西部地区生态状况变化及生态系统服务权衡与协同

doi:10.11821/dlxb202201013

地理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (1): 182-195.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202201013

• 生态系统服务与环境健康 • 上一篇下一篇

西部地区生态状况变化及生态系统服务权衡与协同

牛丽楠¹^,²(), 邵全琴¹^,²(), 宁佳¹, 黄海波¹

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-12-18 修回日期:2021-10-06 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-03-25
通讯作者: 邵全琴(1962-), 女, 江苏常州人, 研究员, 博导, 研究方向为GIS应用与生态信息。E-mail: shaoqq@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:牛丽楠(1996-), 女, 内蒙古赤峰人, 博士生, 研究方向为地理信息系统应用。E-mail: niuln.18b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA23100203);国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0506501)

Ecological changes and the tradeoff and synergy of ecosystem services in western China

NIU Linan¹^,²(), SHAO Quanqin¹^,²(), NING Jia¹, HUANG Haibo¹

1. Key Laboratory of Terrestrial Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2020-12-18 Revised:2021-10-06 Published:2022-01-25 Online:2022-03-25
Supported by:
Strategic Priority Science and Technology Special Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA23100203);National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC0506501)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

西部大开发战略实施20年以来,一系列重大生态建设工程使得西部地区的生态状况和生态服务发生了重要变化,本文分析西部地区生态状况变化及其生态服务时空变化特征,并运用相关分析法研究其服务功能权衡协同关系。研究发现西部地区2000—2019年间：① 聚落和湿地生态系统面积显著增加,草地有逐年下降趋势。② 植被覆盖度呈波动上升趋势,存在年际差异且空间差异较大。③ 水源涵养服务有轻微下降趋势,下降区域主要分布在藏东南地区、三江源西部地区、喀斯特石漠化地区等;土壤保持服务波动中呈上升趋势,上升区域主要黄土高原地区、川滇西部地区、藏西北地区、藏东南地区等;防风固沙服务呈下降趋势,大幅下降区域主要位于内蒙古中西部地区、西藏和北疆部分地区。④ 生态系统供给与水源涵养、土壤保持主要为协同关系,与防风固沙主要为权衡关系且分布在农牧交错带地区。⑤ 生态工程区内生态系统服务协同程度大于非工程区。定量评估生态系统服务变化及其权衡协同关系有助于进行科学化生态管理,最大化生态效益。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 权衡协同关系, 西部地区, 西部大开发

Abstract:

Since the implementation of the government initiative-the Development of Western Regions for 2000-2019, a series of major ecological construction projects have been launched, leading to great changes in the ecological conditions and ecological services of western China. This study calculated the amount of total ecosystem services in the western region from 2000 to 2019, and analyzed ecological changes and the characteristics of spatio-temporal variations in ecological services. And a relevant analysis method was applied to explore the trade-offs and synergy of service. It was found that the area of settlements and wetland ecosystems in the study area increased significantly from 2000 to 2015, whereas grassland showed a downward trend year by year. The vegetation fraction showed a decreasing zonal distribution from south to north. A fluctuating increase was observed during 2000-2019, with inter-annual and large spatial differences. The water conservation service had a slight downward trend from 2000 to 2019, and the main decreasing areas were distributed in southeastern Tibet, the western part of the Three Rivers Source Region, and the karst rocky desertification area. The soil conservation service showed an increasing but fluctuating trend, with the greatest increases observed in the Loess Plateau, western Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, northwest Tibet, and southeast Tibet. The windbreak and sand fixation showed a downward trend, and the sharp decline was mainly found in the central and western parts of Inner Mongolia, Tibet and parts of northern Xinjiang. Ecosystem supply, water conservation, and soil conservation were synergistically connected, they were observed north of the Huaihe River-Qinling Mountains, especially in Ningxia and Inner Mongolia. Ecosystem supply was mainly trade-offs with windbreak and sand fixation, and it was observed in the farming-pastoral transitional zone. The synergistic degree of ecosystem services in areas subjected to ecological engineering policy was greater than that in non-engineering areas. Quantitative assessment of ecosystem service changes and their trade-offs is helpful for scientific ecological management and maximizing ecological benefits.

Key words: ecosystem services, trade-off and synergy, western region, Development of Western Region

牛丽楠, 邵全琴, 宁佳, 黄海波. 西部地区生态状况变化及生态系统服务权衡与协同[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 182-195.

NIU Linan, SHAO Quanqin, NING Jia, HUANG Haibo. Ecological changes and the tradeoff and synergy of ecosystem services in western China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(1): 182-195.

图/表 13

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 47

[1]	Smith L M, Case J L, Smith H M, et al. Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 28: 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.032
[2]	Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Changshun, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	[ 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.]
[3]	Wen Zhi, Zheng Hua, Ouyang Zhiyun. Research progress on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 340-348. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.003 pmid: 31957413
	[ 文志, 郑华, 欧阳志云. 生物多样性与生态系统服务关系研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 340-348.] pmid: 31957413
[4]	Zhang Zhou, Wu Cifang, Tan Rong. Application of ecosystem service value in land use change research: Bottlenecks and prospects. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(2): 556-562. pmid: 23705405
	[ 张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(2): 556-562.] pmid: 23705405
[5]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[6]	Wong C P, Jiang B, Kinzig A P, et al. Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18(1): 108-118. doi: 10.1111/ele.2014.18.issue-1
[7]	Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.
	[ 李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.]
[8]	Barbier E B, Koch E W, Silliman B R, et al. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science, 2008, 319(5861): 321-323. doi: 10.1126/science.1150349 pmid: 18202288
[9]	Dai Erfu, Wang Xiaoli, Zhu Jianjia, et al. Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.
	[ 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.]
[10]	Xue H, Li S, Chang J. Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187(3): 117. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4303-2. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4303-2
[11]	Zhu Ping, Liu Xin, Zheng Yuhan, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in key ecosystem function zones in northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(23): 8694-8706.
	[ 祝萍, 刘鑫, 郑瑜晗, 等. 北方重点生态功能区生态系统服务权衡与协同. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23): 8694-8706.]
[12]	Fu Bojie, Yu Dandan. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.
	[ 傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.]
[13]	Zhao Wenwu, Liu Yue, Feng Qiang, et al. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(1): 139-151. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015
	[ 赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.]
[14]	Shao Quanqin, Fan Jiangwen, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Approaches for monitoring and assessment of ecological benefits of national key ecological projects. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(11): 1174-1182.
	[ 邵全琴, 樊江文, 刘纪远, 等. 重大生态工程生态效益监测与评估研究. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(11): 1174-1182]
[15]	Chen Canping, Gao Yuxiang. Research on ecological environment and system construction of ecological civilization in western China. Journal of Southwest Minzu University: Humanities and Social Science, 2013, 34(12): 138-141.
	[ 陈灿平, 高玉翔. 西部地区生态环境与生态文明制度建设研究. 西南民族大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2013, 34(12): 138-141.]
[16]	Li Zehong, Bai Yongqing, Sun Jiulin, et al. Ecological civilization construction in ecologically fragile poverty-stricken areas in western China. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(5): 80-86.
	[ 李泽红, 柏永青, 孙九林, 等. 西部生态脆弱贫困区生态文明建设战略研究. 中国工程科学, 2019, 21(5): 80-86.]
[17]	Ren Baoping, Zhang Qian. Achievements, experiences and transition of economic development in the western region in 20 years of development of western China. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 48(4): 46-62.
	[ 任保平, 张倩. 西部大开发20年西部地区经济发展的成就、经验与转型. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 48(4): 46-62.]
[18]	Zhang Jiang, Yuan Minshu, Zhang Jing, et al. Responses of the NDVI of alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau to climate change and human activities over the last 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(18): 6269-6281.
	[ 张江, 袁旻舒, 张婧, 等. 近30年来青藏高原高寒草地NDVI动态变化对自然及人为因子的响应. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6269-6281.]
[19]	Zhou Riping. Assessing the soil erosion control service in the typical area of Loess Plateau. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(2): 131-139.
	[ 周日平. 黄土高原典型区土壤保持服务效应研究. 国土资源遥感, 2019, 31(2): 131-139.]
[20]	Gao Jiangbo, Zuo Liyuan, Wang Huan. The spatial trade-offs and differentiation characteristics of ecosystem services in Karst peak-cluster depression. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(21): 7829-7839.
	[ 高江波, 左丽媛, 王欢. 喀斯特峰丛洼地生态系统服务空间权衡度及其分异特征. 生态学报, 2019, 39(21): 7829-7839.]
[21]	Cheng Guodong, Zhang Zhiqiang, Li Rui. On some issues of the ecological construction of west China and proposals for policy. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2000, 20(6): 503-510.
	[ 程国栋, 张志强, 李锐. 西部地区生态环境建设的若干问题与政策建议. 地理科学, 2000, 20(6): 503-510.]
[22]	Zhao Guofeng, Duan Lufeng. Study on ecological environment and urbanization development in western China. Ecological Economy, 2012(2): 166-169.
	[ 赵国锋, 段禄峰. 生态环境与西部地区城镇化发展问题研究. 生态经济, 2012(2): 166-169.]
[23]	Ning Jia, Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 789-802. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805001
	[ 刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.]
[24]	Jiapaer G, Chen X, Bao A M. A comparison of methods for estimating fractional vegetation cover in arid regions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(12): 1698-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.004
[25]	Qiang Xiao, Dan Hu, Yang Xiao. Assessing changes in soil conserved ecosystem services and causal factors in the Three Gorges Reservoir region of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 163: 172-180.
[26]	Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. Maryland: The USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 537, 1978.
[27]	Zhang Wenbo, Xie Yun, Liu Baoyuan. Rainfall erosivity estimation using daily rainfall amounts. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(6): 706-711.
	[ 章文波, 谢云, 刘宝元. 利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究. 地理科学, 2002, 22(6): 706-711.]
[28]	Williams J R. The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: A case history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 1990, 329(1255): 421-428. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0184
[29]	Zhang K L, Shu A P, Xu X L, et al. Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soils in China. Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72(6): 1002-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.11.018
[30]	McCool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 1987, 30(5): 1387-1396. doi: 10.13031/2013.30576
[31]	Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Risse L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994, 37(6): 1835-1840. doi: 10.13031/2013.28273
[32]	Cai Chongfa, Ding Shuwen, Shi Zhihua, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical Information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2): 22-24.
	[ 蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2): 22-24.]
[33]	Wu Dan. Research on water conservation services of major terrestrial ecosystems in China[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014.
	[ 吴丹. 中国主要陆地生态系统水源涵养服务研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014.]
[34]	Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.
	[ 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.]
[35]	Zhu Lianqi, Xu Shuming, Chen Peiyun. Study on the impact of land use/land cover change on soil erosion in mountainous areas. Geographical Research, 2003, 22(4): 432-438.
	[ 朱连奇, 许叔明, 陈沛云. 山区土地利用/覆被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响. 地理研究, 2003, 22(4): 432-438.]
[36]	Li Yuanshou, Wang Genxu, Wang Yibo, et al. Impacts of land cover change on runoff and sediment yields in the headwater areas of the Yangtze River and the Yellow River, China. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(5): 616-623.
	[ 李元寿, 王根绪, 王一博, 等. 长江黄河源区覆被变化下降水的产流产沙效应研究. 水科学进展, 2006, 17(5): 616-623.]
[37]	Meng Xianmin, Cui Baoshan, Deng Wei, et al. An examination of the catastrophic flood in Songnen Drainage Basin:Recognition of wetland functions. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(1): 14-21.
	[ 孟宪民, 崔保山, 邓伟, 等. 松嫩流域特大洪灾的醒示: 湿地功能的再认识. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 14-21.]
[38]	Gong Guoli, Liu Jiyuan, Shao Quanqin. Wind erosion in Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia since the 1990s using the revised wind erosion equation. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(6): 825-834. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.06.011
	[ 巩国丽, 刘纪远, 邵全琴. 基于RWEQ的20世纪90年代以来内蒙古锡林郭勒盟土壤风蚀研究. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(6): 825-834.]
[39]	Fryrear W D, Bilbro D J, Saleh A, et al. RWEQ: Improved wind erosion technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 55(2): 183-189.
[40]	Saleh A. Soil roughness measurement: Chain method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1993, 48(6): 527-529.
[41]	Tian Yu, Zhu Jianhua, Li Qi, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil conservation and its driving forces in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39(4): 1164-1174.
	[ 田宇, 朱建华, 李奇, 等. 三峡库区土壤保持时空分布特征及其驱动力. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1164-1174.]
[42]	Chen Yunming, Liu Guobin, Zheng Fenli, et al. Proceeding and application on soil erosion model of RUSLE. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 11(4): 80-83.
	[ 陈云明, 刘国彬, 郑粉莉, 等. RUSLE侵蚀模型的应用及进展. 水土保持研究, 2004, 11(4): 80-83.]
[43]	Wang Xiaofeng, Ma Xue, Feng Xiaoming, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in key vulnerable ecological areas in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7344-7355.
	[ 王晓峰, 马雪, 冯晓明, 等. 重点脆弱生态区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7344-7355.]
[44]	Huang Lin, Zhu Ping, Cao Wei. The impacts of the Grain for Green Project on the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(3): 1178-1188.
	[ 黄麟, 祝萍, 曹巍. 中国退耕还林还草对生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3): 1178-1188.]
[45]	Gong G L, Liu J Y, Shao Q Q, et al. Sand-fixing function under the change of vegetation coverage in a wind erosion area in northern China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014, 5(2): 105-114. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.02.002
[46]	Zhu Liya, Sun Shuang, Hu Ke. Spatiotemporal distribution of vegetation net primary productivity (NPP) and its impact factors in the Xiliaohe Basin. Guihaia, 2020, 40(11): 1563-1574.
	[ 朱丽亚, 孙爽, 胡克. 西辽河流域植被NPP时空分布特征及其影响因素研究. 广西植物, 2020, 40(11): 1563-1574.]
[47]	Cao S X, Chen L, Shankman D, et al. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China's arid and semi-arid regions: Lessons in ecological restoration. Earth-Science Reviews, 2011, 104(4): 240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.11.002

陆地生态系统类型	2000年	2005年	2010年	2015年	2000—2015年变化面积	变化率(%)
农田生态系统	66.38	67.86	68.20	70.19	3.81	5.74
森林生态系统	112.97	116.10	115.78	115.57	2.6	2.30
草地生态系统	281.18	272.65	266.45	245.76	-35.42	-12.60
水体与湿地生态系统	19.06	21.22	19.78	26.44	7.38	38.72
聚落生态系统	1.37	1.57	2.12	5.76	4.39	320.43
荒漠生态系统	127.63	128.36	127.59	128.68	1.05	0.82
其他生态系统	63.15	63.08	72.15	75.65	12.5	19.79

2000年	2015年
2000年	农田	森林	草地	水体与湿地	聚落	荒漠	其他
农田	47.74	5.83	8.38	1.09	2.98	0.26	0.09
森林	8.35	89.31	12.69	1.53	0.31	0.27	0.42
草地	11.74	18.17	194.60	8.84	1.02	21.15	25.61
水体与湿地	0.52	0.32	2.62	11.93	0.09	0.83	2.72
聚落	0.19	0.04	0.09	0.05	0.97	0.03	0.004
荒漠	1.44	0.36	10.39	1.74	0.35	105.82	7.52
其他	0.20	1.48	16.91	1.21	0.04	4.06	39.23

西部地区生态状况变化及生态系统服务权衡与协同

Ecological changes and the tradeoff and synergy of ecosystem services in western China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祝汉收, 翟俊, 侯鹏, 王桥, 陈妍, 金点点, 王永财. 生态系统服务权衡与协同视角下的重点生态功能区保护特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5): 1275-1288.
[2]	赵筱青, 石小倩, 李驭豪, 李益敏, 黄佩. 滇东南喀斯特山区生态系统服务时空格局及功能分区[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(3): 736-756.
[3]	赵美风, 汪德根. 中国中西部地区就近城镇化空间分异格局及机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 2993-3011.
[4]	赵雪雁, 马平易, 李文青, 杜昱璇. 黄土高原生态系统服务供需关系的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2780-2796.
[5]	刘志涛, 王少剑, 方创琳. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值的时空演化及其影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2797-2813.
[6]	张琨, 吕一河, 傅伯杰, 尹礼唱, 于丹丹. 黄土高原植被覆盖变化对生态系统服务影响及其阈值[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 949-960.
[7]	张静静, 朱文博, 朱连奇, 李艳红. 伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 975-988.
[8]	于贵瑞, 李文华, 邵明安, 张扬建, 王绍强, 牛书丽, 何洪林, 戴尔阜, 李发东, 马泽清. 生态系统科学研究与生态系统管理[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2620-2635.
[9]	李睿倩, 李永富, 胡恒. 生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430.
[10]	刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 李鹏杰. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.
[11]	颜俨,姚柳杨,郎亮明,赵敏娟. 基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.
[12]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 432-445.
[13]	曾莉,李晶,李婷,杨晓楠,王彦泽. 基于贝叶斯网络的水源涵养服务空间格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
[14]	曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,吴健生. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.
[15]	钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,柳冬青,马学成. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 868-879.