Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (7): 1615-1633.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202207004
• Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Yong1,2(), WANG Lijia1,2, YANG Hua1,2
Received:
2021-12-30
Revised:
2022-06-27
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-09-13
Supported by:
XU Yong, WANG Lijia, YANG Hua. Evaluation method and empirical application of human activity suitability of land resources in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(7): 1615-1633.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Suitability evaluation results of construction land in Milin County under different grid precisions
等级 类型 | 适建 指数 | 30 m | 50 m | 100 m | 250 m | 500 m | 1000 m | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | |||||||
适宜 | ≥ 0.58 | 120.41 | 1.26 | 135.95 | 1.43 | 152.77 | 1.60 | 147.39 | 1.55 | 118.23 | 1.24 | 70.30 | 0.74 | |||||
较适宜 | (0.58, 0.48] | 277.97 | 2.92 | 267.33 | 2.80 | 246.20 | 2.58 | 228.79 | 2.40 | 228.64 | 2.40 | 295.09 | 3.10 | |||||
一般适宜 | (0.48, 0.38] | 201.93 | 2.12 | 199.91 | 2.10 | 199.34 | 2.09 | 219.98 | 2.31 | 310.34 | 3.26 | 553.25 | 5.80 | |||||
欠适宜 | (0.38, 0.28] | 263.95 | 2.77 | 264.69 | 2.78 | 273.75 | 2.87 | 364.36 | 3.82 | 599.31 | 6.29 | 1218.69 | 12.79 | |||||
不适宜 | <0.28 | 8666.56 | 90.93 | 8662.95 | 90.89 | 8658.77 | 90.85 | 8570.30 | 89.92 | 8274.30 | 86.82 | 7393.50 | 77.57 |
Tab. 2
Suitability evaluation results of cultivated land in Milin County under different grid precisions
等级 类型 | 适耕 指数 | 30 m | 50 m | 100 m | 250 m | 500 m | 1000 m | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | |||||||
适宜 | ≥ 0.320 | 68.41 | 0.72 | 72.74 | 0.76 | 83.64 | 0.88 | 85.01 | 0.89 | 69.01 | 0.72 | 36.68 | 0.38 | |||||
较适宜 | (0.320, 0.274] | 292.14 | 3.07 | 293.62 | 3.08 | 278.86 | 2.93 | 256.68 | 2.69 | 237.79 | 2.49 | 271.82 | 2.85 | |||||
一般适宜 | (0.274, 0.210] | 249.31 | 2.62 | 246.27 | 2.50 | 246.53 | 2.59 | 267.41 | 2.81 | 370.66 | 3.89 | 633.13 | 6.64 | |||||
欠适宜 | (0.210, 0.180] | 128.89 | 1.35 | 130.16 | 1.37 | 136.66 | 1.43 | 178.39 | 1.87 | 288.00 | 3.02 | 551.70 | 5.79 | |||||
不适宜 | <0.180 | 8792.08 | 92.25 | 8788.03 | 92.21 | 8785.14 | 92.18 | 8743.33 | 91.74 | 8565.37 | 89.87 | 8037.49 | 84.33 |
Tab. 3
Suitability grade distribution of current construction land in Milin County under different grid precisions
适宜性 等级类型 | 城镇村及工矿用地 | 交通运输用地 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 m | 50 m | 100 m | 30 m | 50 m | 100 m | |||||||||||
面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 占比 (%) | |||||
适宜 | 2.44 | 23.01 | 2.78 | 26.17 | 3.08 | 28.99 | 2.61 | 12.17 | 3.24 | 15.13 | 3.87 | 18.06 | ||||
较适宜 | 6.78 | 63.85 | 6.52 | 61.34 | 5.96 | 56.07 | 8.36 | 39.03 | 7.82 | 36.47 | 6.97 | 32.52 | ||||
一般适宜 | 1.01 | 9.52 | 0.94 | 8.85 | 1.07 | 10.04 | 3.71 | 17.31 | 3.68 | 17.18 | 3.81 | 17.76 | ||||
欠适宜 | 0.24 | 2.28 | 0.23 | 2.21 | 0.35 | 3.27 | 1.88 | 8.78 | 1.96 | 9.16 | 2.31 | 10.78 | ||||
不适宜 | 0.14 | 1.33 | 0.15 | 1.43 | 0.17 | 1.63 | 4.87 | 22.72 | 4.73 | 22.06 | 4.48 | 20.88 | ||||
总计 | 10.62 | 100 | 10.62 | 100 | 10.62 | 100 | 21.43 | 100 | 21.43 | 100 | 21.43 | 100 |
Tab. 4
Suitability grade distribution of current cultivated land and garden land in Milin County under different grid precisions
适宜性 等级类型 | 耕地 | 种植园用地 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 m | 50 m | 100 m | 30 m | 50 m | 100 m | |||||||||||
面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | |||||
适宜 | 4.96 | 6.96 | 7.39 | 10.38 | 11.08 | 15.55 | 0.69 | 6.95 | 0.90 | 9.15 | 1.39 | 14.05 | ||||
较适宜 | 53.45 | 75.05 | 51.36 | 72.11 | 45.99 | 64.57 | 7.69 | 77.74 | 7.55 | 76.38 | 6.81 | 68.89 | ||||
一般适宜 | 11.41 | 16.02 | 10.96 | 15.39 | 11.77 | 16.52 | 1.28 | 12.91 | 1.23 | 12.43 | 1.39 | 14.04 | ||||
欠适宜 | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 1.05 | 1.20 | 1.69 | 0.12 | 1.24 | 0.11 | 1.06 | 0.17 | 1.70 | ||||
不适宜 | 0.67 | 0.94 | 0.76 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.66 | 0.11 | 1.16 | 0.10 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.32 | ||||
总计 | 71.23 | 100 | 71.23 | 100 | 71.23 | 100 | 9.89 | 100 | 9.89 | 100 | 9.89 | 100 |
[1] | Wu Chuanjun. A review of agricultural geography development. Geographic Environment Research, 1989, 1(1): 10-17. |
[ 吴传钧. 农业地理学发展述要. 地理环境研究, 1989, 1(1): 10-17.] | |
[2] | Zhou Lisan. Researching formation, development, internal structure and system of China's agricultural zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1964, 30(1): 14-24. |
[ 周立三. 试论农业区域的形成演变、内部结构及其区划体系. 地理学报, 1964, 30(1): 14-24.]
doi: 10.11821/xb196401002 |
|
[3] | Wu Chuanjun. Education and enterprise of geography at Britain British. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1948, 15(2-4): 47-56. |
[ 吴传钧. 英国之地理教育与地理事业. 地理学报, 1948, 15(2-4): 47-56.] | |
[4] |
Wu Chuanjun. Promoting areal specialization of agriculture through development areal predominance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1981, 36(4): 349-357.
doi: 10.11821/xb198104001 |
[ 吴传钧. 因地制宜发挥优势逐步发展我国农业生产的地域专业化. 地理学报, 1981, 36(4): 349-357.]
doi: 10.11821/xb198104001 |
|
[5] | Li Xiubin, Huang Rongjin. Evaluation of agricultural land adaptability in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Natural Resources, 1989, 11(4): 32-38. |
[ 李秀斌, 黄荣金. 黄淮海平原土地农业适应性评价. 自然资源, 1989, 11(4): 32-38.] | |
[6] | Steiner F, McSherry L, Cohen J. Land suitability analysis for the upper Gila River watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 50(4): 199-214. |
[7] | Fan Jie, Zhou Chenghu, Gu Hangfa, et al. State Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction:Resource Environment Carrying Capacity Evaluation. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. |
[ 樊杰, 周成虎, 顾行发, 等. 资源环境承载能力评价国家汶川地震灾后重建规划. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.] | |
[8] | General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Major function oriented zoning of China. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-06/08/content_1879180.htm, 2011-06-30/2021-12-29. |
[中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 全国主体功能区规划. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-06/08/content_1879180.htm, 2011-06-30/2021-12-29.] | |
[9] |
Fan Jie. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 186-201.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502002 |
[ 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 186-201.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502002 |
|
[10] | Xu Y, Tang Q, Fan J, et al. Assessing construction land potential and its spatial pattern in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 103(2): 207-216. |
[11] | Fan J, Wang Y F, Wang C S, et al. Reshaping the sustainable geographical pattern: A major function zoning model and its applications in China. Earth's Future, 2019, 7(1): 25-42. |
[12] | Dang L J, Xu Y, Tang Q. The pattern of available construction land along the Xijiang River in Guangxi, China. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 102-112. |
[13] |
Tang Qing, Xu Yong, Dong Xiaohui, et al. Appraisal of land resources security in the post-earthquake reconstruction area of Lushan earthquake. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(4): 650-663.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201504012 |
[ 汤青, 徐勇, 董晓辉, 等. 芦山地震灾后重建地区土地资源安全评价. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 650-663.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201504012 |
|
[14] | Xinhua News Agency. Provincial Spatial Planning Pilot Program issued by General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-01/09/content_5158211.htm, 2017-01-30/2021-12-29. |
[新华社. 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《省级空间规划试点方案》. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-01/09/content_5158211.htm, 2017-01-30/2021-12-29.] | |
[15] | Fan Jie. Assessment Guidelines for Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity and Territorial Development Suitability. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. |
[ 樊杰. 资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价方法指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.] | |
[16] | Zhou Daojing, Xu Yong, Wang Yafei, et al. Methodology and role of "double evaluation" in optimization of spatial development pattern. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7): 814-824. |
[ 周道静, 徐勇, 王亚飞, 等. 国土空间格局优化中的“双评价”方法与作用. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(7): 814-824.] | |
[17] |
Zheng Du, Yang Qinye. Some problems on the altitudinal belts in southeastern Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1985, 40(1): 60-69.
doi: 10.11821/xb198501007 |
[ 郑度, 杨勤业. 青藏高原东南部山地垂直自然带的几个问题. 地理学报, 1985, 40(1): 60-69.]
doi: 10.11821/xb198501007 |
|
[18] | Zheng Du. Research on the natural territory system of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Scientia Sinica: Terrae, 1996, 26(4): 336-341. |
[ 郑度. 青藏高原自然地域系统研究. 中国科学: 地球科学, 1996, 26(4): 336-341.] | |
[19] | Fan Jie, Xu Yong, Wang Chuansheng, et al. The effects of human activities on the ecological environment of Tibet over the past half century. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(32): 3057-3066. |
[ 樊杰, 徐勇, 王传胜, 等. 西藏近半个世纪以来人类活动的生态环境效应. 科学通报, 2015, 60(32): 3057-3066.] | |
[20] | Xu Yong, Gan Guohui, Wang Zhiqiang. Topographic differentiation simulation of crop yield based on WIN-YIELD software in the loess hilly-gully region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(7): 61-64. |
[ 徐勇, 甘国辉, 王志强. 基于WIN-YIELD软件的黄土丘陵区作物产量地形分异模拟. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(7): 61-64.] | |
[21] | Xu Yong, Tian Junliang, Liu Puling, et al. Topographic differentiation simulation of soil and water loss of slope farmland in Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(5): 18-21, 25. |
[ 徐勇, 田均良, 刘普灵, 等. 黄土高原坡耕地水土流失地形分异模拟. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(5): 18-21, 25.] | |
[22] | Xu Yong, Yang Bo, Liu Guobin, et al. Topographic differentiation simulation of crop yield and soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(11): 1218-1226. |
[ 徐勇, 杨波, 刘国彬, 等. 黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟. 地理学报, 2008, 63(11): 1218-1226.] | |
[23] | Yang Bo, Xu Yong. Topographic differentiation simulation of Alfalfa yield and soil and water loss in the Loess Plateau. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(5): 530-534. |
[ 杨波, 徐勇. 黄土高原坡耕地苜蓿产量及水土流失地形分异模拟: 以延安燕沟流域为例. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(5): 530-534.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.05.003 |
|
[24] | Xu Y, Yang B, Tang Q, et al. Analysis of comprehensive benefits of transforming slope farmland to terraces on the Loess Plateau: A case study of the Yangou Watershed in Northern Shaanxi Province, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 8(3): 448-457. |
[25] |
Xu Yong, Zhao Shen, Fan Jie. Urban planning construction land standard and its revision of climate and topography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(1): 194-208.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202001014 |
[ 徐勇, 赵燊, 樊杰. 中国城市规划建设用地标准及气候和地形地貌修订. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 194-208.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202001014 |
|
[26] | Mao Yalong. Mountainous urban planning and architectural design according to climate. Mountain Research, 2009, 27(5): 605-611. |
[ 冒亚龙. 回应气候的山地城镇与建筑设计. 山地学报, 2009, 27(5): 605-611.] | |
[27] | Zhang Chengcai, Qin Kun, Lu Yan, et al. The Theories and Methods of Spatial Analysis in GIS. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2004. |
[ 张成才, 秦昆, 卢燕, 等. GIS空间分析理论与方法. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2004.] | |
[28] | Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. Assessment guidelines for resource and environmental carrying capacity and territorial development suitability. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-01/22/content_5471523.htm, 2020-01-19/2021-12-29. |
[中华人民共和国自然资源部. 资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价指南(试行). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-01/22/content_5471523.htm, 2020-01-19/2021-12-29.] |
[1] | FANG Chuanglin. Special thinking and green development path of urbanization in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(8): 1907-1919. |
[2] | CHEN Hongjin, LIU Lin, ZHANG Zhengyong, LIU Ya, TIAN Hao, KANG Ziwei, WANG Tongxia, ZHANG Xueying. Spatiotemporal correlation between human activity intensity and surface temperature on the north slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(5): 1244-1259. |
[3] | HU Xiaoyang, WANG Zhaofeng, ZHANG Yili, GONG Dianqing. Spatialization method of grazing intensity and its application in Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(3): 547-558. |
[4] | ZHANG Yihui, LIU Changming, LIANG Kang, LYU Jinxin. Spatio-temporal variation of precipitation in the Yarlung Zangbo river basin [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(3): 603-618. |
[5] | CHEN Dongjun, ZHONG Linsheng, FAN Jie, YU Hu, YANG Ding, ZENG Yuxi. Function evaluation and structure analysis of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Cluster [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(1): 196-213. |
[6] | LIU Yujie, LYU Shuo, CHEN Jie, ZHANG Jie, QIU Shuangjuan, HU Yifan, GE Quansheng. Spatio-temporal differentiation of agricultural modernization and its driving mechanism on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(1): 214-227. |
[7] | LI Wenjun, LI Peng, FENG Zhiming, YOU Zhen, XIAO Chiwei. Spatial definition of "Unpopulated Areas (UPAs)" based on the characteristics of human settlements in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2118-2129. |
[8] | FENG Sansan, LU Hongwei, YAO Tianci, LIU Yunlong, TANG Meng, FENG Wei, LU Jingzhao. Distribution and source analysis of microplastics in typical areas of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2130-2141. |
[9] | LIU Zhen, LIU Shenghe, QI Wei, JIN Haoran. The settlement intention of floating population and the factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: An analysis from the perspective of short-distance and long-distance migrants [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2142-2156. |
[10] | HOU Guangliang, , ZHU Yan, PANG Longhui. Communication route and its evolution on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during the prehistoric time [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1294-1313. |
[11] | DU Yunyan, YI Jiawei, XUE Cunjin, QIAN Jiale, PEI Tao. Modeling and analysis of geographic events supported by multi-source geographic big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(11): 2853-2866. |
[12] | HUANG Hai, TIAN You, LIU Jiankang, ZHANG Jiajia, YANG Dongxu, YANG Shun. The mechanism and sensitivity analysis of soil freeze-thaw erosion on slope in eastern Tibet [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 87-100. |
[13] | DONG Guanghui, QIU Menghan, LI Ruo, CHEN Fahu. Using the Fulcrum Cognitive Model to explore the mechanismof past human-land co-evolution [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 15-29. |
[14] | FENG Zhiming, LI Wenjun, LI Peng, XIAO Chiwei. Relief degree of land surface and its geographical meanings in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1359-1372. |
[15] | SUN Siao, WANG Jing, QI Wei. Urban-and-rural virtual water trade of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Patterns and influencing factors [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1346-1358. |