中国人地关系综合评价的理论模型与实证

doi:10.11821/dlxb201906001

Abstract

Abstract:

Relationship is a classic concern of geographical research, which is also a research field where China's human and economic geography has made notable contributions to international geographical research. The connotation of man-land relationship changes constantly during its dynamic evolution process. Therefore, a scientific evaluation on the status of modern man-land relationship in China is the basis for an accurate understanding of it with which paths of coordinating conflicts between man and land can be sought. Based on the territorial system theory of man-land relationship and a review of the new characteristics of modern man-land relationship in China, this study constructs a theoretical framework to make a comprehensive evaluation on man-land relations using the following four indicators: intensity of human activities, carrying capacity of core resources, ecological and environmental constraints, and openness of man-land system. Counties are taken as the basic spatial units in the evaluation. The following results are found: there are apparent differences between eastern and western China in terms of intensity of human activities and the distribution pattern of it follows the layout of core urban agglomerations; the carrying capacities of core resources take on a relatively dispersed spatial distribution; there is a high level of spatial mismatch between land, water, core energy resources, and the intensity of human activities, which intensifies the tension of regional man-land relationship; areas with strong ecological and environmental constrains are concentrated on both sides of the Heihe-Tengchong Line (also known as the Hu Huanyong Line) and in the southwestern part of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; overall, the level of openness of China's man-land system is not high, with relatively open areas mainly concentrated in economically developed regions. The evaluation results show that about 86% of the regions in China are faced an unstrained man-land relationship, but noticeable man-land conflicts are found in some areas, particularly in southeastern coastal areas. In the western region of China, man-land relationship is relatively unstrained though the level of man-land system evolution is low.

Key words: man-land relationship, comprehensive evaluation, theoretical model, intensity of human activities, carrying capacity of resources, ecological constraints, system openness, China

YANG Yu,LI Xiaoyun,DONG Wen,HONG Hui,HE Ze,JIN Fengjun,LIU Yi. Comprehensive evaluation on China's man-land relationship: Theoretical model and empirical study[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(6): 1063-1078.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 41

[1]	Wu Chuanjun. Man-Land Relationship and Economic Layout. Beijing: Academic Press, 2008.
	[ 吴传钧 . 人地关系与经济布局. 北京: 学苑出版社, 2008.]
[2]	Yang Qingshan, Mei Lin . Human-activity-geographical-environment relationship, its system and its regional system. Economic Geography, 2001,21(5):532-537.
	[ 杨青山, 梅林 . 人地关系、人地关系系统与人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 2001,21(5):532-537.]
[3]	Harden C P . Framing and reframing questions of human-environment interactions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012,102(4):737-747. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.678035
[4]	Turner II B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A , et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003,100(14):8074-8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
[5]	Galvani A P, Bauch C T, Anand M , et al. Human-environment interactions in population and ecosystem health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016,113(51):14502-14506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618138113
[6]	National Research Council of the National Academies, US. Understanding the Changing Planet Strategic Directions for the Geographical Sciences. California: National Academies Press, 2010.
[7]	Turner II B L, Matsond P A, McCarthye J J . Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003,100(14):8080-8085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231334100
[8]	Fan Jie . Human-environment system and economic geography. Economic Geography, 2008,28(2):177-183.
	[ 樊杰 . “人地关系地域系统”学术思想与经济地理学. 经济地理, 2008,28(2):177-183.]
[9]	Fang Chuanglin . Recent progress of studies on man-land relationship and its prospects in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004,59(SI):21-32.
	[ 方创琳 . 中国人地关系研究的新进展与展望. 地理学报, 2004,59(S1):21-32.]
[10]	Fan Jie . Frontier approach of the sustainable progress and pattern of human-environment system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.
	[ 樊杰 . 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1060-1068.]
[11]	Fan Jie. Sun Wei . Recent progress and outlook of human-economic geography in China. Progress in Geography, 2011,30(12):1459-1469. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.001
	[ 樊杰, 孙威 . 中国人文—经济地理学科进展及展望. 地理科学进展, 2011,30(12):1459-1469.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.001
[12]	Wang Liming . A theoretical and methodological study on the PRED oriented modeling of man-land relationship system. Geographical Research, 1997,16(2):39-45.
	[ 王黎明 . 面向PRED问题的人地关系系统构型理论与方法研究. 地理研究, 1997,16(2):39-45.]
[13]	Ye Daifu . The interactive mechanism of man-earth areal system and the sustainable development. Geographical Research, 2001,20(3):307-314.
	[ 叶岱夫 . 人地关系地域系统与可持续发展的相互作用机理初探. 地理研究, 2001,20(3):307-314.]
[14]	Cai Yunlong . A paradigm of the research on man-earth relationship: Positive study of territorial system. Human Geography, 1998,13(2):7-13.
	[ 蔡运龙 . 人地关系研究范型: 地域系统实证. 人文地理, 1998,13(2):7-13.]
[15]	Zhang Lei . Resources and environment foundation and man-land relationship in modern China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 1999,9(4):32-37.
	[ 张雷 . 我国现代人地关系与资源环境基础. 中国人口·资源与环境, 1999,9(4):32-37.]
[16]	Wang Changzheng, Liu Yi . Analysis of the evolvement and optimization of costal area's human-natural relationship. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2003,13(6):94-99.
	[ 王长征, 刘毅 . 沿海地区人地关系演化及优化分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2003,13(6):94-99.]
[17]	Zheng Du . Prospects of studies on man-land relationship in the 21st century. Geographical Research, 2002,21(1):9-13.
	[ 郑度 . 21世纪人地关系研究前瞻. 地理研究, 2002,21(1):9-13.]
[18]	Qiao Jiajun . Quantitative research of regional man-land relationship. Human Geography, 2015,30(1):81-85.
	[ 乔家君 . 区域人地关系定量研究. 人文地理, 2015,30(1):81-85.]
[19]	Li Xiaoyun, Yang Yu, Liu Yi . Research progress in man-land relationship evolution and its resource-environment base in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(12):2067-2088.
	[ 李小云, 杨宇, 刘毅 . 中国人地关系演进及其资源环境基础研究进展. 地理学报, 2016,71(12):2067-2088.]
[20]	Lu Chengpeng, Chen Xingpeng, Wang Hongjuan , et al. A study on dynamic simulation of human-natural relationship evolution in northwest ethic minority: Case of Gannan. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(7):1255-1263. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.017
	[ 逯承鹏, 陈兴鹏, 王红娟 , 等. 西北少数民族地区人地关系演变动态仿真研究: 以甘南州为例. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(7):1255-1263.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.017
[21]	Liu Kai, Ren Jianlan, Zhang Lijuan , et al. Urbanization's resource environmental bearing capacity response from man-land relationship perspective: Take Shandong province as an example. Economic Geography, 2016,36(9):77-84.
	[ 刘凯, 任建兰, 张理娟 , 等. 人地关系视角下城镇化的资源环境承载力响应: 以山东省为例. 经济地理, 2016,36(9):77-84.]
[22]	Wang Jianhua, Gu Yuanxun, Sun Linyan . Study on dynamic models about man-earth relationships. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2003(1):128-131.
	[ 王建华, 顾元勋, 孙林岩 . 人地关系的系统动力学模型研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003(1):128-131.]
[23]	Fan Jie . Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):186-201.
	[ 樊杰 . 中国主体功能区划方案. 地理学报, 2015,70(2):186-201.]
[24]	Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Wang Yafei . Basic points and progress in technical methods of early-warning of the national resource and environmental carrying capacity (V2016). Progress in Geography, 2017,36(3):266-276.
	[ 樊杰, 周侃, 王亚飞 . 全国资源环境承载能力预警(2016版)的基点和技术方法进展. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(3):266-276.]
[25]	Fan Jie, Wang Yafei, Tang Qing , et al. Academic thought and technical progress of monitoring and earl-warning of the national resources and environment carrying capacity (V2014). Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(1):1-10.
	[ 樊杰, 王亚飞, 汤青 , 等. 全国资源环境承载能力监测预警(2014版)学术思路与总体技术流程. 地理科学, 2015,35(1):1-10.]
[26]	Fang C L, Wang J . A theoretical analysis of interactive coercing effects between urbanization and eco-environment. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013,23(2):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0591-z
[27]	Li G D, Fang C L, Wang S J, Sun S A . The effect of economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization on fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) concentrations in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016,50(21):11452-11459.
[28]	Liu Yanxu, Wu Wenheng, Wen Xiaojin , et al. Urban process and its eco-environmental impact in Shanxi-Shaanxi-Inner Mongolia energy area. Geographical Research, 2013,32(11):2009-2020.
	[ 刘焱序, 吴文恒, 温晓金 , 等. 晋陕蒙能源区城镇化过程及其对生态环境的影响. 地理研究, 2013,32(11):2009-2020.]
[29]	Shen Lei, Gao Li . Managing energy and mineral resources development and pollution control coordinately in the western China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013,23(10):17-23.
	[ 沈镭, 高丽 . 中国西部能源及矿业开发与环境保护协调发展研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(10):17-23.]
[30]	Shang Hailong, Pan Yujun . The analysis on the evolution state of man-land relationship and the dynamic prediction in Xi'an. Human Geography, 2013,28(2):104-110, 90.
	[ 尚海龙, 潘玉君 . 西安市人地关系协调状态评价及动态预测. 人文地理, 2013,28(2):104-110, 90.]
[31]	Zhang Jie, Li Tongsheng, Wang Wuke . Quantitative analysis of coupling status of man-land relationship areal system in Weihe River Basin. Progress in Geography, 2010,29(6):733-739. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.06.013
	[ 张洁, 李同昇, 王武科 . 渭河流域人地关系地域系统耦合状态分析. 地理科学进展, 2010,29(6):733-739.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.06.013
[32]	Li Bo, Han Zenglin . Regional system vulnerability of man-land relationship in coastal cities: A case of Dalian city. Economic Geography, 2010,30(10):1722-1728.
	[ 李博, 韩增林 . 沿海城市人地关系地域系统脆弱性研究: 以大连市为例. 经济地理, 2010,30(10):1722-1728.]
[33]	Zhang Lei, Liu Yi . An analysis on man-land relationship of eastern China. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2004,59(2):311-319.
	[ 张雷, 刘毅 . 中国东部沿海地带人地关系状态分析. 地理学报, 2004,59(2):311-319.]
[34]	Jiang Fengqing, Zhu Cheng, Mu Guijin , et al. Present situation of the man-land relationship inconsistency in the oases of Xinjiang and the mitigation measures. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003,23(2):157-163.
	[ 姜逢清, 朱诚, 穆桂金 , 等. 新疆绿洲当代人地关系紧张情势与缓解途径. 地理科学, 2003,23(2):157-163.]
[35]	Xia Kehui, Li Ming, Wu Honglin . The man-land relationship in regional development of Gansu province. Economic Geography, 2015,35(8):40-46.
	[ 夏可慧, 李铭, 武弘麟 . 甘肃省区域发展进程中的人地关系研究. 经济地理, 2015,35(8):40-46.]
[36]	Yang Yang, Wu Cifang, Wei Shichuan . Research on the stage features of man-land relationship and adjustable strategies: Take Zhejiang province for example. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007,17(1):61-65.
	[ 杨杨, 吴次芳, 韦仕川 . 浙江省人地关系变化阶段特征及调整策略. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007,17(1):61-65.]
[37]	Yu Xusheng . Calculation of the population carrying capacity of the land resource and its significance in the study of man-natrue relation: A case in Binhai and Suzhou of Jiangsu province. Journal of Natural Resources, 1991,6(2):117-126. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.1991.02.003
	[ 余旭升 . 土地资源人口承载量的预测及其在人地关系研究中的意义: 以江苏省滨海、苏州为例. 自然资源学报, 1991,6(2):117-126.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.1991.02.003
[38]	Xu Yong, Zhang Xuefei, Li Lijuan , et al. Regional differentiation and classification for constraints of national resources and environment carrying. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016,31(1):34-43.
	[ 徐勇, 张雪飞, 李丽娟 , 等. 我国资源环境承载约束地域分异及类型划分. 中国科学院院刊, 2016,31(1):34-43.]
[39]	Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The Remote Sensing Investigation and Evaluation of National Ecological Environment Decade Changing (2000-2010). Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
	[ 环境保护部, 中国科学院. 全国生态环境十年变化(2000-2010年)遥感调查与评估. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.]
[40]	Jin Fengjun, Wang Chengjin, Li Xiuwei . Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(8):787-798.
	[ 金凤君, 王成金, 李秀伟 . 中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应用分析. 地理学报, 2008,63(8):787-798.]
[41]	Feng Zhiming, Liu Dong, Yang Yanzhao . Evaluation of transportation ability of China: From county to province level. Geographical Research, 2009,28(2):419-429.
	[ 封志明, 刘东, 杨延昭 . 中国交通通达度评价: 从分县到分省. 地理研究, 2009,28(2):419-429.]

城市群名称	极弱(%)	较弱(%)	一般(%)	较强(%)	极强(%)
海峡西岸	0.00	46.28	30.29	11.82	11.61
京津冀	32.71	30.12	9.07	19.54	8.56
山东半岛	0.00	0.00	23.39	62.78	13.83
长三角	1.24	18.18	32.60	27.39	20.59
珠三角	2.01	47.82	23.17	8.65	18.36
中原	3.25	24.99	24.08	40.19	7.50
成渝	32.27	25.29	23.58	16.03	2.84
长江中游	6.07	44.29	34.21	11.81	3.61
呼包鄂榆	67.60	27.98	2.04	1.42	0.95
黔中	29.37	60.55	7.10	2.76	0.23
兰西	65.87	32.91	0.00	0.96	0.25
天山北坡	89.47	8.63	1.73	0.18	0.00
宁夏沿黄	86.88	8.82	1.44	2.85	0.00

Comprehensive evaluation on China's man-land relationship: Theoretical model and empirical study

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 41

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Pingjun, WANG Kewen. Identification and stage division of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1366-1379.
[2]	WEI Shimei, PAN Jinghu. Network structure resilience of cities at the prefecture level and above in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[3]	YANG Ren, PAN Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[4]	YIN Jiangbin, LI Shangqian, JIANG Lei, CHENG Zhe, HUANG Xiaoyan, LU Gaigai. The spatio-temporal variations and driving factors of non-farm employment growth in contiguous destitute areas of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[5]	HU Pan, CHEN Bo, SHI Peijun. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of rainstorm-induced flood disasters in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[6]	LIU Zhenhai, WANG Shaoqiang, CHEN Bin. Spatial and temporal variations of frozen ground and its vegetation response in the eastern segment of China-Mongolia-Russia economic corridor from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1231-1244.
[7]	HUANG Xiaodong, MA Haitao, MIAO Changhong. Connectivity characteristics for city networks in China based on innovative enterprises [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[8]	WANG Lucang, LIU Haiyang, LIU Qing. China's city network based on Tencent's migration big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[9]	XIA Xingsheng, PAN Yaozhong, ZHU Xiufang, ZHANG Jinshui. Monthly calibration and optimization of Ångström-Prescott equation coefficients for agricultural comprehensive area in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[10]	MA Zuopeng, LI Chenggu, ZHANG Pingyu. Characteristics, mechanism and response of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 767-780.
[11]	FAN Zemeng. Spatial identification and scenario simulation of ecotone distribution in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 626-644.
[12]	FENG Zhiming, YOU Zhen, YANG Yanzhao, SHI Hui. Comprehensive evaluation of resource and environment carrying capacity of Tibet based on a three-dimensional tetrahedron model [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 645-662.
[13]	XU Yu, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie. Differentiation of scale-farmland transfer rent and its influencing factors in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 753-763.
[14]	GU Hengyu, SHEN Tiyan. Spatial evolution characteristics and driving forces of Chinese highly educated talents [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[15]	ZHU Shengjun, JIN Wenwan. Local export variety, regional institutions and firm related diversification [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.