中印城镇化区域差异及城镇体系空间演化比较

doi:10.11821/dlxb201706004

Abstract

Abstract:

As two rising great powers, China and India have undergone similar development processes, but they also exhibit significant differences in development paths and patterns. The significant differences in political systems, economic systems, and developmental environment between the two countries have attracted great attention from scholars. This research focuses on the regional differences and spatial evolution processes in urbanization and urban systems between the two countries from a geographical perspective. Based on the demographic censuses of both countries and the urban population data from the United Nations, this paper systematically compared and analyzed the spatial characteristics of urbanization and urban systems in China and India using various methods including spatial analysis, parameter estimation, and nonparametric estimation. The results indicate that: (1) Since the 1990s, the regional differences in urbanization in China have transformed from south-north differences to coastal-inland differences, whereas the north-south differences in India have been stable. (2) In terms of the spatial scale at the province (state) level, the population densities and urbanization rates were positively correlated in both countries. The correlation is more significant when the urbanization rate is higher than 50%. However, in recent years, the correlation between population density and urbanization rate kept increasing in China, while such correlation has been decreasing in India. (3) Currently, the urban system is dominated by large and medium-sized cities in China and India, which complies with the characteristics of the rank-size distribution. But the economic reform has exerted significantly different effects on the spatial evolution of the urban systems in the two countries. The economic reform has changed the major driving force for urban development in China from geological and historical factors to the spatial structure of the economic system. However, in India, the driving forces for urban development have always been geological and historical factors, and the economic reform even decreased the effect of the spatial structure of the economic system on urban development.

Key words: urbanization, urban system, spatial pattern, spatial evolution, China, India

Jiaming LI, Yu YANG, Jie FAN, Fengjun JIN, Wenzhong ZHANG, Shenghe LIU, Bojie FU. Comparative research on regional differences in urbanization and spatial evolution of urban systems between China and India[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 986-1000.

Figures/Tables 17

Tab.1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Tab. 2

Fig. 10

Tab. 3

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

References 19

[1]	Gulati A, Fan S.The Dragon and the Elephant: Agricultural and Rural Reforms in China and India. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
[2]	Mukherjee A, Zhang X.Rural industrialization in China and India: Role of policies and institutions. World Development, 2007, 35(10): 1621-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.008
[3]	Lu H, Huang H, Deva S.Unraveling the puzzle of differing rates of FDI and FVCI in India and China. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 2009, 4(1): 207-236. doi: 10.1017/S2194607800000429
[4]	Haley U C V, Haley G T. The Indian Elephant and the Chinese Dragon: Differing development strategies of India and China and effects on business environments. Indian Journal of Economics & Business, 2006: 131-146.
[5]	Huang Y, Khanna T.Can India overtake China? Foreign Policy, 2003, 137: 74-81.
[6]	KorukondaA R, Carrillo G, Bathala C, et al. The Dragon and the Elephant: A comparative study of financial systems, commerce, and commonwealth in India and China. ICFAI Journal of International Business, 2007, 2(3): 7-20.
[7]	Srinivasan T N.China, India and the world economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 2006: 3716-3727. doi: 10.2307/4418624
[8]	Wang Dehua, Wu Yang.Dragon and Elephant: Comparison Rapid Development between China and India in the 21st Century. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2003.
	[王德华, 吴扬. 龙与象:21世纪中印崛起的比较. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2003.]
[9]	Zhang Minqiu.Across the Himalayan Gap: A Chinses Quest for Urnderstanding Inida. Chongqing: Chongqing Press, 2006.
	[张敏秋. 跨越喜马拉雅障碍: 中国寻求了解印度. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2006.]
[10]	Yang Tianyu, Liu Hehe.The change of industrial structure and the difference of labor productivity growth between China and India. World Economy, 2012(5): 62-80.
	[杨天宇, 刘贺贺. 产业结构变迁与中印两国的劳动生产率增长差异. 世界经济, 2012(5): 62-80.]
[11]	Yao Guoyue, Liu Shenghua.A comparative study of land system between China and India. World Regional Studies, 2015, 24(2): 59-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2015.02.007
	[姚国跃, 刘胜华. 中国与印度土地制度及其效能比较研究. 世界地理研究, 2015, 24(2): 59-67.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2015.02.007
[12]	Shi Bingzhan.A comparison between China's and India's export growth: Based on the decomposition of range, price and quantity. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2011(4): 94-101.
	[施炳展. 中印出口增长方式比较: 基于广度、价格与数量的分解. 当代财经, 2011(4): 94-101.]
[13]	Deng Xiaoxia.Comparison of rural financial system between China and India [D]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2010.
	[邓晓霞. 中印农村金融体系比较[D]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2010.]
[14]	Wen Fude. The differences of urbanization progress in China and India and its reasons . South Asian Studies Quarterly, 2016(2): 48-54.
	[文富德. 中印人口城镇化进展差异及其原因比较. 南亚研究季刊, 2016(2): 48-54.]
[15]	Bhagat R B.Urban growth by city and town size in India. [Unpublished] 2005. Presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America Philadelphia Pennsylvania March 31-April, 2005.
[16]	Li Wenjing, Liu Hong.City size, spatial and temporal changes mechanism of urbanization in India and China. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology Social Sciences Edition, 2015, 30(5): 37-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7672.2015.05.004
	[李文静, 刘红. 中印城市规模、城市化时空变迁及其动力机制的对比研究. 华东理工大学学报社会科学版, 2015, 30(5): 37-48.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7672.2015.05.004
[17]	Mukherjee A, Zhang X.Rural industrialization in China and India: role of policies and institutions. World Development, 2007, 35(10): 1621-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.008
[18]	Zhou Yixing. Urban Geography.Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1995.
	[周一星. 城市地理学. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995.]
[19]	Yeh A G O, Xu X. Provincial variation of urbanization and urban primacy in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 1984, 18(3): 1-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01286467 pmid: 12279860

邦 (中央直辖区)	2011年人口(人)	城镇化率(%)	人口密度(人/km²)	邦 (中央直辖区)	2011年人口(人)	城镇化率(%)	人口密度(人/km²)
北方邦	199,581,477	26.17	828	恰蒂斯加尔邦	25,540,196	23.24	189
马哈拉施特拉邦	112,372,972	45.22	365	北阿坎德邦	10,116,752	30.23	189
比哈尔邦	103,804,637	11.30	1102	喜马偕尔邦	6,856,509	10.03	123
西孟加拉邦	91,347,736	31.87	1029	特里普拉邦	3,671,032	48.40	350
安得拉邦	84,665,533	33.36	308	梅加拉亚邦	2,964,007	20.07	132
中央邦	72,597,565	27.63	236	曼尼普尔邦	2,721,756	29.21	122
泰米尔纳德邦(马德拉斯邦)	72,138,958	23.21	555	那加兰邦	1,980,602	28.86	119
拉贾斯坦邦	68,621,012	24.87	201	果阿邦	1,457,723	62.17	394
卡纳塔克邦(迈索尔邦)	61,130,704	38.67	319	米佐位姆邦	1,091,014	52.11	52
古吉拉特邦	60,383,628	42.60	308	锡金邦	607,688	25.15	86
奥里萨邦	41,947,358	16.69	269	德里	16,753,235	97.50	9340
喀拉拉邦	33,387,677	47.70	859	本地治里	1,244,464	68.33	2598
贾坎德邦	32,966,238	24.05	414	昌迪加尔	1,054,686	97.25	9252
阿萨姆邦	31,169,272	14.10	397	安达曼和尼科巴群岛	379,944	37.70	46
旁遮普邦	27,704,236	37.48	550	达德拉—纳加尔哈维利	342,853	46.72	698
哈里亚纳邦	25,353,081	34.88	573	达曼和第乌	242,911	75.17	2169
查谟和克什米尔邦(印占)	12,548,926	27.38	56	拉克沙群岛	64,429	78.07	2013

年份	中国			印度
年份	Pearson相关性分析		Spearman相关性	Pearson相关性	Spearman相关性
1990/1991年	0.143	0.047		0.846^**	0.483^**
2000/2001年	0.706^**	0.393^**		0.820^**	0.441^**
2010/2011年	0.719^**	0.546^**		0.769^**	0.453^**

	中国			印度
	a		b	a	b
数值	10.7622	-0.8251		10.5622	-0.9380
拟合优度(R²)	0.9936		0.99

年份	中国			印度
年份	Pearson相关性		Spearman相关性	Pearson相关性	Spearman相关性
1950年城市规模与城市规模增长（1950-1980/1990年）	0.730^**	0.860^**		0.857^**	0.646^**
1950年城市规模与城市规模增长（1980/1990-2015年）	0.768^**	0.350^**		0.623^**	0.496^**
1980/1990年城市规模与城市规模增长（1980/1990-2015年）	0.796^**	0.440^**		0.848^**	0.737^**

年份	中国			印度
年份	Pearson相关性		Spearman相关性	Pearson相关性	Spearman相关性
到六大城市的距离与城市规模增长(1950-1980/1990年)	-0.053(0.301)	-0.146^**(0.004)		0.108(0.176)	0.155(0.050)
到六大城市的距离与城市规模增长(1980/1990-2015年)	-0.189^**(0.000)	-0.243^**(0.000)		0.016(0.837)	0.020(0.806)

Comparative research on regional differences in urbanization and spatial evolution of urban systems between China and India

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 19

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CAO Guangzhong, CHEN Sichuang, LIU Tao. Changing spatial patterns of internal migration to five major urban agglomerations in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1334-1349.
[2]	LIN Liyue, ZHU Yu, LIN Kun, KE Wenqian. Spatial pattern and determinants of migrants' urban housing purchase intention under the binary-locational household arrangements [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1350-1365.
[3]	SUN Pingjun, WANG Kewen. Identification and stage division of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1366-1379.
[4]	WEI Shimei, PAN Jinghu. Network structure resilience of cities at the prefecture level and above in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[5]	YANG Ren, PAN Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[6]	YIN Jiangbin, LI Shangqian, JIANG Lei, CHENG Zhe, HUANG Xiaoyan, LU Gaigai. The spatio-temporal variations and driving factors of non-farm employment growth in contiguous destitute areas of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[7]	HU Pan, CHEN Bo, SHI Peijun. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of rainstorm-induced flood disasters in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[8]	LIU Zhenhai, WANG Shaoqiang, CHEN Bin. Spatial and temporal variations of frozen ground and its vegetation response in the eastern segment of China-Mongolia-Russia economic corridor from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1231-1244.
[9]	GUO Xiangyang, MU Xueqing, DING Zhengshan, QIN Dongli. Nonlinear effects and driving mechanism of multidimensional urbanization on PM_2.5 concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1274-1293.
[10]	HUANG Xiaodong, MA Haitao, MIAO Changhong. Connectivity characteristics for city networks in China based on innovative enterprises [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[11]	WANG Lucang, LIU Haiyang, LIU Qing. China's city network based on Tencent's migration big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[12]	XIA Xingsheng, PAN Yaozhong, ZHU Xiufang, ZHANG Jinshui. Monthly calibration and optimization of Ångström-Prescott equation coefficients for agricultural comprehensive area in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[13]	YUAN Lihua, CHEN Xiaoqiang, SONG Changqing, CHENG Changxiu, SHEN Shi. Spatio-temporal patterns of geo-economics of the countries in the Indian Ocean Region: Based on merchandise trade volume data from 1992 to 2017 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 955-972.
[14]	WANG Shaojian, CUI Zitian, LIN Jingjie, XIE Jinyan, SU Kun. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991.
[15]	MA Zuopeng, LI Chenggu, ZHANG Pingyu. Characteristics, mechanism and response of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 767-780.