粤港澳大湾区区域一体化及其互动关系

doi:10.11821/dlxb201912003

Abstract

Abstract:

The integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area will inevitably encounter a series of frictions because of the cross-social system, cross-legal system and cross-administrative hierarchy. Research on the cooperation and conflict between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao is an important supplement to the integration study of the area. This paper reviews the process of integration development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 1997 to 2019 through the global news event database GDELT. The results show that: (1) the relationship between China's mainland and Hong Kong presents a "M" type fluctuation, and the conflict between them has been amplified by the news media compared with the mainland-Macao relationship. (2) The policy and public opinion between China's mainland and Macao are highly consistent, as the verbal cooperation between them is the leading factor of the interaction. (3) The interaction between China's mainland, Hong Kong and Macao has generally become closer, along with the increasing frequency of cooperations and conflicts. The importance of the mainland-Hong Kong relationship in the interactive relationship between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao has been increasingly highlighted. (4) Material cooperation projects are still insufficient in the process of the regional integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, and there is an urgent need for diversified cooperation. The economic and technological competitions and cooperations between Guangdong and Hong Kong are the main factors affecting the interactive relationship between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, as well as the tensions in Hong Kong. In the future, the coordinated development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area should focus on not only the projection of regional policies on space, but also its projection on social public opinion and the news media. It is necessary to combine the integration of physical space and virtue/discourse space, and strengthen the interactions between "hard connection" and "soft connection".

Key words: the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, regional coordination, integration, GDELT, interaction, one country and two systems

LIU Yi, WANG Yun, YANG Yu, MA Li. Regional integration and interaction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2455-2466.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

References 33

[1]	Yangying, Yang ying, Zhong Jinlai, Lin Ruiqiang . Study on the Common Development of Hong Kong, Macao and Zhuhai. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 1996: 10-13.
	[ 杨英, 钟金来, 林瑞强 . 港澳珠共同发展研究. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 1996: 10-13.]
[2]	Lin Geng, Xu Xueqiang . Study on regional economic integration of Great Pearl River Delta. Economic Geography, 2005,25(5):677-681.
	[ 林耿, 许学强 . 大珠三角区域经济一体化研究. 经济地理, 2005,25(5):677-681.]
[3]	Zhou Chunshan, Luo Lijia, Shi Chenyi , et al. Spatio-temporal evolutionary characteristics of the economic development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and its influencing factors. Tropical Geography, 2017,37(6):802-813. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003011
	[ 周春山, 罗利佳, 史晨怡 , 等. 粤港澳大湾区经济发展时空演变特征及其影响因素. 热带地理, 2017,37(6):802-813.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003011
[4]	Peng Fangmei . Economic spatial connection and spatial structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay and the surrounding area citie: An empirical analysis based on improved gravity model and social network analysis. Economic Geography, 2017,37(12):57-64.
	[ 彭芳梅 . 粤港澳大湾区及周边城市经济空间联系与空间结构: 基于改进引力模型与社会网络分析的实证分析. 经济地理, 2017,37(12):57-64.]
[5]	Li Xun, Zheng Shali, Liang Yutian . Integration process of the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area under the promotion of trade. Tropical Geography, 2017,37(6):792-801. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003016
	[ 李郇, 郑莎莉, 梁育填 . 贸易促进下的粤港澳大湾区一体化发展. 热带地理, 2017,37(6):792-801.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003016
[6]	Ma Haitao, Huang Xiaodong, Li Yingcheng . The evolution and mechanisms of megalopolitan knowledge polycentricity of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(12):2297-2314. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812003
	[ 马海涛, 黄晓东, 李迎成 . 粤港澳大湾区城市群知识多中心的演化过程与机理. 地理学报, 2018,73(12):2297-2314.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812003
[7]	Zhou Chunshan, Deng Honghao, Shi Chenyi . A study on synergic development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area. Planners, 2018,34(4):5-12.
	[ 周春山, 邓鸿鹄, 史晨怡 . 粤港澳大湾区协同发展特征及机制. 规划师, 2018,34(4):5-12.]
[8]	Anning, An ning, Ma Ling, Zhu Hong . Reflections on the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A perspective from political geography. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(12):1633-1643. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.005
	[ 安宁, 马凌, 朱竑 . 政治地理视野下的粤港澳大湾区发展思考. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(12):1633-1643.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.005
[9]	Deuskar C, Baker J L, Mason D . East Asia's changing urban landscape: Measuring a decade of spatial growth. World Bank Publications, 2015.
[10]	Cai Chimeng . The building of a world-class city cluster in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Strategic meanings and challenges. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2017(4):5-14.
	[ 蔡赤萌 . 粤港澳大湾区城市群建设的战略意义和现实挑战. 广东社会科学, 2017(4):5-14.]
[11]	Huh H-S, Park C-Y . Asia-Pacific regional integration index: Construction, interpretation, and comparison. Journal of Asian Economics, 2018,54:22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.001
[12]	Chen Xiuzhen . Quantitative evaluation of the degree of economic integration between Hong Kong and the mainland: A study on the CDI economic integration index. China Open Herald, 2005(4):62-68.
	[ 陈秀珍 . 香港与内地经济一体化程度的量化评价: CDI香港与内地经济一体化指数研究. 开放导报, 2005(4):62-68.]
[13]	Zhou Liqun, Xia Liangke . Measurement and comparison of regional economic integration: Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2010(4):81-87.
	[ 周立群, 夏良科 . 区域经济一体化的测度与比较: 来自京津冀, 长三角和珠三角的证据. 江海学刊, 2010(4):81-87.]
[14]	Chen Weijing, Ma Xueguang, Cai Lili , et al. Characteristics of regional city connection's spatial pattern based on intercity passenger traffic flow in Pearl River Delta. Economic Geography, 2013,33(4):48-55.
	[ 陈伟劲, 马学广, 蔡莉丽 , 等. 珠三角城市联系的空间格局特征研究: 基于城际客运交通流的分析. 经济地理, 2013,33(4):48-55.]
[15]	Feng Changchun, Xie Danxing, Ma Xueguang , et al. Functional polycentricity of the urban region in the Zhujiang River Delta based on intercity rail traffic flow. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014,34(6):648-655.
	[ 冯长春, 谢旦杏, 马学广 , 等. 基于城际轨道交通流的珠三角城市区域功能多中心研究. 地理科学, 2014,34(6):648-655.]
[16]	Li Xun, Zhou Jinmiao, Huang Yaofu , et al. Understanding the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the perspective of mega-city region. Progress in Geography, 2019,37(12):1609-1622.
	[ 李郇, 周金苗, 黄耀福 , 等. 从巨型城市区域视角审视粤港澳大湾区空间结构. 地理科学进展, 2019,37(12):1609-1622.]
[17]	Lai Jianbo, Pan Jinghu . Spatial Pattern of population flow among cities in China during the Spring Festival travel rush based on "Tencent Migration" data. Human Geography, 2019,34(3):108-117.
	[ 赖建波, 潘竟虎 . 基于腾讯迁徙数据的中国“春运”城市间人口流动空间格局. 人文地理, 2019,34(3):108-117.]
[18]	Pan Jinghu, Lai Jianbo . Research on spatial pattern of population mobility among cities: A case study of "Tencent Migration" big data in "National Day-Mid-Autumn Festival" vacation. Geographical Research, 2019,38(7):1678-1693.
	[ 潘竟虎, 赖建波 . 中国城市间人口流动空间格局的网络分析: 以国庆—中秋长假和腾讯迁徙数据为例. 地理研究, 2019,38(7):1678-1693.]
[19]	Qin Chenglin, Chai Qingyuan . Transport network construction and integrated development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. China Soft Science, 2018(7):76-84.
	[ 覃成林, 柴庆元 . 交通网络建设与粤港澳大湾区一体化发展. 中国软科学, 2018(7):76-84.]
[20]	Mei Zhixiong, Xu Songjun, Ouyang Jun , et al. The spatio-temporal evolvement of spatial interaction among cities of Zhujiang River Delta in recent 20 years. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012,32(6):694-701.
	[ 梅志雄, 徐颂军, 欧阳军 , 等. 近20年珠三角城市群城市空间相互作用时空演变. 地理科学, 2012,32(6):694-701.]
[21]	Xu Haiyan, Chen Xiaojian, Xiong Ying . The synergy development between the industrial transfer and the urban space. Economic Geography, 2014,34(12):62-68.
	[ 徐海燕, 陈晓键, 熊鹰 . 产业转移与城镇空间协同发展研究: 以珠三角为例. 经济地理, 2014,34(12):62-68.]
[22]	Zhang Lizhen, Wang Zhe . Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Evolution, reference and strategic suggestion. Reformation & Strategy, 2018,34(3):73-77. doi: 10.1242/jcs.236737 pmid: 31843760
	[ 张立真, 王喆 . 粤港澳大湾区: 演进发展, 国际镜鉴与战略思考. 改革与战略, 2018,34(3):73-77.] doi: 10.1242/jcs.236737 pmid: 31843760
[23]	Zhang Shenglei . Discussion on the developing path and construction strategies of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Based on the comparative study among three global bay areas. China Development, 2018,18(3):53-59.
	[ 张胜磊 . 粤港澳大湾区发展路径和建设战略探讨: 基于世界三大湾区的对比分析. 中国发展, 2018,18(3):53-59.]
[24]	Liu Jing . Exploration on the governance and cooperation model of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao Great Bay Area. China Open Herald, 2017(5):96-99.
	[ 刘璟 . 粤港澳大湾区治理与合作模式探索. 开放导报, 2017(5):96-99.]
[25]	Liu Yungang, Hou Lulu, Xu Zhihua . Cross-border collaboration in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Progress, problems and prospect. Urban Insight, 2018(11):7-25.
	[ 刘云刚, 侯璐璐, 许志桦 . 粤港澳大湾区跨境区域协调: 现状、问题与展望. 城市观察, 2018(11):7-25.]
[26]	Qin Kun, Luo Ping, Yao Borui . Networked mining of GDELT and international relations analysis. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019,21(1):14-24.
	[ 秦昆, 罗萍, 姚博睿 . GDELT数据网络化挖掘与国际关系分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2019,21(1):14-24.]
[27]	Chen Xiaoqiang, Yuan Lihua, Shen Shi , et al. Analysis of the geo-relationships between China and its neighboring countries. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1534-1547. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908004
	[ 陈小强, 袁丽华, 沈石 , 等. 中国及其周边国家间地缘关系解析. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1534-1547.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908004
[28]	Ma Mingqing, Yuan Wu, Ge Quansheng , et al. Big data analysis of social development situation in regions along the Belt and Road. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(7):1009-1020. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.07.006
	[ 马明清, 袁武, 葛全胜 , 等. “一带一路”若干区域社会发展态势大数据分析. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(7):1009-1020.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.07.006
[29]	Zhang C, Xiao C, Liu H . Spatial big data analysis of political risks along the Belt and Road. Sustainability, 2019,11(8):1-16. doi: 10.3390/su11010001
[30]	Qiao F, Li P, Zhang X , et al. Predicting social unrest events with hidden Markov models using GDELT. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2017. doi: 10.1155/2013/720818 pmid: 25083120
[31]	Levin N, Ali S, Crandall D , et al. World Heritage in danger: Big data and remote sensing can help protect sites in conflict zones. Global Environmental Change, 2019,55:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.001
[32]	Chi Zhipei, Hou Na . Quantitative research on big data and bilateral relations: A case study of GDELT and Sino-U.S. relations. Quarterly Journal of International Politic, 2019,4(2):67-88.
	[ 池志培, 侯娜 . 大数据与双边关系的量化研究: 以GDELT与中美关系为例. 国际政治科学, 2019,4(2):67-88.]
[33]	Zhang Hong'ou, Wang Yang, Ye Yuyao , et al. Key scientific issues and important topics in the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao region. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(12):1587-1596. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.001
	[ 张虹鸥, 王洋, 叶玉瑶 , 等. 粤港澳区域联动发展的关键科学问题与重点议题. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(12):1587-1596.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.001

事件类型	具体活动
言语合作	公开声明、呼吁、合作意向、协商咨询、外交合作
现实合作	参与实际合作、提供援助、产出/收益、投资
言语冲突	要求、不赞成、拒绝、威胁、抗议
现实冲突	展示军力/力量形象、降低/减少关系、胁迫、攻击、战斗

年份	报道最多的新闻事件	参与者	GoldsteinScale
2015	① 联想让摩托罗拉重返中国市场	粤港	3.4
	② 从广州到香港的旅行时间将缩短至45分钟	粤港	1.9
	③ 跨境警察合作为中国海外追捕逃犯提供便利	粤澳	1.9
	④ 中国发布澳门特区新地图	粤澳	7
	⑤ 粤港澳珠江三角洲区域空气质量监测网发布2014年监测结果	粤港澳	7
2016	① 新华见解：中国的硅谷充满希望	粤港	-2
	② 澳门将成为“中医药中心”	粤澳	0
	③ 联想将为香港初创企业提供资金	粤港	7.4
	④ Tishman与联想合作开发华南房地产	粤港	7.4
	⑤ 华为手机进入高端市场	粤港	-2
2017	① 横琴将于2017年扩建	粤澳	5
	② 广东期待与港澳深化合作	粤港澳	3
	③ 澳门从台风天鸽灾难中强劲复苏	粤澳	1.9
	④ 澳门召开旅游工作会议,商讨区域合作事宜	粤澳	1.9
2018	① 中国加强与葡语国家的合作	粤澳	0
	② 广州将通过澳门开拓全球市场	粤澳	3.5
	③ 中国即将公布粤港澳发展规划	粤港澳	0
	④ 港珠澳大桥通车后,澳门旅客人数上升	粤港澳	1.9
	⑤ 中兴通讯禁令余波蔓延,联想推动中国科技股暴跌	粤港	-5
2019	① 珠海国际会展中心加快建设成为“粤港澳大湾区高端会展综合体”	粤澳	5
	② 香港抗议活动	粤港	-0.4
	③ 珠海如何抓住粤港澳大湾区发展的机遇	粤澳	3.5
	④ 中国公布粤港澳大湾区发展规划	粤港澳	0
	⑤ 中央政府发言人呼吁香港市民反对、抵制暴力	粤澳	2.8

Regional integration and interaction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

事件类型	1997-2000年			2001-2005年			2006-2010年			2011-2015年			2016-2019年
事件类型	粤港澳	粤港	粤澳	粤港澳	粤港	粤澳	粤港澳	粤港	粤澳	粤港澳	粤港	粤澳	粤港澳	粤港	粤澳
公开声明	18		18	1	1		15	5	10	15	13	2	32	2	30
呼吁	2		2	4		4	7	1	6	4		4	20		20
合作意向	10		10	2		2	10	2	8	3	3		26		26
协商咨询	30		30	16	2	14	15	3	12	15	5	10	74	6	68
外交合作	4		4				2		2	8	4	4	20	4	16
实际合作				5	1	4	3	1	2	7	3	4
提供援助	4		4										3	3
产出/收益	2		2				1	1		7	1	6	40	40
投资	2		2	2		2				3	3		10	4	6
要求							4		4
不赞成	6		6				3	1	2	12	12		16	4	12
拒绝	2		2
威胁	2		2				4		4	1	1
抗议										3	3		1	1
胁迫	14		14				2		2				8	2	6
攻击										2		2
战斗										2		2

[1]	JIN Fengjun, YAO Zuolin, CHEN Zhuo. Development characteristics and construction prospects for an integrated economic zone in the South China Sea Region [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 428-443.
[2]	DONG Guanghui, QIU Menghan, LI Ruo, CHEN Fahu. Using the Fulcrum Cognitive Model to explore the mechanismof past human-land co-evolution [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 15-29.
[3]	JIN Gui, DENG Xiangzheng, DONG Yin, WU Feng. China's multidimensional poverty measurement and its spatiotemporal interaction characteristics in the perspective of development geography [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1633-1646.
[4]	WANG Nan, WANG Huimeng, DU Yunyan, YI Jiawei, LIU Zhang, TU Wenna. Spatiotemporal patterns of in- and out-bound population flows of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1418-1431.
[5]	LIU Yu, YAO Xin, GONG Yongxi, KANG Chaogui, SHI Xun, WANG Fahui, WANG Jiao'e, ZHANG Yi, ZHAO Pengfei, ZHU Di, ZHU Xinyan. Analytical methods and applications of spatial interactions in the era of big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1523-1538.
[6]	GE Dazhuan, LONG Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.
[7]	MA Haitao. The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 708-721.
[8]	ZHAO Chengshuangping, MO Duowen. Holocene hydro-environmental evolution and its impacts on human activities in Jianghan-Dongting Basin, middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(3): 529-543.
[9]	LI Ruiqian, LI Yongfu, HU Heng. Support of ecosystem services for spatial planning theories and practices [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430.
[10]	SONG Weixuan, CHEN Yanru, SUN Jie, HE Miao. Spatial differentiation of urban housing prices in integrated region of Yangtze River Delta [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2109-2125.
[11]	SONG Changqing, CHENG Changxiu, YANG Xiaofan, YE Sijing, GAO Peichao. Understanding geographic coupling and achieving geographic integration [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(1): 3-13.
[12]	CHEN Xiaoqiang, YUAN Lihua, SHEN Shi, LIANG Xiaoyao, WANG Yuanhui, WANG Xiangyu, YE Sijing, CHENG Changxiu, SONG Changqing. Analysis of the geo-relationships between China and its neighboring countries [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1534-1547.
[13]	LI Yurui,CAO Zhi,LONG Hualou. Developing Rural Science and Promoting Rural Vitalization: An overview of the Second Forum on Rural Vitalization and Rural Science [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(7): 1482-1486.
[14]	Jinliao HE, GEBHARDT Hans, Xianjin HUANG, Gang ZENG. A proposal for geography of unification: The lessons from German Unification [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4): 770-779.
[15]	LONG Hualou, GE Dazhuan, WANG Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2546-2559.