城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望

doi:10.11821/dlxb201502013

Abstract

Abstract:

As a fundamental supplying carrier of natural ecosystem services in urban areas, ecological land couples human social development and natural ecological succession based on the inherent correlation between land use and land cover. Thus spatial optimization of ecological land has gradually become a vital and comprehensive approach to address the conflicts between urban development and ecological conservation. The measurement of urban ecological land demand can directly determine the equilibrium between supply and demand for ecological land, which is a significant step in overall planning and management of urban ecological land. After a systematic review of the concept of ecological land, the similarities and differences between ecological demands and ecological land demands are discussed in this paper. Then a conceptual space-function framework for measuring urban ecological land demand is proposed. Within this framework methodologies of measuring urban ecological land fall into three categories, namely experimental predication, ecosystem services and spatial patterns. In details, the category of experimental predication includes legal quota and historical trend methods. The methods of ecological footprint and carbon-oxygen equilibrium belong to the category of ecosystem services, while the method of ecological security pattern is included in the spatial patterns category. By methodological principles analysis, the advantages and disadvantages of these methods are comparatively discussed and summarized in terms of comprehensiveness, representativeness, threshold and area, and location. Finally, four key directions of future research are presented: urban ecological land classification related to ecological functions, comprehensive efficiency measurement on urban ecological land focusing on spatial patterns of ecological land, functional tradeoff of urban ecological land using multi-target scenarios, and urban ecological hinterland recognition based on ecological land supply-demand balance analysis.

Key words: urban ecological land demand measurement, experimental predication, ecosystem services, ecological security pattern, urban ecological hinterland, research progress and prospect

Jian PENG, An WANG, Yanxu LIU, Jing MA, Jiansheng WU. Research progress and prospect on measuring urban ecological land demand[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 333-346.

Figures/Tables 4

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

References 63

[1]	Daily G C, Matson P A.Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(28): 9455-9456.
[2]	Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M et al. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(28): 9457-9464.
[3]	Rodriguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M et al. Tradeoffs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28-42.
[4]	Bennett E M, Balvanera P.The future of production systems in a globalized world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007, 5(4): 191-198.
[5]	Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A.Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(Suppl. 1): 3665-3672.
[6]	Platt R H, Rowan A R, Pamela C M.The ecological city: Preserving and Restoring Urban Biodiversity. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press, 1994.
[7]	Gunawardhana L N, Kazama S, Kawagoe S.Impact of urbanization and climate change on aquifer thermal regimes. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(13): 3247-3276.
[8]	Liu Zhenhuan, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian et al. Using ISA to analyze the spatial pattern of urban land cover change: A case study in Shenzhen. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(7): 961-971.
	[刘珍环, 王仰麟, 彭建等. 基于不透水表面指数的城市地表覆被格局特征: 以深圳市为例. 地理学报, 2011, 66(7): 961-971.]
[9]	Li Feng, Ye Yaping, Song Bowen et al. Spatial structure of urban ecological land and its dynamic development of ecosystem services: A case study in Changzhou City, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5623-5631.
	[李锋, 叶亚平, 宋博文等. 城市生态用地的空间结构及其生态系统服务动态演变: 以常州市为例. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5623-5631.]
[10]	Su Weizhong, Yang Guishan, Zhen Feng.Ecological land fragmentation and its connectivity with urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(12): 1309-1317.
	[苏伟忠, 杨桂山, 甄峰. 长江三角洲生态用地破碎度及其城市化关联. 地理学报, 2007, 62(12): 1309-1317.]
[11]	Dong Yawen, Zhou Wen, Zhou Lan et al. Ecological protect ion in urbanization distinct: A case study of Nanjing city, Jiangsu Province. Urban Research, 1999(2): 6-10.
	[董雅文, 周雯, 周岚等. 城市化地区生态防护研究: 以江苏省南京市为例. 城市研究. 1999(2): 6-10.]
[12]	Deng Xiaowen, Sun Yichao, Han Shijie.General principles of urban ecological land classification and planning. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(10): 2003-2006.
	[邓小文, 孙贻超, 韩士杰. 城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(10): 2003-2006.]
[13]	Wang Zhenjian, Li Ruxue.Classification, ecosystem service, protection and utilization of the urban ecological land: A case study of Liaocheng City. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(6): 306-308.
	[王振健, 李如雪. 城市生态用地分类、功能及其保护利用研究: 以山东聊城市为例. 水土保持研究, 2006, 13(6): 306-308.]
[14]	He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, Li Jinggang et al. Scenarios simulation land use change in the northern China by system dynamic model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(4): 599-607.
	[何春阳, 史培军, 李景刚等. 中国北方未来土地利用变化情景模拟. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 599-607.]
[15]	Tang Shuang'e. The Definition and scopes of ecological land in law. Ecological Economy, 2009(7): 190-193.
	[唐双娥.法学视角下生态用地的内涵与外延. 生态经济, 2009(7): 190-193.]
[16]	Liu Xin, Gu Yu, Deng Hongbin.Importance assessment of ecological land protection in Jiangxi Province. China Environmental Science, 2010, 30(5): 716-720.
	[刘昕, 谷雨, 邓红兵. 江西省生态用地保护重要性评价研究. 中国环境科学, 2010, 30(5): 716-720.]
[17]	Xu Jian, Zhou Yankang, Jin Xiaobin et al. Discussing virgin land classification subsystem based on the protection of the eco-environment. Resources Science, 2007, 29(2): 137-141.
	[徐健, 周寅康, 金晓斌等. 基于生态保护对土地利用分类系统未利用地的探讨. 资源科学, 2007, 29(2): 137-141.]
[18]	Yue Jian, Zhang Xuemei.A discussion on classification of land use in China. Arid Land Geography, 2003, 26(l): 111-123.
	[岳健, 张雪梅. 关于我国土地利用分类问题的讨论. 干旱区地理, 2003, 26(l): 111-123.]
[19]	Chen Jing, Shi Peijun.Discussion on functional land use classification system. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2005, 41(5): 536-540.
	[陈婧, 史培军. 土地利用功能分类探讨. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 41(5): 536-540.]
[20]	Deng Hongbin, Chen Chundi, Liu Xin et al. Conception and function classification of regional ecological land. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1519-1524.
	[邓红兵, 陈春娣, 刘昕等. 区域生态用地的概念及分类. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1519-1524.]
[21]	Wen Rui, Wu Yuzhe.An Investigation on influences of implementing new code of land use classification on land Administration in China. Resources Science, 2010, 32(4): 731-736.
	[文锐, 吴宇哲. 《土地利用现状分类》实施对中国土地管理影响之管见. 资源科学, 2010, 32(4): 731-736.]
[22]	Guo Rongchao, Miao Changhong.A study on the eco-spatial structure of the urban group. Economic Geography, 2007, 27(1): 104-107.
	[郭荣朝, 苗长虹. 城市群生态空间结构研究. 经济地理, 2007, 27(1): 104-107.]
[23]	Chen Shuang, Liu Yunxia, Peng Lihua.Dynamics of urban ecological space evolution and policy responses: A case study of Nanjing City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 2270-2278.
	[陈爽, 刘云霞, 彭立华. 城市生态空间演变规律及调控机制. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2270-2278.]
[24]	Yu Kongjian, Qiao Qing,Li Dihua et al. Ecological land use in three towns of eastern Beijing: A case study based on landscape security pattern analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(8): 1932-1939.
	[俞孔坚, 乔青, 李迪华等. 基于景观安全格局分析的生态用地研究: 以北京市东三乡为例. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8): 1932-1939.]
[25]	Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Liu Song et al. Research on landscape ecology and sustainable land use. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2004, 40(1): 154-160.
	[彭建, 王仰麟, 刘松等. 景观生态学与土地可持续利用研究, 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 40(1): 154-160.]
[26]	Pei Bin, Pan Tao.Land use system dynamic modeling: Literature review and future research direction in China. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(9): 1060-1066.
	[裴彬, 潘韬. 土地利用系统动态变化模拟研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(9): 1060-1066.]
[27]	Huang Qiuhao, Cai Yunlong.Review on several domestic land use change models. China Land Science, 2005, 19(25): 25-30.
	[黄秋昊, 蔡运龙. 国内几种土地利用变化模型述评. 中国土地科学, 2005, 19(25): 25-30.]
[28]	Jie Xiuping, Zhou Jie, Zhang Hailong et al. LUCC analysis of Xi'an Region based on landscape ecology and Markov model. Resources Science, 2006, 26(6): 175-181.
	[解修平, 周杰, 张海龙等. 基于景观生态和马尔可夫过程的西安地区土地利用变化分析. 资源科学, 2006, 26(6): 175-181.]
[29]	Bagliani M, Galli A, Niccolucci V et al. Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: The case of the Province of Siena (Italy). Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 86(2): 354-364.
[30]	Wackernagel M, Yount J D.Footprints for sustainability: The next steps. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2000, 2(1): 23-44.
[31]	Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Chen Yanfei et al. Economic value of urban ecosystem services: A case study in Shenzhen. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 2005, 41(4): 594-604.
	[彭建, 王仰麟, 陈燕飞等. 城市生态系统服务功能价值评估初探: 以深圳市为例. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 41(4): 594-604.]
[32]	Folke C, Kautsky N.The ecological footprint: Communicating human dependence on nature's work. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32: 351-355.
[33]	Xie G D, Cao S, Lu C et al. Human's consumption of ecosystem services and ecological debt in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 43-51.
[34]	Chen Yong, Mao Changbao, Cheng Lin.A study on eco-optimum population in different parts of China using theory of ecological footprint. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(2): 560-566.
	[陈勇, 茆长宝, 程琳. 基于地区生态足迹差异的生态适度人口研究. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(2): 560-566.]
[35]	Zhang Jiankun, Wang Chaoyang, Wang Biao.A study on industrial ecological optimum population based ecological footprint: A case study of Nanjing City. Human Geography, 2010, 25(6): 89-92.
	[张建坤, 王朝阳, 王彪. 基于生态足迹的产业适度人口分析: 以南京市为例. 人文地理, 2010, 25(6): 89-92.]
[36]	Peng Jian, Wu Jiansheng, Jiang Yiyi et al. Shortcomings of applying ecological footprints to the ecological assessment of regional sustainable development. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(8): 2716-2722.
	[彭建, 吴健生, 蒋依依等. 生态足迹分析应用于区域可持续发展生态评估的缺陷. 生态学报, 2006, 26(8): 2716-2722.]
[37]	An Baosheng, Cheng Guodong.Dynamic analysis of the ecological footprint and carrying capacity of Tibet. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(4): 1002-1009.
	[安宝晟, 程国栋. 西藏生态足迹与承载力动态分析. 生态学报, 2014, 34(4): 1002-1009.]
[38]	Wang Wei.An approach on ecosystem services classification and valuation. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(11): 1314-1316.
	[王伟. 生态系统服务功能分类与价值评估探讨. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(11): 1314-1316.]
[39]	Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong.A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.
	[欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.]
[40]	Zhang Ying, Wang Qun, Li Bianjiang et al. Study on for ecasting ecological land demand with carbon-oxygen balance method. China Land Science, 2007, 21(6): 23-28.
	[张颖, 王群, 李边疆等. 应用碳氧平衡法测算生态用地需求量实证研究. 中国土地科学, 2007, 21(6): 23-28.]
[41]	Wu Tao, Yang Muzhuang, Zhen Yanmin.Supply and demand of Guangzhou ecological land. Journal of Anhui Agri.Sci., 15: 202-204.
	[吴涛, 杨木壮, 郑延敏. 广州市生态用地供需测算. 广东农业科学, 2012, 15: 202-204.]
[42]	Niu Yanqiong, Li Shuangjiang, Luo Xiao et al. Study on ecological land demand of Shijiazhuang City based on carbon-oxygen balance method. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences. 2012, 40(12): 7325-7327.
	[牛彦琼, 李双江, 罗晓等. 基于碳氧平衡法的石家庄生态用地需求研究. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(12): 7325-7327.]
[43]	Gui Lide.Relationship between urbanization level and ecological land demand and supply in Lanzhou city. Bulletion of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(4): 298-302.
	[贵立德. 兰州市城镇化水平与其生态用地的供求关系. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(4): 298-302.]
[44]	Tang Jie, Mao Zilong, Wang Chenye et al. Regional land use struction optimization based on carbon balance: A case study Tongyu county, Jilin province. Resources Science, 2009, 31(1): 130-135.
	[汤洁, 毛子龙, 王晨野等. 基于碳平衡的区域土地利用结构优化: 以吉林省通榆县为例. 资源科学, 2009, 31(1): 130-135.]
[45]	Qu Yi, Su Bangrong,Ou Minghao et al. Optimization of land use quantity structure based on ecological land constraints. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(1): 155-161.
	[曲艺, 舒帮荣, 欧名豪等. 基于生态用地约束的土地利用数量结构优化. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(1): 155-161.]
[46]	Termorshuizen J W, Opdam P.Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24(8): 1037-1052.
[47]	Yu K J.Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36(1): 1-17.
[48]	Zhou Rui, Wang Xinjun, Su Hailong et al. Identification and security pattern of ecological land in Pingdingshan newly developed area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 1-12.
	[周锐, 王新军, 苏海龙等. 平顶山新区生态用地的识别与安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2014, 35(6): 1-12.]
[49]	Xiao Dunin, Chen Wenbo, Guo Fuliang.On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(3): 354-358.
	[肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(3): 354-358.]
[50]	Kang Xiangwu, Liu Xuehua.Construction of regional ecological security pattern for Shunyi District, Beijing. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 23(10): 71-78.
	[康相武, 刘雪华. 北京顺义区域生态安全格局构建. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009, 23(10): 71-78.]
[51]	Li Yonghong, Xiang Bao, Yuan Xingzhong et al. Ecological security patterns for regional landscapes: A case in the Cheng-Yu economic zone. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2013, 21(1): 18-24.
	[李咏红, 香宝, 袁兴中等. 区域尺度景观生态安全格局构建: 以成渝经济区为例. 草地学报, 2013, 21(1): 18-24.]
[52]	Li Y, Sun X, Zhu X, Cao H.An early warning method of landscape ecological security in rapid urbanizing coastal areas and its application in Xiamen, China. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(19): 2251-2260.
[53]	Yu Kongjian, Wang Sisi,Li Dihua et al. The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth framework in Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(3): 1189-1204.
	[俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华等. 北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1189-1204.]
[54]	Su S, Li D, Yu X et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2011, 25(6): 737-746.
[55]	Xie Hualin, Li Xiubin.A method for identifying spatial structure of regional critical ecological land based on GIS. Resources Science, 2011, 33(1):112-119.
	[谢花林, 李秀彬. 基于GIS的区域关键性生态用地空间结构识别方法探讨. 资源科学, 2011, 33(1):112-119.]
[56]	Fang Shubo, Xiao Dunin, An Shuqing.Regional ecosecurity pattern in urban area based on land use analysis: A case study in Lanzhou. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(12): 2284-2290.
	[方淑波, 肖笃宁, 安树青. 基于土地利用分析的兰州市城市区域生态安全格局研究. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(12): 2284-2290.]
[57]	Li Hui, Yi Na, Yao Wenjing et al. Shangri-La county ecological land use planning based on landscape security pattern. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(20): 5928-5936.
	[李晖, 易娜, 姚文璟等. 基于景观安全格局的香格里拉县生态用地规划. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20): 5928-5936.]
[58]	Su Yongxian, Zhang Hong'ou, Chen Xiuzhi et al. The ecological security patterns and construction land expansion simulation in Gaoming. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 1524-1534.
	[苏泳娴, 张虹鸥, 陈修治等. 佛山市高明区生态安全格局和建设用地扩展预案. 生态学报, 2013, 33(5):1524-1534.]
[59]	Li Shuangcheng, Liu Jinlong, Zhang Caiyu et al. The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2011, 66(12): 1618-1630.
	[李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉等. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1618-1630.]
[60]	Peng Jian, Jiang Yiyi, Li Zhengguo et al. Evaluation of land use efficiency: A case study of Jiangnin County. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2005, 14(3): 304-309.
	[彭建, 蒋依依, 李正国等. 快速城市化地区土地利用效益评价: 以南京市江宁区为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 304-309.]
[61]	Wang Rusong, Ouyang Zhiyun.Some considerations with scientific views on ecological security in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007, 22(3): 223-229.
	[王如松, 欧阳志云. 对我国生态安全的若干科学思考. 中国科学院院刊, 2007, 22(3): 223-229.]
[62]	Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Jing Juan et al. Research on integrated regional planning of urban landscape functions: A case study in Shenzhen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(7): 1714-1719.
	[彭建, 王仰麟, 景娟等. 城市景观功能的区域协调规划: 以深圳市为例. 生态学报, 2005, 25(7): 1714-1719.]
[63]	Wang Baojun, Song Cui'e. Fu Hua. Tentative study of urban eco-hinterland: On Beijing's urban eco-hinterland's construction. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 2008, 21(1): 9-12.
	[王宝钧, 宋翠娥, 傅桦. 城市生态腹地的初步研究: 兼论北京城市生态腹地构建. 城市环境与城市生态, 2008, 21(1): 9-12.]

类型	学科视角	提出背景	关注点	判定标准	代表人物
生态中心	生态学	自然资源遭到破坏,生态用地未受到重视	生态用地所提供的生态功能	凡是具有生态功能的土地（广义）	岳健^[18] 郭荣朝^[22]
生态中心	生态学	自然资源遭到破坏,生态用地未受到重视	生态用地所提供的生态功能	以生态功能为主的土地（狭义）	陈爽^[23] 俞孔坚^[24]
人类中心	法学	人与生态用地关系不明确,缺乏有效保护制度	生态用地保护对土地权利人的权利和义务可能产生的影响	保障人类生态安全、以发挥生态功能为主的用地	唐双娥^[15]

类型	模型	基本思路	优点	缺点
经验判定法	法定定额	各级政府、部门、组织、制定并颁布实施的法律、法规、规范、标准	简单明确、易操作	指标阈值缺少科学性;城市特点考虑不足;编制主体混乱、权责不明
经验判定法	历史趋势预判	基于历史规律通过模型预景未来土地变化	规避复杂分析,基于过去预测未来	无法阐释社会经济系统与自然生态系统的内在关联机理;缺乏主动干预
生态系统服务法	生态足迹	利用生物生产性用地测算自然、人类对生态功能的供给与需求	综合核算自然生态系统与人类社会经济系统的生物生产功能与需求	生态功能代表性不强;难以确定城市自身所应承担的功能阈值
生态系统服务法	碳氧平衡	利用绿色植物固碳释氧量与城市的排碳耗氧量评估碳氧平衡、测算生态用地需求	综合关注人类个体的生理需求与经济活动的生产需求	生态功能代表性不强;城市尺度应用有限;难以确定城市与外界的气体交换
空间格局法	生态安全格局	通过景观过程分析和模拟判别关键性景观要素及其空间位置	生态功能代表性强;同时确定数量规模与空间分布	未能耦合自然生态系统与人类经济社会系统;基于供给核算需求

Research progress and prospect on measuring urban ecological land demand

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 63

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	YAN Yan,YAO Liuyang,LANG Liangming,ZHAO Minjuan. Revaluation of ecosystem services in inland river basins of China: Based on meta-regression analysis [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.
[2]	Feng CHEN, Hongbo LI, Anlu ZHANG. Ecological risk assessment based on terrestrial ecosystem services in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[3]	ZENG Li,LI Jing,LI Ting,YANG Xiaonan,WANG Yanze. Optimizing spatial patterns of water conservation ecosystem service based on Bayesian belief networks [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
[4]	CAO Qiwen,ZHANG Xiwen,MA Hongkun,WU Jiansheng. Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services: ESRISK [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.
[5]	QIAN Caiyun,GONG Jie,ZHANG Jinxi,LIU Dongqing,MA Xuecheng. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 868-879.
[6]	PENG Jian, LI Huilei, LIU Yanxu, HU Yi'na, YANG Yang. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong'an New Area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 701-710.
[7]	Lin MA, Hao LIU, Jian PENG, Jiansheng WU. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
[8]	Jian PENG, Xiaoxu HU, Mingyue ZHAO, Yanxu LIU, Lu TIAN. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.
[9]	Cheng MA, Xiaoyue WANG, Yaxin ZHANG, Shuangcheng LI. Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 974-985.
[10]	Yijie SUN, Zhiyuan REN, Shengnan ZHAO, Jing ZHANG. Spatial and temporal changing analysis of synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services in valley basins of Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3): 521-532.
[11]	Pengtao WANG, Liwei ZHANG, Yingjie LI, Lei JIAO, Hao WANG, Junping YAN, Yihe LÜ, Bojie FU. Spatio-temporal characteristics of the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River Basin [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 2064-2078.
[12]	Mengtao LI, Zhongxue ZHOU. Positive and negative ecosystem services evaluation and its spatial pattern analysis on urban landscape: A case study of Xi'an City [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1215-1230.
[13]	Liwei ZHANG, Bojie FU, Yihe LÜ, Zhibao DONG, Yingjie LI, Yuan ZENG, Bingfang WU. The using of composite indicators to assess the conservational effectiveness of ecosystem services in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(5): 768-780.
[14]	Shengfa LI, Xiubin LI. Progress and prospect on farmland abandonment [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 370-389.
[15]	Guangdong LI, Chuanglin FANG. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.