization of compulsory educational resources. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(10): 1771-1787.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.10.013 |
[宋正娜, 华芙莉, 刘少丽. 义务教育资源资本化相关研究进展与述评. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(10): 1771-1787.]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.10.013 |
|
[33] | Liu Chunhui, Gu Yue, Liu Yu, et al. The spatial differentiation of urban shadow educational institutions and the territorialization of educational resources: A case study of Nanjing, China. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(5): 155-164. |
[刘春卉, 谷跃, 刘予, 等. 城市影子教育机构的空间分异与教育资源领域化: 以南京为例. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5): 155-164.] | |
[34] |
Song Weixuan, Tu Tangqi, Yin Shanggang, et al. The differentiation and effects of social-spatial accessibility in compulsory education resources in Nanjing. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(8): 2008-2026.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180575 |
[宋伟轩, 涂唐奇, 尹上岗, 等. 南京义务教育资源的社会—空间可达性差异及效应研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 2008-2026.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180575 |
|
[35] |
Cai R, Hu L R, He S J. Policy-driven education-led gentrification and its spatiotemporal dynamics: Evidence from Shanghai, China. The Geographical Journal, 2022. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12440.
doi: 10.1111/geoj.12440 |
[36] |
Lees L. The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography, 2012, 36(2): 155-171.
doi: 10.1177/0309132511412998 |
[37] |
Gao Zhe, Qiu Jiayi, Yu Jiayi, et al. Influence of school districts on housing prices and the effect on socio-spatial restructuring: Taking Wuchang district of Wuhan city as a case. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(4): 609-620.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.006 |
[高喆, 邱嘉怡, 余家怡, 等. 学区对住宅价格的影响及其社会空间重构研究: 以武汉市武昌区为例. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(4): 609-620.]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.006 |
|
[38] |
He Yanbing, Huang Xiaojun, Yang Xinjun. Adaptation of land-lost farmers to rapid urbanization in urban fringe: A case study of Xi'an. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(2): 226-240.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201702003 |
[何艳冰, 黄晓军, 杨新军. 快速城市化背景下城市边缘区失地农民适应性研究: 以西安市为例. 地理研究, 2017, 36(2): 226-240.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201702003 |
|
[39] |
Song Weixuan, Mao Ning, Chen Peiyang, et al. Coupling mechanism and spatial-temporal pattern of residential differentiation from the perspective of housing prices: A case study of Nanjing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 589-602.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704003 |
[宋伟轩, 毛宁, 陈培阳, 等. 基于住宅价格视角的居住分异耦合机制与时空特征: 以南京为例. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 589-602.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704003 |
|
[40] |
Elliott-Cooper A, Hubbard P, Lees L. Moving beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, displacement and the violence of un-homing. Progress in Human Geography, 2020, 44(3): 492-509.
doi: 10.1177/0309132519830511 |
[41] |
Wu Q Y, Zhang X L, Waley P. When Neil Smith met Pierre Bourdieu in Nanjing, China: Bringing cultural capital into rent gap theory. Housing Studies, 2017, 32(5): 659-677.
doi: 10.1080/02673037.2016.1228849 |
[42] |
Wu Q Y, Edensor T, Cheng J Q. Beyond space: Spatial (re)production and middle-class remaking driven by jiaoyufication in Nanjing city, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2018, 42(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12568.
doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12568 |
[43] |
Liu C, Deng Y, Song W X, et al. Differentiation under capitalism: Genesis and consequences of the rent gap. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2021, 53(7): 1770-1788.
doi: 10.1177/0308518X211032978 |
[44] | Yang Zhenshan, Su Zilin, Ding Yue, et al. The external effect of Jiaoyufication upon urban space. Human Geography, 2018, 33(4): 60-67. |
[杨振山, 粟子林, 丁悦, 等. 学区化外部性对城市空间的影响. 人文地理, 2018, 33(4): 60-67.] | |
[45] |
Wang J, Li G. Pursuing educational equality and divergence in the housing market: How do educational equality policies affect housing prices in Shanghai? Cities, 2022, 131: 104001. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104001.
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104001 |
[46] | Liu Jingming. Changing patterns of inequality of educational opportunity in basic education in China. Social Sciences in China, 2008(5): 101-116, 206. |
[刘精明. 中国基础教育领域中的机会不平等及其变化. 中国社会科学, 2008(5): 101-116, 206.] | |
[47] | Li Zhonglu, Qiu Zeqi. Family background and children's academic performance: Evidence from the compulsory education in China. Sociological Studies, 2016, 31(4): 121-144. |
[李忠路, 邱泽奇. 家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就?义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析. 社会学研究, 2016, 31(4): 121-144.] | |
[48] | Wu Yuxiao, Huang Chao, Huang Suwen. The dual cultural reproduction of families and schools: A heterogeneous discussion about the effects of cultural capital. Journal of Social Development, 2017, 4(3): 1-27, 242. |
[吴愈晓, 黄超, 黄苏雯. 家庭、学校与文化的双重再生产: 文化资本效应的异质性分析. 社会发展研究, 2017, 4(3): 1-27, 242.] | |
[49] |
Kauppinen T M, van Ham M, Bernelius V. Understanding the effects of school catchment areas and households with children in ethnic residential segregation. Housing Studies, 2022, 37(9): 1625-1649.
doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1857707 |
[50] | Chen Jie, Mao Sanqin. Research on the interactive relationship between spatial balance of compulsory education and residential integration. Social Science Journal, 2022(6): 170-180. |
[陈杰, 茆三芹. 义务教育空间均衡与居住融合的互动关系研究. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(6): 170-180.] |