生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑

doi:10.11821/dlxb202011011

Abstract

Abstract:

Spatial planning system reform is a critical strategy to promote ecosystem civilization construction in China. In view of the new spatial planning system, how to coordinate human activities and protect ecological pattern as well as natural resources are critical to the reformation, which urgently requires multi-disciplinary perspectives and knowledge. Ecosystem services bridge the ecosystem and the human well-being, serving as an important tool for land spatial optimization and decision making to better conform with the ecological civilization. In the light of construction demands from the spatial planning system, this research investigates how ecosystem services may provide relevant support from multiple dimensions through intensive literature and theoretical analyses. Firstly, this paper clarifies ecosystem services' connection with spatial planning in terms of values and goal. Not only are ecosystem services a carrier of spatial planning to shape the value of natural resources, but they are a government choice for spatial planning to promote public welfare as well. Secondly, an in-depth analysis of ecosystem services' support is performed with functions and contents, which vary across planning hierarchy, including the national, provisional, urban, county and village/town levels. To be more specific, insights are gained into ways that ecosystem services may facilitate the strategic and policy-oriented function, the coordinative function, and the operational function, respectively. From a scale-effect perspective, the vertical coordination across planning levels that could be facilitated by ecosystem services is also discussed. Finally, facing the needs of horizontal coordination emphasized by "multiple planning integration", ecosystem services may play important roles in three aspects: fostering common values among different sectors, coordinating multiple stakeholders' interests, and improving spatial planning technology. Results give theoretical supports and possible paths to direct spatial planning reforms, which may help to expand the application of ecosystem services in policy making.

Key words: spatial planning, ecosystem services, values and goal, planning levels, multiple planning integration

LI Ruiqian, LI Yongfu, HU Heng. Support of ecosystem services for spatial planning theories and practices[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430.

Figures/Tables 3

References 94

[1]	Yan Jinming, Chen Hao, Xia Fangzhou. Cognition, direction and path of future spatial planning based on the background of multiple planning integration. China Land Sciences, 2017,31(1):21-27.
	[ 严金明, 陈昊, 夏方舟. “多规合一”与空间规划: 认知、导向与路径. 中国土地科学, 2017,31(1):21-27.]
[2]	Healy P. Collaborative Planning. London: Macmillan, 1997.
[3]	Williams R H. European Union Spatial Policy and Planning. London: Paul Chapman, 1996.
[4]	Zhang Yongjiao, Fang Chuanglin. A review on spatial planning coordination and China's "Coordinated Planning". Urban Planning Forum, 2016(2):78-87.
	[ 张永姣, 方创琳. 空间规划协调与多规合一研究: 评述与展望. 城市规划学刊, 2016(2):78-87.]
[5]	Rutherford R J, Herbert G J, Coffen S S. Integrated ocean management and the collaborative planning process: The Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management (ESSIM) Initiative. Marine Policy, 2005,29(1):75-83.
[6]	Warnken J, Mosadeghi R. Challenges of implementing integrated coastal zone management into local planning policies:A case study of Queensland, Australia. Marine Policy, 2018,91:75-84.
[7]	Jiang Bo, Wang Xiaoyuan, Yang Mengfei, et al. Application of ecosystem services research on a protection effectiveness evaluation of the ecological redline policy. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(9):3365-3371.
	[ 江波, 王晓媛, 杨梦斐, 等. 生态系统服务研究在生态红线政策保护成效评估中的应用. 生态学报, 2019,39(9):3365-3371.]
[8]	Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016,352(6292):1455-1459. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295 pmid: 27313045
[9]	Piwowarczyk J, Kronenberg J, Dereniowska M A. Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: Do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance? Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013,109(1):85-93.
[10]	Hansen R, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, et al. The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities. Ecosystem Services, 2015,12:228-246.
[11]	Woodruff S C, Bendor T K. Ecosystem services in urban planning: Comparative paradigms and guidelines for high quality plans. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016,152:90-100.
[12]	Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, et al. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013,25:13-21.
[13]	Beery T, Stålhammar S, Jönsson K I, et al. Perceptions of the ecosystem services concept: Opportunities and challenges in the Swedish municipal context. Ecosystem Services, 2016,17:123-130.
[14]	Xue Fei, Jia Liuyao, Zhong Le, et al. State of art on integrated research of ecosystem services with spatial planning by literature information analysis. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019,35(10):95-100.
	[ 薛飞, 贾刘耀, 钟乐, 等. 基于文献计量分析的生态系统服务与空间规划交叉研究评述. 中国园林, 2019,35(10):95-100.]
[15]	Xie Xiangxiang, Zhang Anlu, Yang Meng. Spatial differences in land consolidation performance and investment priority in Hubei Province. Resources Science, 2016,38(11):2058-2071.
	[ 谢向向, 张安录, 杨蒙. 土地整治绩效空间差异及投入优先序: 以湖北省为例. 资源科学, 2016,38(11):2058-2071.]
[16]	Wang Nüjie, Liu Jian, Wu Daqian, et al. Regional eco-compensation based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study of Shandong Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(23):6646-6653.
	[ 王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿: 以山东省为例. 生态学报, 2010,30(23):6646-6653.]
[17]	Lien A M, Schlager E, Lona A. Using institutional grammar to improve understanding of the form and function of payment for ecosystem services programs. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:21-31.
[18]	Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. PNAS, 2009,106(5):1305-1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 pmid: 19179280
[19]	Deng Hongbing, Chen Chundi, Liu Xin, et al. Conception and function classification of regional ecological land. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(3):1519-1524.
	[ 邓红兵, 陈春娣, 刘昕, 等. 区域生态用地的概念及分类. 生态学报, 2009,29(3):1519-1524.]
[20]	Zhu Yuanyuan, Yu Bin, Zeng Juxin, et al. Spatial optimization from three spaces of production, living and ecology in national restricted zones: A case study of Wufeng County in Hubei Province. Economic Geography, 2015,35(4):26-32.
	[ 朱媛媛, 余斌, 曾菊新, 等. 国家限制开发区“生产—生活—生态”空间的优化: 以湖北省五峰县为例. 经济地理, 2015,35(4):26-32.]
[21]	Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(1):49-65.
	[ 李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析. 地理学报, 2016,71(1):49-65.]
[22]	Cao Yu, Wang Jiayi, Li Guoyu. Ecological restoration for territorial space: Basic concepts and foundations. China Land Science, 2019,33(7):1-10.
	[ 曹宇, 王嘉怡, 李国煜. 国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(7):1-10.]
[23]	Li Yan, Li Shuangcheng, Gao Yang, et al. Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1038-1047.
	[ 李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架. 地理学报, 2013,68(8):1038-1047.]
[24]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision-makers Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[25]	Wang Min, Feng Xiangzhao, Liu Zhe. Discussions on feasibility of mainstreaming ecosystem service decision-making. World Environment, 2016(3):57-59.
	[ 王敏, 冯相昭, 刘哲. 生态系统服务决策主流化的可行性探讨. 世界环境, 2016(3):57-59.]
[26]	Liu Lyuyi, Liu Huimin, Ren Jiayan, et al. Research progress on the mechanism of ecosystem services generation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(8):2731-2738.
	[ 刘绿怡, 刘慧敏, 任嘉衍, 等. 生态系统服务形成机制研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(8):2731-2738.]
[27]	Rodríguez J P, Douglas B T, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1):28. Doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128.
[28]	Chapin F S, Folke C, Kofinas G P. A framework for understanding change//Folke C, Kofinas G P, Chapin F S. Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. New York: Springer, 2009: 3-28.
[29]	Yu Feng, Zhang Lijun. Following the concept of ecological civilization and strengthening the land spatial planning. Land and Resources Information, 2013(2):2-4.
	[ 喻锋, 张丽君. 遵循生态文明理念, 加强国土空间规划. 国土资源情报, 2013(2):2-4.]
[30]	Paavola J, Hubacek K. Ecosystem services, governance and stakeholder participation: An introduction. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(4):42. Doi: 10.5751/ES-06019-180442.
[31]	Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973,4:1-23.
[32]	Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009,461(7263):472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a pmid: 19779433
[33]	Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013,32(8):1379-1390.
	[ 李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013,32(8):1379-1390.]
[34]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Burgess N D, et al. Measuring, modeling and mapping ecosystem services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 2011,35(5):595-611.
[35]	Cao Qiwen, Wei Xiaomei, Wu Jiansheng. A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016,35(11):3102-3111.
	[ 曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(11):3102-3111.]
[36]	Kabisch N. Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning: The case of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy, 2015,42:557-567.
[37]	Rozas-Vásquez D, Fürst C, Geneletti D, et al. Integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment across spatial planning scales. Land Use Policy, 2018,71:303-310.
[38]	Sangiuliano S J. Analysing the prevalence of ecosystem services in the objectives and policies of Scotland's National Marine Plan. Marine Policy, 2019,104:37-52.
[39]	Huang Jinchuan, Lin Haoxi, Qi Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(3):378-391.
	[ 黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(3):378-391.]
[40]	Yue Wenze, Wang Tianyu. Logical problems on the evaluation of resources and environment carrying capacity for territorial spatial planning. China Land Science, 2019,33(3):1-8.
	[ 岳文泽, 王田雨. 资源环境承载力评价与国土空间规划的逻辑问题. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(3):1-8.]
[41]	Yue Wenze, Wang Tianyu. Rethinking on the basic issues of territorial and spatial use control in China. China Land Science, 2019,33(8):8-15.
	[ 岳文泽, 王田雨. 中国国土空间用途管制的基础性问题思考. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(8):8-15.]
[42]	Huang Xinyi, Zhao Xiaomin, Guo Xi, et al. The natural ecological spatial management zoning based on ecosystem service function and ecological sensitivity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(3):1065-1076.
	[ 黄心怡, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的自然生态空间管制分区研究. 生态学报, 2020,40(3):1065-1076.]
[43]	Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(3):22. Doi: 10.5751/ES-04853-170322.
[44]	Smith A, Yee S H, Russell M, et al. Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: An example from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecological Indicators, 2017,74:371-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.036
[45]	Turkelboom F, Leone M, Jacobs S, et al. When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosystem Services, 2018,29:566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011
[46]	Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, et al. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002,418(6898):671-677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014 pmid: 12167873
[47]	Zhang Yushuo, Wu Dianting. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and associated influencing factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Areal Research and Development, 2019,38(3):141-147.
	[ 张宇硕, 吴殿廷. 京津冀地区生态系统服务权衡的多尺度特征与影响因素解析. 地域研究与开发, 2019,38(3):141-147.]
[48]	Onaindia M, Fernández de M B, Madariaga I, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology & Management, 2013,289(1):1-9.
[49]	Galler C, Albert C, Haaren C V. From regional environmental planning to implementation: Paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2016,18:118-129.
[50]	White C, Halpern B S, Kappel C V. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. PNAS, 2012,109(12):4696-4701. pmid: 22392996
[51]	Longato D, Gaglio M, Boschetti M, et al. Bioenergy and ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in marginal agricultural lands: A remote-sensing-based assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,237:1-15.
[52]	Ran Fengwei, Luo Zhijun, Wu Jiaping, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,30(3):995-1004. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.005 pmid: 30912393
	[ 冉凤维, 罗志军, 吴佳平, 等. 鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(3):995-1004.] pmid: 30912393
[53]	Sun Yijie, Ren Zhiyuan, Zhao Shengnan, et al. Spatial and temporal changing analysis of synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services in valley basins of Shaanxi province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(3):521-532.
	[ 孙艺杰, 任志远, 赵胜男, 等. 陕西河谷盆地生态系统服务协同与权衡时空差异分析. 地理学报, 2017,72(3):521-532.]
[54]	Shui Wei, Du Yong, Wang Yanan, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics and scenarios simulation of trade-offs between ecosystem services in Min Delta urban agglomeration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(14):5188-5197.
	[ 税伟, 杜勇, 王亚楠, 等. 闽三角城市群生态系统服务权衡的时空动态与情景模拟. 生态学报, 2019,39(14):5188-5197.]
[55]	Sun Zexiang, Liu Zhifeng, He Chunyang, et al. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing drylands of China: A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(15):4881-4891.
	[ 孙泽祥, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 等. 中国快速城市化干燥地区的生态系统服务权衡关系多尺度分析: 以呼包鄂榆地区为例. 生态学报, 2016,36(15):4881-4891.]
[56]	Gao Jie, Liu Chang. Ethics and order: Value-oriented thinking of spatial planning reform. Urban Development Studies, 2018,25(2):1-7.
	[ 高洁, 刘畅. 伦理与秩序: 空间规划改革的价值导向思考. 城市发展研究, 2018,25(2):1-7.]
[57]	Li Shuangcheng, Liu Jinlong, Zhang Caiyu, et al. The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(12):1618-1630.
	[ 李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉, 等. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式. 地理学报, 2011,66(12):1618-1630.]
[58]	Xu Li, Zhou Yong, Xu Beishen. Evaluation of spatial control division of construction lands based on land eco-environmental quality. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,32(1):222-226.
	[ 徐理, 周勇, 许倍慎. 基于土地生态环境质量的建设用地空间管制分区评价. 水土保持通报, 2012,32(1):222-226.]
[59]	Luo Yanfang, Qian Yi, Wang Xiuzhen. Analysis on the characteristics of landscape pattern of land use and its ecological effect in Chun'an County. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007,14(6):371-375.
	[ 罗彦芳, 钱翌, 王秀珍. 淳安县土地利用景观格局特征及其生态效应研究. 水土保持研究, 2007,14(6):371-375.]
[60]	Wei Hui, Zhao Wenwu, Zhang Xiao, et al. Regional ecosystem service value evaluation based on land use changes: A case study in Dezhou, Shandong Provience, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(11):3830-3839.
	[ 魏慧, 赵文武, 张骁, 等. 基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价: 以山东省德州市为例. 生态学报, 2017,37(11):3830-3839.]
[61]	Peng Jian, Li Huilei, Liu Yanxu, et al. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong'an New Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):701-710.
	[ 彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 等. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):701-710.]
[62]	Li Guoyu, Lin Liqun, Wu Shidai, et al. Recognition of ecological source and ecological security pattern construction: A case study of Fuqing City. Areal Research and Development, 2018,37(3):120-125.
	[ 李国煜, 林丽群, 伍世代, 等. 生态源地识别与生态安全格局构建研究: 以福建省福清市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2018,37(3):120-125.]
[63]	Wu Jiansheng, Yue Xinxin, Qin Wei. The establishment of ecological security patterns based on the redistribution of ecosystem service value: A case study in the Liangjiang New Area, Chongqing. Geographical Research, 2017,36(3):429-440.
	[ 吴健生, 岳新欣, 秦维. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建: 以重庆两江新区为例. 地理研究, 2017,36(3):429-440.]
[64]	Karrasch L, Klenke T, Woltjer J. Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management: A planning approach. Land Use Policy, 2014,38:522-532.
[65]	Peng Jian, Hu Xiaoxu, Zhao Mingyue, et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(6):960-973.
	[ 彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展: 从认知到决策. 地理学报, 2017,72(6):960-973.]
[66]	Loft L, Mann C, Hansjürgens B. Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services, 2015,16:150-157.
[67]	Schleyer C, Görg C, Hauck J, et al. Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policy-making within the EU. Ecosystem Services, 2015,16:174-181.
[68]	Olsson P, Folke C, Hughes T P. Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. PNAS, 2008,105(28):9489-9494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706905105 pmid: 18621698
[69]	Pittock J, Cork S, Maynard S. The state of the application of ecosystems services in Australia. Ecosystem Services, 2012,1(1):111-120.
[70]	Keune H, Dendoncker N, Popa F, et al. Emerging ecosystem services governance issues in the Belgium ecosystem services community of practice. Ecosystem Services, 2015,16:212-219.
[71]	Maltby E, Acreman M, Blackwell M S A, et al. The challenges and implications of linking wetland science to policy in agricultural landscapes: Experience from the UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Ecological Engineering, 2013,56(7):121-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.086
[72]	Moreno J, Palomo I, Escalera J, et al. Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: A participative mental model approach. Landscape Ecology, 2014,29(8):1407-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0053-8
[73]	Zhan Guobin. On the effectiveness, challenges and path-choice of Jiaxing's "multiple planning integration" reform. Chinese Public Administration, 2017(11):33-38.
	[ 詹国彬. “多规合一”改革的成效、挑战与路径选择: 以嘉兴市为例. 中国行政管理, 2017(11):33-38.]
[74]	Lin Jian, Chen Shihong, Xu Chaoyi, et al. Game analysis of spatial planning. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(1):10-14.
	[ 林坚, 陈诗弘, 许超诣, 等. 空间规划的博弈分析. 城市规划学刊, 2015(1):10-14.]
[75]	Termorshuizen J W, Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 2009,24(8):1037-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8
[76]	Fürst C, Opdam P, Inostroza L, et al. Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: Proposing a balanced score card. Landscape Ecology, 2014,29(8):1435-1446. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0052-9
[77]	Ravar Z, Zahraie B, Sharifinejad A, et al. System dynamics modeling for assessment of water-food-energy resources security and nexus in Gavkhuni Basin in Iran. Ecological Indicators, 2020,108. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105682. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105699 pmid: 31903047
[78]	Roldan V A, Lopes P F M, et al. Are we seeing the whole picture in land-sea systems? Opportunities and challenges for operationalizing the ES concept. Ecosystem Services, 2019,38. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100966
[79]	Martin L. The use of ecosystem services information by the U.S. National Estuary Programs. Ecosystem Services, 2014,9:139-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.004
[80]	Börger T, Beaumont N J, Pendleton L, et al. Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: The role of valuation. Marine Policy, 2014,46(2):161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.019
[81]	Abson D J, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, et al. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 2014,103(3):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012
[82]	van Oudenhoven A P E, Petz K, Alkemade R, et al. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2012,21:110-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012
[83]	Lin Y S, Dong Z F, Zhang W, et al. Estimating inter-regional payments for ecosystem services: Taking China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as an example. Ecological Economics, 2020,168. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106514.
[84]	Li R Q, van den Brink M, Woltjer J. Market-based instruments for the governance of coastal and marine ecosystem services: An analysis based on the Chinese case. Ecosystem Services, 2017,23:71-81.
[85]	Bryan B A, Grandgirard A, Ward J R. Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems, 2010,13(4):539-555.
[86]	Schröter M, van der Zanden E H, van Oudenhoven A P E, et al. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters, 2014,7:514-523. doi: 10.1111/conl.12091
[87]	Leslie H M, McLeod K L. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007,5(10):540-548. doi: 10.1890/060093
[88]	McKinley E, Pagès J F, Wyles K J, et al. Ecosystem services: A bridge or barrier for UK marine stakeholders? Ecosystem Services, 2019,37. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100922.
[89]	Feng Weilin, Li Shuzhuo, Li Cong. Overview and frame work for ecosystem services and human well-being. Resources Science, 2013,35(7):1482-1489.
	[ 冯伟林, 李树茁, 李聪. 生态系统服务与人类福祉: 文献综述与分析框架. 资源科学, 2013,35(7):1482-1489.]
[90]	Grêt-Regamey A, Celio E, Klein T M, et al. Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2013,109(1):107-116.
[91]	Dick J, Verweij P, Carmen E, et al. Testing the ecosystem service cascade framework and QUICKScan software tool in the context of land use planning in Glenlivet Estate Scotland. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, 2017,13(2):12-25.
[92]	Ding Yuchen, Feng Changchun, Wang Liwei. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe town in Chongqing municipality. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(7):851-859.
	[ 丁雨賝, 冯长春, 王利伟. 山地区域土地生态红线划定方法与实证研究: 以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(7):851-859.]
[93]	Ma Qi, Liu Kang, Liu Wenzong, et al. Zoning the ecological redline in arid and semiarid regions: Taking Yulin city as an example in the context of an integrated multi-planning. Geographical Research, 2018,37(1):158-170.
	[ 马琪, 刘康, 刘文宗, 等. 干旱半干旱区生态保护红线划分研究: 以“多规合一”试点榆林市为例. 地理研究, 2018,37(1):158-170.]
[94]	Bai Y, Wong C P, Jiang B, et al. Developing China's Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nature Communications, 2018,9:3034. Doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1 pmid: 30072771

生态系统服务决策支持手段	规划阶段	利益相关者的观点表达与整合
物质量评估价值评价偏好分析空间叠加统计分析情景分析多目标分析级联框架等	规划准备	激发对多元利益目标的协同思考,明确规划主要问题
	规划编制	表达资源的使用偏好及优序选择,识别关键服务和功能空间,反馈不同规划情景对自身福祉的影响,交流决策透明化
	草案讨论和决策	基于生态系统服务价值冲突,实现对规划编制成果的开放性探讨,拓展参与路径,增强协同成效
	实施和评价	对规划质量及效果的动态评估和积极反馈

Support of ecosystem services for spatial planning theories and practices

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 94

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	GE Dazhuan, LU Yuqi. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.
[2]	YANG Qingyuan, LUO Kui, LAO Xin. Evolution and enlightenment of foreign spatial planning: Exploration from the perspective of geography [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1223-1236.
[3]	GE Dazhuan, LONG Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.
[4]	ZHANG Jingjing, ZHU Wenbo, ZHU Lianqi, LI Yanhong. Multi-scale analysis of trade-off/synergy effects of forest ecosystem services in the Funiu Mountain Region [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5): 975-988.
[5]	YU Guirui, LI Wenhua, SHAO Ming'an, ZHANG Yangjian, WANG Shaoqiang, NIU Shuli, HE Honglin, DAI Erfu, LI Fadong, MA Zeqing. Ecosystem science research and ecosystem management [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2620-2635.
[6]	LIU Licheng, LIU Chunfang, WANG Chuan, LI Pengjie. Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.
[7]	YAN Yan,YAO Liuyang,LANG Liangming,ZHAO Minjuan. Revaluation of ecosystem services in inland river basins of China: Based on meta-regression analysis [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.
[8]	Feng CHEN, Hongbo LI, Anlu ZHANG. Ecological risk assessment based on terrestrial ecosystem services in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[9]	CHEN Mingxing, LIANG Longwu, WANG Zhenbo, ZHANG Wenzhong, YU Jianhui, LIANG Yi. Geographical thinking on the relationship between beautiful China and land spatial planning [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.
[10]	ZENG Li,LI Jing,LI Ting,YANG Xiaonan,WANG Yanze. Optimizing spatial patterns of water conservation ecosystem service based on Bayesian belief networks [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
[11]	QIAN Caiyun,GONG Jie,ZHANG Jinxi,LIU Dongqing,MA Xuecheng. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 868-879.
[12]	PENG Jian, LI Huilei, LIU Yanxu, HU Yi'na, YANG Yang. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong'an New Area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 701-710.
[13]	Lin MA, Hao LIU, Jian PENG, Jiansheng WU. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
[14]	Jian PENG, Xiaoxu HU, Mingyue ZHAO, Yanxu LIU, Lu TIAN. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.
[15]	Cheng MA, Xiaoyue WANG, Yaxin ZHANG, Shuangcheng LI. Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 974-985.