城乡过渡带社会经济空间演化特征与机理

doi:10.11821/dlxb202112004

Abstract

Abstract:

Urban space is characterized by both marketing and planning driven attributes, but very few studies were carried out on the scale of their spatial influence in Chinese academia. This paper takes the rural-urban transition zones of 10 cities in Zhejiang from 1980 to 2010 as the case, aiming to conduct multi-level research which was formed between 60 m to 800 m, including courtyard group level, block level, community level, and residential area level, spatial analysis with the market and planning driving forces. It also analyzes the micro-meso space with the generalized spatial multifractal analysis based on five-year data. Through composition of the spatial regularized, trended and disordered land patches, the analysis shows that there were three basic spatial scales (including market-driven courtyard group level space, plan-driven residential area level space, and the transitional interval of the two-block level space and community level space) in the rural-urban transition zones. The results of spatial expansion analysis show that, due to the different leading roles of market and planning at different scales, the spatial evolution at the courtyard group level, community level, and residential area level was dominated by the combination of trend and regularization, while the spatial evolution at the block level was dominated by the combination of trend and disorder. The results of subjectivity analysis further indicate that under the action of the corresponding driving forces, the courtyard group level space was displayed as agglomeration, while the community level space and the residential area level space were shown as diffusion, and the three have obvious trended characteristics. Furthermore, the development of block level space followed a disordered evolution. The contribution of the paper includes the finding of an objective phenomenon that the spatial pattern of the rural-urban transition zones has often been dominated by tendency and regularity, but the evolution subjectivity is dominated by tendency, due to the combination and its sequence changes of the regularity, trend and disordered on the f(a)-a(q) curve. It will provide a specific scientific basis for the spatial scale division and "the system identification of multi-level features" in territorial spatial planning driving forces.

Key words: multicomponent recombination, spatial multifractal, courtyard level-residential level, f(a)-a(q) curve, rural-urban transition zone

SONG Zhijun, LI Xiaojian, ZHENG Xing. Evolution and mechanism of social-economic space in the rural-urban transition zones[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(12): 2909-2928.

Figures/Tables 11

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Tab. 4

Fig. 7

References 38

[1]	Wu Li. "Two wheel drive": The greatest achievement of China's economic restructuring. Researches in Chinese Economic History, 2013(3): 15-19.
	[武力. “双轮驱动”: 中国经济体制改革的最大成就. 中国经济史研究, 2013(3): 15-19.]
[2]	Huang Gengzhi, Xue Desheng, Zhang Hong'ou. The development of urban informal employment and its effect on urbanization in China. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(3): 442-454. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201603004
	[黄耿志, 薛德升, 张虹鸥. 中国城市非正规就业的发展特征与城市化效应. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3): 442-454.]
[3]	Huang Gengzhi, Xue Desheng, Jin Lixia. Micro-location decision making of urban street vendors: Evidence from interviews with 200 vendors in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2016, 31(1): 57-64.
	[黄耿志, 薛德升, 金利霞. 城市流动摊贩的微区位选择机制: 基于广州市200个摊贩访谈的实证研究. 人文地理, 2016, 31(1): 57-64.]
[4]	Goodchild M F, Mark D M. The fractal nature of geographic phenomena. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1987, 77(2): 265-278. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00158.x
[5]	Frankhauser P. Fractal Geometry for Measuring and Modeling Urban Patterns. The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2008.
[6]	Song Z J, Yu L J. Multifractal features of spatial variation in construction land in Beijing (1985-2015). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2019, 5: 68. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0257-2. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0257-2
[7]	Ma Y L, Qiao J J, Han D. Interpreting the humanistic space of urban-rural interface using consumption behaviors. Journal of Rural Studies, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.014. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.014
[8]	Ma W Q, Jiang G H, Chen Y H, et al. How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban-rural interface? Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region in China. Land Use Policy, 2020, 92: 104433. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104433. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104433
[9]	Chen Yanguang. Fractal Urban Systems: Scaling, Symmetry, Spatial Complexity. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
	[陈彦光. 分形城市系统: 标度、对称空间复杂性. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.]
[10]	Li X J, Luo Q, Hai B B, et al. Progress in the micro-perspective studies of economic geography in China since 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(8): 1041-1056. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1314-z
[11]	Batty M, Longley P A. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press, 1994.
[12]	Yu Lu, Hao Bolin, Chen Xiaosong. Marginal Miracle: Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
	[于渌, 郝柏林, 陈晓松. 边缘奇迹:相变与临界现象. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.]
[13]	Song Z J, Chen Y, Li Y. Comparative studies on evolutionary spatial multifractal mechanism for built-up lands in Zhengzhou from 1988 to 2015 with the characteristics of Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 269: 122451. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122451. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122451
[14]	Kantelhardt J W, Zschiegner S A, Koscielny-Bunde E, et al. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 316(1-4): 87-114. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3
[15]	Chen Y G, Wang J J. Multifractal characterization of urban form and growth: The case of Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2013, 40(4) : 884-904. doi: 10.1068/b36155
[16]	Batty M. Less is more, more is different: Complexity, morphology, cities, and emergence. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2000, 27: 167-168. doi: 10.1068/b2702ed
[17]	Xu Guozhi. System Science. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 2000.
	[许国志. 系统科学. 上海: 上海科学技术教育出版社, 2000.]
[18]	Du Ping, Pan Zheqi. The evolution and enrichment of the Zhejiang model. Governance Studies, 2019, 35(5): 68-77.
	[杜平, 潘哲琪. “浙江模式”的演进与丰富. 治理研究, 2019, 35(5): 68-77.]
[19]	Zhao Wei. Forced logic: Re-examination of the Zhejiang model. Governance Studies, 2019, 35(6): 66-77, 2.
	[赵伟. 倒逼的逻辑: 浙江模式再审视. 治理研究, 2019, 35(6): 66-77, 2.]
[20]	Xu Weixiang, Li Lu, Huang Mingjun, et al. Spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics and formation mechanism of coordinated development of "four modernizations" and residents' happiness in Zhejiang Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 1631-1641. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.10.012
	[徐维祥, 李露, 黄明均, 等. 浙江县域“四化同步”与居民幸福协调发展的时空分异特征及其形成机制. 地理科学, 2019, 39(10): 1631-1641.]
[21]	Thomas I, Frankhauser P, Badariotti D. Comparing the fractality of European urban neighbourhoods: Do national contexts matter? Journal of Geographical Systems, 2012, 14(2): 189-208. doi: 10.1007/s10109-010-0142-4
[22]	Li Dehua. Principles of Urban Planning. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2001.
	[李德华. 城市规划原理(第三版). 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.]
[23]	Ihlen E A. Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab. Front Physiol, 2012, 3: 141. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00141. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00141
[24]	Frankhauser P, Tannier C, Vuidel G, et al. An integrated multifractal modelling to urban and regional planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2018, 67: 132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.011
[25]	Huang L S, Chen Y G. A comparison between two ols-based approaches to estimating urban multifractal parameters. Fractals, 2018, 26(1): 1850019. DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X18500196. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X18500196
[26]	Song Z J, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. An analysis of the allometric and multifractal features of a development in the urban-rural area in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River: 2012 cross-sectional data of four provinces and one City. Complexity, 2020: 1-19. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6963827. doi: 10.1155/2020/6963827
[27]	Song Zhijun, Liu Liming. Allometric growth of Beijing development functions from 1979 to 2009: Based on the analysis of the social economy functions. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(1): 53-60. doi: 10.2307/142022
	[宋志军, 刘黎明. 1979—2009年间北京多种发展功能的异速生长. 经济地理, 2016, 36(1): 53-60.]
[28]	Song Zhijun, Zhao Xin, Zhou De. The chaos of economic geography-"entropy": A review of relevant analytical techniques. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(6): 35-43.
	[宋志军, 赵欣, 周德. 经济地理空间的混乱现象: “熵情”. 经济地理, 2018, 38(6): 35-43.]
[29]	The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Establishing a Territorial Space Planning System and Supervising Its Implementation (2019-05-23). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/23/content_5394187.htm.
	[中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中共中央、国务院关于建立国土空间规划体系并监督实施的若干意见(2019-05-23). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/23/content_5394187.htm.]
[30]	Chen Y G. Exploring the fractal parameters of urban growth and form with wave-spectrum analysis. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2010, 2010(2): 1038-1045.
[31]	Chen Y G. On the spaces and dimensions of geographical systems. Journal of Geography and Geology, 2012, 4(1): 118. DOI: 10.5539/jgg.v4n1p118. doi: 10.5539/jgg.v4n1p118
[32]	Batty M, Xie Y C. Self-organized criticality and urban development. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 1999, 3(2-3): 109-124. doi: 10.1155/S1026022699000151
[33]	Portugali J. Self-organization and the City. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
[34]	White R, Engelen G. Urban systems dynamics and cellular automata: Fractal structures between order and chaos. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1994, 4(4): 563-583. doi: 10.1016/0960-0779(94)90066-3
[35]	White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1993, 25(8): 1175-1199. doi: 10.1068/a251175
[36]	Chen Y G, Lin J Y. Modeling the self-affine structure and optimization conditions of City systems using the idea from fractals. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2009, 41(2): 615-629. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.02.035
[37]	Guo Yan, Yuan Qifeng, Tan Shimin, et al. Urban renewal to integrate fragmented rural industrialized areas: A case study of Nanhai district, Foshan City. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(4): 53-61, 89.
	[郭炎, 袁奇峰, 谭诗敏, 等. 农村工业化地区的城市更新: 从破碎到整合, 以佛山市南海区为例. 城市规划, 2020, 44(4): 53-61, 89.]
[38]	Li Xiaojian, Qiao Jiajun. Impact of landform on input-output of man-land system in farmland of mountainous region: A micro-study of a small village in Wugou of Henan province. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(6): 717-726.
	[李小建, 乔家君. 地形对山区农田人地系统投入产出影响的微观分析: 河南省巩义市吴沟村的实证研究. 地理研究, 2004, 23(6): 717-726.]

数据等级	杭州(半平原) (26 km×26 km)			湖州(半丘陵) (13 km×13 km)			嘉兴(平原) (18 km×18 km)			金华(平原) (15 km×15 km)			丽水(滨河+丘陵) (12 km×12 km)
	格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)
	居住区级	812.5	898		406.3	722		562.5	977		468.8	904		375	567
小区级	406.3	3175		203.1	2176		281.3	3271		234.4	2953		187.5	1727
街坊级	203.1	10971		101.6	7005		140.6	10593		117.2	9609		93.8	5707
院落组级	101.6	38024		-	-		70.3	35398		-	-		-	-
数据等级	宁波(半平原) (22.5 km×22.5 km)			衢州(谷地) (12 km×12 km)			绍兴(半平原) (20 km×20 km)			台州(滨河+丘陵) (18 km×18 km)			温州(滨河+丘陵) (16 km×16 km)
数据等级	格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)		格子边长(m)	非空格子数(个)
居住区级	703.1	993		375	233		625	873		562.5	637		500	735
小区级	351.6	3480		187.5	802		312.5	2781		281.3	1851		250	2450
街坊级	175.8	11671		93.8	2716		156.3	8862		140.6	5764		125	8612
院落组级	87.9	40017		-	-		78.1	29442		70.3	19579		62.5	31863

年份	杭州			湖州			嘉兴			金华
年份	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级
1980	-	-	-	-	-2.0~1.3	-2.0~2.0	-2.0~1.6	-0.7~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~2.0	-1.3~2.0
1995	*	*	*	-	-2.0~1.2	-1.0~2.0	-2.0~2.0	-0.7~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~2.0	-1.4~2.0
2000	*	*	*	-	-2.0~1.1	-2.0~2.0	-2.0~1.6	-0.6~2.0	0~2.0	-	-2.0~2.0	-1.1~2.0
2005	*	*	*	-	-2.0~0.8	-0.9~2.0	-2.0~0.6	-0.6~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~0.6	-0.7~2.0
2010	-2.0~2.0	-0.4~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~2.0	-0.5~2.0	-2.0~2.0	-0.8~2.0	-0.4~2.0	-	-1.4~2.0	-0.1~2.0
年份	丽水			宁波			衢州			绍兴
年份	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级
1980	-	-2.0~-1.4	-2.0~0.1	-2.0~-0.1	-1.5~2.0	-0.5~2.0	-	-2.0~1.5	-1.4~2.0	*	-1.0~2.0	1.4~2.0
1995	-	-2.0~-1.0	-2.0~2.0	-2.0~1.0	-0.7~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~1.6	-1.3~2.0	-2.0~1.1	-1.0~2.0	-0.3~2.0
2000	-	-2.0~-1.4	-2.0~0.1、1.0~2.0	-2.0~0.9	-0.7~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~1.4	-1.3~2.0	-2.0~1.0	-0.9~2.0	-0.3~2.0
2005	-	-2.0~-0.9	-1.2~0、0.7~2.0	-2.0~0.9	-0.5~2.0	-0.1~2.0	-	-2.0~2.0	-0.6~2.0	-0.7~0.6	-0.8~2.0	-0.2~2.0
2010	-	-2.0~-1.2	-0.8~2.0	-2.0~2.0	-0.2~2.0	0.2~2.0	-	-1.8~2.0	-0.4~2.0	0.9~1.1	-0.5~0.2	-0.1~02
年份	台州			温州
年份	院落组级	小区级	居住区级	院落组级	小区级	居住区级
1980	*	-2.0~1.7	-0.8~2.0	*	-1.4~0.5	-0.6~2.0
1995	-2.0~-0.7	-1.7~2.0	-0.7~2.0	*	-1.3~0.7	-0.5~2.0
2000	*	-1.7~1.2	-0.6~2.0	-2.0~-1.7	-1.1~1.2	-0.4~2.0
2005	*	-1.3~0.6	-0.5~2.0	*	-0.9~1.6	-0.4~2.0
2010	-2.0~-0.7	-1.7~2.0	-0.7~2.0	*	-0.8~2.0	-0.3~2.0

年份	杭州			湖州			金华			温州
年份	宏中观	微中观	差值	宏中观	微中观	差值	宏中观	微中观	差值	宏中观	微中观	差值
1980	1.9728	1.7644	0.2084	1.8415	1.6109	0.2306	1.8930	1.5934	0.2996	1.8261	1.6486	0.1775
1995	1.9718	1.8025	0.1693	1.8522	1.6296	0.2226	1.8818	1.5747	0.3071	1.8425	1.6711	0.1714
2000	1.9802	1.8137	0.1665	1.8557	1.6413	0.2144	1.8978	1.6160	0.2818	1.8813	1.7114	0.1699
2005	1.9741	1.8755	0.0986	1.8752	1.6774	0.1978	1.8842	1.7715	0.1127	1.9189	1.8353	0.0836
2010	1.9873	1.8909	0.0964	1.9530	1.7612	0.1918	1.9932	1.8778	0.1154	1.9533	1.8538	0.0995

Evolution and mechanism of social-economic space in the rural-urban transition zones

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 38

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments