Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (2): 459-470.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102015
• Industrial and Regional Development • Previous Articles Next Articles
PENG Shiyao1(), CHEN Shaokuan2, XU Qi1(
), NIU Jiaqi3
Received:
2019-07-08
Revised:
2020-10-28
Online:
2021-02-25
Published:
2021-04-25
Contact:
XU Qi
E-mail:17120865@bjtu.edu.cn;xuqi@bjtu.edu.cn
Supported by:
PENG Shiyao, CHEN Shaokuan, XU Qi, NIU Jiaqi. Spatial characteristics of land use based on POI and urban rail transit passenger flow[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 459-470.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Urban construction land classification based on different granularity level POIs
用地分类 | I级POI | II级POI |
---|---|---|
商业服务业 设施用地 | 酒店 | 星级酒店、其他(酒店) |
美食 | 中餐厅、外国餐厅、小吃快餐店、蛋糕甜品店、咖啡厅、茶座、酒吧、其他(美食) | |
丽人 | 美容、美甲、美体 | |
购物 | 购物中心、百货商场、超市、便利店、家居建材、家电数码、商铺、集市 | |
金融 | 银行、ATM、信用社、投资理财、典当行 | |
写字楼 | 写字楼 | |
公司单位 | 公司、物流公司、园区、农林园艺、文化传媒、新闻出版、艺术团体、广播电视 | |
商业服务 | 通讯营业厅、售票处、洗衣店、图文快印店、照相馆、房产中介机构、维修点、家政服务、殡葬服务、彩票销售点、宠物服务、报刊亭、诊所、药店 | |
休闲娱乐 | 度假村、农家院、电影院、KTV、剧院、歌舞厅、网吧、游戏场所、洗浴按摩、游乐园、水族馆、海滨浴场 | |
运动健身 | 极限运动场所、健身中心、体育场馆 | |
商业培训 | 成人教育、亲子教育、留学中介机构、培训机构、文化宫 | |
汽车服务 | 汽车维修 | |
居住用地 | 居住 | 住宅区、宿舍 |
道路与交通 设施用地 | 对外交通 | 飞机场、火车站、长途汽车站 |
公交车站 | 公交车站 | |
其他交通 | 停车场、加油加气站、充电站 | |
工业用地 | 工业厂矿 | 厂矿 |
公用设施用地 | 公用设施 | 邮局、公用事业、公共厕所 |
公共管理与 公共服务用地 | 公共游览 | 博物馆、文物古迹、教堂、图书馆、美术馆、展览馆 |
科研教育 | 大学、中学、小学、幼儿园、特殊教育学校、科研机构 | |
政府机构 | 各级政府、行政单位、公检法机构、涉外机构、党派团体、福利机构、政治教育机构 | |
公共医疗 | 综合医院、专科医院、体检机构、急救中心、疾控中心、疗养院 | |
绿地与广场用地 | 绿地广场 | 公园、动物园、植物园、风景区、休闲广场 |
Tab. 2
Parameter estimation results of regression models
粒度水平 | 影响因素/lip | OLS/β | SLM/β | SEM/β | SDM/β | GWR/β | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1% | 5% | 10% | 不显著 | ||||||
粗 粒 度 | 居住用地 | -4.929 | -4.733 | -4.519 | -2.532 | -13.274(18%) | -4.631(17%) | -2.155(8%) | -1.102(57%) |
商业服务业设施用地 | 12.137*** | 12.057*** | 12.044*** | 11.721*** | 6.887(31%) | 4.237(12%) | 4.496(6%) | 1.342(51%) | |
公共管理与公共服务用地 | 54.224*** | 51.411*** | 53.537*** | 42.654*** | 9.663(41%) | 34.181(9%) | 8.592(4%) | 5.091(46%) | |
道路与交通设施用地 | 4.836* | 4.576 | 4.522 | 3.226 | 81.913(85%) | 96.526(1%) | 7.922(2%) | 11.669(12%) | |
绿地与广场用地 | -24.262 | -23.074 | -24.259 | -11.633 | -62.629(6%) | -1.910(5%) | -17.206(7%) | -6.857(82%) | |
ρ | 0.464 | -0.278 | |||||||
λ | 0.304 | ||||||||
细 粒 度 | 居住 | -4.405 | -4.452 | -4.657 | -0.596 | 4.305(28%) | -4.103(13%) | -2.146(3%) | -2.044(56%) |
写字楼 | 136.630*** | 136.930*** | 138.361*** | 131.143*** | 146.738(66%) | 102.819(5%) | 70.582(7%) | 22.748(22%) | |
公司单位 | 6.415 | 6.430 | 6.079 | 8.988 | 30.325(19%) | 13.698(7%) | 10.624(6%) | 1.245(68%) | |
科研教育 | -5.119 | -6.508 | -1.729 | -34.545 | -204.995(14%) | -46.527(12%) | -21.512(12%) | -11.767(62%) | |
政府机构 | 42.241 | 39.633 | 43.904* | 29.315 | 54.225(54%) | 44.685(10%) | 26.300(8%) | 13.107(28%) | |
对外交通 | -62.564*** | -61.790*** | -63.434*** | -58.885*** | 3.315(20%) | 58.661(27%) | 45.774(11%) | 19.068(42%) | |
公交车站 | -46.889 | -39.879 | -58.888 | -64.629 | (0%) | -581.734(2%) | -300.432(5%) | -70.24(93%) | |
绿地广场 | 6.227 | 6.876 | 6.577 | 11.821 | -90.427(3%) | 38.195(10%) | 87.552(1%) | 11.356(86%) | |
ρ | 0.380 | -0.999* | |||||||
λ | -0.355 |
Tab. 3
Comparison of evaluation indexes of regression models fitting effect based on I-level POI
模型 | R2 | 校正的R2 | 对数似然值 | AIC | 残差的Moran's I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLS | 0.650 | 0.612 | - | 4636.620 | 0.0775 |
SLM | 0.653 | 0.616 | -2212.674 | 4471.348 | -0.0033 |
SEM | 0.651 | 0.613 | -2213.029 | 4472.059 | -0.0035 |
SDM | 0.684 | 0.608 | -2198.581 | 4443.162 | -0.0145 |
GWR | 0.841 | 0.824 | - | 4449.164 | 0.0001 |
Tab. 4
Results of Saturday's regression fitting parameter estimation
粒度水平 | 影响因素/lip | OLS/β | SLM/β | SEM/β | SDM/β | GWR/β | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1% | 5% | 10% | 不显著 | ||||||
粗 粒 度 | 居住用地 | -2.432 | -2.424 | -2.395 | -2.503 | -6.213(12%) | -4.414(16%) | -3.935(15%) | -1.596(57%) |
商业服务业设施用地 | 4.359*** | 4.359*** | 4.357*** | 4.346*** | 3.358(69%) | 1.504(7%) | 0.854(4%) | 0.125(20%) | |
公共管理与公共服务用地 | 9.679* | 9.432* | 9.629* | 8.695 | 18.115(7%) | 2.651(6%) | -2.217(9%) | -1.678(78%) | |
道路与交通设施用地 | -0.608 | -0.611 | -0.618 | -0.852 | 17.062(42%) | 10.451(15%) | 8.118(11%) | 6.130(32%) | |
绿地与广场用地 | -5.360 | -5.196 | -5.274 | -4.197 | -67.081(8%) | -30.039(2%) | 10.025(4%) | 0.028(86%) | |
ρ | 0.127 | -0.024 | |||||||
λ | 0.092 | ||||||||
细 粒 度 | 居住 | -1.319 | -1.354 | -1.303 | -1.999 | 5.797(10%) | 3.334(19%) | 2.375(12%) | -0.034(59%) |
美食 | 9.472** | 9.511*** | 9.393*** | 10.792*** | 18.912(76%) | 4.220(4%) | 4.224(3%) | 0.514(17%) | |
酒店 | 23.898 | 21.507 | 23.515 | 8.540 | -33.005(17%) | 15.636(21%) | -30.626(6%) | -3.314(56%) | |
写字楼 | 59.568*** | 59.713*** | 59.404*** | 57.193*** | 63.240(56%) | 51.826(9%) | 27.864(3%) | 10.797(32%) | |
公司单位 | -4.544* | -4.481* | -4.512* | -4.774* | -6.861(29%) | -4.987(17%) | -4.195(5%) | -1.504(49%) | |
休闲娱乐 | -58.196* | -58.977* | -58.585* | -107.261*** | -94.921(15%) | -68.644(48%) | -56.245(18%) | -40.797(19%) | |
公共游览 | 19.067 | 18.578 | 18.655 | 15.450 | 55.573(10%) | 25.549(26%) | 20.895(10%) | 12.053(54%) | |
科研教育 | -45.515 | -45.479* | -45.732* | 53.231** | -61.216(14%) | -59.024(43%) | -46.242(14%) | -25.193(29%) | |
政府机构 | 11.991 | 12.107 | 12.286 | 11.545 | 31.377(19%) | 18.163(8%) | 8.609(7%) | 4.756(66%) | |
对外交通 | -6.547 | -6.174 | -6.451 | -11.179 | 59.435(65%) | 12.966(8%) | -3.128(6%) | 4.881(21%) | |
公交车站 | 15.901 | 17.128 | 16.064 | 11.746 | 193.295(1%) | -83.031(5%) | 43.392(6%) | 7.562(88%) | |
绿地广场 | -2.843 | -2.437 | -2.695 | -1.360 | (0%) | -25.855(4%) | -8.709(2%) | 0.272(94%) | |
ρ | 0.247 | -0.972 | |||||||
λ | 0.088 |
[1] |
Zhao P J, Yang H Z, Kong L, et al. Disintegration of metro and land development in transition China: A dynamic analysis in Beijing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018,116:290-307.
doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.017 |
[2] |
Hu N, Legara E F, Lee K K, et al. Impacts of land use and amenities on public transport use, urban planning and design. Land Use Policy, 2016,57:356-367.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.004 |
[3] |
Ratner K A, Goetz A R. The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities, 2013,30:31-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.007 |
[4] |
Tan Zhangzhi, Li Shaoying, Li Xia, et al. Spatio-temporal effects of urban rail transit on complex land-use change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(5):850-862.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201705007 |
[ 谭章智, 李少英, 黎夏, 等. 城市轨道交通对土地利用变化的时空效应. 地理学报, 2017,72(5):850-862.] | |
[5] | Gu Jiecheng, Shi Xiaofa. Relationship between ridership characteristics at railway stations and surrounding land-use in Shenzhen. Traffic & Transportation, 2019,35(5):47-50. |
[ 顾介澄, 石小法. 深圳市轨道站点客流特征与周边土地利用的关系. 交通与运输, 2019,35(5):47-50.] | |
[6] |
Ma X L, Chen X, Li X P, et al. Sustainable station-level planning: An integrated transport and land use design model for transit-oriented development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,170:1052-1063.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.182 |
[7] |
Gutiérrez J, Cardozo O D, García-Palomares J C. Transit ridership forecasting at station level: An approach based on distance-decay weighted regression. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011,19(6):1081-1092.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.004 |
[8] |
Jun M J, Choi K, Jeong J E, et al. Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015,48:30-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.002 |
[9] |
Estupiñán N, Rodríguez D A. The relationship between urban form and station boardings for Bogotá's BRT. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008,42(2):296-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.006 |
[10] | Kuby M, Barranda A, Upchurch C. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2004,38(3):223-247. |
[11] | Zhao J B, Deng W, Song Y, et al. What influences metro station ridership in China? Insights from Nanjing. Cities, 2013,35(4):114-124. |
[12] | Shen Lifan, Wang Ye, Zhang Chun, et al. Relationship between built environment of rational pedestrian catchment areas and URT commuting ridership: Evidence from 44 URT stations in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(12):2423-2439. |
[ 申犁帆, 王烨, 张纯, 等. 轨道站点合理步行可达范围建成环境与轨道通勤的关系研究: 以北京市44个轨道站点为例. 地理学报, 2018,73(12):2423-2439.] | |
[13] | Wang Shuwei, Sun Lishan, Hao Siyuan, et al. Station level transit ridership direct estimation model based on precise land use. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015,15(3):37-43. |
[ 王淑伟, 孙立山, 郝思源, 等. 基于精细化用地的轨道客流直接估计模型. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015,15(3):37-43.] | |
[14] | Xu Q, Mao B H, Bai Y. Network structure of subway passenger flows. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016,2016(3):033404. DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/03/033404. |
[15] | Sohn K, Shim H. Factors generating boardings at metro stations in the Seoul metropolitan area. Cities, 2010,27(5):358-368. |
[16] | Cardozo O D, García-Palomares J C, Gutiérrez J. Application of geographically weighted regression to the direct forecasting of transit ridership at station-level. Applied Geography, 2012,34:548-558. |
[17] | Liu Y, Ji Y J, Shi Z B, et al. The influence of the built environment on school children's metro ridership: An exploration using geographically weighted Poisson regression models. Sustainability, 2018,10(12):4684. DOI: 10.3390/su10124684. |
[18] | Li Junfang, Yao Minfeng, Ji Feng, et al. Quantitative study on how land use mix impact urban rail transit at station-level. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016,44(9):1415-1423. |
[ 李俊芳, 姚敏峰, 季峰, 等. 土地利用混合度对轨道交通车站客流的影响. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,44(9):1415-1423.] | |
[19] | Code for Classification of Urban Land Use and Planning Standards of Development Land. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011. |
[ 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB50137-2011城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.] | |
[20] | Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1997,2(3):199-219. |
[21] | Baidu Map. POI industry classification. http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=lbscloud/poitags, 2018-12-03. |
[ 百度地图. POI行业分类. http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=lbscloud/poitags, 2018-12-03.] | |
[22] | Efthymiou D, Antoniou C. How do transport infrastructure and policies affect house prices and rents? Evidence from Athens, Greece. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013,52:1-22. |
[1] | WULAN Tuya. Characteristics of grassland utilization in Mongolian Plateauand their differences among countries [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(7): 1722-1731. |
[2] | HAN Bo, JIN Xiaobin, SUN Rui, LI Hanbing, LIANG Xinyuan, ZHOU Yinkang. Land use sustainability evaluation based on conflict-adaptation perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777. |
[3] | ZHANG Yongqiang, KONG Dongdong, ZHANG Xuanze, TIAN Jing, LI Congcong. Impacts of vegetation changes on global evapotranspiration in the period 2003-2017 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 584-594. |
[4] | LONG Hualou, CHEN Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. |
[5] | LIAO Liuwen, GAO Xiaolu, LONG Hualou, TANG Lisha, CHEN Kunqiu, MA Enpu. A comparative study of farmland use morphology in plain and mountainous areas based on farmers' land use efficiency [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 471-486. |
[6] | YANG Weishi, DAI Erfu, ZHENG Du, DONG Yuxiang, YIN Le, MA Liang, WANG Junxiong, PAN Lihu, QIN Shipeng. Spatial simulation of "Grain to Green Program" implementation in a typical region based on agent-based model [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(9): 1983-1995. |
[7] | QU Shijin, HU Shougeng, LI Quanfeng. Stages and spatial patterns of urban built-up land transition in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553. |
[8] | GU Hengyu, MENG Xin, SHEN Tiyan, CUI Nana. Spatial variation of the determinants of China's urban floating population's settlement intention [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 240-254. |
[9] | SONG Xiaoqing, SHEN Yajing, WANG Xiong, LI Xinyi. Vulnerability to biological disasters: A novel field of cultivated land use transition research [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(11): 2362-2379. |
[10] | DANG Qin, HU Wei, GE Yuejing, DING Shihong, YE Li, WANG Shufang. Geo-economic linkages intensity and its influencing factors between China and South American countries [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2061-2075. |
[11] | SUN Yizhong, YANG Jing, SONG Shuying, ZHU Jie, DAI Junjie. Modeling of multilevel vector cellular automata and its simulation of land use change [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2164-2179. |
[12] | JU Hongrun, ZUO Lijun, ZHANG Zengxiang, ZHAO Xiaoli, WANG Xiao, WEN Qingke, LIU Fang, XU Jinyong, LIU Bin, YI Ling, HU Shunguang, SUN Feifei, TANG Zhanzhong. Methods research on describing the spatial pattern of land use types in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(1): 143-159. |
[13] | LU Lu, DAI Erfu, CHENG Qianding, WU Zhenzhen. The sources and fate of nitrogen in groundwater under different land use types: Stable isotope combined with a hydrochemical approach [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1878-1889. |
[14] | TU Jianjun,TANG Siqi,ZHANG Qian,WU Yue,LUO Yunchao. Spatial heterogeneity of the effects of mountainous city patternon catering industry location [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(6): 1163-1177. |
[15] | SU Weizhong,RU Jingjing,YANG Guishan. Modelling stormwater management based on infiltration capacity of land use in the watershed scale [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 948-961. |