中国县域国土空间集约利用计量测度与影响机理

doi:10.11821/dlxb201412001

Abstract

Abstract:

Land use issue is an important constraining force for economic sustainable development of China. Urban and rural rapid expansion depletes valued land resources under the background of rapid urbanization. An extensive use pattern might cause a serious waste of land resources. The study on influencing mechanism of land intensive use (LIU) in China at the county level is an important tool for effective LIU practice and policy-making. This paper uses OLS model, Spatial Panel Lagged model and Spatial Panel Error model to characterize the influencing mechanisms of five class factors and 17 variables supported by GIS (Geographic Information System) and MATLAB. And a comprehensive data set, including physical geography attributes and socio-economic information with 2286 counties, was developed. Meanwhile, the spatiotemporal pattern of LIU has been discussed by means of GIS. The results show that Spatial Panel Data models are slightly superior to OLS model in terms of significance and confidence level. Regression results of these models indicate that industrialization, urbanization, economic development level, location, transportation and policy have significant impact on LIU of counties. The variables of physical geography are less significant than socio-economic variables. An ignored variable of historical factor, however, became the most significant factor. In the future, the LIU at the county level should enhance favorable factors and reduce disadvantageous ones, which can be acquired by improving the entire level and quality of industrialization and urbanization. We argued that an efficient and complete land market and operating system should be built to reflect market-oriented activities at the first place. Then, according to regional differences, differential LIU regulation policies and measurements should be optimized. Meanwhile, we should pay close attention to the carrying capacity of local resources and environments when conducting LIU practices.

Key words: land intensive use, national territory, quantitative measure, influencing mechanism, influencing factors, spatial econometrics models, GIS, county, China

Guangdong LI, Chuanglin FANG. Quantitative measure and influencing mechanism of land intensive use in China at the county level[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(12): 1739-1752.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 1

Timetable for regional preferential policies of China, 1979-2010

批准年份	类型与数量	区域	批准年份	类型与数量	区域
1979	3 SEZ	深圳、珠海、汕头	1999	1WDS	西部地区
1980	1 SEZ	厦门	2000	11 ETDZ	合肥、郑州、成都、长沙、西安、昆明、贵阳、石河子、南昌、西宁、呼和浩特
1984	14 COC; 10 ETDZ	天津、上海、大连、秦皇岛、烟台、青岛、连云港、南通、宁波、温州、福州、广州、湛江、北海;大连、秦皇岛、烟台、青岛、宁波、湛江、天津、连云港、南通、广州	2001	4 ETDZ	南宁、太原、银川、拉萨
1985	1 ETDZ; 3 COEZ	福州;长江三角洲、珠江三角洲、闽东南地区、环渤海地区	2002	2 ETDZ	兰州、南京
1986	2 ETDZ	上海 (闵行)、上海 (虹桥)	2003	1 RNEC	东北地区老工业基地
1988	OCB; 1 SEZ; 1 ETDZ	沿海经济带;海南;上海 (漕河泾)	2004	1RCCP	中部地区
1989	1 ETDZ	厦门 (海沧)	2005	1NSRTD	浦东新区
1990	1 PD; 1 ETDZ	浦东新区、上海 (金桥)	2006	1ELD;1BH;1 NSRTD	东部地区;滨海新区
1992	13 BA; 10 MC;13BECZ;AC; 5 ETDZ	黑河、绥芬河、珲春、满洲里、二连浩特、伊宁、塔城、博乐、瑞丽、畹町、河口、凭祥、东兴;温州、昆山、营口、威海、福清 (福清融侨)、海南 (洋浦)	2007	4 NSRTD	重庆市、成都市;武汉城市圈、长株潭城市群
1993	12 ETDZ; 1 ETDZ	东山、沈阳、杭州、萧山、广州(南沙)、惠州 (大亚湾)、武汉、芜湖、长春、哈尔滨、重庆、宁波 (大榭)	2009	2 ETDZ;1 NSRTD	廊坊、扬州;深圳市
1994	2 ETDZ; 1 ETDZ	北京、乌鲁木齐、苏州 (工业园)	2010	1 SEZ 1LJ 1 NSRTD 32 ETDZ	喀什;重庆;沈阳;锦州、大连(长兴岛)、吉林、宾西、海林、日照、潍坊、东营、马鞍山、安庆、徐州、镇江、绍兴、嘉兴、湖州、漳州、泉州、增城、襄樊、黄石、岳阳、常德、井冈山、赣州、九江、金昌、天水、曲靖、德阳、广安、遵义、万州、陕西省航天、陕西省航空、临沂

Tab. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Quantitative analysis results of influencing factors for LIU in China at the county level

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
	OLS	SAR 时空固定 (ML)	SAR 时间固定 (ML)	SEM 时空固定 (ML)	SEM 时间固定 (ML)
α	-0.001493^***
α	(-2.6120)
LNGDP	0.000138^***	0.000453^***		0.000459^***
LNGDP	(2.1139)	(7.5172)		(7.5232)
LNPOP	-0.000148	-0.000179		-0.000165
LNPOP	(-0.9617)	(-1.3779)		(-1.2498)
IND	0.001056^***	0.002470^***		0.001763^***
IND	(3.2009)	(8.8279)		(3.4884)
URBAN	0.002233^***	0.005983^***		0.002536^***
URBAN	(7.4161)	(3.5428)		(9.3160)
POLICY	0.000251^***	0.000551^***		0.000561^***
POLICY	(8.5146)	(8.7210)		(8.7705)
LNELV	-0.000167^***		-0.000144^***		-0.000168^***
LNELV	(-4.7297)		(-4.0509)		(-4.6797)
LNSLOPE	-0.000062^***		-0.000059^**		-0.000063^***
LNSLOPE	(-2.6428)		(-2.5075)		(-2.6210)
LNRAI	0.000131		0.000127		0.000132
LNRAI	(1.6255)		(1.4923)		(1.5947)
LNTEM	0.000056		0.000052^**		0.000056
LNTEM	(1.5794)		(2.0475)		(1.5465)
LNWATER	0.000005^***		0.000005^***		0.000005^***
LNWATER	(5.9565)		(16.2101)		(15.2856)
LNDIST_PORT1	-0.000101^**		-0.000093^***		-0.000101^*
LNDIST_PORT1	(-1.9987)		(-2.7832)		(-1.9835)
LNDIST_PORT2	-0.000065^**		-0.000060^***		-0.000065^*
LNDIST_PORT2	(-1.5784)		(-2.1576)		(-1.5756)
LNDIST_CITY	-0.000106^***		-0.000095^**		-0.000105^*
LNDIST_CITY	(-1.7944)		(-2.1448)		(-1.7667)
LNTRAN_DENS	0.000076^***		0.000419^***		0.000075^***
LNTRAN_DENS	(4.1285)		(6.5455)		(4.1050)
REG	0.000171^*		0.000156^***		0.000172^**
REG	(2.5522)		(2.3459)		(2.5190)
CITY_COUNTY	0.000682^***		0.000674^***		0.000681^***
CITY_COUNTY	(5.5233)		(5.4681)		(5.4984)
LIU_A0	1.002834^***	0.760664^***	1.004324^***	0.760664^***	1.002239^***
LIU_A0	(758.0175)	(191.7858)	(770.4556)	(191.7857)	(762.4691)
ρ		0.006915^***	0.006917^***
ρ		(5.7392)	(5.7393)
γ				0.021971^***	0.025973^***
γ				(15.1074)	(16.1554)
Rbar²	0.9537	0.9584	0.9534	0.9584	0.9536
σ²	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001
LM lag	3736.5680^***
LM err	2200.3740^***
R-LM lag	1755.2066^***
R-LM err	219.0127^***
Durbin-Watson	2.0005
Log-likelihood	96323	99113	96300	99114	96272

Tab. 3

References 28

[1]	Seto K C, Fragkias M, Guneralp B et al. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. Plos One, 2011, 6(8): e23777.
[2]	Urban Secretary of National Bureau of Statistics of China. China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1985-2012.
	[国家统计局城市司. 中国城市统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1985-2012.]
[3]	Rural Secretary of National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Yearbook of Town Survey. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008-2012.
	[国家统计局农村司. 中国建制镇统计资料. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008-2012.]
[4]	Liu Yansui.Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
	[刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[5]	Li Yurui, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou.Spatio-temporal analysis of population and residential land change in rural China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(10): 1629-1638.
	[李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 龙花楼. 中国农村人口与农村居民点用地的时空变化.自然资源学报, 2010, 25(10): 1629-1638.]
[6]	Chen Yuqi, Li Xiubin, Tian Yujun et al. Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2009, 19(5): 545-556.
[7]	Huang Daquan, Hong Lixuan, Liang Jinshe.Analysis and evaluation of industrial land efficiency and intensive use in Fujian Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 479-486.
	[黄大全, 洪丽璇, 梁进社. 福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 479-486.]
[8]	Wang Mei, Qu Futian.Indicator system for land use intensity assessment of industrial enterprises in Kunshan Development Zone. China Land Science, 2004, 18(6): 22-27.
	[王梅,曲福田.昆山开发区企业土地集约利用评价指标构建与应用研究. 中国土地科学, 2004, 18(6): 22-27.]
[9]	Shao Xiaomei, Wang Jing.Appraisal of intensive land use of development zones in small towns: A case study of Cixi in Zhejiang Province. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(1): 75-81.
	[邵晓梅, 王静.小城镇开发区土地集约利用评价研究: 以浙江省慈溪市为例. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(1): 75-81.]
[10]	Feng Ke, Wu Cifang, Liu Yong.Spatial difference of urban land intensive use in Zhejiang Province. China Soft Science, 2007, (2): 102-108.
	[冯科, 吴次芳, 刘勇. 浙江省城市土地集约利用的空间差异研究: 以PSR与主成分分析的视角. 中国软科学, 2007, (2): 102-108.]
[11]	Li Jinggang, Ou Minghao, Liu Zhijian et al. Research on the potential of land consolidation of development zones in Jiangsu Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(6): 129-134.
	[李景刚, 欧名豪, 刘志坚等. 江苏省开发区土地集约利用潜力研究. 中国人口资源与环境, 2006, 16(6): 129-134.]
[12]	Xu Y, Tang Q, Fan J et al. Assessing construction land potential and its spatial pattern in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 103(2): 207-216.
[13]	Lin S W, Ben T M.Impact of government and industrial agglomeration on industrial land prices: A Taiwanese case study. Habitat International, 2009, 33(4): 412-418.
[14]	Meng Y, Zhang F R, An P L et al. Industrial land-use efficiency and planning in Shunyi, Beijing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 85(1): 40-48.
[15]	Geurs K T, van Eck J R R. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 2003, 30(1): 69-87.
[16]	Zhao Xiaofeng, Huang Xianjin, Chen Yi et al. Research progress in urban land intensive use. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(11): 1979-1996.
	[赵小风, 黄贤金, 陈逸等. 城市土地集约利用研究进展. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(11): 1979-1996.]
[17]	Yang Feng, Yuan Chun, Zhou Wei et al. Study on the influence factors to regional land intensive use. Resources & Industries, 2010, 12(4): 67-73.
	[杨锋, 袁春, 周伟等. 区域土地集约利用影响因素研究. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(4): 67-73.]
[18]	Chen Haiyan.Study on mechanism of land intensive use which based on economic development pattern transformation: A case of Kunshan county in Jangsu Province [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011.
	[陈海燕. 转变经济发展方式背景下土地集约利用机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.]
[19]	Wang Jiating, Ji Kaiwen.An empirical research on the factors influencing urban land intensive use: Based on the data of 34 sample cities in China. Economic Geography, 2009, 29(7): 1172-1176, 1181.
	[王家庭, 季凯文. 中国城市土地集约利用的影响因素分析: 基于34个典型城市数据的实证研究. 经济地理, 2009, 29(7): 1172-1176, 1181.]
[20]	Hu Angang, Wei Xing.Local disequilibrium of regional economic development: 1993 to 2005. Reform, 2008, (11): 68-76.
	[胡鞍钢, 魏星. 地区经济发展的局部不均衡剖解:1993-2005. 改革, 2008, (11): 68-76.]
[21]	Demurger S, Sachs J D, Woo W T et al. The relative contributions of location and preferential policies in China's regional development: Being in the right place and having the right incentives. China Economic Review, 2002, 13(4): 444-465.
[22]	Ban Maosheng, Fang Chuanglin, Liu Xiaoli et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing High-tech Industrial Zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
	[班茂盛, 方创琳, 刘晓丽等. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.]
[23]	Cliff A, Ord J K.Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals. Geographical Analysis, 1972, (4): 267-284.
[24]	Cliff A, Ord J K.Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion, 1981.
[25]	Anselin L.Spatial Economy: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1988
[26]	Elhorst J P.Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 2003, 26(3): 244-268.
[27]	Elhorst J P.Spatial panel data models //GETIS M M F A A. Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Berlin:Springer. 2010.
[28]	Wang Jinfeng, Fischer M M, Liu Tiejun.Spatial Analysis of Economic and Social Science. Beijing: Science Press. 2012.
	[王劲峰, Fischer M M, 刘铁军. 经济与社会科学空间分析. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.]

要素集	具体因素	符号与单位	变量 (或代理变量)	预期影响方向
被解释变量	空间集约利用度	LIU	县域空间集约利用度指数 (由地均GDP、地均固定资产投资额和人口密度综合计算得到)
经济社会发展	经济发展水平	LNGDP	人均地区生产总值	+
	人口增长量	LNPOP	人均地方财政预算支出	+
	工业化水平	IND	第二产业增加值占国民生产总值的比重	+
	城市化水平	URBAN	非农人口占总人口的比重	+
自然环境本底	高程	LNELV	平均高程	-
	坡度	LNSLOPE	平均坡度	-
	降水	LNRAI	年均降水	+
	气温	LNTEM	年均气温	?
	水资源利用	LNWATER	全社会水资源利用总量	+
区位交通地理	距一级海港距离	LNDIST_PORT1	到最近的一级海港距离	-
	距二级海港距离	LNDIST_PORT2	到最近的二级海港距离	-
	距地级城市距离	LNDIST_CITY	到最近的地级城市距离	-
	高等级道路密度	LNTRAN_DENS	铁路、高速公路和国道密度(线路长度/面积)	+
	区域虚拟变量	REG	东、中和西部分别设定为3,2和1	+
	市县虚拟变量	CITY_COUNTY	市和县分别设定为1和0	+
宏观战略政策	国家战略与宏观区域政策	POLICY	是否是国家战略性政策瞄准区	+
	国家级经济技术开发区		是否设置国家级经济技术开发区	+
	地位与等级		在全国城镇体系中的地位,在全国主体功能区中的功能定位	+
历史基础	期初集约利用水平	LIU_A0	基期年1992年空间集约利用度	+

Quantitative measure and influencing mechanism of land intensive use in China at the county level

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Pingjun, WANG Kewen. Identification and stage division of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1366-1379.
[2]	WEI Shimei, PAN Jinghu. Network structure resilience of cities at the prefecture level and above in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407.
[3]	YANG Ren, PAN Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[4]	YIN Jiangbin, LI Shangqian, JIANG Lei, CHENG Zhe, HUANG Xiaoyan, LU Gaigai. The spatio-temporal variations and driving factors of non-farm employment growth in contiguous destitute areas of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488.
[5]	HU Pan, CHEN Bo, SHI Peijun. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of rainstorm-induced flood disasters in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
[6]	LIU Zhenhai, WANG Shaoqiang, CHEN Bin. Spatial and temporal variations of frozen ground and its vegetation response in the eastern segment of China-Mongolia-Russia economic corridor from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(5): 1231-1244.
[7]	HUANG Xiaodong, MA Haitao, MIAO Changhong. Connectivity characteristics for city networks in China based on innovative enterprises [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 835-852.
[8]	WANG Lucang, LIU Haiyang, LIU Qing. China's city network based on Tencent's migration big data [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 853-869.
[9]	XIA Xingsheng, PAN Yaozhong, ZHU Xiufang, ZHANG Jinshui. Monthly calibration and optimization of Ångström-Prescott equation coefficients for agricultural comprehensive area in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 888-902.
[10]	PENG Ruxia, XIA Lili, LIN Jiange. The impact of innovation policy environment on location choice of foreign direct investment from the perspective of knowledge base: A case study of six cities in the core area of the Pearl River Delta [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 992-1005.
[11]	MA Zuopeng, LI Chenggu, ZHANG Pingyu. Characteristics, mechanism and response of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 767-780.
[12]	FAN Zemeng. Spatial identification and scenario simulation of ecotone distribution in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 626-644.
[13]	XU Yu, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie. Differentiation of scale-farmland transfer rent and its influencing factors in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 753-763.
[14]	GU Hengyu, SHEN Tiyan. Spatial evolution characteristics and driving forces of Chinese highly educated talents [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[15]	ZHU Shengjun, JIN Wenwan. Local export variety, regional institutions and firm related diversification [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.