Acta Geographica Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (7): 1277-1289.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707012
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lin MA1,2,3, Hao LIU4, Jian PENG3, Jiansheng WU2,3()
Received:
2016-07-15
Revised:
2017-03-22
Online:
2017-08-07
Published:
2017-08-07
Supported by:
Lin MA, Hao LIU, Jian PENG, Jiansheng WU. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Methods of mapping ecosystem services supply and demand and their characteristics
方法 | 优点 | 缺点 | 适用特征 | 生态系统服务类型 |
---|---|---|---|---|
土地利用估计 | 操作简便,数据要求低 | 易导致内部异质性和边缘效应缺失,结果存在一定误差 | 数据有限 | 授粉[ |
生态过程模拟 | 结果详尽可靠 | 操作复杂,对数据要求高 | 水文类生态系统服务的供给研究 | 洪水调节[ |
数据空间叠置 | 操作简便 | 对数据要求高 | 具备服务影响因素的空间数据 | 气候调节、地下水灌溉[ |
专家经验判别 | 对数据要求低 | 空间化准则的普适性差 | 背景材料充分或建立专家团队 | 食物供给、气候调节、娱乐活动等[ |
InVEST模型 | 操作简便,适用性强 | 难以进行需求分析 | 供给研究 | 水供给[ |
ARIES模型 | 刻画生态系统服务空间流动 | 模型功能有限,对中国的适用性尚不明确 | 碳固定和存储等8类生态系统服务 | 水供给[ |
[1] | Daily C.Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997. |
[2] |
Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
doi: 10.1038/387253a0 |
[3] | Zhang Yongmin, Zhao Shidong.Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2016. |
[张永民, 赵士洞. 生态系统与人类福祉: 评估框架. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2006.] | |
[4] |
Li Shuangcheng, Liu Jinlong, Zhang Caiyu, et al.The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1618-1630.
doi: 10.11821/xb201112004 |
[李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉, 等. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1618-1630.]
doi: 10.11821/xb201112004 |
|
[5] | Zhang Liwei, Fu Bojie.The progress in ecosystem services mapping: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(2): 316-325. |
[张立伟, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学报, 2014, 34(2): 316-325.] | |
[6] | Li Shuangcheng, Wang Yu, Zhu Wenbo, et al.Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639. |
[李双成, 王珏, 朱文博等. 基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639.] | |
[7] |
Liu Huimin, Fan Yulong, Ding Shengyan.Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005 |
[刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.]
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005 |
|
[8] |
Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, et al.Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274 |
[肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274 |
|
[9] | Yang Li, Zhen Lin, Pan Ying, et al.Ecosystem services supply and consumption: A case in Yellow River watershed, China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(3): 131-138. |
[杨莉, 甄霖, 潘影, 等. 生态系统服务供给-消费研究: 黄河流域案例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(3): 131-138.] | |
[10] | Zhao Qingjian, Wen Zuomin, Zhang Minxin.Identifying forest ecosystem services supplies and demands: Insights from ecosystem services flows. Forestry Economics, 2014(10): 3-7. |
[赵庆建, 温作民, 张敏新. 识别森林生态系统服务的供应与需求: 基于生态系统服务流的视角. 林业经济, 2014(10): 3-7.] | |
[11] | Tang Xiumei, Hao Xingyao, Pan Yuchun, et al.Ecological regionalization based on ecological demanding evaluation in Beijing City. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(1): 170-176. |
[唐秀美, 郝星耀, 潘瑜春, 等. 基于生态需求评价的北京市生态区位划分研究. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(1): 170-176.] | |
[12] |
Roces-Diaz J V, Díaz-Varela R A, Álvarez-Álvarez P, et al. A multiscale analysis of ecosystem services supply in the NW Iberian Peninsula from a functional perspective. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 50: 24-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.027 |
[13] |
Locatelli B, Imbach P, Vignola R, et al.Ecosystem services and hydroelectricity in Central America: Modelling service flows with fuzzy logic and expert knowledge. Regional Environmental Change, 2011, 11(2): 393-404.
doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0149-x |
[14] |
Fisher B. Turnera R, Morling P.Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(3): 643-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 |
[15] |
Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B, et al.Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 |
[16] |
Syrbe U, Walz U.Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 80-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 |
[17] |
Geijzendorffer I R, Martín-López B, Roche P K.Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 52: 320-331.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016 |
[18] |
Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, et al.Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(3): 521-535.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008 |
[19] |
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al.Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 |
[20] |
Costanza R.Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020 |
[21] | Serna-Chavez M, Schulp C J E, van Bodegom P M, et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 39: 24-33. |
[22] |
Schroter M, Barton D N, Remme R P, et al.Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 539-551.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 |
[23] |
Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J, et al.The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 47(2): 377-385.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x |
[24] |
Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg P H.Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 38: 198-211.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010 |
[25] |
Nedkov S, Burkhard B.Flood regulating ecosystem services: Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 67-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 |
[26] |
Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C, et al.Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 2013, 9: 161-185.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x |
[27] |
Wu W, Tang H, Yang P, et al.Scenario-based assessment of future food security. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(1): 3-17.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-011-0825-x |
[28] |
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, et al.National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 104-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001 |
[29] |
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, et al.Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape online, 2009, 15(1): 1-22.
doi: 10.3097/LO.200915 |
[30] | Ruckelshaus M, Daily G, Kareiva P. Natural Capital Project.. |
[31] | Sharp R. Tallis H T, Ricketts T, et al.InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund, 2015. |
[32] |
Boithias L, Acuña V, Vergoñós L, et al.Assessment of the water supply: Demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 470: 567-577.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.003 pmid: 24176705 |
[33] | Villa F, Bagstad K, Voigt B, et al.. |
[34] |
Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D, et al.From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 2014, 19(2): 64.
doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264 |
[35] |
Villa F, Bagstad K J, Voigt B, et al.A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PloS One, 2014, 9(3): e91001.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 pmid: 3953216 |
[36] |
Schirpke U, Scolozzi R, Marco C D, et al.Mapping beneficiaries of ecosystem services flows from natural 2000 sites. Ecosystem Services, 2014, 9: 170-179.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.003 |