生态系统服务权衡研究进展：从认知到决策

doi:10.11821/dlxb201706002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为沟通自然生态系统与人类社会的重要桥梁,生态系统服务一直以来都是地理学、生态学等学科的研究前沿和热点。正确认知生态系统服务之间的关系,是开展多种生态系统服务可持续管理决策的前提,有助于人类福祉的全面提升。本文通过厘定生态系统服务权衡的概念内涵,梳理了生态系统服务权衡的空间、时间和可逆性特征,将多层次人类福祉的满足作为权衡的最终目标,视生态补偿为权衡决策的基本保障途径。生态系统服务权衡关系的识别依托于定量指标法和综合模型法,且权衡关系可能随时空尺度的推移发生改变;情景分析与多目标分析是生态系统服务权衡决策的有效手段。生态系统服务权衡多尺度关联、生态系统服务流与远程耦合、生态系统服务消费与生态补偿,成为当前生态系统服务权衡研究的重点方向。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 权衡, 服务流, 生态补偿, 远程耦合, 多尺度关联

Abstract:

As a hot spot in geography, ecology and related disciplines, ecosystem services have been playing a vital role in bridging the human society with the ecosystem. A deep understanding of the relationship among ecosystem services is a critical enabling factor for sustainable management and decision-making in multiple ecosystem services, in turn realizing the dual goals of economic development and ecological protection and thus contributing to the overall wellbeing of human. Through a systematic review of the concept of ecosystem service trade-offs, this article explores their characteristics in terms of spatial scales, temporal scales and reversibility, considering human's wellbeing at different levels as the ultimate goal of ecosystem service trade-offs and ecological compensation as a baseline method of protection in trade-offs. Such ecosystem services trade-offs are expressed by quantitative indexing and integrated modelling. While such trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services could present significant variations by spatial and temporal scales, scenario simulation and multi-objective analysis are effective ways to support decision-making in ecosystem service trade-offs. Based on these findings, the multi-scale correlation of ecosystem service trade-offs, the flow of ecosystem service based on telecoupling, and the consumption and compensation of ecosystem services are identified to be the main directions for future research on ecosystem service trade-offs.

Key words: ecosystem services, trade-offs, ecosystem service flow, ecological compensation, telecoupling, multi-scale correlation

彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 刘焱序, 田璐. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展：从认知到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.

Jian PENG, Xiaoxu HU, Mingyue ZHAO, Yanxu LIU, Lu TIAN. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.

图/表 3

参考文献 78

[1]	Li C, Zheng H, Li S Z, et al.Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7396-7401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406486112 pmid: 26082546
[2]	Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei, et al.The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China. Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 24(6): 571-576. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001
	[傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6): 571-576.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001
[3]	Li Wenhua, Zhang Biao, Xie Gaodi.Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2009.01.001
	[李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 1-10.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2009.01.001
[4]	Daily G C.Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
[5]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[6]	MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[7]	Fu Bojie, Zhang Liwei.Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[8]	Li Shuangcheng, Wang Jue, Zhu Wenbo, et al.Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201411004
	[李双成, 王珏, 朱文博, 等. 基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201411004
[9]	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
[10]	Posthumus H, Rouquette J R, Morris J, et al.A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services: A case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1510-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011
[11]	Rodríguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al.Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
[12]	Power A G.Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, 365(1554): 2959-2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 pmid: 2935121
[13]	Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J.Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(12): 1394-1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x pmid: 19845725
[14]	Zheng Hua, Li Yifeng, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al.Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 702-710.
	[郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等. 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 702-710.]
[15]	Lin Quan, Wu Xiuqin.Progress on trade-offs in ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 35(6): 100-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.06.021
	[林泉, 吴秀芹. 生态系统服务冲突及权衡的研究进展. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(6): 100-105.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.06.021
[16]	Dai Erfu, Wang Xiaoli, Zhu Jianjia, et al.Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201606001
	[戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡: 方法、模型与研究框架. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201606001
[17]	Deng X Z, Li Z H, Gibson J.A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(7): 953-968. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1309-9
[18]	Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani F, et al.Ecosystem services for 2020. Science, 2010, 330(6002): 323-324.
[19]	Zheng H, Robinson B E, Liang Y C, et al.Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(41): 16681-16686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312324110 pmid: 24003160
[20]	Xu Jianying, Liu Xinxin, Feng Lin, et al.Research advances in understanding the trade-offs involved in payment for ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(20): 6901-6907. doi: 10.5846/stxb201402240316
	[徐建英, 刘新新, 冯琳, 等. 生态补偿权衡关系研究进展. 生态学报, 2015, 35(20): 6901-6907.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201402240316
[21]	Fu Bojie, Yu Dandan.Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9. doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.01
	[傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.01
[22]	Li Peng, Jiang Luguang, Feng Zhiming, et al.Research progress on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services: An overview. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(16): 5219-5229. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109161360
	[李鹏, 姜鲁光, 封志明, 等. 生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16): 5219-5229.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201109161360
[23]	Bennett E M, Balvanera P.The future of production systems in a globalized world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007, 5(4): 191-198. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[191:TFOPSI]2.0.CO;2
[24]	Willemen L, Hein L, van Mensvoort M E F, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10: 62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
[25]	Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al.The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.
	[李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.]
[26]	Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al.Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(28): 9495-9500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 pmid: 18621701
[27]	Fu Bojie, Leng Shuying, Song Changqing.The characteristics and tasks of geography in the new era. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(8): 939-945. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00311-2
	[傅伯杰, 冷疏影, 宋长青. 新时期地理学的特征与任务. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8): 939-945.] doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00311-2
[28]	Lester S E, Costello C, Halpern B S, et al.Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 2013, 38: 80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022
[29]	Dai Erfu, Wang Xiaoli, Zhu Jianjia, et al.Progress and prospective on ecosystem services trade-offs. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
	[戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
[30]	Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J, et al.Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(5): 1305-1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 pmid: 19179280
[31]	Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, et al.Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 49: 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.037
[32]	Lü Yihe, Zhang Liwei, Wang Jianglei.Assessment of ecosystem and its services conservation: Indicators and methods. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(5): 1237-1243.
	[吕一河, 张立伟, 王江磊. 生态系统及其服务保护评估: 指标与方法. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5): 1237-1243.]
[33]	Dong Liangeng, Zhu Wenbo, Gao Yang, et al.Research progress in culture ecosystem services (CES) and its development trend. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2014, 50(6): 1155-1162.
	[董连耕, 朱文博, 高阳, 等. 生态系统文化服务研究进展. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(6): 1155-1162.]
[34]	Mao Qizheng, Huang Ganlin, Wu Jianguo.Urban ecosystem services: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(4): 1023-1033.
	[毛齐正, 黄甘霖, 邬建国. 城市生态系统服务研究综述. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 1023-1033.]
[35]	Zhang Liwei, Fu Bojie.The progress in ecosystem services mapping: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(2): 316-325. doi: 10.5846/stxb201303110391
	[张立伟, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学报, 2014, 34(2): 316-325.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201303110391
[36]	Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M.Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(11): 5242-5247.
[37]	Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, et al.Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio, 2015, 44(1): 89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0 pmid: 4289005
[38]	Bai Y, Zhuang C W, Ouyang Z Y, et al.Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8(2): 177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.01.007
[39]	Dick J, Andrews C, Beaumont D A, et al.A comparison of ecosystem services delivered by 11 long-term monitoring sites in the UK environmental change network. Environmetrics, 2011, 22(5): 639-648. doi: 10.1002/env.1069
[40]	Qiu J X, Turner M G.Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(29): 12149-12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539110 pmid: 23818612
[41]	Bradford J B, D'Amato A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 10(4): 210-216. doi: 10.1890/110031
[42]	Yang Xiaonan, Li Jing, Qin Keyu, et al.Trade-offs between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201511006
	[杨晓楠, 李晶, 秦克玉, 等. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201511006
[43]	Su C H, Fu B J.Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global and Planetary Change, 2013, 101: 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.12.014
[44]	Chisholm, R A.Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(10): 1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.013
[45]	Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot R S, et al. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(2): 209-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
[46]	Zhou Chen, Ding Xiaohui, Li Guoping, et al.Ecological compensation standards in the water source area of the middle route project of the South-North water transfer project. Resources Science, 2015, 37(4): 792-804.
	[周晨, 丁晓辉, 李国平, 等. 南水北调中线工程水源区生态补偿标准研究: 以生态系统服务价值为视角. 资源科学, 2015, 37(4): 792-804.]
[47]	Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, et al.Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 28(1): 263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005
[48]	Su C H, Fu B J, He C S, et al.Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: A case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecology, 2012, 44: 46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.11.006
[49]	Li Jing, Li Hongyan, Zhang Liang.Ecosystem service trade-offs in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3053-3062. doi: 10.5846/stxb201408261688
	[李晶, 李红艳, 张良. 关中-天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3053-3062.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201408261688
[50]	Sun Zexiang, Liu Zhifeng, He Chunyang, et al.Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing drylands of China: A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin Region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891. doi: 10.5846/stxb201507051423
	[孙泽祥, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 等. 中国快速城市化干燥地区的生态系统服务权衡关系多尺度分析: 以呼包鄂榆地区为例. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201507051423
[51]	Xue H, Li S Y, Chang J.Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187(3): 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4303-2 pmid: 25690608
[52]	Pan Ying, Xu Zengrang, Yu Chengqun, et al.Spatiotemporal variation of interacting relationships among multiple provisioning and regulating services of Tibet grassland ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(18): 5794-5801.
	[潘影, 徐增让, 余成群, 等. 西藏草地多项供给及调节服务相互作用的时空演变规律. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 5794-5801.
[53]	Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, et al.Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 2001, 292(5517) : 641-642. doi: 10.1126/science.1059386 pmid: 11330321
[54]	Wu Jianguo, Guo Xiaochuan, Yang Jie, et al.What is sustainability science? Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1): 1-11.
	[邬建国, 郭晓川, 杨劼, 等. 什么是可持续性科学?应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1): 1-11.]
[55]	Zhao Wenwu, Fang Xuening.Landscape sustainability and landscape sustainability science. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(10): 2453-2459.
	[赵文武, 房学宁. 景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学. 生态学报, 2014, 34(10): 2453-2459.]
[56]	Wu Jianguo, He Chunyang, Zhang qingyun, et al. Integrative modeling and strategic planning for regional sustainability under climate change. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(12): 1315-1324. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.12.1315
	[邬建国, 何春阳, 张庆云, 等. 全球变化与区域可持续发展耦合模型及调控对策. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1315-1324.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.12.1315
[57]	Gasper D.Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2010, 39(3): 351-360. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006
[58]	Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, et al.Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102. doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274
	[肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274
[59]	Li Yan, Li Shuangcheng, Gao Yang, et al.Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.
	[李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.]
[60]	Zhen Lin, Liu Xuelin, Li Fen, et al.Consumption of ecosystem services and eco-compensation mechanism in ecological sensitive regions: Progress and challenges. Resources Science, 2010, 32(5): 797-803.
	[甄霖, 刘雪林, 李芬, 等. 脆弱生态区生态系统服务消费与生态补偿研究: 进展与挑战. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5): 797-803.]
[61]	Serna-Chavez H M, Schulp C J E, van Bodegom P M, et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 39: 24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
[62]	Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Batistella M, et al.Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(23): 7870-7885.
	[刘建国, Vanessa Hull, MateusBatistella, 等. 远程耦合世界的可持续性框架. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23): 7870-7885.]
[63]	Butler J R A, Wong G Y, Metcalfe D J, et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 180: 176-191. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.017
[64]	Maass J M, Balvanera P, Castillo A, et al.Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: Insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society, 2005, 10(1): 17. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.014
[65]	Uhde B, Hahn W A, Griess V C, et al.Hybrid MCDA methods to integrate multiple ecosystem services in forest management planning: A critical review. Environmental Management, 2015, 56(2): 373-388. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0503-3 pmid: 25896820
[66]	Schwenk W S, Donovan T M, Keeton W S, et al.Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: Comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Applications, 2012, 22(5): 1612-1627. doi: 10.2307/41722877 pmid: 22908717
[67]	Fontana V, Radtke A, Fedrigotti V B, et al.Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 2013, 93: 128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007
[68]	Grošelj P, Hodges D G, Stirn L Z.Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, 71: 80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.006
[69]	Langemeyer J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D, et al.Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy, 2016, 62: 45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
[70]	Bekele E G., Nicklow J W.Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41, W10406. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004090
[71]	Liu S, Crossman N D, Nolan M, et al.Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129: 92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.047 pmid: 23900082
[72]	Segura M, Maroto C, Belton V, et al.A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests, 2015, 6(5): 1696-1720. doi: 10.3390/f6051696
[73]	Hu H T, Fu B J, Lü Y H, et al.SAORES: A spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(3): 547-560. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0126-8
[74]	de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3): 260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
[75]	Song Qingfeng, Niu Xiang, Wang Bing.Review on forest ecosystem services assessment based on big data. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(10): 2914-2921.
	[宋庆丰, 牛香, 王兵. 基于大数据的森林生态系统服务功能评估进展. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(10): 2914-2921.]
[76]	Wolff S, Schulp C J E, Verburg P H. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 55: 159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016
[77]	Liu Huimin, Fan Yulong, Ding Shengyan.Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.
	[刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.]
[78]	Luederitz C, Brink E, Gralla F, et al.A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 14: 98-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001