生计多样化背景下种植业非点源污染负荷演变

doi:10.11821/dlxb201607009

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on objective data collected from interviews in typical villages of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, this study presents three livelihood scenarios related to rural transformation development: agriculturally dominant livelihood, multiple-type livelihood and non-agriculturally dominant livelihood. Results indicated the following: (1) The current farmland pattern shows a trend of diversification as self-cultivation, cropland transfer and fallow in the sample region. Dynamic characteristics of cultivated land present a special feature that is more "transfer-into" than "transfer-out". Various scales of planting are represented among various households, according to the following decreasing order: half-labor household > non-labor household > adequate labor household. (2) The highest pollution loading produced by crop farming occurs in half-labor households while the lowest occurs in non-labor households. With the increase of labor, the pollution load per unit area tends to first increase and then decrease within families with enough labor. (3) As the type of livelihood transitions from agriculturally dominant to non-agriculturally dominant, the maximum reduction of total pollution loading produced by the agricultural industry can reach 72.01%. Compared to agriculturally dominant livelihoods, multiple-type livelihoods produce a pollution load reduction yield of 19.61%-29.85%, and non-agriculturally dominant livelihoods reduce the pollution load yield by 35.20%-72.01%. However, the rate of reduction of total nitrogen is not the same as total phosphorus. (4) The non-agricultural characteristics of labor allocation and income promote the transformation from dominant livelihood types to non-agricultural livelihoods, and potential revenue conversion follows a similar trend. In addition, different household types do not display identical conversion rates, according to the following decreasing order: enough labor household > half-labor household > non-labor household. (5) During rapid urbanization and the building of new industrial systems, the livelihood types of rural households have been further transformed to non-agricultural household types in the mountainous region; this process will lead to the further reduction of pollution load generated by planting and agriculture.

Key words: livelihood, crop farming, non-point source pollution, evolution, Three Gorges Reservoir area

Jianbing ZHONG, Jing'an SHAO, Yuzhu YANG. Characteristics of non-point source pollution load of crop farming undergoing the background of livelihood diversification[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1201-1214.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Tab.4

Fig. 3

Tab. 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Tab. 8

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 26

[1]	Liang Liutao, Qu Futian, Feng Shuyi.Study on eco-environmental problems and management system innovation in the process of rural development. Soft Science, 2010, 24(8): 53-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8409.2010.08.011
	[梁流涛, 曲福田, 冯淑怡. 农村发展中生态环境问题及其管理创新探讨. 软科学, 2010, 24(8): 53-57.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8409.2010.08.011
[2]	Liu Yansui.Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.06.001
	[刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.06.001
[3]	Rozelle S, Boisvert R N.Control in a dynamic village economy: The reforms and unbalanced development in China's rural economy. Journal of Development Economics, 1995, 46(2): 233-252. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(94)00060-P
[4]	Shui Shangnan.Options for agricultural business model: Capital farm or co-operative. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2013(8): 32-36.
	[税尚楠. 农业经营模式的选择: 资本农场或合作经营. 农业经济问题, 2013(8): 32-36.]
[5]	Ganesh C B, John F N, David C R.Energy savings by adopting precision agriculture in rural USA. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2012, 22(2): 1-5. doi: 10.1186/2192-0567-2-22
[6]	Walford N.Multifunctional agriculture a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Land Use Policy, 2005, 22(4): 387. doi: 10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.014_2.x
[7]	Yang Linzhang, Shi Weiming, Xue Lihong, et al.Reduce-retain-reuse-restore technology for the controlling the agricultural non-point source pollution in countryside in China: General countermeasures and technologies. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2013.01.001
	[杨林章, 施卫明, 薛利红, 等. 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践: 总体思路与“4R”治理技术. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(1): 1-8.] doi: 10.11654/jaes.2013.01.001
[8]	Li Xiufen, Zhu Jinzhao, Gu Xiaojun, et al.Current situation and control of agricultural non-point source pollution. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(4): 81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.04.014
	[李秀芬, 朱金兆, 顾晓君, 等. 农业面源污染现状与防治进展. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(4): 81-84.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.04.014
[9]	Zhang Yan, Gao Xiang, Zhang Hong.Association study between water quality of Chaohu Lake and resources input in agriculture of basin. Environmental Sciences, 2012, 33(9): 3009-3013.
	[张燕, 高翔, 张洪. 巢湖水质与流域农业投入的关联性研究. 环境科学, 2012, 33(9): 3009-3013.]
[10]	Zhong Jianbing, Shao Jing'an, Xie Deti, et al. Evaluation and changing characteristics of fertilizer input in different agricultural systems in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(11): 1372-1378. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.140340
	[钟建兵, 邵景安, 谢德体, 等. 三峡库区不同农业经营模式的肥料投入评估及其变化特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(11): 1372-1378.] doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.140340
[11]	Gong Qianwen, Zhang Junbiao, Li Jin.Impact factor of fertilizer inputs decision based on analysis of the survey data in Hubei Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2008(10): 65-70. doi: 10.3901/JME.2008.09.177
	[巩前文, 张俊飚, 李瑾. 农户施肥量决策的影响因素实证分析: 基于湖北省调查数据的分析. 农业经济问题, 2008(10): 65-70.] doi: 10.3901/JME.2008.09.177
[12]	Feng Xiaojie, Wei Chaofu, Xie Deti, et al.Effects of farm households management behavior upon non-point pollution of agriculture and model analysis. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(12): 354-358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.12.101
	[冯孝杰, 魏朝富, 谢德体,等. 农户经营行为的农业面源污染效应及模型分析. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(12): 354-358.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.12.101
[13]	Hou Jundong, Lv Jun, Yin Weifeng.Effects of farmer households' production and operation behaviors on rural eco-environment. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(3): 30-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.005
	[侯俊东, 吕军, 尹伟峰. 农户经营行为对农村生态环境影响研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(3): 30-35.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.005
[14]	Long Dongping, Li Tongsheng, Miao Yuanyuan, et al.Spatio-temporal characteristics and impacting factors of non-agriculturalization of China's rural population. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 517-530. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.009
	[龙冬平, 李同昇, 苗园园, 等. 中国农村人口非农化时空演变特征及影响因素. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 517-530.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.009
[15]	Zhao Chunyu, Su Qin, Fang Jueshu.The research system and methods of the rural labor's environment cognition in the employment transference's process. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(5): 891-901. doi: 10.11821/yj2013050012
	[赵春雨, 苏勤, 方觉曙. 农村劳动力转移就业环境认知研究体系与方法. 地理研究, 2013, 32(5): 891-901.] doi: 10.11821/yj2013050012
[16]	Zhang Wuwei, Zhang Fuming, Yang Xuecheng. The relationship between the transfer of surplus rural labor force and its land disposal: An analysis based on the survey data of 2421 agricultural transfer labor force in Shandong Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2009(3): 85-90.
	[张务伟, 张福明, 杨学成. 农业富余劳动力转移程度与其土地处置方式的关系: 基于山东省2421位农业转移劳动力调查资料的分析. 中国农村经济, 2009(3): 85-90.]
[17]	Sharma D K, Ghosh D, Alade J A.A fuzzy goal programming approach for regional rural development planning. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 176(1): 141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.09.080
[18]	Li Bin, Ma Jiujie.The study on impact of labor force transfer on innovation in agricultural production and operation organization innovation and impact of this innovation on change of urban-rural income gap. China Soft Science magazine, 2014(7): 60-76.
	[李宾, 马九杰. 劳动力转移、农业生产经营组织创新与城乡收人变化影响研究. 中国软科学, 2014(7): 60-76.]
[19]	Zhao Xueyan.Environmental perception of farmers of different livelihood strategies: A case of Gannan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(21): 6776-6787. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109211386
	[赵雪雁. 不同生计方式农户的环境感知: 以甘南高原为例. 生态学报, 2012, 32(21): 6776-6787.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201109211386
[20]	Ouyang Jinliang, Song Chunmei, Yu Zhenrong, et al.The farm household’s choice of land use type and its effectiveness on land quality and environment in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(1): 1-11. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2004.01.001
	[欧阳进良, 宋春梅, 宇振荣, 等. 黄淮海平原农区不同类型农户的土地利用方式选择及其环境影响: 以河北省曲周县为例. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 1-11.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2004.01.001
[21]	Luo Xiaojuan, Feng Shuyi, Reidsma Pytrik, et al.Simulation of agricultural and environmental policy response based on the farmer's bio economic model: A case study of Taihu River Basin. Chinese Rural Economy, 2013(11): 74-87.
	[罗小娟, 冯淑怡, Reidsma Pytrik, 等. 基于农户生物—经济模型的农业与环境政策响应模拟: 以太湖流域为例. 中国农村经济, 2013(11): 74-87.]
[22]	Long Tianyu, Cao Huailiang, An Qiang, et al.Spatial distribution of transfer pollution absorbed phosphorus load in slopefarmland of purple soil in Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(4): 157-164, 297. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.04.020
	[龙天渝, 曹怀亮, 安强, 等. 三峡库区紫色土坡耕地吸附态磷可迁移污染负荷空间分布. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(4): 157-164, 297.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.04.020
[23]	Beven K, Kirkby M J.A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Science Bulletin, 1979, 24(1): 43-69.
[24]	Chen Yucheng, Yang Zhimin, Chen Qinghua, et al.Source apportionment of agricultural non-point source pollution in Chongqing based on pressure-response system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(8): 2362-2369.
	[陈玉成, 杨志敏, 陈庆华, 等. 基于“压力—响应”态势的重庆市农业面源污染的源解析.中国农业科学, 2008, 41(8): 2362-2369.]
[25]	Zhong Jianbing, Shao Jing’an, Yang Yuzhu.Spatial distribution characteristics of pollution load of crop farming in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(7): 2150-2159.
	[钟建兵, 邵景安, 杨玉竹. 三峡库区(重庆段)种植业污染负荷空间分布特征. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(7): 2150-2159.]
[26]	Xu Ping, Zhang Zhengbin, Wang Jianzhong, et al.Development directions of Chinese agriculture in future. World Sci-tech R&D, 2004, 26(6): 65-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6055.2004.06.012
	[徐萍, 张正斌, 王建忠, 等. 中国农业的未来发展方向. 世界科技研究与发展, 2004, 26(6): 65-68.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6055.2004.06.012

年龄段(岁)	劳动力配置(人)
年龄段(岁)	仅务工	非劳动力	仅务农	务工为主兼务农	务农为主兼务工	总计
< 16	3	536	7	——	——	546
16~50	607	168	414	198	15	1402
50~65	25	23	427	45	9	529
> 65	1	77	253	4	2	337
总计	636	804	1101	247	26	2814

主导生计类型情景	主要生计资产	主导生计策略	土地依赖程度	土地流转强度	主要农户收益
农业主导生计	自然资产	农业生产	高	低	农产品
兼业转向生计	自然资产、人力资产	务农、兼业	较高	较强	非农收益、农产品
非农主导生计	人力资产、社会资产	务工	低	强	非农收益

样区名称	TN取值范围	TN均值	TP取值范围	TP均值
巫山样区	0.0675~0.3902	0.1221	0.0401~0.2321	0.0726
武隆样区	0.0485~0.4906	0.1006	0.0289~0.2919	0.0598

家庭类型	户均“劳动力”(人)	实际耕种^*	承包地^*	转入^*	转出^*	退耕地^*	撂荒地^*	TN^**	TP^**	总负荷量^**
劳动力家庭	1	9.02	17.93	1.11	2.16	6.69	1.17	35.70	18.02	53.72
	2	6.44	9.77	1.18	0.73	3.05	0.72	34.15	19.30	53.45
	3	7.00	9.22	1.67	0.96	2.22	0.70	38.45	20.19	58.64
	4	4.72	7.96	1.18	0.85	3.00	0.55	35.69	21.70	57.39
	5	4.79	8.38	0.38	0.13	3.00	0.84	28.77	19.09	47.86
半劳动力家庭	1	10.43	25.16	1.52	4.16	9.72	2.36	33.02	23.06	56.08
半劳动力家庭	2	11.34	22.55	1.81	1.57	9.82	1.64	37.53	23.40	60.92
无劳动力家庭	—	8.66	24.89	1.82	3.10	11.74	3.21	30.35	16.85	47.20
均值	—	6.81	11.21	1.31	1.06	3.79	0.87	35.59	19.98	55.57

农户生计类型	总负荷量	TN	TP
农业主导生计	17.22~16.22	11.59~11.88	5.63~4.33
兼业转向生计	13.04~12.08	9.45~8.76	3.58~3.33
非农主导生计	10.51~4.82	8.49~1.97	2.02~2.85

Characteristics of non-point source pollution load of crop farming undergoing the background of livelihood diversification

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 26

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

农户类型	主导生计类型	总负荷量	TN	TP
劳动力家庭	农业主导生计	14.46~13.63	9.73~9.98	4.73~3.64
	兼业转向生计	11.09~10.29	8.04~7.45	3.05~2.84
	非农主导生计	8.83~4.05	7.13~1.65	1.70~2.39
半劳动力家庭	农业主导生计	1.99~1.88	1.34~1.38	0.65~0.50
	兼业转向生计	1.58~1.53	1.10~1.06	0.48~0.47
	非农主导生计	1.22~0.56	0.98~0.23	0.23~0.33
无劳动力家庭	农业主导生计	0.76~0.71	0.51~0.52	0.25~0.19
	兼业转向生计	0.56~0.46	0.44~0.37	0.11~0.09
	非农主导生计	0.46~0.21	0.37~0.09	0.09~0.13

家庭类型	户有“劳动力”(人)	户均人数	仅务工	无劳动力	仅务农	务工为主兼务农	务农为主兼务工
劳动力家庭	1	2.95	0.61	0.48	1.55	0.29	0.01
	2	4.66	0.97	1.57	1.65	0.40	0.06
	3	4.65	1.10	1.47	1.56	0.48	0.04
	4	5.52	2.01	1.49	1.48	0.52	0.01
	5	6.35	2.06	2.00	1.76	0.53	-
半劳动力家庭	1	1.73	0.03	0.16	1.35	0.14	0.05
半劳动力家庭	2	2.11	0.05	0.20	1.75	0.11	-
无劳动力家庭	-	1.76	0.02	0.12	1.61	-	-
均值	-	4.07	0.92	1.16	1.59	0.36	0.04

农户家庭类型	户有“劳动力”(人)	非农收入	种植业收入	养殖业收入	资助性收入	总收入
劳动力家庭	1	6335.43	244.25	921.22	1248.00	8748.90
	2	6565.66	579.68	700.35	681.03	8526.73
	3	7167.32	667.82	1246.90	438.14	9520.18
	4	8242.03	638.33	436.72	402.26	9719.34
	5	9952.04	669.19	655.09	255.39	11531.71
半劳动力家庭	1	1098.44	360.31	928.78	1501.07	3888.60
半劳动力家庭	2	1347.46	348.56	1674.15	1547.25	4917.42
无劳动力家庭	-	523.60	305.22	759.58	1775.10	3363.50
均值	-	6561.05	560.84	870.35	684.79	8677.01

农户生计类型	劳动力家庭			半劳动力家庭			无劳动力家庭
农户生计类型	户均		人均		户均	人均	户均	人均
农业主导生计	9650.16	2099.66		7565.44	3865.86		4623.30	2632.71
兼业转向生计	55906.36	12164.00		7565.44	3865.86		4669.72	2659.14
非农主导生计	58935.70	12823.12		13930.70	7118.44		4669.72	2659.14

[1]	LU Lin, ZHANG Qingyuan, HUANG Jianfeng, REN Yisheng. A theoretical research and prospect of tourism destination evolution based on a glocalization perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1504-1520.
[2]	KONG Fanbiao, CHEN Haitao, XU Shujian, MIAO Xiaodong. Dust accumulation processes and palaeoenvironmental significance of loess indicated by grain size in Zhangqiu, Shandong Province [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1163-1176.
[3]	ZHU Zheng, ZHU Xiang, LI Shuangshuang. Evolution process and characteristics of spatial structure of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 799-817.
[4]	HUANG Chunchang. Palaeoflood deposits in the Zoige Basin and the enlightening on the formation of the Yellow River drainage systemon the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 612-625.
[5]	LI Wenlong, KUANG Wenhui, LYU Jun, ZHAO Zhonghua. Adaptive evolution mechanism of rural human-land system in farming-and-pastoral areas of northern China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 487-502.
[6]	CHAI Yuanfang, DENG Jinyun, YANG Yunping, SUN Zhaohua, LI Yitian, ZHU Lingling. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of the water level at the same discharge in the Jingjiang reach of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 101-113.
[7]	HUANG Hai, TIAN You, LIU Jiankang, ZHANG Jiajia, YANG Dongxu, YANG Shun. The mechanism and sensitivity analysis of soil freeze-thaw erosion on slope in eastern Tibet [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(1): 87-100.
[8]	FANG Shimin, HUANG Yan. Spatiotemporal evolutions and coordination of tourism efficiency and scale in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1757-1772.
[9]	YANG Qingyuan, LUO Kui, LAO Xin. Evolution and enlightenment of foreign spatial planning: Exploration from the perspective of geography [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1223-1236.
[10]	WEI Suhao, LI Jing, LI Zeyi, ZONG Gang. Spatio-temporal evolution and its influencing factors of China's agricultural competitiveness [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[11]	CUI Yaoping, LIU Xuan, LI Dongyang, DENG Qingxin, XU Jianing, SHI Xinyu, QIN Yaochen. Urban spatial correlation characteristics and intrinsic mechanism in the Yangtze River Delta region [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1301-1315.
[12]	WANG Shaojian, GAO Shuang, HUANG Yongyuan, SHI Chenyi. Spatio-temporal evolution and trend prediction of urban carbon emission performance in China based on super-efficiency SBM model [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.
[13]	LIU Fenliang, GAO Hongshan, LI Zongmeng, PAN Baotian, SU Huai. Terraces development and their implications for valley evolution of the Jinsha River from Qiaojia to Menggu [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5): 1095-1105.
[14]	LI Luqi, WU Qiyan, LIU Kewen, LIANG Shuangbo, QIAN Chaofeng. Spatial evolution of Eurasian land and sea transport accessibility from the historical perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 804-819.
[15]	LIU Min, HAO Wei. Spatial distribution and its influencing factors of national A-level tourist attractions in Shanxi Province [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 878-888.