Please wait a minute...
 
引用检索 快速检索 DOI 高级检索
地理学报    2017, Vol. 72 Issue (8): 1408-1418     DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201708006
  产业发展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
行动者网络理论与农村空间商品化——以北京市麻峪房村乡村旅游为例
王鹏飞1(),王瑞璠2
1. 首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京 100048
2. 北京广渠门中学,北京 100062
Actor network theory and commodification in rural space: A case study of Mayufang village in Beijing
WANG Pengfei1(),WANG Ruifan2
1. College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
2. Beijing Guangqumen Middle School, Beijing 100062, China
全文: PDF (3264 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)     
摘要 

乡村旅游作为农村空间商品化的表现形式之一,在增加农民收入、阻止农村衰退、振兴农村经济方面发挥着重要作用。为此本文以北京市昌平区麻峪房村的乡村旅游为例,借助行动者网络理论分析农村空间商品化的形成与演变,并讨论农户在此过程中的参与。麻峪房村在从农民生活空间转变为城市居民消费空间的过程中,形成了以区旅游局、乡旅游公司为关键行动者,并吸纳了多个人类和非人类行动者所构成的行动者网络。在网络形成的过程中农户参与乡村旅游的程度逐渐提高,由此推动了麻峪房村农村空间商品化的发展。麻峪房村演变为城市居民消费空间后,由于行动者网络发生变化使农村空间商品化发生变化,导致麻峪房村农村空间商品化程度降低。同时新的行动者网络中的各行动者的不对等性明显,各行动者之间存在很多异议,使该网络趋于僵化、丧失活力,不足以支撑麻峪房村乡村旅游继续发展。在麻峪房村农村空间商品化的形成过程中,农户的院落区位、年龄与原有工作等对农户参与乡村旅游的意愿产生不同的影响。当农村地区行动者网络中的关键行动者与行动者利益共通且紧密联系时,其空间商品化就得到强化,反之亦然。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王鹏飞
王瑞璠
关键词 乡村旅游行动者网络理论农村空间商品化北京麻峪房村 
Abstract

Along with the development of facility agriculture, horticultural agriculture and leisure agriculture, nowadays, the functions of agricultural production in rural areas have been weakened but the functions of consumption have been increased in Beijing. This shows that the commodification of rural space in Beijing has been developed in recent years. Rural tourism, as one of the important forms of the commodification of rural space, has played an important role in increasing farmers' income, preventing rural decline and revitalizing rural economy. Therefore, this paper selects rural tourism as the representative of the commodification to examine the formation and evolution of spatial commodification of rural space in Mayufang village as well as to explore farmers' participation in this process based on the actor network theory. In the process of the transformation, the rural areas being the farmers' producing and living spaces have changed to the urban residents' leisure and consumption spaces in Mayufang village and formed a heterogeneous actor-network, in which Tourism Bureau of Changping District and Changling Travel Company and other human actors and non-human actors have played a focal role. Major actors used the policy and the financial support to enroll farmers and other actors by the top-down executive network. Along with development of promotion, training, supervision and infrastructure, some local farmers started to create the physical and non-physical environments for the urban residents' consumption activities. Thus more and more farmers have been engaged in rural tourism, and the commodification of rural spaces in Mayufang village has been developed. As Mayufang village became the consumption space to the urban residents, the commodification of rural space in Mayufang village started its transformation of actor network. However, with the quit of non-human actors, which is Duijiuyu Natural Beauty and reduction of incentives launched by the original major actors, the representative of market has become the focal actor in the new actor network. More and more farmers, who were against the common purpose of the actor network were excluded, quitted the former actor network, thus commodification in rural space in Mayufang village declined. In the process of the formation of commodification of rural space in Mayufang village, the farmers who had the advantages of location, age and profession have much stronger desire to be involved in rural tourism, unemployed farmers prefer to be involved in rural tourism than farmers who make a living on agriculture. The farmers who worked in township enterprises are more willing to participate in rural tourism than self-employed business persons; villagers employed in the government units have less possibility to take part in rural tourism. While commodification of rural space in Mayufang village has declined, farmers began to transfer the labor force to other professions from rural tourism. When interests of major actors are commonly and inextricably linked with actors in actor network in rural areas, its commodification in rural space is strengthened, and vice versa.

Key wordsrural tourism    actor-network theory    commodification in rural space    Mayufang village in Beijing
收稿日期: 2016-12-22      出版日期: 2017-08-23
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41271188)
引用本文:   
王鹏飞, 王瑞璠 . 行动者网络理论与农村空间商品化——以北京市麻峪房村乡村旅游为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1408-1418.
WANG Pengfei, WANG Ruifan . Actor network theory and commodification in rural space: A case study of Mayufang village in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1408-1418.
链接本文:  
http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/10.11821/dlxb201708006      或      http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V72/I8/1408
Fig. 1  北京昌平区行政区分与案例地的区位
Fig. 2  北京麻峪房村乡村旅游发展的行动者与强制通行点
Fig. 3  北京麻峪房村的行动者网络
Fig. 4  1997年北京麻峪房村民俗户分布示意图
Fig. 5  1998年北京麻峪房村民俗户分布示意图
Fig. 6  2006年北京麻峪房村民俗户分布示意图
Fig. 7  2015年北京麻峪房村民俗户分布示意图
Fig. 8  2026年北京麻峪房村民俗旅游接待户经营情况的预测
[1] Long Hualou, Li Yurui, Liu Yansui.Analysis of evolutive characteristics and their driving mechanism of hollowing villages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.
[龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随. 中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxb200910006
[2] Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2015 Yearbook 2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015.
[北京统计年鉴, 2015. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015.]
[3] Long H L, Tu S S, Ge D Z et al. The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 392-412.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016716300456
[4] Wu Ying, Lu Yuxia, Chen Jiajian et al. Follow the actors to restructure the society, read Latour's restructuring society: Actors network theory. Social Studies, 2008(2): 218-234.
[吴莹, 卢雨霞, 陈家建, . 跟随行动者重组社会: 读拉图尔的《重组社会: 行动者网络理论》. 社会学研究, 2008(2): 218-234.]年度引用
[5] Li Lihua, Fu Difei, Liu Rui.Spatial turn of tourism studies: A review on tourism studies from the perspective of the actor-network theory. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(3): 107-115.
[李立华, 付涤非, 刘睿. 旅游研究的空间转向—行动者网络理论视角的旅游研究述评. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(3): 107-115.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyxk201403017
[6] Latour B.Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 165-174.
[7] Latour B, Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986: 16-25.
[8] Zhu Feng, Bao Jigang, Xiang Yixian.Actor-network-theory and paradigm innovation for tourism research. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(11): 24-31.
[朱峰, 保继刚, 项怡娴. 行动者网络理论与旅游研究范式创新. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(11): 24-31.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyxk201211018
[9] Liu Xuan, Wang Xiaoyi.A review on the application of actor network theory to human geography. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.
[刘宣, 王小依. 行动者网络理论在人文地理领域应用研究述评. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.]年度引用
[10] Van der Duim R. Tourismscapes: An actor-network perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007, 34(4): 961-976.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738307000795
[11] Povilanskas R, Armaitienė A.Seaside resort-hinterland nexus: Palanga, Lithuania. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3): 1156-1177.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738311000296
[12] Valkonen J.Acting in nature: Service events and agency in wilderness guiding. Tourist Studies, 2009, 9(2): 164-180.http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20103172731.html
[13] Ren C.Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3): 858-881.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738310001660
[14] Busch L, Juska A.Beyond political economy: Actor networks and the globalization of agriculture. Review of International Political Economy, 1997, 4(4): 688-708.年度引用
[15] Chen Peipei, Zhang Min.From beautiful village to urban residents' consumption space: Actor network theory and the social space reconstruction of Dashiao village. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(8): 1435-1446.
[陈培培, 张敏. 从美丽乡村到都市居民消费空间: 行动者网络理论与大世凹村的社会空间重构. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8): 435-1446.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlyj201508003
[16] Zhang Huanzhou, Zhou Yongguang, Wei Huiya, et al.An empirical study of rural tourism endogenous development based on actor network theory. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(2): 65-71.
[张环宙, 周永广, 魏蕙雅, . 基于行动者网络理论的乡村旅游内生式发展的实证研究: 以浙江浦江仙华山村为例. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(2): 65-71.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyxk200802017
[17] Cloke P.The countryside as commodity: New rural spaces for leisure//Patmore J A. Leisure and the Environment.London: Belhaven Press, 1993: 53-67.
[18] Woods M. Rural Geography. London: SAGE Publications, 2005.
[19] Perkins H C.Commodification: Re-resourcing rural areas. Handbook of Rural Studies, 2006: 243-257.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/293254947_Commodification_Re-resourcing_rural_areas
[20] Dahms F.The graying of south Georgian Bay. The Canadian Geographer, 1996, 40(2): 148-163.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1996.tb00442.x/full
[21] Akira T.Regional development owing to the commodification of rural spaces in Japan. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 103-125.http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/130004544340
[22] Sharpley R, Sharpley J.Rural Tourism: An introduction. International Thomson Business Press, 1997.
[23] Nagatada T.Rural revitalization with sunflowers as amenity crops in a Japanese countryside. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 78-88.年度引用
[24] Keisuke M.Commodification of a rural space in a world heritage registration movement: Case study of Nagasaki church group. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2010, 82(2): 149-166.http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/130004544343
[25] Song Zhijun, Liu Liming.Spatial characteristics analysis for multifunctional transition of suburban agricultural areas in Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(4): 427-433.
[宋志军, 刘黎明. 北京市城郊农业区多功能演变的空间特征. 地理科学, 2011, 31(4): 427-433.]年度引用
[26] Shi Yuanyuan, Zhao Huafu, Yun Wenju, et al.Analysis on spatial differentiation of arable land multifunction and socio-economic coordination model in Beijing. Resources Science, 2015, 37(2): 247-257.
[施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, . 北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释. 资源科学, 2015, 37(2): 247-257.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zykx201502004
[27] Qian Jing, Lv Jiang.Urban Modern Agriculture on Ecology, Circulation, Three-dimension in Suburb Beijing. Beijing: Agricultural Science & Technology Press, 2008: 55-58.
[钱静, 律江. 北京市城郊生态—循环—立体型都市现代农业. 北京: 农业科学技术出版社, 2008: 55-58.]
[28] Wang Pengfei.A study on commodification in rural space and the relationship between urban and rural areas in Beijing City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(12): 1657-1667.
[王鹏飞. 论北京农村空间的商品化与城乡关系. 地理学报, 2013, 68(12): 1657-1667.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxb201312006
[1] 梅琳, 薛德升, Frauke KRAAS. 跨国机构与地方共同作用下的城市全球化——德国波恩的案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(2): 156-168.
[2] 汪德根, 王金莲, 陈田, 章鋆. 乡村居民旅游支持度影响模型及机理——基于不同生命周期阶段的苏州乡村旅游地比较[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2013 《地理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发