适应人口发展的现代化综合交通运输体系研究

doi:10.11821/dlxb202012011

Abstract

Abstract:

China's modernized transport strategies have been focused on building new infrastructures in areas with insufficient transport facilities, supplying the lack of new transport services, and investing in transport construction on a large scale since the 10th Five-Year Plan (2000-2005). However, these strategies are now facing new situations in population development, including population growth, migration, spatial relocation and agglomeration, and changes in lifestyle. It is imperative to investigate population-development oriented comprehensive modern transport system in order to implement people-oriented principles and the National Strategy of Strengthening Country in Transportation. This study presents some research results from the National Development and Reform Commission Key Research Project for the National 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025), "Population Development and Modern Transportation System Strategies in China". The study is based on theoretical mechanisms in the coupling and interaction between population and transport system. It conducts in-depth analyses on the new trends of population development and transport demand, and proposes a new "diamond" strategy for China's comprehensive transport system in order to cope with these new trends. According to this strategy, the new comprehensive modern transport system in China will have four "diamond pole" including Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, and Chengdu-Chongqing region, four "diamond edges" including Beijing-Shanghai (Jing-Hu), Shanghai-Guangdong (Hu-Yue), Guangdong-Sichuan (Yue-Chuan), and Beijing-Sichuan (Jing-Chuan) transport corridors, two cross backbones including water transport along the Yangtze River and Beijing-Hong Kong-Macao transport corridors, and multiple transport hubs in cities with intensive intracity population movement flow. The study also proposes key missions to implement the new strategy in order to build population-development oriented comprehensive modern transport system in China, which includes supporting the national development and spatial plan, applying for the National Strategy of Strengthening Country in Transportation, and supplying high-quality transport services with a priority to the people.

Key words: population development, comprehensive modern transport system, "diamond" strategy, National Strategy of Strengthening Country in Transportation

ZHAO Pengjun, LYU Di, HU Haoyu, CAO Yushu, XIE Jinxin, PANG Liang, ZENG Liang'en, ZHANG Tingyu, YUAN Dandan. Population-development oriented comprehensive modern transport system in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2699-2715.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Tab. 1

Fig. 17

References 35

[1]	Zhang Xueliang. Transportation Infrastructure, Spatial Spillover and Regional Economic Growth. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2009: 128-131.
	[ 张学良. 交通基础设施、空间溢出与区域经济增长. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2009: 128-131.]
[2]	Xiong Y, Zhang J. Effects of land use and transport on young adults' quality of life. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2016,5:37-47.
[3]	Allsop R E. Transport studies and the quality of life. Environment & Planning A, 1980,12(3):339-356.
[4]	Li Hong. Reflections on the development of China's comprehensive transportation system. Integrated Transportation, 2005(3):6-10.
	[ 李宏. 对我国综合交通体系发展的思考. 综合运输, 2005(3):6-10.]
[5]	Ou Guoli. Integrated transportation theory based on three-dimensional level. Integrated Transportation, 2008(7):4-8.
	[ 欧国立. 基于三维层面的综合交通运输认识论. 综合运输, 2008(7):4-8.]
[6]	Luo Renjian. The connotation and development concept of integrated transportation system. Integrated Transportation, 2009(4):4-7.
	[ 罗仁坚. 综合运输体系的内涵和发展理念. 综合运输, 2009(4):4-7.]
[7]	Rong Chaohe. Re-recognition of integrated transportation. Integrated Transportation, 2011(12):4-9.
	[ 荣朝和. 关于综合交通运输的重新认识. 综合运输, 2011(12):4-9.]
[8]	Jin Fengjun, Wang Jiaoe. The expansion of China's railway network in the 20th century and its spatial accessibility. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004,59(2):293-302.
	[ 金凤君, 王姣娥. 20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性. 地理学报, 2004,59(2):293-302.]
[9]	Wu Chuanjun. On the research core of geography: The regional system of man-land relationship. Economic Geography, 1991,11(3):1-6.
	[ 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991,11(3):1-6.]
[10]	Yang Wuyang, Yang Qi. On the regional structure of cities. Geographical Research, 1986,5(1):1-11.
	[ 杨吾扬, 杨齐. 论城市的地域结构. 地理研究, 1986,5(1):1-11.]
[11]	John C, Moryadas S. The Geography of Movement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1975.
[12]	Hoyle B S, Knowles R D. Modern Transport Geography. London: Belhaven Press, 1992.
[13]	Knowles R, Shaw J, Docherty I. Transport Geographies: Mobilities, Flows and Spaces. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
[14]	Walter G Hansen. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959,25(2):73-76.
[15]	De Martinis V, Pagliara F, Wilson A. The evolution and planning of hierarchical transport networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2014,41(2):192-210.
[16]	Lösch A. The Economics of Location. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1954.
[17]	Alonso W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1964.
[18]	Fujita M, Krugman P R, Venables A. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999.
[19]	Alonso W. A theory of movements. Human Settlement Systems International Perspectives on Structure Change & Public Policy, 1978.
[20]	Holtz-Eakin D, Lovely M E. Scale economies, returns to variety, and the productivity of public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1996,26(2):105-123.
[21]	Munnell A H. Policy watch: Infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1992,6(4):189-198.
[22]	Hoover E M. Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1937.
[23]	Boarnet M G. Spillovers and the locational effects of public infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, 1998,38(3):381-400.
[24]	Button K. Transport Economics. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
[25]	Krugman P. Urban concentration: The role of increasing returns and transport costs. International Regional Science Review, 1996,19(1/2):5-30.
[26]	Parr J B. Agglomeration economies: Ambiguities and confusions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2002,34(4):717-731.
[27]	Spiekermann K, Wegener M. The shrinking continent: New time-space maps of Europe. Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 1994,21(6):653-673.
[28]	Meijers E, Hoogerbrugge M, Cardoso R. Beyond polycentricity: Does stronger integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance? Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2017,109(1):1-21. doi: 10.1111/tesg.2018.109.issue-1
[29]	Manuel Castells. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
[30]	Hesse M. On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces: The exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2016,23(4):612-627.
[31]	Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.
[32]	Jin Fengjun, Chen Zhuo. The evolution and laws of China's transportation geographical structure since the reform and opening up in 1978. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(10):1941-1961.
	[ 金凤君, 陈卓. 1978年改革开放以来中国交通地理格局演变与规律. 地理学报, 2019,74(10):1941-1961.]
[33]	Wang Yifang, Liu Chong, Xie Hui. Review and prospect of the development of Hongqiao comprehensive transportation hub in ten years. Urban Transportation, 2019(5):59-65.
	[ 王亿方, 刘翀, 谢辉. 虹桥综合交通枢纽十年发展回顾与展望. 城市交通, 2019(5):59-65.]
[34]	Party Group of the Ministry of Transport of the Communist Party of China. Comprehensively deepen reform and opening up and strive to move from a big transportation country to a powerful transportation country. Journal of the Ministry of Transport and Management, 2018,28(4):3-5.
	[ 中共交通运输部党组. 全面深化改革开放奋力从交通大国迈向交通强国. 交通运输部管理干部学院学报, 2018,28(4):3-5.]
[35]	Aurora Big Data. 2018 China Urban Commuter Research Report. https://www.jiguang.cn/reports/305, 2018-06-15/2020-05-14.
	[ 极光大数据. 2018年中国城市通勤研究报告. https://www.jiguang.cn/reports/305, 2018-06-15/2020-05-14.]

通道	连通地区	通道	子通道	途径重要节点	高速公路及高速铁路建设现状
菱形骨架	京津冀—长三角	京沪通道	京沪线通道	北京、济南、南京、上海	已建成高速公路、全线已建成350 km/h铁路
	京津冀—长三角	京沪通道	北部沿海海岸通道	北京、青岛、上海	已建成高速公路、烟台—盐城已建成200~250 km/h铁路
	长三角—粤港澳	沪粤通道	沪杭广通道	上海、杭州、广州	已建成高速公路、上海—金华已建成350 km/h铁路
	长三角—粤港澳	沪粤通道	东南沿海海岸通道	上海、宁波、福州、厦门、深圳	已建成高速公路、全线已建成200~250 km/h铁路
	京津冀— 成渝	京川通道	京太西成通道	北京、太原、西安、成都	已建成高速公路、全线已建成200~250 km/h铁路
	京津冀— 成渝	京川通道	京郑西渝通道	北京、郑州、西安、重庆	已建成高速公路、北京—西安已建成350 km/h铁路
	粤港澳— 成渝	粤川通道	成贵南广通道	成都、贵阳、南宁、广州	已建成高速公路、南宁—广州已建成200~250 km/h铁路
	粤港澳— 成渝	粤川通道	渝贵桂广通道	重庆、贵阳、桂林、广州	已建成高速公路、贵阳—广州已建成300 km/h铁路
十字骨架	京津冀—粤港澳	京港澳通道	京广线通道	北京、郑州、武汉、长沙、广州	已建成高速公路、全线已建成350 km/h铁路
	京津冀—粤港澳	京港澳通道	京九线通道	北京、雄安新区、合肥、南昌、深圳	已建成高速公路、合肥—福州已建成350 km/h铁路
	长三角— 成渝	长江水陆通道	长江北通道	上海、南京、合肥、武汉、重庆、成都	已建成高速公路、全线已建成200~250 km/h铁路
	长三角— 成渝	长江水陆通道	长江南通道	上海、杭州、南昌、长沙、重庆、成都	已建成高速公路、上海—长沙已建成350 km/h铁路

Population-development oriented comprehensive modern transport system in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 35

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments