1978年以来广州市居民职住地选择行为时空特征与影响因素的代际差异

doi:10.11821/dlxb201904010

Abstract

Abstract:

The housing and employment system in urban China has experienced profound transformations in the late 1980s and 1990s. Thus, individual daily behavior and its trajectory in life process have been reshaped and changed. However, previous studies barely focused on the feedback interaction of home-work behavior among different generations, especially beyond Chinese policy transition. Based on the intergenerational difference theory and the perspective of time geography, this paper combines individual jobs-housing course and inter-generational issue to analyze the spatio-temporal characteristics and structural differences of living and working behavior among different generations. These generations were born either before the reform of employment and housing system in 1988 or after in 1998. Through the analysis of the questionnaire, the main results are as follows. (1) Considering the migration of residence, all generations tend to move out from the old city area, and the migration of work places surrounds two city centers, forming a transition process from core area of old city to the suburbs. (2) The average commuting distance increased from 4.91 km to 6.46 km, while the work places and residences of post-1990s' changes much more than those of other age groups, who have suffered higher jobs-housing separation. (3) The commercialization and socialization of housing have greatly increased the freedom of individual residence and job choices after removing residents' house restrictions. In 1998-2016, the rates of post-1960s' and post-1970s' housing change increased to 113.16% and 112.33%, while the rates of their employment place change increased to 148.68% and 197.26%, which are higher compared with before housing reform. (4) The residence time decrease obviously due to the mobility of occupation, with a most obvious change among post-1960s from 14.43 years before 1988 to 5.43 years after 1998. Besides, and the staying in employment place decreased from 12.43 years to 3.95 years. The staying time of post-1980s and post-1990s was much shorter as well after 1988 while that of post-1970s was relatively long. (5) The influences of housing price, marital status, education, welfare house and laid-off status, etc. in capability constraints, coupling constraints and authority constraints are different among different generations on both living and working place migration. However, children's attendance at school and colleagues relationship in combined constraints have no significant different influences between groups on working place migration.

Key words: home-work location change, intergenerational differences, time geography, Guangzhou, space-time

Rongping LIN, Suhong ZHOU, Xiaopei YAN. Intergenerational differences of spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of home-work location changes since 1978: Empirical analysis based on the micro-survey in Guangzhou, China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4): 753-769.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

References 50

[1]	Chen Yuming, Cui Xun.A review of generational difference theory and generational difference in values. Human Resources Development of China, 2014(13): 43-48.
	[陈玉明, 崔勋. 代际差异理论与代际价值观差异的研究评述. 中国人力资源开发, 2014(13): 43-48.]
[2]	Wang E, Song J, Xu T.From "spatial bond" to "spatial mismatch": An assessment of changing jobs-housing relationship in Beijing. Habitat International, 2011, 35(2): 398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.11.008
[3]	Wang D, Chai Y.The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China: The legacy of Danwei. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17(1): 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.005
[4]	Zhang Yan, Chai Yanwei.Characteristics of commuting pattern in Beijing: Based on the comparison of different urban residential areas, Geographical Research, 2009, 28(5): 1327-1340. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.019
	[张艳, 柴彦威. 基于居住区比较的北京城市通勤研究. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1327-1340.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.019
[5]	Zhou Suhong, Liu Yulan.The situation and transition of jobs-housing relocation in Guangzhou, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(2): 191-201. doi: 10.11821/xb201002006
	[周素红, 刘玉兰. 转型期广州城市居民居住与就业地区位选择的空间关系及其变迁. 地理学报, 2010, 65(2): 191-201.] doi: 10.11821/xb201002006
[6]	Zhong Weijing, Wang De, Xie Dongcan, et al.Dynamic characteristics of Shanghai's population distribution using cell phone signaling data. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(5): 972-984. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201705013
	[钟炜菁, 王德, 谢栋灿, 等. 上海市人口分布与空间活动的动态特征研究: 基于手机信令数据的探索. 地理研究, 2017, 36(5): 972-984.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201705013
[7]	Horner M.Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure. Urban Geography, 2004, 25(3): 264-284. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.25.3.264
[8]	Zhang P, Zhou J, Zhang T.Quantifying and visualizing jobs-housing balance with big data: A case study of Shanghai. Cities, 2017, 66: 10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.004
[9]	Peng Z R.The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Studies, 2014, 34(8): 1215-1235.
[10]	Xu Yuanyuan, Tana, Li Xiang.Analysis of commuting behavior and employment center using subway smart card data. Human Geography, 2017, 32(3): 93-101.
	[许园园, 塔娜, 李响. 基于地铁刷卡数据的城市通勤与就业中心吸引范围研究. 人文地理, 2017, 32(3): 93-101.]
[11]	Suzuki T, Lee S.Jobs-housing imbalance, spatial correlation, and excess commuting. Transportation Research Part A, 2012, 46(2): 322-336. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.10.004
[12]	Sultana S.Job/Housing imbalance and commuting time in the Atlanta metropolitan area: Exploration of causes of longer commuting time. Urban Geography, 2002, 23(8): 728-749. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.23.8.728
[13]	Layman C C, Horner M W.Comparing methods for measuring excess commuting and jobs-housing balance: Empirical analysis of land use changes. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2174(1): 110-117. doi: 10.3141/2174-15
[14]	Antipova A, Wang F, Wilmot C.Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(3): 1010-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.001
[15]	Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan, Liu Zhilin.Spatial differences of home-work separation and the impacts of housing policy and urban sprawl: Evidence from household survey data in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(2): 157-166. doi: 10.11821/xb201102002
	[柴彦威, 张艳, 刘志林. 职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 157-166.] doi: 10.11821/xb201102002
[16]	Merlin L A.Measuring community completeness: Jobs-housing balance, accessibility, and convenient local access to nonwork destinations. Environment & Planning B Planning & Design, 2014, 41(4): 736-756.
[17]	Zhou J, Wang Y, Schweitzer L.Jobs/housing balance and employer-based travel demand management program returns to scale: Evidence from Los Angeles. Transport Policy, 2012, 20(1): 22-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.003
[18]	Findlay A, Mccollum D, Coulter R, et al.New mobilities across the life course: A framework for analysing demographically linked drivers of migration. Population Space & Place, 2015, 21(4): 390-402. doi: 10.1002/psp.1956
[19]	Geist C, Mcmanus P A.Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications. Population Space & Place, 2008, 14(4): 283-303. doi: 10.1002/psp.508
[20]	Cummins S K, Jackson R J.The built environment and children's health. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 2001, 48(5): 1241-1252. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70372-2 pmid: 11579672
[21]	Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei, Cao Xiaoshu.Housing type variation and its influencing factors in transitional urban China: based on analysis of CGSS 2005. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(8): 949-960. doi: 10.11821/xb201008006
	[刘望保, 闫小培, 曹小曙. 转型期中国城镇居民住房类型分化及其影响因素: 基于CGSS(2005)的分析. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 949-960.] doi: 10.11821/xb201008006
[22]	Yang Yongchun, Tan Yiming, Huang Xing, et al.Housing choice of urban residents in china based on the transformation of cultural values: A case study in Chengdu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(6): 841-852. doi: 10.11821/xb201206011
	[杨永春, 谭一洺, 黄幸, 等. 基于文化价值观的中国城市居民住房选择: 以成都市为例. 地理学报, 2012, 67(6): 841-852.] doi: 10.11821/xb201206011
[23]	Kim T K, Horner M W, Marans R W.Life cycle and environmental factors in selecting residential and job locations. Housing Studies, 2005, 20(3): 457-473. doi: 10.1080/02673030500062335
[24]	Kataure V, Walton-Roberts M.The housing preferences and location choices of second-generation South Asians living in ethnic enclaves. South Asian Diaspora, 2013, 5(1): 57-76. doi: 10.1080/19438192.2013.722385
[25]	Izuhara M.Life-course Diversity, Housing choices and constraints for women of the 'Lost' generation in Japan. Housing Studies, 2015, 30(1): 60-77. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2014.933780
[26]	Moore S Y, Grunberg L, Krause A J.The relationship between work and home: Examination of white and blue-collar generational differences in a large U.S. Organization. Psychology, 2014, 5(15): 1768-1776.
[27]	Lyons S, Kuron L.Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(Suppl.1): S139-S157. doi: 10.1002/job.1913
[28]	Laurijssen I, Glorieux I.Early career occupational mobility of Turkish and Moroccan second-generation migrants in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Youth Studies, 2015, 18(1): 101-117. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.933194
[29]	Zhuo Macao, Kong Xiangli.Research on intergenerational occupational mobility of migrant workers: Double embeddedness about intergenerational differences and intergenerational transmission. Finance & Economics, 2016(6): 84-96.
	[卓玛草, 孔祥利. 农民工代际职业流动: 代际差异与代际传递的双重嵌套. 财经科学, 2016(6): 84-96.]
[30]	Wang Meimei, Yang Yongchun, Tan Yiming, et al.Behavior and factors influencing intergenerational household cohabitation/separation among urban Chinese citizens: A case study from Chengdu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(8): 1296-1312. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508009
	[王梅梅, 杨永春, 谭一洺, 等. 中国城市居民的家庭代际分/合居行为及其影响要素: 以成都市为例. 地理学报, 2015, 70(8): 1296-1312.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508009
[31]	Zhan Dongsheng, Zhang Wenzhong, Meng Bin, et al.Spatial structure of urban residence and employment in Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(3): 356-366.
	[湛东升, 张文忠, 孟斌, 等. 北京城市居住和就业空间类型区分析. 地理科学, 2017, 37(3): 356-366.]
[32]	Zhong Yichun, Feng Jian, Residential spatial differentiation of migrant population within the city: A case study of Shenzhe. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(1): 125-135. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.012
	[钟奕纯, 冯健. 城市迁移人口居住空间分异: 对深圳市的实证研究. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 125-135.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.012
[33]	Zhou Chunshan, Tong Xinmei, Wang Juehan, et al.Spatial differentiation and the formation mechanism of population aging in Guangzhou in 2000-2010. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(1): 103-118.
	[周春山, 童新梅, 王珏晗, 等. 2000-2010年广州市人口老龄化空间分异及形成机制. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 103-118.]
[34]	Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei.Life course and housing tenure transition in urban China: A case study of Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(6): 1117-1128. doi: 10.11821/yj2010060016
	[刘望保, 闫小培. 转型期广州市生命历程与住房产权转换. 地理研究, 2010, 29(6): 1117-1128.] doi: 10.11821/yj2010060016
[35]	Chen Zao.Study on the intergenerational differences in the employment of migrant rural workers. Population Journal, 2011(2): 75-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-129X.2011.02.011
	[陈藻. 我国农民工就业代际差异研究: 以成都市为例. 人口学刊, 2011(2): 75-82.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-129X.2011.02.011
[36]	Song Jian, Huang Fei.Inergenerational relationship between adult only child and their parents. Population Research, 2011, 35(3): 3-16.
	[宋健, 黄菲. 中国第一代独生子女与其父母的代际互动: 与非独生子女的比较研究. 人口研究, 2011, 35(3): 3-16.]
[37]	Huang Xiaoting, Zhang Xiaoshan, Zhao Ying.Temporal-spatial behavior patterns of Chinese mainland tourists at Ocean Park Hong Kong. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2140-2150.
	[黄潇婷, 张晓珊, 赵莹. 大陆游客境外旅游景区内时空行为模式研究: 以香港海洋公园为例. 资源科学, 2015, 37(11): 2140-2150.]
[38]	Chai Yanwei, Wang Enzhou.Basic concepts and notation of time-geography. Economic Geography, 1997, 17(3): 55-61.
	[柴彦威, 王恩宙. 时间地理学的基本概念与表示方法. 经济地理, 1997, 17(3): 55-61.]
[39]	Zhao Ying, Chai Yanwei, Chen Jie, et al.GIS-Based analyzing method for spatial-temporal behavior data. Geography and Geo -Information Science, 2009, 25(5): 1-5.
	[赵莹, 柴彦威, 陈洁, 等. 时空行为数据的GIS分析方法. 地理与地理信息科学, 2009, 25(5): 1-5.]
[40]	Chen Jie, Lu Feng, Zhai Han et al. Making place recommendations: An individual accessibility measure to urban opportunities in space and time. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(6): 931-940. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506007
	[陈洁, 陆锋, 翟瀚, 等. 面向活动地点推荐的个人时空可达性方法. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6): 931-940.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506007
[41]	Patterson Z, Farber S.Potential path areas and activity spaces in application: A review. Transport Reviews, 2015, 35(6): 679-700. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1042944
[42]	Qi Mingyao, Wu Tao, Zhang Xin.Vehicle routing problem: From a perspective of time geography, Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2015, 17(1): 22-30. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.00022
	[戚铭尧, 吴涛, 张新. 车辆路径问题: 从时间地理学的视角. 地球信息科学学报, 2015, 17(1): 22-30. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.00022
[43]	Wu Xiaoying.Intergenerational conflict and the change of youth discourse. Youth Studies, 2006(8): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1437.2006.08.001
	[吴小英. 代际冲突与青年话语的变迁. 青年研究, 2006(8): 1-8.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1437.2006.08.001
[44]	Smola K W, Sutton C D.Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23(4): 363-382. doi: 10.1002/job.147
[45]	Moore S, Grunberg L, Krause A J.Generational differences in workplace expectations: A comparison of production and professional workers. Current Psychology, 2015, 34(2): 346-362. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9261-2
[46]	Wang Xuelong, Yuan Yiming.The social mobility of Chinese society: Trends and causes. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(9): 58-71.
	[王学龙, 袁易明. 中国社会代际流动性之变迁: 趋势与原因. 经济研究, 2015, 50(9): 58-71.]
[47]	Chen J, Lian R.Generational differences in work values in China. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2015, 43(4): 567-578. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.4.567
[48]	Dou W, Wang G, Zhou N.Generational and regional differences in media consumption patterns of Chinese generation X consumers. Journal of Advertising, 2006, 35(2): 101-110. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2006.10639230
[49]	You Jia, Sun Yuchun, Lei Hui.An empirical study of generational differences in work values for Chinese new generation. Soft Science, 2013, 27(6): 83-88.
	[尤佳, 孙遇春, 雷辉. 中国新生代员工工作价值观代际差异实证研究. 软科学, 2013, 27(6): 83-88.]
[50]	Li S M, Liu Y.The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Guangzhou, China: Hukou, and dual structure. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 54: 286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.014

	居住地变迁	备注	就业地变迁	备注
能力制约	家庭总人口	人口数	学历	1：小学;2：初中;3：高中;4：中专/中技/职高;5：大专;6：大学本科;7：研究生以上
	房价/租金便宜	1：是;0：否	职务	1：专业及科研人员;2：教师;3：高级管理人员;4：中级管理人员;5：低级管理人员;6：科员/办事人员;7：技术工人;8：非技术工人及一般体力劳动者;9：服务员;10：个体户;11：散工;12：其他
	想拥有自己的房子	1：是;0：否	单位性质	1：机关单位;2：事业单位;3：集体单位;4：国有企业;5：私营企业;6：个体;7：其他
	居住地周边设施完善,生活便利	1：是;0：否	离住所太远	1：是;0：否
	居住地交通方便	1：是;0：否	工作前景	1：有;0：无
	居住地比较安全	1：是;0：否	工资太低	1：是;0：否
组合制约	与家人上班方便	1：是;0：否	配偶工作调动	1：是;0：否
	结婚	1：是;0：否	子女上学	1：是;0：否
	子女上学	1：是;0：否	与同事或领导关系不好	1：是;0：否
权威制约	拆迁安置	1：是;0：否	单位内部调动	1：是;0：否
	福利分房	1：是;0：否	原单位搬迁	1：是;0：否
			下岗	1：是;0：否

属性		样本数	比例(%)	属性		样本数	比例(%)
性别	男	414	50.36	婚姻状况	未婚	213	25.91
性别	女	408	49.64		已婚	608	73.97
年龄(岁)	90后(18~26)	124	15.09		离异/丧偶	1	0.12
	80后(27~36)	327	39.78	个人月收入(元)	1000~1499	2	0.24
	70后(37~46)	219	26.64		1500~2999	30	3.65
	60后(47~56)	152	18.49		3000~4999	291	35.40
家庭总人口(人)	1	5	0.61		5000~6999	301	36.62
	2	44	5.35	7000~8999		117	14.23
	3	658	80.05	9000~12000		31	3.77
	4	59	7.18	12000以上		50	6.08
	> 4	56	6.81	单位性质	机关单位	10	1.22
教育程度	小学	3	0.36	单位性质	事业单位	39	4.74
	初中	36	4.38	集体单位		104	12.65
	高中	173	21.05	国有企业		91	11.07
	中专/中技/职高	145	17.64	私营企业		498	60.58
	大专	293	35.64	个体		72	8.76
	大学本科	169	20.56	其他		8	0.97
	研究生	3	0.36

居住地		60后	70后	80后	90后	就业地		60后	70后	80后	90后
未变迁(%)		17.76	18.72	22.94	40.32	未变迁(%)		23.68	22.83	42.81	79.84
1978-1987	变迁率(%)	6.58 (10)				1978-1987	变迁率(%)	24.34 (37)
1978-1987	驻留时长(年)	14.43				1978-1987	驻留时长(年)	12.43
1988-1997	变迁率(%)	38.82(59)	22.37(49)			1988-1997	变迁率(%)	58.55 (89)	48.86 (107)
1988-1997	驻留时长(年)	9.36	9.94			1988-1997	驻留时长(年)	8.12	7.70
1998-2016	变迁率(%)	113.16(172)	112.33(246)	94.50(309)	69.35(86)	1998-2016	变迁率(%)	148.68(226)	197.26(432)	207.03(677)	129.03(160)
1998-2016	驻留时长(年)	5.43	6.75	3.92	1.91	1998-2016	驻留时长(年)	3.95	4.54	2.30	1.31

			60后	70后	80后	90后
职住地空间特征	居住地变迁		分布趋势一致,各代际迁移距离分布相对均匀			近距离比例高
	就业地变迁		相对分散分布,距离分布不均			近距离比例高
	职住地距离		长距离,分散	短距离向长距离转变	集中于7 km内
职住地时间特征	变迁率	1978-1987年	低	/	/	/
		1988-1997年	较低	较低	/	/
		1998-2016年	高	高	高	较高
	驻留时长	1978-1987年	长	/	/	/
		1988-1997年	较长	较长	/	/
		1998-2016年	短	短	短	短

	居住地变迁	卡方	就业地变迁	卡方
能力制约	家庭总人口	2.342	学历	88.326^***
	房价(租金)便宜	8.509^**	职务	5.519
	想拥有自己的房子	2.328	单位性质	0.525
	居住地周边设施完善,生活便利	5.612	离住所太远	1.595
	居住地交通方便	3.944	工作前景	1.730
	居住地比较安全	8.925^**	工资太低	7.265^*
组合制约	与家人上班方便	1.904	配偶工作调动	0.433
	结婚	17.843^***	子女上学	1.837
	子女上学	0.000	与同事或领导关系不好	1.868
权威制约	拆迁安置	1.263	单位内部调动	13.293^***
	福利分房	9.421^**	原单位搬迁	2.068
			下岗	9.001^**

Intergenerational differences of spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of home-work location changes since 1978: Empirical analysis based on the micro-survey in Guangzhou, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 50

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	AN Ning,FENG Qiuyi,ZHU Hong. The spatial imagination of Guangzhou's African community: Analysis based on newspaper discourses [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1650-1662.
[2]	XU Zhihua,LIU Kaizhi. State rescaling of the urban development in Hong Kong after the reunification: A case study of the planning process of the Hong Kong section of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 253-265.
[3]	YANG Ying,LIN Lin,ZHONG Zhiping,OU Yingying,XU Qian,MENG Meiyun,HAO Shan. Comprehensive evaluation and spatial differentiation of community resilience in Guangzhou based on response of the city to public health hazards [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 266-284.
[4]	WU Rong,HUANG Xu,LIU Ye,LI Zhigang. Place attachment of urbanites in Guangzhou: Measurement and mechanism [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 379-393.
[5]	DUAN Dezhong,DU Debin,CHEN Ying,GUAN Mingming. Technology transfer in China's city system: Process, pattern and influencing factors [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 738-754.
[6]	YANG Wenyue,CAO Xiaoshu. The influence mechanism of travel-related CO₂ emissions from the perspective of residential self-selection: A case study of Guangzhou [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(2): 346-361.
[7]	CHEN Chun,YUAN Zhenjie,ZHU Hong. Floating children in Guangzhou: The construction of "home" in the context of urbanization [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12): 2440-2451.
[8]	DONG Yaqing,LU Zi,LIU Yuan,ZHANG Qiuluan. The design of China's corridors-in-the-sky and the influence of air routes traffic on the identification of space-time congestion [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 2001-2013.
[9]	Suhong ZHOU, Jiangyu SONG, Guangwen SONG. Examining the dual-levels impact of neighbourhood and individual variables on car use on weekdays in Guangzhou [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1444-1457.
[10]	Zhangzhi TAN, Shaoyin LI, Xia LI, Xiaoping LIU, Yimin CHEN, Weixian LI. Spatio-temporal effects of urban rail transit on complex land-use change [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(5): 850-862.
[11]	Chenhao FU, Suhong ZHOU, Xiaopei YAN, Lin LIU, Weishan CHEN. Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of consumer behavior in retailing centers: A case study of Guangzhou in Guangdong Province [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 603-617.
[12]	Yiming TAN, Yanwei CHAI, Mei-Po KWAN. The impact of the uncertain geographic context on the space-time behavior analysis: A case study of Xining, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 657-670.
[13]	Guangwen SONG, Luzi XIAO, Suhong ZHOU, Dongping LONG, Shuli ZHOU, Kai LIU. Impact of residents' routine activities on the spatial-temporal pattern of theft from person [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(2): 356-367.
[14]	Wei TAO, Shaoxu WANG, Hong ZHU. Scavengers' bodily practices and spatial construction in Guangzhou [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2199-2213.
[15]	Yue SHEN, Yanwei CHAI. Space-time flexibility of daily activities and gender differences: A case study of Beijing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2214-2225.

居住地			全体	70后	80后	90后	就业地			全体	70后	80后	90后
能力制约	房价/租金便宜	60后	-0.054	-0.066	-0.021	-0.119^*	能力制约	学历	60后	-0.532^***	-0.292^***	-0.778^***	-0.359
		70后	0.030		0.044	-0.053			70后	-0.189^*		-0.486^***	-0.067
		80后	-0.037			-0.097			80后	0.584^***			0.419^*
		90后	0.088						90后	-0.059
	住地安全	60后	-0.050	0.055	0.044	0.101^**		工资太低	60后	0.016	0.093	-0.043	-0.075
		70后	-0.010		-0.011	0.046	70后			-0.124		-0.136^*	-0.168
		80后	0.006			0.057^*	80后			0.090			-0.032
		90后	-0.063				90后			0.092
组合制约	结婚	60后	0.058	-0.082^***	-0.072^***	0.017	权威制约	单位内部调动	60后	0.000	-0.040	0.033	0.038
		70后	0.047		0.010	0.099^***			70后	0.062^***		0.073^***	0.078^***
		80后	0.040			0.089^***			80后	-0.052^*			0.006
		90后	-0.077*						90后	-0.040
权威制约	福利分房	60后	-0.059	-0.082^**	-0.035	-0.032		下岗	60后	0.055	0.030	0.074	0.096^***
		70后	0.057**		0.048	0.051	70后		0.020			0.044	0.066^***
		80后	-0.010			0.003	80后		-0.049				0.022
		90后	-0.010				90后		-0.056