Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (7): 1450-1466.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201907013
• Ecosystem • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Hang,LIANG Xiaoying,LIU Di,SHI Qinqin,CHEN Hai()
Received:
2018-05-18
Revised:
2019-03-05
Online:
2019-07-25
Published:
2019-07-23
Contact:
CHEN Hai
E-mail:chw@nwu.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZHANG Hang,LIANG Xiaoying,LIU Di,SHI Qinqin,CHEN Hai. The resilience evolution and scenario simulation of social-ecological landscape in the fragile area[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Evaluation index system of social-ecological landscape resilience in the fragile area
准则层(权重) | 要素层 | 指标(权重) | 单位 | 指标方向 |
---|---|---|---|---|
生态系统(0.350) | 景观格局 | 景观多样性指数(0.146) | % | + |
景观连接性指数(0.152) | % | - | ||
生态系统功能 | 植被覆盖度(0.169) | % | - | |
生态胁迫 | 化肥施用强度(0.179) | kg/hm2 | + | |
农药施用强度(0.137) | kg/hm2 | + | ||
生态保护 | “三田”面积占比(0.216) | % | + | |
社会系统(0.293) | 产业结构 | 产业结构多样化指数(0.207) | % | + |
人口压力 | 人类活动强度(0.281) | % | - | |
农户生计 | 农业总产值(0.234) | 元 | + | |
集体记忆 | 外迁人口占比(0.279) | % | - | |
生产系统(0.357) | 地形条件 | 坡度(0.208) | 度 | - |
高程(0.161) | m | - | ||
生产能力 | 粮食产量(0.213) | kg | + | |
耕地面积占比(0.228) | % | + | ||
劳动力 | 农业劳动力数量(0.190) | 人 | + |
Tab. 2
Classification of subsystems resilience grade in Mizhi County during 2000-2015
恢复力 等级 | 2000年 | 2000-2009年面积变化 (km2) | 2009年 | 2009-2015年面积变化 (km2) | 2015年 | 2000-2015年 面积变化 (km2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | |||||
生态 系统 | I级 | 378.52 | 31.49 | -324.56 | 53.96 | 4.58 | -28.59 | 42.90 | 3.64 | -335.62 |
II级 | 412.39 | 34.89 | -61.78 | 350.61 | 29.74 | -21.43 | 329.18 | 27.92 | -83.21 | |
III级 | 230.07 | 17.94 | 218.66 | 448.73 | 38.06 | -45.64 | 415.1 | 35.21 | 185.03 | |
IV级 | 135.95 | 11.72 | 111.25 | 247.20 | 20.69 | 51.54 | 298.74 | 25.34 | 162.79 | |
V级 | 22.00 | 3.96 | 55.92 | 77.92 | 6.61 | 44.39 | 93.01 | 7.89 | 71.01 | |
社会 系统 | I级 | 72.28 | 6.13 | -36.14 | 36.14 | 3.07 | 22.26 | 58.40 | 4.95 | -13.88 |
II级 | 482.73 | 41.03 | -62.33 | 420.4 | 35.66 | -225.54 | 194.86 | 16.53 | -287.87 | |
III级 | 245.55 | 20.83 | 117.92 | 363.47 | 30.83 | 20.84 | 384.31 | 32.60 | 138.76 | |
IV级 | 271.72 | 23.05 | -108.42 | 163.30 | 13.85 | 244.66 | 407.96 | 34.61 | 136.24 | |
V级 | 106.28 | 9.02 | 89.27 | 195.55 | 16.59 | -62.23 | 133.32 | 11.31 | 27.04 | |
生产 系统 | I级 | 138.93 | 11.79 | -62.79 | 76.14 | 6.46 | -28.53 | 47.61 | 4.04 | -91.32 |
II级 | 199.86 | 16.95 | 0.54 | 200.40 | 17.00 | 11.16 | 211.56 | 17.95 | 11.70 | |
III级 | 589.18 | 49.98 | -25.71 | 563.47 | 47.80 | -54.86 | 508.61 | 43.14 | -80.57 | |
IV级 | 199.00 | 16.88 | 64.30 | 263.3 | 22.34 | -0.48 | 302.82 | 25.69 | 103.82 | |
V级 | 51.50 | 4.37 | 24.05 | 75.55 | 6.41 | 32.45 | 108.00 | 9.16 | 56.50 |
Tab. 3
Transition matrixes of ecosystem resilience during 2000-2015
恢复力等级 | I级 | II级 | III级 | IV级 | V级 | 2000年总计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 (km2) | 42.90 | 174.32 | 91.93 | 39.43 | 29.94 | 378.52 |
II级 (km2) | 144.51 | 173.27 | 94.61 | 412.39 | ||
III级 (km2) | 10.35 | 99.06 | 92.20 | 28.46 | 230.07 | |
IV级 (km2) | 50.84 | 62.87 | 22.24 | 135.95 | ||
V级 (km2) | 9.63 | 12.37 | 22.00 | |||
2015年总计(km2) | 42.90 | 329.18 | 415.10 | 298.74 | 93.01 | 1178.90 |
面积净变化(km2) | -335.62 | -83.21 | 185.03 | 162.79 | 71.01 |
Tab. 4
Transition matrixes of society system resilience during 2000-2015
恢复力等级 | I级 | II级 | III级 | IV级 | V级 | 2000年总计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 (km2) | 14.62 | 32.50 | 25.16 | 72.28 | ||
II级 (km2) | 18.23 | 210.79 | 201.48 | 53.23 | 483.73 | |
III级 (km2) | 87.53 | 132.08 | 25.94 | 245.55 | ||
IV级 (km2) | 67.57 | 80.57 | 123.58 | 271.72 | ||
V级 (km2) | 16.23 | 90.05 | 106.28 | |||
2015年总计(km2) | 58.40 | 194.86 | 384.31 | 407.96 | 133.32 | 1178.85 |
面积净变化(km2) | -13.88 | -288.87 | 138.76 | 136.24 | 27.04 |
Tab. 5
Transition matrixes of production system resilience during 2000-2015
恢复力等级 | I级 | II级 | III级 | IV级 | V级 | 2000年总计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 (km2) | 47.61 | 57.12 | 34.20 | 138.93 | ||
II级 (km2) | 76.43 | 60.50 | 62.93 | 199.86 | ||
III级 (km2) | 69.34 | 400.98 | 109.36 | 29.50 | 609.18 | |
IV级 (km2) | 8.67 | 12.93 | 111.60 | 65.80 | 199.00 | |
V级 (km2) | 18.93 | 32.70 | 51.50 | |||
2015年总计(km2) | 47.61 | 211.56 | 508.61 | 302.82 | 128.00 | 1178.85 |
面积净变化(km2) | -91.32 | -8.30 | 29.43 | 13.51 | 21.81 |
Tab. 6
Classification of social-ecological landscape resilience grade in Mizhi County during 2000-2015
恢复力 等级 | 2000年 | 2000-2009年面积变化 (km2) | 2009年 | 2009-2015年 面积变化 (km2) | 2015年 | 2000-2015年 面积变化 (km2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | ||||
I级 | 173.21 | 14.69 | -100.11 | 73.10 | 6.20 | -14.70 | 58.40 | 4.95 | -114.81 |
II级 | 371.70 | 31.53 | -148.28 | 223.42 | 18.95 | -28.56 | 194.86 | 16.53 | -176.84 |
III级 | 459.95 | 39.02 | 195.50 | 655.45 | 55.60 | -271.14 | 384.31 | 32.60 | -75.64 |
IV级 | 114.72 | 9.73 | 20.52 | 135.24 | 11.47 | 272.72 | 407.96 | 34.60 | 293.24 |
V级 | 59.27 | 5.03 | 32.39 | 91.66 | 7.78 | 41.66 | 133.32 | 11.30 | 74.05 |
Tab. 7
Transition matrixes of social-ecological landscape resilience during 2000-2015
恢复力等级 | I级 | II级 | III级 | IV级 | V级 | 2000年总计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I级 (km2) | 50.11 | 58.01 | 65.09 | 173.21 | ||
II级 (km2) | 8.29 | 83.65 | 113.94 | 165.82 | 371.70 | |
III级 (km2) | 53.20 | 180.36 | 191.32 | 35.07 | 459.95 | |
IV级 (km2) | 24.92 | 45.99 | 43.81 | 114.72 | ||
V级 (km2) | 4.83 | 54.44 | 59.27 | |||
2015年总计(km2) | 58.40 | 194.86 | 384.31 | 407.96 | 133.32 | 1178.85 |
面积净变化(km2) | -114.81 | -176.84 | -75.64 | 293.24 | 74.05 |
Tab. 8
Result of the ordered of weight
次序 权重 | a→0(0.0001) 极悲观 | a = 0.1 悲观 | a = 0.5 较悲观 | a = 1 无偏好 | a = 2 较乐观 | a = 10 乐观 | a→∞(1000) 极乐观 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人类活动强度 | 1 | 0.8123 | 0.3536 | 0.0667 | 0.0156 | 0.0000 | 0 |
外迁人口占比 | 0 | 0.0554 | 0.1380 | 0.0667 | 0.0428 | 0.0000 | 0 |
坡度 | 0 | 0.0327 | 0.1000 | 0.0667 | 0.0641 | 0.0000 | 0 |
化肥施用强度 | 0 | 0.0229 | 0.0792 | 0.0667 | 0.0800 | 0.0000 | 0 |
高程 | 0 | 0.0173 | 0.0652 | 0.0667 | 0.0909 | 0.0018 | 0 |
农药施用强度 | 0 | 0.0136 | 0.0546 | 0.0667 | 0.0972 | 0.0069 | 0 |
景观多样性指数 | 0 | 0.0109 | 0.0461 | 0.0667 | 0.0994 | 0.0192 | 0 |
景观连接性指数 | 0 | 0.0088 | 0.0389 | 0.0667 | 0.0978 | 0.0419 | 0 |
植被覆盖度 | 0 | 0.0072 | 0.0327 | 0.0667 | 0.0929 | 0.0759 | 0 |
产业结构多样性 | 0 | 0.0058 | 0.0271 | 0.0667 | 0.085 | 0.1170 | 0 |
农业劳动力数量 | 0 | 0.0046 | 0.0220 | 0.0667 | 0.0746 | 0.1558 | 0 |
农业总产值 | 0 | 0.0035 | 0.0173 | 0.0667 | 0.0622 | 0.1798 | 0 |
“三田”面积占比 | 0 | 0.0026 | 0.0127 | 0.0667 | 0.0481 | 0.1776 | 0 |
粮食产量 | 0 | 0.0017 | 0.0084 | 0.0667 | 0.0328 | 0.1434 | 0 |
耕地面积占比 | 0 | 0.0008 | 0.0042 | 0.0667 | 0.0166 | 0.0803 | 1 |
Tab. 9
Classification of social-ecological landscape resilience grade of three scenarios
恢复力 等级 | 情景一 | 情景一、二 面积变化 (km2) | 情景二 | 情景二、三 面积变化 (km2) | 情景三 | 情景一、三 面积变化 (km2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | 面积 (km2) | 比例 (%) | ||||
I级 | 278.10 | 23.59 | -218.13 | 59.96 | 5.09 | -46.16 | 13.80 | 1.17 | -264.30 |
II级 | 464.95 | 39.44 | -312.77 | 152.17 | 12.91 | -76.48 | 75.69 | 6.42 | -389.25 |
III级 | 224.54 | 19.05 | 409.79 | 634.34 | 53.81 | -212.65 | 421.68 | 35.77 | 197.14 |
IV级 | 158.04 | 13.41 | 43.05 | 201.10 | 17.06 | 276.37 | 477.47 | 40.50 | 319.43 |
V级 | 53.22 | 4.51 | 78.06 | 131.28 | 11.14 | 58.92 | 190.21 | 16.14 | 136.98 |
[1] |
Cumming G S, Olsson P, Chapin F S , et al. Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2013,28(6):1139-1150.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9725-4 |
[2] |
Ciftcioglu G C . Assessment of the resilience of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes: A case study from Lefke Region of North Cyprus. Ecological Indicators, 2017,73(6):128-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.036 |
[3] |
Zhao Wenwu, Fang Xuening . Sustainable landscapes and landscape sustainability science. Journal of Ecology, 2014,34(10):2453-2459.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201312042884 |
[ 赵文武, 房学宁 . 景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学. 生态学报, 2014,34(10):2453-2459.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201312042884 |
|
[4] | Mcginlay J, Gowing D J G, Budds J . Conserving socio-ecological landscapes: An analysis of traditional and responsive management practices for floodplain meadows in England. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016,66:234-241. |
[5] |
Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Zurlini G . Multi-scale vulnerability of natural capital in a panarchy of social-ecological landscapes. Ecological Complexity, 2010,7(3):359-367.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.01.001 |
[6] | Garmestani A S, Benson M H . A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society, 2013,18(1):265-277. |
[7] | Chen Jia, Yang Xinjun, Yin Sha , et al. The vulnerability evolution and simulation of the social-ecological systems in the semi-arid area based on the VSD framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(7):1172-1188. |
[ 陈佳, 杨新军, 尹莎 , 等. 基于VSD框架的半干旱地区社会—生态系统脆弱性演化与模拟. 地理学报, 2016,71(7):1172-1188.] | |
[8] | Zhang Tian, Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin . The rural spatial evolution and reconstruction on a resilience view. Journal of Ecology, 2017,37(7):2147-2157. |
[ 张甜, 刘焱序, 王仰麟 . 恢复力视角下的乡村空间演变与重构. 生态学报, 2017,37(7):2147-2157.] | |
[9] | Wu J G . Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2013,8(6):999-1023. |
[10] | Rescia A J, Willaarts B A, Schmitz M F , et al. Changes in land uses and management in two nature reserves in Spain: Evaluating the social-ecological resilience of cultural landscapes. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2010,98(1):26-35. |
[11] |
Min K, You S, Chon J , et al. Sustainable land-use planning to improve the coastal resilience of the social-ecological landscape. Sustainability, 2017,9(7):1086.
doi: 10.3390/su9071086 |
[12] |
Li Y, Shi Y, Qureshi S , et al. Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface. Ecological Indicators, 2014,42(7):135-146.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.032 |
[13] | Rescia A J, Ortega M, Rescia A J , et al. Quantitative evaluation of the spatial resilience to the B. oleae pest in olive grove socio-ecological landscapes at different scales. Ecological Indicators, 2017,84:820-827. |
[14] | Yang Xinjun, Shi Yuzhong, Wang Ziqiao . Exploring the impacts of road construction on a local social-ecological system in Qinling mountainous area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(8):1313-1326. |
[ 杨新军, 石育中, 王子侨 . 道路建设对秦岭山区社会—生态系统的影响. 地理学报, 2015,70(8):1313-1326.] | |
[15] | Bergamini N, Blasiak R, Eyzaguirre P , et al. Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes. UNU-IAS Policy Report, 2010. |
[16] | Plieninger T, Bieling C. Resilience and the Cultural Landscape: Understanding and Managing Change in Human Shaped Environments. Cambridge: Camridge University Press, 2012(2):264. |
[17] | Oudenhoven F J, Mijatovic D, Eyzaguirre P B . Social-ecological indicators of resilience in agrarian and natural landscapes. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2011,22(2):154-173. |
[18] | Wang Qun, Lu Lin, Yang Xingzhu . Study on measurement and impact mechanism of socio-ecological system resilience in Qiandao Lake. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(5):779-795. |
[ 王群, 陆林, 杨兴柱 . 千岛湖社会—生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理. 地理学报, 2015,70(5):779-795.] | |
[19] | Zhou Xiaofang . Measuring methods for the resilience of social-ecological systems. Journal of Ecology, 2017,37(12):4278-4288. |
[ 周晓芳 . 社会—生态系统恢复力的测量方法综述. 生态学报, 2017,37(12):4278-4288.] | |
[20] |
Zhang Mengjie, Guan Dongjie, Su Weici . Scenarios simulation and indices thresholds determination of ecological security in Three Gorges Reservoir based on system dynamics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(14):4880-4890.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201311122717 |
[ 张梦婕, 官冬杰, 苏维词 . 基于系统动力学的重庆三峡库区生态安全情景模拟及指标阈值确定. 生态学报, 2015,35(14):4880-4890.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201311122717 |
|
[21] |
Xu Yueqing, Li Shuangcheng, Cai Yunlong . Spatial simulation using GIS and artificial neural network for regional poverty: A case study of Maotiaohe Watershed, Guizhou province. Progress in Geography, 2006,25(3):79-85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2006.03.010 |
[ 许月卿, 李双成, 蔡运龙 . 基于GIS和人工神经网络的区域贫困化空间模拟分析: 以贵州省猫跳河流域为例. 地理科学进展, 2006,25(3):79-85.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2006.03.010 |
|
[22] | Li Shaoying, Li Xia, Liu Xiaoping , et al. Multi-scenario simulations on the interactions of jobs-housing based on agent-based model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(10):1389-1400. |
[ 李少英, 黎夏, 刘小平 , 等. 基于多智能体的就业与居住空间演化多情景模拟: 快速工业化区域研究. 地理学报, 2013,68(10):1389-1400.] | |
[23] |
Liu Yanxu, Peng Jian, Han Yinan , et al. Suitability assessment for building land consolidation on gentle hillside based on OWA operator: A case in Dali Bai Nationality Borough in Yunnan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(12):3188-3197.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201312233004 |
[ 刘焱序, 彭建, 韩忆楠 , 等. 基于OWA的低丘缓坡建设开发适宜性评价: 以云南大理白族自治州为例. 生态学报, 2014,34(12):3188-3197.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201312233004 |
|
[24] | Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian , et al. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the 3D framework of adaptive cycle. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(7):1052-1067. |
[ 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建 , 等. 基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2015,70(7):1052-1067.] | |
[25] | Liu Yanxu, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian , et al. Land ecological suitability assessment for forest coupled with the resilience perspective: A case study in Wangqing county, Jilin province, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(3):476-487. |
[ 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建 , 等. 耦合恢复力的林区土地生态适宜性评价: 以吉林省汪清县为例. 地理学报, 2015,70(3):476-487.] | |
[26] | Feng Shu, Zhao Wenwu, Chen Liding , et al. Advances in landscape ecology in the Loess Plateau since 2010 in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(12):3957-3966. |
[ 冯舒, 赵文武, 陈利顶 , 等. 2010年来黄土高原景观生态研究进展. 生态学报, 2017,37(12):3957-3966.] | |
[27] | Chen Hai, Liang Xiaoying, Wang Tao . Land use intensity, landscape complexity and village specialization in the fragile area of Mizhi county. Resources Science, 2014,36(10):2183-2193. |
[ 陈海, 梁小英, 王涛 . 生态脆弱区土地集约利用、景观复杂性、村落专业化的关系研究: 以陕西省米脂县为例. 资源科学, 2014,36(10):2183-2193.] | |
[28] |
Sun Honghu, Cheng Xianfu, Dai Mengqin , et al. Study on the influence factors and evaluation index system of regional flood disaster resilience based on DEMATEL method: Taking Chaohu Basin as a case. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015,24(9):1577-1583.
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201509019 |
[ 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 戴梦琴 , 等. 基于DEMATE的区域洪涝灾害恢复力影响因素及评价指标体系研究: 以巢湖流域为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015,24(9):1577-1583.]
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201509019 |
|
[29] | Jia Hui, Chen Hai, Mao Nanzhao , et al. Landscape sustainable development in highly sensitive ecological fragile areas. Resources Science, 2018,40(6):1277-1286. |
[ 贾慧, 陈海, 毛南赵 , 等. 高度敏感生态脆弱区景观可持续性评价. 资源科学, 2018,40(6):1277-1286.] | |
[30] |
Peng Jian, Wu Jiansheng, Pan Yajing , et al. Evaluation for regional ecological sustainability based on PSR model: Conceptual framework. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(7):933-940.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012 |
[ 彭建, 吴健生, 潘雅婧 , 等. 基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(7):933-940.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012 |
|
[31] |
Yan Haiming, Zhan Jinyan, Zhang Tao . Review of ecosystem resilience research progress. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(3):303-314.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.03.005 |
[ 闫海明, 战金艳, 张韬 . 生态系统恢复力研究进展综述. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(3):303-314.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.03.005 |
|
[32] | Peng Jian, Dang Weixiong, Liu Yanxu , et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(4):664-677. |
[ 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序 , 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2015,70(4):664-677.] | |
[33] |
Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Zhang Yuan , et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns. Ecological Indicators, 2010,10(2):217-223.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.017 |
[34] |
Zurlini G, Petrosillo I, Jones K B , et al. Highlighting order and disorder in social-ecological landscapes to foster adaptive capacity and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 2013,28(6):1161-1173.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9763-y |
[35] | Ning Lixin, Ma Lan, Zhou Yunkai , et al. Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem health of the coastal zone in Jiangsu Province based on the PSR model. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(2):534-543. |
[ 宁立新, 马兰, 周云凯 , 等. 基于PSR模型的江苏海岸带生态系统健康时空变化研究. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(2):534-543.] | |
[36] | Peng Jian, Xie Pan, Liu Yanxu , et al. Integrated ecological risk assessment and spatial development trade-offs in lowslope hilly land: A case study in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(11):1747-1761. |
[ 彭建, 谢盼, 刘焱序 , 等. 低丘缓坡建设开发综合生态风险评价及发展权衡: 以大理白族自治州为例. 地理学报, 2015,70(11):1747-1761.] | |
[37] | Lu Changhe, Wang Qian, Ma Junfei . Effects of the ecological construction in the hlilly Loess Plateau. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011,25(10):28-31. |
[ 吕昌河, 王茜, 马俊飞 . 黄土丘陵区生态建设效应与农户响应. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011,25(10):28-31.] | |
[38] |
Guo Yongrui, Zhang Jie . Research progress and themes of geography on community resilience. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(1):100-109.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.012 |
[ 郭永锐, 张捷 . 社区恢复力研究进展及其地理学研究议题. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(1):100-109.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.012 |
|
[39] |
Speranza C I, Wiesmann U, Rist S . An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 2014,28(1):109-119.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005 |
[40] |
Perz S G, Shenkin A, Barnes G , et al. Connectivity and resilience: A multidimensional analysis of infrastructure impacts in the southwestern Amazon. Social Indicators Research, 2012,106(2):259-285.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9802-0 |
[41] | Li Xiao, Zhou Dingyang . An overview of the resilience of agro-ecosystems. Resources Science, 2015,37(9):1747-1754. |
[ 李晓, 周丁扬 . 农业系统恢复力研究进展综述. 资源科学, 2015,37(9):1747-1754.] | |
[42] | Xu Yong, Sun Xiaoyi, Tang Qing . Human activity intensity of land surface: Concept, method and application in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(7) : 1068-1079. |
[ 徐勇, 孙晓一, 汤青 . 陆地表层人类活动强度: 概念、方法及应用. 地理学报, 2015,70(7):1068-1079.] | |
[43] | Song Shixiong, Liang Xiaoying, Mei Yajun , et al. Modeling and simulating land abandonment behavior of farmer households based on the CBDI. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016,31(11):1926-1937. |
[ 宋世雄, 梁小英, 梅亚军 , 等. 基于CBDI的农户耕地撂荒行为模型构建及模拟研究: 以陕西省米脂县冯阳坬村为例. 自然资源学报, 2016,31(11):1926-1937.] | |
[44] | Xiang Hui, Kong Xiangbin, Wu Zhaokun , et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of potential productivity of arable land in main crop production area in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012,28(24):235-244. |
[ 相慧, 孔祥斌, 武兆坤 , 等. 中国粮食主产区耕地生产能力空间分布特征. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(24):235-244.] | |
[45] |
Yager R R . On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988,18(1):183-190.
doi: 10.1109/21.87068 |
[46] |
Yager R R . Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996,11(1):49-73.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<>1.0.CO;2-3 |
[47] | Lu Dadao . The framework document of "Future Earth" and the development of Chinese geographical science: The foresight of Academician HUANG Bingwei's statement. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1043-1051. |
[ 陆大道 . “未来地球”框架文件与中国地理科学的发展: 从“未来地球”框架文件看黄秉维先生论断的前瞻性. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1043-1051.] |